1. Advantages and disadvantages of treatment of experimental ARDS by M2-polarized RAW 264.7 macrophages
- Author
-
A.M. Kosyreva, P.A. Vishnyakova, I.S. Tsvetkov, V.V. Kiseleva, D. Sh. Dzhalilova, E.A. Miroshnichenko, A.V. Lokhonina, O.V. Makarova, and T.H. Fatkhudinov
- Subjects
Macrophage ,ARDS ,Therapy ,Polarization ,Lung ,Immune system ,Science (General) ,Q1-390 ,Social sciences (General) ,H1-99 - Abstract
Innate immunity reactions are core to any immunological process, including systemic inflammation and such extremes as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cytokine storm. Macrophages, the key cells of innate immunity, show high phenotypic plasticity: depending on microenvironmental cues, they can polarize into M1 (classically activated, pro-inflammatory) or M2 (alternatively activated, anti-inflammatory). The anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization-based cell therapies constitute a novel prospective modality. Systemic administration of ‘educated’ macrophages is intended at their homing in lungs in order to mitigate the pro-inflammatory cytokine production and reduce the risks of ‘cytokine storm’ and related severe complications. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the main mortality factor in pneumonia including SARS-CoV-associated cases. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of infusions of RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line polarized towards M2 phenotype on the development of LPS-induced ARDS in mouse model. The results indicate that the M2-polarized RAW 264.7 macrophage infusions in the studied model of ARDS promote relocation of lymphocytes from their depots in immune organs to the lungs. In addition, the treatment facilitates expression of M2-polarization markers Arg1, Vegfa and Tgfb and decreases of M1-polarization marker Cd38 in lung tissues, which can indicate the anti-inflammatory response activation. However, treatment of ARDS with M2-polarized macrophages didn't change the neutrophil numbers in the lungs. Moreover, the level of the Arg1 protein in lungs decreased throughtout the treatment with M2 macrophages, which is probably because of the pro-inflammatory microenvironment influence on the polarization of macrophages towards M1. Thus, the chemical polarization of macrophages is unstable and depends on the microenvironment. This adverse effect can be reduced through the use of primary autologous macrophages or some alternative methods of M2 polarization, notably siRNA-mediated.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF