Search

The P3 installation of ELI-Beamlines is conceived as an experimental platform for multiple high-repetition-rate laser beams spanning time scales from femtosecond via picosecond to nanosecond. The upcoming L4n laser beamline will provide shaped nanosecond pulses of up to 1.9 kJ at a maximum repetition rate of 1 shot/min. This beamline will provide unique possibilities for high-pressure, high-energy-density physics, warm dense matter, and laser–plasma interaction experiments. Owing to the high repetition rate, it will become possible to obtain considerable improvements in data statistics, in particular, for equation-of-state data sets. The nanosecond beam will be coupled with short sub-picosecond pulses, providing high-resolution diagnostic tools by either irradiating a backlighter target or driving a betatron setup to generate energetic electrons and hard X-rays.

The concept of competitiveness is currently very frequently used term. However, the interpretation of its essence is different. In this paper, one of the many concepts of competitiveness will be analyzed and that is macroeconomic competitiveness, which is understood as a process, which is based on the productivity growth through the growth of key macroeconomic indicators such as standards of living and employment, where all of these variables must have a sustainable basis. Given the competition is a relative quantity it must be constantly compared with the development of competitiveness in other economies or regions. And this comparison method is also used in the article that compares the macrocompetitiveness of selected economies of the European Economic Area – the Czech Republic, Poland, Austria, Switzerland and Germany. The aim of the paper is to verify the hypothesis concerning the direct correlation between the size of the economy and its competitiveness., {"references":["A. Kadeřábková, \"Základymakroekonomickéanalýzy – růst, konkurenceschopnost, rovnováha,\" Linde, Praha, 2003.","A. Lopez-Claroz, Executive Summary, in The Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005. pp. xiii-xxvii. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2005.","A. Slaný, et al. Konkurenceschopnostčeskéekonomiky (vývojové trendy). Masaryk University, Brno, 2006.","B. Gardiner, R. Martin, and P. Tyler, Competitiveness, productivity and economic growth across the European regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 1037-1059, 2004.","B. Plchová, \"Konkurenceschopnost v mezinárodnímprostředí. Vybranéaspektypostavenínovýchčlenskýchzemí EU,\" inActaOeconomicaPragensia, vol. 2, pp. 3-27, 2011.","E. Klvačová, \"Konkurenceschopnostzemí a světovýchregionů:racionálnícíl, nebodobřeukrytápast?,\" In Scientia et Societas, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 23-35.","E. S. Reinert, \"Competitiveness and its predecessors – a 500-year cross-national perspective,\" inStructural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 6 (1), pp. 23-42, 1995.","European Commission. (2010). \"European Competitiveness Report 2010,\" Commission Staff working document. SEC (2010) 1276 final. EC, Brussels.","K. Gajdová, and G. Cieslarová, \"Changes in selected characteristics of the EU labour market in times of economic crisis,\" in K.S. Soliman (ed.), Proc. of the 19th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Norristown, 2012, pp. 628-635. \n[10]\tK. Schwab, The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. Geneva: WEF, 2010. \n[11]\tM. E. Porter, CH. Ketels, and M. DELGADO, \"The Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index,\"InThe Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008. World Economic Forum, 2007.\n[12]\tM. Kitson, R. Martin, and P. Tyler, \"Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?,\" In: Regional Competitiveness. Association of Regional Obervatories, 2004. (Online). Available at: http://www.regionalobservatories.org.uk.\n[13]\tM. Saisana, S. Tarantola, and A. Saltelli, Uncertainty and sensitivity techniques as tools for the analysis and validation of composite indicators, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 168(2), pp. 307-323, 2005.\n[14]\tP. Krugman, \"Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession,\" Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 28-35, 1994. (Online). Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/23125626/Paul-Krugman-Competitiveness-A-dangerous-obsession. \n[15]\tR. Hindls, R. Holman, S. Hronová, et al., Ekonomickýslovník. 1. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2003.\n[16]\tR. L. Martin, \"A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness,\" A draft final report for The European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy. Cambridge Econometrics, Cambridge, 2004. \n[17]\tS. Chudárková, T. Verner, Production Function and Human Capital: The Case of Visegrad Countries, inProceedings of 31st International Conference Mathematical Methods in Econiomics 2013, pp. 321-325. Jihlava: Polytechnickáuniverzita, 2013.\n[18]\tWEF, 2001. The Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press. \n[19]\tWEF, 2002. The Global Competitiveness Report 2002-2003. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[20]\tWEF, 2003. The Global Competitiveness Report 2003-2004. Geneva: World Economic Forum.\n[21]\tWEF, 2004. The Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[22]\tWEF, 2005. The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[23]\tWEF, 2006. The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[24]\tWEF, 2007. The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[25]\tWEF, 2008. The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009. Geneva: World Economic Forum. \n[26]\tWEF, 2009. The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum."]}