Search

Study Question: Does hysteroscopic endometrial peeling improve reproductive outcomes in women with implantation failure?, Design: In this case series, 66 women underwent an hysteroscopic endometrial peeling and subsequently, a single frozen embryo transfer., Results: After the exclusion of patients with intraoperative incidental findings, pregnancy was achieved in 63% (42/66) of the women who underwent hysteroscopic endometrial peeling and subsequently a single frozen embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate was observed in 57% (38/66) of the patients and, clinical pregnancy loss occurred in 10% (4/38)., Conclusion: this novel surgical technique seems to increase implantation as well as clinical pregnancy rates in women with repeated implantation failure. We can hypothesize that the controlled and subtle degree of endometrial injury generated by the peeling generates an inflammatory cascade that enhances implantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the proposed criteria in a large sample and in additional subgroups in order to test the validity of the hysteroscopic features widely-accepted as suggestive of CE., Method(s): All patients (n: 2675) underwent outpatient hysteroscopy, with the vaginoscopic approach technique. Hysteroscopic features such as, stromal oedema, diffuse or focal hyperaemia, "strawberry aspect", micropolyposis and endometrial polyps, are often indicate the presence of chronic endometritis. All hysteroscopic features, alone and in combination were applied in 7 (seven) different subgroups of the sample: total sample, women in reproductive age, women with infertility issues/IVF screening, women with history of recurrent miscarriages, menopausal women, and women with hysteroscopic indication of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB) in women of reproductive age and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). From each case, endometrial samples were obtained and immunohistochemistry, identifying CD-138, was applied in order to diagnose CE., Result(s): A total of 2675 patients were included of which, 1444 women were found with at least one of the proposed hysteroscopic features mentioned above. Stromal oedema, focal or diffuse hyperaemia and "strawberry aspect" in combination with micropolyposis demonstrated higher rates of diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CE correlated to histologic confirmation. Micropolyposis, stromal oedema, focal or diffuse hyperaemia and "strawberry aspect" offer great diagnostic accuracy in the hysteroscopic detection of Chronic Endometritis, regardless reproductive status and/or clinical presentation. Endometrial polyps are not valid hysteroscopic features in cases of suspected CE., Conclusion(s): Diagnostic hysteroscopy can accurately diagnose cases of CE, based on stromal oedema, focal or diffuse hyperaemia and "strawberry aspect", in combination with micropolyposis. In subgroups of infertile women, higher diagnostic accuracy based on the hysteroscopic features mentioned, was more likely to be achieved. Whether endometrial polyps are suggestive of CE, when identified during office hysteroscopy, remains controversial., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no conflict of Interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Implantation failure remains a mystery since decades. This procedure needs a "top quality embryo" and a "normal" uterine cavity. To assess uterine cavity before first in vitro fertilization (IVF), many diagnostic tools could be used. Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard to diagnose and treat intra-uterine anomalies. However, it is not clearly recommanded to offer an office hysteroscopy before first IVF when transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) were normal., Purpose: This study aimed to assess the role of office hysteroscopy before first IVF when no intra-uterine anomalies are suspected., Basic Procedures: We conducted a randomized controlled trial including 171 women scheduled for their first IVF. Women were assigned to either Group I: office hysteroscopy before IVF or Group II: immediate IVF. We included women aged less than 40 years, having regular cycles, FSH levels less than10UI/l, antral follicular count ≥12, normal TVUS and HSG. Their body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 30 kg/m 2 . We excluded patients known having severe endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and oocyte receivers. The primary outcome were livebirth rate and clinical pregnancy rate., Main Fundings: Between january 2016 and september 2017, we randomly assigned 171 women to either Group I (n = 84) or Group II (n = 87). Hysteroscopy was done in the mid-follicular phase immediately before IVF. Baseline characteristics and IVF features were comparable between groups except for the IVF protocol. Live birth rate was 23,9% in Group I versus 19,3% in Group II. (p = 0,607). Clinical Pregnancy rate was 32,4% in Group I versus 21,7% in Group II. (p = 0,326). No statistical significance was observed for neither miscarriage rate nor multiple pregnancy rate. Hysteroscopy showed 30% unsuspected intra-uterine anomalies: 11 intra-uterine adhesions, 7 polyps, 7 clinical endometritis and one fibroid print. Therapeutic hysteroscopy was done only for 6 intra-uterine adhesions and 3 polyps. Other anomalies did not require operative hysteroscopy. Visual analog score during hysteroscopy was 4,69 +/-2,892. 5 women (6%) of Group I experienced discomfort during diagnostic hysteroscopy. Only one patient had vagal syncope. No further complications were observed., Principal Conclusions: Office hysteroscopy before first IVF seems not improve IVF results. Minimal intra-uterine anomalies not diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography do not seem to reduce IVF results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature on the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair of isthmocele., Data Sources: A thorough search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190668)., Methods of Study Selection: Studies from the last 20 years that addressed isthmocele repair were collected. Both authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. All prospective and retrospective studies of more than 10 women were included., Tabulation, Integration, and Results: The initial search identified 666 articles (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart) (see Supplemental Fig.). We excluded duplicates, case reports, reviews, video articles, and technique articles. We also excluded studies describing only laparotomy or vaginal repair as these were not in the scope of this review. A total of 31 articles met the inclusion criteria, 21 for hysteroscopic resection and 13 for laparoscopic or combined repair (4 articles tested both modalities and appear in both Tables 1 and 2).For abnormal uterine bleeding, hysteroscopic remodeling relived symptoms in 60% to 100% of cases and laparoscopy in 78% to 94%. Secondary infertility was not evaluated in all studies. After hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment, 46% to 100% and 37.5% to 90% of those who wished to conceive became pregnant, after the procedure, respectively. Pain and dysmenorrhea seem to be uncommon. All studies that tested improvement of pain had fewer than 10 women. However, between 66% and 100% of women who complain of pain or dysmenorrhea will note a marked improvement to full resolution., Conclusion: Patients with an isthmocele or cesarean scar defect are usually asymptomatic. For symptomatic women, a repair is a valid option. For those with residual myometrial thickness >2 to 3 mm, hysteroscopic remodeling is the modality of choice with an improvement in abnormal uterine bleeding, secondary infertility, and pain. Women with a residual myometrial thickness <2- to 3-mm laparoscopic repair with simultaneous hysteroscopic guidance show similar results. Because available data are limited, no cutoff for the correct choice between hysteroscopy and laparoscopy can be concluded. We recommend 2.5 mm as the cutoff value based on common practice and expert opinion, although no significance between hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment was shown., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women is a common gynaecological symptom and composes of abnormality in the frequency, duration, regularity, and flow volume of menstruation. It could constitute the presentation of various gynaecological malignancies. An appropriate history and physical examination are mandatory to ascertain the diagnosis. Depending on the clinical condition, a complete blood picture, thyroid function test, clotting profile, chlamydia test, cervical smear, and pregnancy test can be performed. Ultrasound should be performed in cases with a pelvic mass, unsatisfactory physical examination, persistent symptoms, or no response to medical treatment. In women aged ≥40 years, an out-patient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle should be performed. In women aged <40 years with risk factors for endometrial cancer, persistent symptoms, or no response to medical treatment, an endometrial biopsy should be performed to rule out endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy or saline infusion sonohysterography is more sensitive than ultrasound for diagnosing endometrial pathology. Details of the above recommendations are presented., Competing Interests: All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Endometrial polyps are a common finding, with a prevalence of about 40%, and are usually diagnosed incidentally as most are asymptomatic. Symptomatic polyps usually present with abnormal uterine bleeding and/or sub-fertility. About 25% of polyps resolve spontaneously if managed conservatively. The usual management of endometrial polyps, symptomatic or asymptomatic, is polypectomy, performed primarily to exclude malignancy within the polyp despite the overall risk of malignancy being low (about 3%). The main risk factors for malignancy are menopause and abnormal uterine bleeding, with hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and tamoxifen use thought to play a lesser role. Transvaginal ultrasonography is the primary diagnostic tool for endometrial polyps although visualization by hysteroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis. There is no proven preventative or medical treatment, with complete polyp removal under hysteroscopic guidance the recommended surgical treatment. Some women may decline surgical endometrial polyp management due to the small inherent risks. Conservative management is an option for asymptomatic premenopausal and postmenopausal women, whilst polypectomy is recommended for all women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Management should be individualized and made in consultation with the patient.

Purpose of Review: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of hysterectomy and hysteroscopic endometrial resection in improving quality of life (QoL), sexual function and psychological wellbeing of women abnormal uterine bleeding., Recent Findings: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase for original studies written in English (registered in PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019133632), using the terms 'endometrial ablation', 'endometrial destruction', 'endometrial resection', 'hysterectomy', 'menorrhagia', 'dysfunctional uterine bleeding', 'quality of life', 'sexuality' published up to April 2019. Our literature search produced 159 records. After exclusions, nine studies were included showing the following results: both types of treatment significantly improve QoL and psychological wellbeing; hysterectomy is associated with higher rates of satisfaction; hysterectomy is not associated with a significant deterioration in sexual function., Summary: Hysterectomy is currently more advantageous in terms of improving abnormal uterine bleeding and satisfaction rates than hysteroscopic endometrial destruction techniques. Furthermore, there is some evidence of a greater improvement in general health for women undergoing hysterectomy. However, high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials should be implemented to investigate the effectiveness of hysterectomy and endometrial ablation in the improvement of QoL outcomes in larger patient cohorts.

This study aimed to compare the quality of histological endometrial samples collected through Pipelle aspiration and hysteroscopic biopsies to assess the agreement between these 2 biopsies in the histological diagnosis of malignancy and to compare the costs of both biopsies.This was a cross-sectional study. Forty-five women were biopsied, first using Pipelle and immediately after using hysteroscopy. The material collected was sent for analysis, and hysteroscopy was considered the gold standard. The results were divided into the following 3 categories: normal (atrophic, proliferative, and secretory endometrium); polyps; and malignancies. We report the agreement between Pipelle and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy and compare their costs.The study showed that while analyzing endometrial malignancies, Pipelle sampling had 100% sensitivity and specificity. In the detection of polyps, Pipelle sampling showed 26.1% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, 48.5% negative predictive value, and 53.7% accuracy. Agreement with hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100%. The Pipelle device costs 27 times less than hysteroscopic biopsy for health insurance companies. This cost is 13.7 times lower in the Brazilian Unified Health System.Endometrial biopsies using the Pipelle have a high accuracy for endometrial cancer and a low accuracy for polyps. We detected 100% agreement between the reports of Pipelle and hysteroscopy with regard to malignancy. Pipelle is the most cost-effective method of endometrial biopsy.

Objective: In women with postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial polyps are a frequent finding and the risk of a focal (pre)malignancy in a polyp is up to 6%. Because of this reported risk, the detection of polyps in these women, preferably by a minimally invasive method, is important. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) for diagnosis of endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding., Methods: In August 2018, an electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases to identify all diagnostic studies in which SCSH was used to detect endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women. Studies were included if SCSH was performed to detect endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding and if detection of a polyp on hysteroscopy or diagnosis on histopathology was used as a reference standard. Two reviewers assessed methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Two separate analyses were performed for each reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics (HSROC) model and HSROC curves were plotted., Results: After selection and quality assessment, five studies were included. Using 'polyps diagnosed with histopathology' as the reference standard, the pooled sensitivity of SCSH was 86.5% (95% CI, 63.6-100%) and the pooled specificity was 91.1% (95% CI, 63.2-100%). Using 'polyps seen on hysteroscopy' as the reference standard, the pooled sensitivity of SCSH was 85.1% (95% CI, 66.9-100%) and the pooled specificity was 84.5% (95% CI, 68.1-100%). Excluding the one study that included women in whom the SCSH examination was reported to be suboptimal, the pooled sensitivity increased to 90.7% (95% CI, 72.8-100%) using hysteroscopy as the reference standard. The sensitivity of hysteroscopy to detect polyps, as reported in two studies, was 81-98%., Conclusions: Provided that the SCSH examination is of optimal quality, it can be considered as a method to stratify women with postmenopausal bleeding for further diagnostic workup and treatment with hysteroscopy. In women without suspicion of a polypoid lesion on SCSH, and with a benign endometrial sample, expectant management should be considered. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to prove that a short dry lab training prior to the surgery is efficient to acquire basic hysteroscopic skills and that these skills are transferable directly to the operation theater., Methods: Thirty-nine gynecologists who never attended a training course or practiced hysteroscopy before were evaluated. Participants were randomly divided into trainees (n = 21) and control (n = 18). Trainees attended a short time dry lab prior the exposure to the OR. The controls went directly to the OR. Participants were asked to identify the different landmarks of the uterine cavity and to perform a punch biopsy under the supervision of a gynecologist expert in hysteroscopy. A video recording for all the exercises was done, and showed independently to two expert surgeons in hysteroscopy for evaluation. The experts were also asked to distinguish between the trainees and the control., Results: For both experts, the trainees' performance was statistically better than that of the controls (p < 0.001) for the identification of the uterus land marks and the punch biopsy. The two experts identified 80.9 and 85.7%, respectively, of the trainees. The participants' subgroup ID and the experts' identification were statistically correlated (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: A short time dry lab is efficient to acquire basic hysteroscopic skills and these skills are transferable directly to the OR.

Objective: To evaluate feasibility of office hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women and correlation between transvaginal ultrasound (TV-US) and hysteroscopy., Methods: Postmenopausal women addressed at office hysteroscopy for postmenopausal bleeding or increase endometrial thickness were included. A 3.5-mm rigid hysteroscope was used without cervical dilatation or local anaesthesia. Speculum was never used. Data concerning women's symptoms and TV-US findings were collected., Results: Four-hundred-seventy postmenopausal women referred for office hysteroscopy were included in this descriptive study. Three-hundred-fifty women (74.5%) experienced abnormal uterine bleeding. The success rate of office hysteroscopy was 76.4% and was significantly higher in cases of postmenopausal bleeding (80.9%) than in women without postmenopausal bleeding (63.3%) (p=0.01). Three-hundred-sixteen women had both a successful hysteroscopy and TV-US. The correlation between hysteroscopy and TV-US was 68.5% for the diagnosis of increased endometrial thickness, polyps and submucosal myoma (Kappa=0.28). The rate of endometrial cancer for women with postmenopausal bleeding was 12.6% (n=44) while it was 1.7% (n=2) for asymptomatic women. Two (4.3%) out of these 46 women with endometrial cancer had normal hysteroscopy, while 7 (15.2%) had a normal TV-US (including endometrial thickness below 5mm). Among the 54 women without bleeding and with a thickened endometrium, one (1.8%) had endometrial cancer., Conclusion: Office hysteroscopy is successful without anaesthesia for 76.4% of postmenopausal women. The correlation between TV-US and hysteroscopy is low, and we recommend to practice both sonography and hysteroscopy in women with postmenopausal bleeding., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objective: The application of an electronic database in clinical practice is used widespread in every field of medicine. The aim of the present study is to illustrate our experience to use a database software for documentation of two of our clinical activities, outpatient hysteroscopy and inpatient gynaecological surgery., Patients and Methods: In 2004, we designed two databases, the first one to document surgical procedures in the operating theatre, the second to document outpatient hysteroscopy procedures using FileMaker v.8.5. The data entry interface contains free text fields for patient demographic data and the description of the surgical procedure, supplemented by drop-down lists for items such as clinical findings, procedures, instrumentation, technique, and complications. Copies were filed in the main hospital notes, sent to General Practitioners, and also given to our patients., Results: Since August 2004, we have used our two databases to document 2766 gynaecological operations and 3777 outpatient hysteroscopies. All users particularly liked the dropdown lists as their use greatly reduced the time taken to enter each patient's data. The databases were regularly used to select patients for audit projects and research data collection for prospective studies., Conclusions: FileMaker is an user-friendly and easily configured software, extremely valuable in everyday clinical work.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of office hysteroscopy and 3D ultrasound for the diagnostic of uterine anomalies after late foetal loss., Method: This retrospective observational study took place in the gynaecologic unit of a teaching hospital from 2009 to 2014. Women with late foetal loss (<22 weeks of gestation) had an office hysteroscopy and 3D ultrasound within three months after delivery. The results of the ultrasound and hysteroscopy were recorded and compared., Results: Eighty women were included with a mean age of 29.8 years (28.2-31.4). Forty-seven women had both hysteroscopy and 3D ultrasound, and a uterine cavity's anomaly (bicornuate uterus, T-Shape uterus and septate uterus) was found in ten women (21%) at 3D sonography and in 13 women (28%) at office hysteroscopy. Concordance between the two exams was very good with a kappa at 0.83. In three cases, a uterine cavity's anomaly was found at hysteroscopy whereas sonography was normal. Anomalies at ultrasound (uterine cavity's anomaly, myometrium anomaly or ovarian anomaly) were found in 27.6% of cases., Conclusions: Both 3D ultrasound and office hysteroscopy are useful for assessment of the uterine cavity after late foetal loss. The application of these two exams is important, as hysteroscopy is generally used for assessment of the uterine cavity and endometrium, while 3D ultrasound is generally used to identify the precise type of uterine malformation and for the examination of the myometrium and annexes., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of outpatient (or office) hysteroscopy (OH) preceding in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in women who had experienced repeated implantation failure (RIF), particularly in regard to the conflicting evidence reported by previous studies. Two reviewers independently searched Pubmed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase to identify all publications of clinical trials of hysteroscopy with or without endometrial biopsy in RIF patients. The primary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Pooled relative ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Publication bias was detected using funnel plots and Egger's regression tests. Six eligible studies comprising 4143 patients were included. The CPR and LBR were both significantly higher in RIF patients with OH than RIF patients without OH (CPR: RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.14-1.57, P < 0.05; LBR: RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant association between OH and CPR in Asia (CPR: RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.69; P < 0.05) rather than in Europe (CPR: RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.26; P = 0.291). However, there was no evidence of a significant difference in either CPR or LBR between the normal and abnormal OH groups (CPR: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02, P = 0.12; LBR: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37-1.56, P = 0.450). Hysteroscopy may potentially improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIP., (© 2018 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: Focal abnormalities most commonly acquired within the uterine cavity include endometrial polyps (arising from the endometrium) and submucous fibroids (arising from the myometrium). These benign abnormalities can cause several problems, including abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and subfertility. Two-dimensional saline infusion sonography (2D SIS) is a minimally invasive test that can be used to diagnose these pathologies, but it is less accurate than hysteroscopy, which is a more invasive procedure by which an endoscope allows direct visualisation of the uterine cavity. Three-dimensional (3D) SIS appears to enhance sonographic visualisation within the uterine cavity, thereby offering a potentially more accurate minimally invasive diagnostic test., Objectives: Primary objectives • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3D SIS (index test 1) compared with 2D SIS for the diagnosis of focally growing lesions (presence or not) in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy performed as the reference test. • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D+3D SIS (index test 2) compared with 2D SIS for the diagnosis of focally growing lesions (presence or not) in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy performed as the reference test. In this case, any abnormality on either modality was regarded as a positive result ('OR' approach). Secondary objectives • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3D SIS (index test 1) compared with 2D SIS according to type of abnormality and discrimination between uterine polyps and submucous fibroids in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy and histology used as the reference.• To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D+3D SIS (index test 2) compared with 2D SIS according to type of abnormality and discrimination between uterine polyps and submucous fibroids in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy and histology used as the reference., Search Methods: We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online (CENTRAL CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Specialised Register and CGFG Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) Specialised Register, clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Screening reference lists of appropriate studies was also performed. We screened for eligibility all studies identified from inception until March 2016. We performed searches with no date or language restrictions., Selection Criteria: The population of interest consisted of premenopausal women with AUB or subfertility and postmenopausal women with AUB. Diagnostic test accuracy studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the accuracy of both 2D SIS and 3D SIS for the diagnosis of acquired intracavitary abnormalities with hysteroscopy used as the reference standard. In light of the lack of data for 3D SIS, we also included studies that evaluated the accuracy of 3D SIS alone., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors read all potentially eligible references after performing a first screening by title and abstract (LLN and FJRH). They independently extracted data to construct 2×2 tables from eligible studies and assessed studies for methodological quality using the QUADAS-2 tool (revised tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies). To describe and visually present results, we produced in RevMan forest plots showing pairs of sensitivity and specificity together with 95% confidence intervals from each study, as well as raw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots. We displayed paired analyses in an ROC plot by linking sensitivity-specificity pairs from each study by using a dashed line. To compare 3D SIS versus 2D SIS, we restricted analyses to studies that provided 2×2 tables for both tests and used the bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity., Main Results: Thirteen studies (1053 women) reported the accuracy of 3D SIS for focal uterine abnormalities; 11 of these (846 women) were suitable for meta-analysis, and eight reported accuracy according to the type of focal abnormality. The design of the included studies seems applicable. The main problem involving the quality of included studies is insufficient reporting of study methods, resulting in unclear risk of bias for several of the quality domains assessed. Therefore, we considered the overall quality of the evidence as low. The summary estimate (11 studies reporting absence or presence of abnormality at 3D SIS) for sensitivity was 94.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.6% to 96.9%) and for specificity 99.4% (95% CI 96.2% to 99.9%). Meta-analysis of the eight studies (N = 716) directly comparing 2D SIS versus 3D SIS showed summary sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI 91.9% to 98.8%) and summary specificity of 99.5% (95% CI 96.1% to 100%) for 3D SIS. For 2D SIS, summary sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 81.2% to 95.8%) and summary specificity was 96.3% (95% CI 86.1% to 99.1%). The difference in accuracy between 2D SIS and 3D SIS was non-significant (P values of 0.07 for sensitivity and 0.10 for specificity)., Authors' Conclusions: Low-quality evidence suggests that 3D SIS may be very accurate in detecting intracavitary abnormalities. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between 2D SIS and 3D SIS. Summary sensitivity and summary specificity are higher for 3D SIS, but margins of improvement are limited because 2D SIS is already very accurate. When the technology and appropriate expertise are available, 3D SIS offers an alternative to 2D SIS. Both 2D SIS and 3D SIS should be considered alternatives to diagnostic hysteroscopy when intracavitary pathology is suspected in subfertile women and in those with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare lower and higher uterine filling pressures during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy., Methods: One hundred and seventy-five women eligible for outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy were included in this randomized double blind comparative study. The subjects were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 80) underwent surgery with lower intrauterine filling pressures (30, 40, and 50 mmHg) and group 2 (n = 81) underwent surgery with higher filling pressures (70, 80, and 100 mmHg). The primary outcome measure was adequate visibility during the procedure. The secondary outcome measure was pain perceived by the patient during and 30 min after the procedure., Results: In total, 161 patients completed the trial. Group 2 had significantly higher adequate visibility than group 1 (71/80, 88.75% in group 1 and 79/81, 97.5% in group 2, P = 0.008). There was a trend toward increase in pain scores with higher pressures during the procedure. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of visual analog scale pain scores measured 30 min after the procedure., Conclusion: Lower uterine filling pressure was associated with lower pain scores with a higher trend towards inadequate visibility. It appears that higher filling pressure can be used for performing office hysteroscopy, but it is associated with higher pain scores., (© 2017 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Advanced hysteroscopic surgery (AHS) is a vitally important technique in the armamentarium for the management of many day-to-day clinical problems, such as menorrhagia, surgical excision of uterine myomata and septa in the management of female infertility, hysteroscopic excision of chronically retained products of conception (placenta accreta), and surgical removal of intramural ectopic pregnancy. In today's climate of accountability, it is necessary that gynecologists take a more active role in assuring the quality of their work. In this article, we discuss the quality assurance system from the point of view of the surgical audit meetings in some of the major teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Queensland (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia).

Background: In Australia, gynaecologists continue to investigate women with abnormal bleeding and suspected intrauterine pathology with inpatient hysteroscopy despite some evidence in the literature that that there is no difference in safety and outcome when compared to an outpatient procedure., Aims: This prospective study assessed the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of outpatient hysteroscopy over 11 years at a tertiary hospital in Australia. Resource savings were then calculated., Materials and Methods: A prospective database was analysed from March 2003 to January 2014 (130 months, 990 women)., Results: Successful hysteroscopic access was obtained in 94% of cases. Twenty-six percent of patients required a second procedure, including 132 for endometrial polyps and 33 for submucosal fibroids that were not able to be treated in the outpatient setting. On questioning, 88% of women would be happy to have the procedure again. Factors affecting success were pre-procedure pain, menopausal status and previous vaginal delivery. The difference between pain experienced versus pain expected was a major factor in patient acceptability. A vasovagal episode occurred in 5% of cases., Conclusion: Outpatient hysteroscopy was demonstrated to be safe, effective and acceptable to women. Provision of an outpatient hysteroscopy service saves theatre time and approximately $1000 per case. Improved techniques and technology will allow progression to a 'see and treat' service, providing further savings. With budget constraints, increasing wait times for major procedures and concerns about trainee surgical experience, an outpatient hysteroscopy service should be considered the 'gold standard' investigation over hysteroscopy in theatre., (© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Background: To determine the utility of three-dimensional (3D) sonography to control the position of hysteroscopic sterilizing device compared to hysterosalpingography (HSG)., Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 139 patients who underwent hysteroscopic tubal occlusion method between February 2012 and May 2013. Patients underwent 3D ultrasound scan to control device positioning, and they also underwent HSG as an additional control method. Comparison between both methods was carried out., Results: In all, 17 (12.2%) devices were inserted due to a hydrosalpinx and 122 (87.8%) due to sterilization purposes. In 124 (89.2%) cases, sonography correlated completely to HSG findings. Sonography-positive predictive value was 89.5% to detect correct device positioning. Just 4 (2.8%) patients did not present complete tubal occlusion 3 months after device insertion; one of them presented device expulsion, 2 of them presented previous hydrosalpinx (tubal occlusion was confirmed after 6 months), and the last case rejected to undergo further controls but device seem to be effective., Conclusions: 3D sonography seems to be effective for the control of sterilization device positioning, but it also detects insertion complications and device migration. Further studies would be required to assess our findings and the role of sonography in case of hydrosalpinx., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Cervical cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death among women in low-to-middle income countries. Pap testing and pathological services are difficult to implement under these settings. Alternative techniques for the diagnosis of cervical precancer in these settings are needed to reduce the burden of the disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost, high-resolution microendoscope imaging system in identifying precancerous lesions of the cervix in vivo. A retrospective study of 59 patients undergoing colposcopy for an abnormal Pap test was performed at Hospital de Câncer de Barretos in Brazil. All patients underwent colposcopy as per standard of care, and acetowhite lesions were recorded. High-resolution microendoscopy (HRME) images were obtained from one colposcopically normal region and from all lesions observed on colposcopy. Biopsies of abnormal areas were obtained and reviewed by three independent, blinded pathologists and compared with HRME findings. The mean nuclear area and the median nuclear eccentricity were calculated from HRME images acquired from each site. A diagnostic algorithm to distinguish histopathologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasias of grade 2 or more severe lesions (high grade) from less severe lesions (low grade) was developed using these parameters. A test of trend was used to analyze the relationship between HRME positivity and severity of histopathogical diagnosis. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze differences in HRME positivity between high-grade and low-grade lesions. Evaluable images were obtained from 108 of 143 discrete sites. Of these, 71 sites were colposcopically normal or low grade according to histopathology and 37 were diagnosed as high grade on the basis of histopathology. Using the mean nuclear area and the median nuclear eccentricity, HRME images from 59 colposcopically abnormal sites were classified as high grade or low grade with 92% sensitivity and 77% specificity compared with histopathological findings. Increasing HRME positivity showed a significant trend with increasing severity of diagnosis (Ptrend<0.001). We found a strong association (P<0.001) between HRME positivity and a histopathological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or higher. HRME demonstrated an accurate in-situ diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia. In low-resource settings in which colposcopy and histopathology services are severely limited or unavailable, HRME may provide a low-cost, accurate method for diagnosis of cervical precancer without the need for biopsy, allowing for a single 'screen-and-treat' approach.

