1. Upholding science in health, safety and environmental risk assessments and regulations
- Author
-
Herman Autrup, James E. Klaunig, Edmond E. Creppy, Gio Batta Gori, Philippe Joudrier, Wolfgang Dekant, Helmut Greim, Corrado L. Galli, I. Glenn Sipes, Michael Aschner, Hans Marquardt, Kendall B. Wallace, Curtis D. Klaassen, Olavi Pelkonen, Marcello Lotti, Alan R. Boobis, John Doull, Sir Colin Berry, Jay I. Goodman, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Samuel M. Cohen, Norbert E. Kaminski, Molecular Pharmacology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Pathology, Università degli Studi di Verona, Department of Medicine, PUCRS School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Bristol [Bristol], Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Department of Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. University of Tübingen, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center [Lawrence], Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli studi di Milano [Milano], Michigan State University [East Lansing], Michigan State University System, Health Policy Center, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ingénierie des Agro-polymères et Technologies Émergentes (UMR IATE), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institute for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University System-Michigan State University System, Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Cardiology, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Padova, Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, University of Hamburg, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Pharmacology, University of Oxford [Oxford], Medical School Duluth, University of Minnesota [Duluth], University of Minnesota System-University of Minnesota System, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Showa Pharmaceutical University, University of Verona (UNIVR), Università degli Studi di Milano [Milano] (UNIMI), Technische Universität Munchen - Université Technique de Munich [Munich, Allemagne] (TUM), Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), and Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,recherche agronomique ,recherche médicale ,Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Legislation as Topic ,Appeal ,Scientific evidence ,Regulatory policy ,agronomic research ,010501 environmental sciences ,Toxicology ,01 natural sciences ,Science education ,scientific controversy ,incertitude de mesure ,medical research ,Statute ,03 medical and health sciences ,Environmental health ,Animals ,Humans ,Medicine ,Environmental impact assessment ,Regulation ,Regulatory ethics ,Animal bioassays ,Hazard assessment ,Risk assessment ,health care economics and organizations ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,media_common ,business.industry ,controverse scientifique ,Public health ,risk assessment ,Public relations ,Discretion ,Disease Models, Animal ,030104 developmental biology ,Health ,Scientific controversy ,1115 Pharmacology And Pharmaceutical Sciences ,Safety ,business ,évaluation des risques - Abstract
A public appeal has been advanced by a large group of scientists, concerned that science has been misused in attempting to quantify and regulate unmeasurable hazards and risks.1 The appeal recalls that science is unable to evaluate hazards that cannot be measured, and that science in such cases should not be invoked to justify risk assessments in health, safety and environmental regulations. The appeal also notes that most national and international statutes delineating the discretion of regulators are ambiguous about what rules of evidence ought to apply. Those statutes should be revised to ensure that the evidence for regulatory action is grounded on the standards of the scientific method, whenever feasible. When independent scientific evidence is not possible, policies and regulations should be informed by publicly debated trade-offs between socially desirable uses and social perceptions of affordable precaution. This article explores the premises, implications and actions supporting the appeal and its objectives.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF