Search

To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical quality metrics for patients undergoing benign, non-urgent hysterectomy.A multicentre, retrospective review at 7 hospitals in Ontario, Canada (4 academic, 3 community) was conducted. Patients undergoing hysterectomy from July 2016 to June 2019 were included. Hysterectomies for premalignant, malignant and emergency indications were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of any complication or readmission. Secondary outcomes were grade 2 or greater complication, postoperative emergency department (ED) visit, hospital readmission, operative time (ORT) and estimated blood loss (EBL). Patient characteristics (age, ASA class, preoperative diagnoses, preoperative anemia, prior surgeries), surgical factors (endometriosis, adhesions, hysterectomy route, uterine weight, concomitant procedures, ORT, EBL) and surgeon characteristics (volume, fellowship/generalist training, academic/community hospital) were recorded along with complications, hospital readmissions and ED visits. Outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression and log-regression linear analysis grouping patients by BMI category (normal, overweight, obesity class 1, 2, and 3) and by hysterectomy route (abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal).2528 hysterectomies were performed by 67 surgeons. 828 (33%) patients had a normal BMI, 889 (35%) were overweight. 500 (20%) patients had a BMI corresponding to obesity class 1, 205 (8%) class 2 and 106 (4%) class 3. Obese patients had higher ASA class (p .001) and more prior surgeries (p .001) compared to patients with normal BMI. Those with class 2 and 3 obesity were younger (p .001), had greater uterine weight (p .001) and more intra-operative adhesions (p .001). After controlling for covariates, there were no differences in the odds of the primary or secondary outcomes, with the exception of patients with class 2 obesity who underwent vaginal hysterectomy. They had 9.1% (11 min) significantly longer ORT (0.091, 95% CI 0.002-0.18, p .05) and patients with an overweight BMI who underwent vaginal hysterectomy had 28 ml significantly less EBL (-0.154, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.05, p .01) compared to patients with normal BMI.BMI was not independently associated with surgical quality outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign, non-urgent indications. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy can be performed safely in overweight and obese patients.

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) combines the advantages of vaginal surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Feasibility of vNOTES for other indications such as hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy and myomectomy has been established. In this article, we describe a standardised step by step process to perform adnexal surgery by vNOTES.

To determine the perioperative characteristics associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following vaginal pelvic floor surgery.A retrospective cohort study using multivariable prediction modelling.A tertiary referral urogynaecology unit.Patients undergoing vaginal pelvic floor surgery from January 2015 to February 2020.Eighteen variables (24 parameters) were compared between those with and without POUR and then included as potential predictors in statistical models to predict POUR. The final model was chosen as the model with the largest concordance index (c-index) from internal cross-validation. This was then externally validated using a separate data set (n = 94) from another surgical centre.Diagnosis of POUR following surgery while the patient was in hospital.Among the 700 women undergoing surgery, 301 (43%) experienced POUR. Preoperative variables with statistically significant univariate relationships with POUR included age, menopausal status, prolapse stage and uroflowmetry parameters. Significant perioperative factors included estimated blood loss, volume of intravenous fluid administered, operative time, length of stay and specific procedures, including vaginal hysterectomy with intraperitoneal vault suspension, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy and colpocleisis. The lasso logistic regression model had the best combination of internally cross-validated c-index (0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.74) and a calibration curve that showed good alignment between observed and predicted risks. Using this data, a POUR risk calculator was developed (https://pourrisk.shinyapps.io/POUR/).This POUR risk calculator will allow physicians to counsel patients preoperatively on their risk of developing POUR after vaginal pelvic surgery and help focus discussion around potential management options.

The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in women undergoing vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension using permanent as opposed to absorbable sutures. We also aimed to assess for specific risk factors for suture complications.Retrospective cohort study.Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery unit at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center.Women with apical prolapse who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension during the study period.none.A total of 197 women were included in the study. Of them, 118 (59.9%) underwent the procedure using a permanent suture and 79 (40.1%) using an absorbable suture. Women in the permanent suture group were less sexually active and had less prolapse of point C on pre-operative exam. With regard to intra-operative and postoperative data, women in the permanent suture group had increased frequency of concomitant procedures, regional anesthesia, surgical time, duration of hospital stay, and change in hemoglobin. Clinical, anatomical, and composite success did not differ between groups. Patient satisfaction recorded using the Patient Global of Improvement Questionnaire was similar as well. Women in the permanent suture group had a higher frequency of suture exposure compared with the absorbable suture group (9.3% vs 0.0%, p = .006). In order to assess for risk factors leading to suture complications, a comparison was performed between women who had suture exposure or granulation tissue and those who did not. Increasing parity by 1 increased the odds of having suture exposure or granulation tissue by a factor of approximately 1.2 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.24; Confidence interval, 1.05-1.47). Women with stage IV prolapse had 3.4 times the odds of suture complication compared with women with stage III prolapse (adjusted odds ratio = 3.4; Confidence interval, 1.1-10.6).Use of an absorbable suture affords comparable success and lower frequency of suture exposure compared with permanent sutures in women undergoing vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.

The vaginal approach is the reference surgical route to perform hysterectomy for benign pathologies. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) is a new technique that would overcome the limitations of vaginal surgery by allowing a complete exploration of the peritoneal cavity and a constant visual control of the adjacent structures. The aim of this study is to assess the V-NOTES technique compared with vaginal hysterectomy (VH).A retrospective cohort study.French teaching hospital.The first 50 V-NOTES hysterectomies were included successively and compared with the last 50 VH performed from March 2019 to November 2020. The study concerned all patients requiring hysterectomy unless it was for endometriosis or cancer (except for grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma).The baseline characteristics and the surgical outcomes were compared. The main outcome assessed was the performing of outpatient surgery. Secondary end points were uterine weight and intraoperative and postoperative complications.The rate of outpatient surgery did not differ between the 2 surgical techniques (p = .23). The success rate of outpatient management was 77% in the V-NOTES group versus 75% in the VH group (p = .85). There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the 2 groups, except for the rate of salpingectomies or adnexectomies, which was significantly higher in the V-NOTES group, with 100% of patients undergoing one of these procedures, compared with 60% of patients in the vaginal route group (p.001). There were 2 cases of re-admission in the month following the intervention in the vaginal group and 0 cases in the V-NOTES group.Hysterectomy by V-NOTES can be performed as a safe and adequate alternative to VH. This surgical route is a good candidate for outpatient management. However, more studies need to be conducted to confirm these findings.

The past 4 years have been consequential in the world of surgery to correct pelvic organ prolapse. In 2018, results of a large, multicenter randomized trial demonstrated very disappointing cure rates of traditional native tissue repairs at 5 years or more. In 2019, a vaginal mesh hysteropexy kit was removed from the market by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration only to subsequently demonstrate it provided better cure rates and similar risk profile to vaginal hysterectomy plus native tissue repair in its own 5-year study published in 2021. Meanwhile, the use and techniques of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistance have evolved such that it is commonly adapted to treat all support defects for patients with uterovaginal or posthysterectomy prolapse. This article is intended to provide an overview of the contemporary use and techniques of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy based on the evidence and our clinical experience.