Background/aims: To assess uterine cavity with office hysteroscopy in order to diagnose and treat pathologies in patients who have started their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles and evaluate its impact on pregnancy rate., Methods: A number of 220 infertile women scheduled for ICSI participated in this prospective randomized study. They were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. Group I (intervention) underwent office hysteroscopy before starting assisted reproductive techniques (ART) cycle. Group II (control) started ART cycles without office hysteroscopy. All women had normal transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography. The detected intrauterine abnormalities were treated during hysteroscopy. Four weeks after embryo transfer, ultrasonography was done for detecting clinical pregnancy., Results: Abnormal findings were seen in hysteroscopy in 22.7% of the intervention group. The pregnancy rate in the intervention group (48.20%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (38.60%; p = 0.004)., Conclusion: Routine office hysteroscopy before ICSI cycles provides direct evaluation of uterine cavity. Also, pregnancy rate improves after correction of endometrial cavity abnormalities., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and diagnostic value of hysterosonography performed in an emergency setting among patients consulting for active abnormal uterine bleeding., Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we included 216 patients visiting our emergency department for abnormal uterine bleeding. All patients had a transvaginal ultrasound with doppler study and an hysterosonography. Secondly, the patients, in whom we diagnosed a suspected organic lesion, were addressed to an endoscopic or surgical procedure with pathological examination. Initially, we evaluated the feasibility and the safety of hysterosonography and secondly, we compared the two techniques (EEV and hysterosonography), sensitivity, specificity, LHR+and LHR-., Results: The hysterosonography was performed in 98.1 % of patients and its realization has resulted in an additional period of 1.2minutes on average (extreme: 6-12) compared to ultrasound. The tolerance of the hysterosonographic examination was very good in 73.5 % of patients and good in 23.1 % of them. For the 167 patients who had been diagnosed with presumed organic lesions, pathological examination found an endometrial hyperplasia in 34.7 % of cases, polyps in 40.1 % of cases, sub-mucosal fibroids in 11.3 % of cases, endometrial cancer in 0.7 % of cases and other lesions in 13.2 % of cases. The diagnostic value of hysterosonography was superior to ultrasound in the detection of polyps (AUC: 0.894 vs 0.778, P=0.003) and fibromas (AUC: 1.000 vs 0.716, P=0.001) while the two methods showed no significant difference in the detection of hyperplasia., Conclusion: The purpose of our study was to focus on a particular context of use of the hysterosonography consisting on hemorrhagic period and on its realization in the emergency room. We were able to demonstrate that hysterosonography is compatible with the emergency situation as to its feasibility and its diagnostic value and that its realization would contribute to the sorting of patients to guide them immediately to a surgical or endoscopic procedure if necessary., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Guidelines report the quality of the evidence used when formulating recommendations to ensure transparency and allow end-users to assess the estimates of effect that underlie the recommendation. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in grading of evidence quality between the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) model and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method., Materials and Methods: The GRADE system was used to create evidence profiles for recommendations from a guideline that used the SIGN method to assess the quality of evidence. Scores were allocated to the quality assessment in its GRADE and SIGN forms, so that the difference between the two methods could be quantified., Results: The SIGN grading system led to quality ratings of the evidence of high and moderate but using the GRADE system, the majority of ratings were graded as low or very low. All of the recommendations were graded as higher quality by SIGN than by GRADE. The points' difference ranged from one to three points (maximum difference possible was four points). The most common reasons for downgrading evidence were "study limitations", "imprecision"' and "publication bias". "Indirectness" and "inconsistency" were rarely selected as reasons to downgrade the evidence., Conclusions: The GRADE and SIGN methods produce varying estimates of the quality of evidence., (© 2015 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a useful screening test for the evaluation of female infertility. Laparoscopy has proven role in routine infertility work up but role of hysteroscopy in an infertile patient with normal HSG for additional information is a subject of debate. Hysteroscopy permits direct visualization of the cervical canal and the uterine cavity and thereby helping in the evaluation of shape, and cavitary lesion. Objective To detect uterine abnormalities in infertile women by various approaches i.e. HSG and hysteroscopy and evaluating the role of combining hysteroscopy with laparoscopy for the evaluation of tubo-uterine factor for primary infertility. Method One twenty eight infertile women were evaluated and HSG was performed as a basic test for evaluation of tubes and uterine cavity. Women were subjected to combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic examination on evidence of HSG abnormalities. In absence of any HSG abnormality, women were subjected to ovulation induction for three to six months and if they did not conceive during this period they were undertaken for combined laparo-hysteroscopic evaluation. Result The positive predictive value of HSG for detecting the intrauterine abnormalities was 70% among 126 patients where the hysteroscopy could be performed successfully. The diagnostic accuracy of HSG for intrauterine abnormalities revealed false negative rate of 12.96%. The most frequent pathologies encountered by laparoscopy were tubal and/or peritoneal and were found in 68% (87/128) of women. Total 64.06% infertile women had some abnormality on laparoscopy. This detection rate has been increased from 64.06% to 71.86% on including the concomitant hysteroscopy. Conclusion HSG is a good diagnostic modality to detect uterine as well as tubal abnormalities in infertile patient. HSG and hysteroscopy are complementary to each other and whenever the patient is undertaken for diagnostic laparoscopy for the infertility, hysteroscopy should be combined to improve the detection rate of abnormalities especially in communities where there is enormous risk of pelvic infection.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was recently introduced to the field of gynecologic malignancies; however, its value is not yet validated. A clinical trial is in preparation to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of IMRT for postoperative cervical cancer. The object of this study was to perform a surveillance study of IMRT for post-operative cervical cancer. A questionnaire regarding the precise methods of conducting IMRT was sent to six institutions that had already introduced IMRT for post-operative cervical cancer, and the data were analyzed. Half of the institutions used static IMRT and the others used volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Most institutions used body-immobilizing devices for patient fixation. Most institutions instructed patients to fill their bladder before undergoing planning CT or daily treatment. While one institution inserted metallic markers and another one used radio-contrast-soaked gauze to visualize the vaginal cuff, the other institutions used nothing for vaginal cuff visualization. Most institutions defined the clinical target volumes according to the Japan Clinical Oncology Group or the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines. Only one institution used a prescribed dose based on 95% of the PTV (D(95)), while the rest used the mean dose (D(mean)). This valuable information from six leading institutions will be utilized in a future prospective clinical trial., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

