The Gyrodactylidae is a diverse family of predominantly viviparous monogeneans (for familial status of oviparous genera see Boeger W.A, Kritsky D.C, Belmont-Jegu E. 1994: J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 61: 34-44) found on a wide variety of fish taxa globally. Gyrodactylids are thought to be more common in high latitude environments and conversely less common in low latitude environments such as the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) (Rohde K. 1985: Hydrobiologia 127: 197201). Most research on gyrodactylids has been carried out in temperate areas of Europe and North America, but the gyrodactylid fauna of the Indo-Pacific Ocean remains comparatively unknown. In Australia, for example, few of the estimated 3000 coastal marine fish species (Kuiter R.H. 1996: Guide to Sea Fishes of Australia. New Holland, Sydney, 433 pp.) have been examined thoroughly for small ectoparasites such as gyrodactylids. There is the potential, therefore, for a diverse, undiscovered gyrodactylid fauna on Australian marine fishes. This note presents the results of a survey for these parasites from coastal marine fishes from Queensland, Australia. Our survey has resulted in the discovery of several new gyrodactylid species, and descriptions of some of these have already been published (Ernst I., Whittington I.D., Jones M.K. 2000: Syst. Parasitol. 45: 61-73; Ernst I., Jones M.K., Whittington I.D. 2001: J. Nat. Hist. 35: 313-340). Fishes were collected between 1995 and 2000 by beach seine, cast net, line fishing, anaesthetic (clove oil) or spearfishing. On the GBR, fishes were collected at Heron and Wistari Reefs (23°27’S, 151°55’E) in the southern region and Eagle Islet (14°42’S, 145°23’E) and Lizard Island (14°40’S, 145°28’E) in the northern region. Fishes were collected in south-east Queensland at Amity Point (27°45’S, 153°26’E), Dunwich (27°30’S, 153°24’E), Manly (27°28’S, 153°11’E), Redcliffe (27°14’S, 153°07’E), Wellington Point (27°28’S, 153°11’E), Noosa (26°23’S, 153°07’E), Nudgee Beach (27°21’S, 153°06’E) and Southport Broadwater (27°58’S, 153°25’E). Fishes were identified using the books of Randall et al. (Randall J.E., Allen G.R., Steene R.C. 1990, 1998: Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. Editions 1 and 2. Crawford House Press, Bathurst, 507 pp. and 557 pp.), Kuiter (Kuiter R.H. 1993: Coastal Fishes of South-Eastern Australia. Crawford House Press, Bathurst, 437 pp.) and Myers (Myers R.F. 1991: Micronesian Reef Fishes. Coral Graphics, Guam, 298 pp.). Live fish of the same species were placed in individual containers of seawater for transport to the laboratory where they were held in separate aquaria until dissection. Fish were killed and dissected and worms were mounted as described in Ernst et al. (2000, op. cit.). Specimens are deposited in the Queensland Museum (QM), P.O. Box 3300, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia. We examined 501 marine teleosts comprising 104 species in 37 families (Table 1). Gyrodactylids were found on 20 fish species (19% of those examined) from 9 families. At least 16 different species of gyrodactylids were found in this survey including: 7 species of Gyrodactylus von Nordmann, 1832, 7 species of Acanthoplacatus Ernst, Jones et Whittington, 2001, 1 species of Anacanthocotyle Kritsky et Fritts, 1970 and 1 species of Polyclithrum Rogers, 1967 (Table 2). Due to insufficient material, the specific status could not be determined for a single specimen of Gyrodactylus from a goby and specimens of Acanthoplacatus from two siganid species (Table 2). It is possible that these specimens represent three additional gyrodactylid species. Therefore, the gyrodactylids collected in this survey represent between 16 and 19 species. Those specimens ascribed specific status (Table 2) are considered to be new species (see also Ernst et al. 2001, op. cit.) and constitute a major addition to the known gyrodactylid fauna of the world which is estimated to include over 400 species (see Harris P.D. 1993: Bull. Fr. Peche Piscic. 328: 546). When interpreting these data, two sources of bias should be borne in mind. First, we did not examine species in some potential host families that have been studied for monogeneans previously and which are not reported as hosts of gyrodactylids (e.g. Lethrinidae, Serranidae; see Whittington I.D. 1998: Int. J. Parasitol. 28: 1481-1493). Secondly, only a few specimens of some fish species were examined (Table 1). Of 104 marine fish species examined in this survey, 33 species are represented by 5 or more specimens and only 13 species are represented by 10 or more specimens (Table 1). With sample sizes of 5 and 10 individuals, parasite prevalences of up to 45 and 26%, respectively (95% confidence limit) could go undetected (see Post R.J., Millest A.L. 1991: Parasitol. Today 7: 141). Therefore the reported absence of gyrodactylids from some fish species should be interpreted cautiously because only relatively prevalent gyrodactylid species are likely to have been detected. This is not the first survey for monogeneans in marine waters of Australia. Rohde (1985, op. cit.) presented the results of surveys for monogeneans from the northern GBR where he examined 239 specimens of 56 fish species, the southern GBR where he examined 392 specimens of 74 fish species and northern New South Wales (NSW) where he examined 1859 specimens of 45 fish species. Gyrodactylid species were poorly represented, with only one or two unidentified species recorded from the southern GBR and one unidentified species recorded in northern NSW. Rohde (1985, op. cit.) compared these results with surveys for monogeneans from other geographic areas. He presented data showing that FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 48: 165-168, 2001