Objectives The Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) is the main source of routinely-collected data for gynecologic surgery in Canada and are increasingly used for research. As these data were originally collected for healthcare administrative purposes, like billing or surveillance, they are prone to error and should be validated prior to their use for clinical research. The objective of this study was to validate hysterectomy codes from the CIHI-DAD at a single institution. Methods We obtained a consecutive sample of all gynecologic procedures performed from April 2016 to March 2017 using the CIHI-DAD at The Ottawa Hospital. Patient data, including diagnosis, procedure type, and surgical approach, were reabstracted from charts. Reabstracted chart data were then compared to CIHI-DAD Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) codes using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and kappa coefficient with associated 95% confidence intervals. Results Of 1079 gynecologic procedures, 649 hysterectomies were performed, including 23.3% vaginally, 17.1% laparoscopically, and 14.9% abdominally. The median patient age was 46years (interquartile range:41-54). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and kappa, with associated 95% confidence intervals, for all hysterectomies was94.8%(92.8-96.4%), 88.4%(85.0-91.3%), 92.5%(90.2-94.4%), 91.8%(88.7-94.3%) and 0.84(0.80-0.87%), respectively. For vaginal hysterectomy, sensitivity=88.8%(84.3-92.5%), specificity=99.2%(98.3-99.7%), PPV=97.0%(93.8-98.9%), NPV=96.7%(95.3-97.8%), and kappa=0.91(0.87-0.94). For laparoscopic hysterectomy, sensitivity=91.3%(86.3-95.0%), specificity=92.8%(91.0-94.4%), PPV=72.4%(66.2-78.1%), NPV=98.1%(97.0-98.9%), and kappa=0.79(0.71-0.81). For abdominal hysterectomy, sensitivity= 96.9%(93.9-99.0%), specificity=94.9%(93.2-96.2%), PPV=76.8%(70.4-82.5%), NPV=99.4%(98.7-99.8%), and kappa=0.83 (0.78-0.87). Conclusions Our study suggests a high level of validity for hysterectomy CCI codes in the CIHI-DAD for clinical research purposes.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, anatomical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) using light-weight Y mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.A retrospective observational study of women who underwent LSC for post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse between January 2010 and January 2019. Y shaped mesh was used for the LSC after dissection of the rectum and the bladder. Pre-operative evaluation included symptoms' assessment using the Prolpase Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) and objective assessment using the POP-Q scores. Post operatively, patient symptoms, anatomical outcomes, mesh complications and patient global impression of improvement scores were evaluated. Patients were followed up at 12 months and yearly thereafter.247 consecutive patients were included in this study. Patients' age ranged from 35 to 86 years old with an average BMI of 28.8. The most common presenting symptoms were vaginal bulge (95%), vaginal heaviness (73%) and urinary urgency (46%). The time interval between hysterectomy and LSC was 10.5 years (5 months - 42 years). Complications reported were bladder injury (1.6%), small bowel injury (0.8%), major haemorrhage (0.4%), vaginal mesh extrusion (1.2 %). 85.8% of women reported cure of prolapse symptoms. 14.2% of patients developed further/unresolved prolapse symptoms and 6.5% went on to have further surgery for prolapse. 10% of women developed new onset dyspareunia. Anatomically, postoperative point C (apex) was at -7.6 cm (range -9 - +3 cm) CONCLUSION: LSC using Y mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse is safe. LSC is effective in 85% of women who develop vaginal prolapse post hysterectomy. Further surgery for bothersome prolapse symptoms were needed in 6.5% with a 1.2% mesh extrusion rate and 10% new onset dyspareunia. This will help in counselling women undergoing this surgery.

Classical radical vaginal hysterectomy first performed by Anton Pawlik in Prague in 1888 and popularized by Frederic Schauta is now a historical technique virtually abandoned due to painful perineal incision, a high rate of urinary dysfunction, and the inability to perform lymph node assessment. However, the heritage of this approach has been still used and taught in a few centers outside their Austrian birthplace. A combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach was developed in the 1990s by French and German surgeons who designed diverse surgical techniques for which a novel classification is proposed. All these techniques are different from the so-called laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH), a term widely used for laparoscopic radical hysterectomies with vaginal extraction of the specimen. Interestingly, after the publication of the LACC trial (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer), the radical vaginal approach has found a very timely application. The creation of a vaginal cuff before performing radical laparoscopic hysterectomy described in 2007 by Leblanc as "Schautheim" operation can be used as a protective maneuver to avoid tumor spillage and potentially overturn the negative outcome of minimally invasive surgery in early-stage cervical cancer. As a result, the combination of radical vaginal and laparoscopic steps of surgery is one possible evolution after the LACC trial that needs further investigation. The forgotten vaginal surgical technique needs a specific learning curve. The creation of a vaginal cuff should be mastered by every gynecological oncologist.

Although vaginal hysterectomy(VH) is traditionally considered the safest route of hysterectomy, newer data suggest that laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) might have lower risks of perioperative complications in contemporary practice. Using a large surgical database, we aimed to assess the hypothesis that there are no significant differences in rates of major and minor complications between LH and VH when performed with pelvic reconstructive surgery, controlling for the number and type of pelvic reconstructive procedures.A total of 27,941 eligible LH and VH from the 2010-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery was defined as either an apical suspension, enterocele repair, or colporrhaphy. Laparoscopy-assisted VH, gynecological malignancy, and concomitant nongynecological procedures were excluded. Complications within 30 days of surgery were grouped into major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) or minor (grade 1-2) classifications. Bivariate analysis and inverse propensity-weighted logistic regression compared the outcomes of the VH and LH groups. Cochran-Armitage tests and multivariate regression assessed changes over time.The majority of hysterectomies (72%) were vaginal, although its utilization declined from 89% in 2010 to 64% in 2018 (p 0.001). In multivariate analysis controlling for patient factors and the type and number of concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures, LH was associated with a lower odds of major (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.711, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.639-0.791) and minor (aOR 0.659, 95% CI: 0.612-0.710) complications.Relative safety profiles should be considered among other patient factors when counseling women undergoing surgical prolapse repair. Our findings suggest that laparoscopic approaches can be safely utilized among older and sicker patients traditionally counseled toward a vaginal approach.