Objective: To compare diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy in patients with benign uterine endocavitary findings., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 202 patients submitted to sonohysterography after transvaginal ultrasound examination suspicious for uterine endocavitary findings. Cytological sample was taken and analyzed from the fluid used to distend the uterine cavity. Of 202 patients enrolled for this study, 86 patients underwent gynaecological surgery, of whom 77 were treated with operative hysteroscopy and 9 with other gynaecological surgical techniques. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic agreement between sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy and cytology vs histology., Results: Diagnostic concordance between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy was significant (k value 0.87). The correlation between cytological and histological findings had a moderate level of concordance (k value 0.49)., Conclusions: Sonohysterography provides a diagnostic accuracy as well as hysteroscopy, therefore, it could be considered an alternative procedure in the diagnosis of benign uterine endocavitary findings.

Backgrounds: There are variable results regarding the risk factors associated with levels of pain during office hysteroscopy., Objective: Describe levels of pain in Colombian patients who undergo office hysteroscopy performed by doctors in training., Material and Methods: Case series study. Conducted in patients who undergo office hysteroscopy without anesthesia in outpatient clinic in May 2012. The procedure was performed by Gynecologists in training and under supervision of the specialist. The Obstetric and Gynecological history was obtained through questionnaire. The pain perception, according to visual analog scale (VAS), was taken at three moments during the study: (1) 5 minutes before the procedure, (2) At the end of the procedure, (3) 10 minutes after the procedure.The major outcomes were: VAS 0-4, considered as absent or mild pain and VAS 5-10 considered as moderate or severe pain., Results: We studied 44 patients, aged between 29 and 65 years. The group of patients with a VAS score >5 was mainly compose by: (1) Patients older than 50 years (58.8%), (2) with positive history of C-section (66.7%), (3) with positive history of abortion (75%) and menopausal (56.3%)., Conclusion: 47.7% of our patients presentVAS score > 5. The majority of this group was composed by patients with risk factors to have pain during office hysteroscopy. Then we can't conclude that the level of pain experimented by our patients was due to the level of training of the doctors.

Objective: To measure the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness for the detection of intra-uterine pathologies among asymptomatic postmenopausal women, and to test the diagnostic accuracy and appropriateness of performed hysteroscopies., Study Design: Prospective study of 268 asymptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness ≥4 mm referred to diagnostic hysteroscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of various endometrial thickness cut-off values was tested. Histological and hysteroscopic results were compared to measure the diagnostic accuracy of outpatient hysteroscopies., Results: No endometrial thickness cut-off values had optimal diagnostic accuracy [positive likelihood ratio (LR+) >10 and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) <0.1]. The best endometrial thickness cut-off value for the detection of all intra-uterine pathologies was ≥8 mm (LR+ 10.05 and LR- 0.22). An endometrial thickness cut-off value ≥10 mm did not miss any cases of endometrial cancer. The success rate of diagnostic hysteroscopy was 89%, but 97% of these revealed a benign intra-uterine pathology. The diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy was optimal for all intra-uterine pathologies, except endometrial hyperplasia (LR- 0.52)., Conclusion: Using an endometrial thickness cut-off value ≥4 mm, only 3% of performed hysteroscopies were useful for the detection of pre-malignant or malignant lesions. Despite the finding that endometrial thickness did not show optimal diagnostic accuracy, using the best cut-off value (≥8 mm) may be helpful to decrease the number of false-positive results. No cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness <10mm., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography (3D-SIS) and office hysteroscopy in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty (HM) and determine the interrater/intrarater agreement for 3D-SIS., Design: Prospective observational study., Setting: University hospital, private hospital, and clinic., Patient(s): One hundred forty-one women undergoing HM for septate uterus with a history of miscarriage and/or infertility., Intervention(s): 3D-SIS and office hysteroscopy at 6-8 weeks after HM., Main Outcome Measure(s): Shape of the uterine cavity, length of the fundal notch (≥1 or <1 cm), and the presence of intrauterine adhesions were assessed, and the interrater/intrarater agreement of 3D-SIS was evaluated in 30 randomly selected patients., Result(s): Uterine abnormalities were detected with the use of hysteroscopy in 18 (12.8%) of 141 women. 3D-SIS was highly accurate (97.2%), sensitive (97%), and specific (100%), with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 85%. The diagnostic values of hysteroscopy and 3D-SIS were not significantly different (McNemar test). 3D-SIS showed substantial interrater/intrarater agreement regarding overall uterine cavity evaluation (κ = 0.79 and 0.78, respectively)., Conclusion(s): 3D-SIS demonstrated substantial interrater/intrarater agreement for the postoperative evaluation of the uterine cavity, being as diagnostically accurate as hysteroscopy. The use of second-look hysteroscopy may be limited to cases that require reoperation., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Many image-based systems for aiding the surgeon during minimally invasive surgery require the endoscopic camera to be calibrated at all times. This article proposes a method for accomplishing this goal whenever the camera has optical zoom and the focal length changes during the procedure. Our solution for online calibration builds on recent developments in tracking salient points using differential image alignment, is well suited for continuous operation, and makes no assumptions about the camera motion or scene rigidity. Experimental validation using both a phantom model and in vivo data shows that the method enables accurate estimation of focal length when the zoom varies, avoiding the need to explicitly recalibrate during surgery. To the best of our knowledge this the first work proposing a practical solution for online zoom calibration in the operation room.

Background/aims: Cesarean-induced isthmocele can cause heavy or prolonged menses, dyspareunia, and dysmenorrhea. We compared the efficacy of vaginal surgery and operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele., Methods: Seventy-seven women with cesarean-induced isthmocele underwent either vaginal surgery or operative hysteroscopy between August 2008 and December 2011. We evaluated operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative pregnancy. Operative efficacy was defined as an improvement in menstrual periods and a change in residual isthmocele nidus size on transvaginal ultrasonography., Results: The operative efficacy of vaginal surgery was superior to that of hysteroscopy (93.5 vs. 64.5%; p < 0.001). However, patients who underwent vaginal surgery had a longer operative time (55 vs. 25 min; p < 0.001) and greater blood loss (50 vs. 10 ml; p < 0.001). Two patients in each group were able to achieve subsequent pregnancy. Patients who had menstrual periods longer than 7 days after surgery were more likely to have a residual nidus., Conclusions: The therapeutic efficacy of vaginal surgery is superior to operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate accuracy of the outpatient hysteroscopy., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 494 women who underwent outpatient hysteroscopy after administration ofnon-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents with the 3.2 mm hysteroscope. Normal saline solution was used as the distension medium. All women were discharged in good general condition afterwards., Results: In cases of abnormal uterine bleeding, there was no apparent pathology found in 112 cases (83.6%). Detection rate (DR) of endometrial polyps was 88.7% with false positive rate (FPR) of 4.6%. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 82.7% with negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.1%. Detection rate (DR) of the submucosal fibroids was 57.7%. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 57.7% with negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.0%. Endometrial cancer was confirmed in ten cases (2.0%), being suspected in eight cases during the procedure. DR in case of the endometrial cancer was 80.0% with FPR of 0.4%. PPV was 66.7% with NPV) of 99.6%., Conclusions: Outpatient hysteroscopy seems to be an effective and accurate diagnostic tool.

Hysteroscopic sterilization is growing in popularity. Nearly 500,000 women have been sterilized using this method, and an increasing number of physicians are now performing this procedure in the office setting. The office setting can provide a cost-effective, convenient, and safe environment for hysteroscopic sterilization. Patients may benefit from avoiding hospital preoperative visits, excessive laboratory evaluation, operating room wait times, and expense associated with hospital care. Physicians may improve productivity through remaining in their office or avoiding operating room delays. This article reviews office-hysteroscopic sterilization with the Essure microinsert system., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To provide clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning the adverse events related to hysteroscopy., Materials and Methods: Review of literature using following Keywords: hysteroscopy; vaginoscopy; infection; perforation; intrauterine adhesions, Results: Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for outpatient hysteroscopy (grade A) using a miniature (≤ 3.5mm sheath) (grade A) rigid hysteroscope (grade C), using normal saline solution distension medium (grade C), without any anesthesia (conscious sedation should not be routinely used), without cervical preparation (grade B), without vaginal disinfection and without antibiotic prophylaxy (grade B). Misoprostol (grade A), vaginal estrogens (grade C), or GnRH agonist routine administration is not recommended before operative hysteroscopy. Before performing hysteroscopy, it is important to purge the air out of the system (grade A). The uterine cavity distention pressure should be maintained below the mean arterial pressure and below 120 mmHg. The maximum fluid deficit of 2000 mL is suggested when using normal saline solution and 1000 mL is suggested when using hypotonic solution. When uterine perforation is recognized during operative hysteroscopy using monopolar or bipolar loop, the procedure should be stopped and a laparoscopy should be performed in order to eliminate a bowel injury. Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is allowed when an endometrial cancer is suspected (grade B)., Conclusion: Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to office and operative hysteroscopy., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

We did a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the incidence of infectious complications and the protective effect of antibiotic administration during operative hysteroscopic procedures in an office setting. A total of 1046 consecutively enrolled women with intrauterine lesions were randomly allocated to the reference group (523 patients administered with 1 g of cefazolin intramuscularly) and the study group (523 patients administered with 10 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution), and treated in office setting by operative hysteroscopy for endometrial polypectomy, uterine septa, submucosal myomas, and intrauterine adhesions. The primary outcome measure was the computation of difference between groups in postsurgical infectious complications occurring in the 5 days after the procedures. The time spent in performing the various procedures did not differ significantly (P > .05) between the groups. With respect to the overall rate of postsurgical infection, we found that 12 (1.15%) of 1046 patients referred with symptoms related to infective complications, 7 (1.3% of 523 women) in the study--untreated--group and 5 (1.0% of 523 women) in the reference group. Such incidences did not differ significantly between the groups (P > .05). Antibiotics were prescribed in all cases of postsurgical infection and the infective process resolved in few days. None of these patients developed serious infections with adnexal involvement, as confirmed by clinical and ultrasounds evaluation. The results of the current study would support the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendation not to prescribe routine antibiotic administration in the case of hysteroscopic surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of hysteroscopic impression for diagnosing benign and malignant endometrial pathology., Method: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving case records of 412 patients who underwent hysteroscopy with diagnostic dilatation and curettage (D&C) at the University of Malaya Medical Centre from January 2009 to August 2011, and cases with records of previous hysteroscopies (2007-2008). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, likelihood ratios (LR) and post-test probabilities of hysteroscopy were calculated. D&C was set as the 'gold standard'., Results: Hysteroscopy and histology results were concordant in 366 (88.8%) subjects. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were high exceeding 80%. Moderate sensitivity for endometrial hyperplasia (64.4%, 95% CI=49.8%-76.8%) with moderate PPV for malignancy (62.1%, 95% CI=44.0%-77.3%) due to misdiagnosing hyperplasia as malignant was observed. PPV for leiomyoma was reduced (83.3%, 95% CI=60.8%-94.2%) despite 100% sensitivity, due to D&C false negatives. High positive LR (>10) and low negative LR (<0.2) were observed generally except for endometrial hyperplasia (0.36). Hysteroscopy had moderate positive post-test probability for malignancy (0.62) but effective in ruling out malignancy (negative post-test probability=0.00)., Conclusion: Hysteroscopy is accurate for diagnosing focal and malignant endometrial pathology but only moderate for hyperplasia. Endometrial sampling is recommended for all cases especially when suspecting hyperplasia or malignancy., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the placement rates for experienced users versus newly trained physicians using the new ESS 305 delivery catheter for the Essure microinsert hysteroscopic sterilization system., Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study., Setting: Seventy-six sites throughout the U.S. comprising community hospitals, teaching institutions, surgery centers, and office-based practices., Patient(s): A total of 578 women seeking hysteroscopic sterilization., Intervention(s): Hysteroscopic sterilization with the ESS 305 device by either experienced or novice physicians., Main Outcome Measure(s): Successful bilateral placement of the Essure 305 device., Result(s): A total of 625 patients were recruited with 578 eligible cases performed by 37 newly trained and 39 experienced physicians: 562/578 (97.2%) overall had successful placement, with 98% successful placement rate versus 96.1% for experienced versus novice physicians, respectively. Mean procedural time was 9 minutes (±7 SD), with experienced physicians completing it on average quicker at 7.9 minutes (±5.8 SD) and novices completing it in 10.7 minutes (±8.3 SD). There was no significant association between successful placement with patient characteristics such as body mass index, surgical history, parity, or prior vaginal deliveries observed., Conclusion(s): The Essure procedure can be performed quickly and safely with high bilateral placement rates regardless of physician experience or patient characteristics., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of the hysteroscopic resection of type II submucous fibroids regardless of the myometrial free margin separating them from the serosa and to report the dynamic changes the margin undergoes after the various phases of resection., Design: A prospective observational study., Setting: A tertiary-level university hospital., Patient(s): Thirteen women with single type II submucous fibroids of ≤ 5 cm in diameter regardless of the myometrial free margin., Intervention(s): Hysteroscopic myomectomy and ultrasound evaluation of myometrial free margin before and after each phase of the procedure., Main Outcome Measure(s): The possibility of a complete one-step resection, the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, and the analysis of the dynamic changes occurring in myometrial free margin., Result(s): Complete resection was performed successfully in all patients. No complications were registered. The myometrial free margin decreased on the distension of the uterine cavity and then increased progressively and significantly after the various phases of resection., Conclusion(s): In selected cases and in experienced hands, hysteroscopic myomectomy of type II submucous fibroids may be performed successfully and safely regardless of the myometrial free margin. Myometrial free margin increases progressively with each step of the procedure probably leading to an increasing margin of safety., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to compare the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS), saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysteroscopy (HS) for uterine pathologies among infertile women. A total of 346 patients were selected for operative hysteroscopy, following SIS after TVS. SİS was performed with a Cook Soft 500 IVF catheter. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated to compare the accuracy of TVS, SIS and hysteroscopy for uterine abnormalities. SIS showed a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100% and PPV of 100% for endometrial hyperplasia, and a sensitivity and NPV of 100% for polypoid lesions. For submucosal myoma SIS showed a sensitivity of 99% with PPV of 96%. Hysteroscopy had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 98%, 83%, 96% and 91%, respectively for overall uterine pathologies. Finally, SIS seems to be superior to TVS, for uterine pathologies, with respect to hysteroscopy as the gold standard.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcome of hysteroscopic myomectomy in patients with infertility and recurrent abortions., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective clinical analysis of 186 patients who underwent hysteroscopic myomectomy by monopolar electrode loop. A second-look diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed in all cases within 2 months. The mean follow-up period was 36.5 months., Results: The mean age of the patients was 28.4 years. The presenting clinical complaint was primary infertility in 31% (62/200) patients, secondary infertility in 10% (20/200) patients, recurrent abortions in 50.5% (101/200) and preterm deliveries in 8.5% (17/200) patients. Final reproductive outcome was assessed for 186 patients, after excluding patients with other confounding factors, interfering in pregnancy outcome. There was a significant difference in reduction of number of miscarriages and increase in term deliveries while the number of preterm deliveries remained almost the same. Fifty-eight out of 82 infertile patients (70.7%) conceived after hysteroscopic myomectomy. The take home baby rate was increased from 16.2 to 74%. There was an increased incidence (35.6%) of cesarean section recorded in mode of delivery., Conclusion: Hysteroscopic myomectomy is a safe and effective method for improving the obstetric outcome in women with infertility and recurrent abortions and associated submucous fibroids.

Approximately 15% of couples are affected with subfertility, of which up to 20% remain unexplained. Uterine cavity abnormalities can be a contributing cause of subfertility and recurrent implantation failure. Uterine cavity assessment has been suggested as a routine investigation in the evaluation of subfertile women. Traditionally, hysterosalpingography has been the most commonly used technique in the evaluation of infertility. Transvaginal ultrasound scan allows visualization of the endometrial lining and cavity, and has been used as a screening test for the assessment of uterine cavity. Abnormal uterine findings on a baseline scan can be further evaluated with saline hysterosonography, which is highly sensitive and specific in identifying intrauterine abnormalities. Hysteroscopy is considered as the definitive diagnostic tool to evaluate any abnormality suspected on hysterosalpingography, transvaginal ultrasound scan or saline hysterosonography during routine investigation of infertile patients. Minimally invasive hysteroscopes have minimized the pain experienced by patients during the procedure and made it feasible to use hysteroscopy as a routine outpatient examination. Following recurrent IVF failure there is some evidence of benefit from hysteroscopy in increasing the chance of pregnancy in the subsequent IVF cycle, both in those with abnormal and normal hysteroscopic findings. Various possible mechanisms have been proposed for this beneficial effect, but more randomized controlled trials are needed before its routine use in the general subfertile population can be recommended.

Objectives: To evaluate the outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman's syndrome., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective clinical analysis of 89 patients who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis by monopolar electrode knife. A second-look office hysteroscopy was performed in all cases after 2 months. On second-look hysteroscopy, 12 patients showed reformation of adhesions and needed a repeat procedure., Results: The mean age of the patient was 28.4 years. In the majority (64%) of patients, the possible cause of Asherman's syndrome was previous curettage on gravid uterus. The overall conception rate was 40.4% after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. The mean conception time after surgery was 12.8 months. There was no conception in patients who needed repeat adhesiolysis. The conception rate was higher (58%) in mild Asherman's syndrome compared to 30% conception rate in moderate and 33.3% conception rate in severe cases. There was no significant association between conception rate and preoperative menstrual pattern. There was significant higher likelihood of conception rate (44.3%) in those who continued to have improved menstrual pattern compared to only 10% likelihood of conception in those who continued to have amenorrhea after adhesiolysis. The live birth rate was 86.1% and miscarriage rate was 11.1%. Cumulative pregnancy rate showed that 97.2% patients conceived within 24 months. There was increased incidence (43.8%) of cesarean section. Four (12.5%) patients had postpartum hemorrhage for adherent placenta., Conclusion: Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome is a safe and effective method of choice for restoring menstrual function and fertility.

Laparoscopic surgical techniques are increasingly being used to treat gynaecological malignancies as studies confirm long-term results similar to open procedures. Within the UK National Health Service, there is a drive towards day of surgery admission and reducing inpatient stay. We audited the length of inpatient stay, acceptability to patients of day of surgery admission and timing of discharge and accessibility to early community follow-up, among women undergoing laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in our unit over a 6-month period. We show that women find short inpatient stays acceptable and that many can be safely discharged, with no postoperative hospital follow-up, within 24&#x2009;h. Adequate pre-admission procedures and easy access to advice, post-discharge must be ensured.