Objectives: We examined the use and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage I-II endometrial cancer treated with primary hysterectomy from 2000-2015. Multivariable models were developed to examine clinical, demographic, and pathologic factors associated with performance of TVH. The association between route of hysterectomy and cancer specific and overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 19,212 patients including 837 (4.6%) who underwent TVH were identified. Performance of vaginal hysterectomy declined from 4.5% in 2000 to 2.2% in 2015 (P 80 years old (aRR=1.60; 95% CI, 1.30-1.97) were more likely to undergo TVH. There was no association between either overall co-morbidity (Charlson index) or any individual comorbidities and performance of TVH. Women with high grade tumors were less likely to undergo TVH. Five-year survival was 78.4% (95% CI: 77.6-79.2) in those who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, 83.3% (95% CI: 82.1-84.4) in those who had a laparoscopic hysterectomy and 80.9% (95% CI: 77.8-83.5) in those who underwent TVH. In multivariable models, there was no adverse impact between TVH and either overall (HR=1.06; 95% CI, 0.94-1.19) or cancer-specific (HR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.70-1.28) survival. Download : Download high-res image (83KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Use of vaginal hysterectomy for stage I/II endometrial cancer has decreased in the U.S. Chronologic age is the greatest predictor of performance of TVH. Performance of TVH does not negatively impact survival for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.

The primary objectives of this study were to estimate blood loss, operation time and cost differences in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH) versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). The secondary objectives were to determine differences in hospital stay, need for postoperative analgesia, intra- and immediate post-operative complications, and the rate of conversion to laparotomy. VH was hypothesized to be the preferred route for hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions.A randomized control study was undertaken at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and included the women admitted between January 2017 and December 2019 for hysterectomy due to benign conditions, meeting the inclusion criteria (vaginally accessible uterus, estimated uterine size ≤ 12 weeks of gestation or ≤ 280 g on ultrasound examination and pathology confined to the uterus). Surgical procedures were performed by the residents in training under the supervision of specialists with large experience. The patient demographic characteristics, uterine weight, operative time, estimated blood loss(expressed as the difference between preoperative and postoperative day one serum haemoglobin),direct surgery-associated costs, intra- and immediate post-operative complications and the length of hospital stay were recorded and comparatively analysed among patients randomly placed in VH and LAVH group.A total of 227 women were included (151 patients underwent VH and 76 LAVH, upon 2:1 randomization, performed on this way to reflect the previous pattern of operating of the unit). The patients were matched with respect to age, parity and body mass index. No significant differences between two groups were found in mean uterine weight and also in mean serum haemoglobin shift, intra- and immediate post-operative complications, and convalescence period duration. There were statistically significant differences in operating time and in cost between the two procedures. On average, LAVH took longer than VH to be performed (62.8 ± 9.3 vs 29.9 ± 6.6 min, p 0.0001) and it was more costly, mainly due to the longer operating time and required disposables. An amount of 15698.20 South African Rand (ZAR) or 1145.85 United States Dollar (USD) more were needed to perform LAVH in comparison to VH. All VHs and LAVHs were successfully accomplished without major complications or conversation to laparotomy.Our data indicate that VH is a feasible and safe alternative for a large group of women with benign pathology and non-prolapsed uteri, being a faster and less costly procedure than LAVH.

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and colpocleisis are both used for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).To compare short- and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy vs. colpocleisis for advanced POP.Hospital and outpatient charts of patients who underwent VH or colpocleisis at our institution between January 2006 and December 2015 were reviewed. Clinical data were obtained and analyzed.In this study, 188 patients underwent VH and 32 patients underwent colpocleisis. The colpocleisis group was significantly older than the VH group (79.5 ± 4.5 vs. 69 ± 6.1 years respectively, P0.0001) and presented with significantly higher co-morbidity rates and a higher degree of POP. Perioperative blood loss was significantly lower (250 ± 7.6 ml vs. 300 ± 115 ml, P0.0001) and postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter (2 ± 2.7 vs. 3 ± 2.2 days, P = 0.015) among the colpocleisis group. None of the patients from the colpocleisis group required an indwelling urethral catheter after discharge, compared to 27.5% of the patients from the VH group (P = 0.001). Total postoperative complication rate was significantly lower among the colpocleisis group (25% vs. 31% P0.0001). Objective recurrence of POP was significantly more common among the VH group (7% vs. 0% and 21% vs. 0% for the anterior and posterior compartments, respectively, P = 0.04).Colpocleisis is associated with faster recovery, lower perioperative morbidity, and higher success rates than VH and should be considered for frail and elderly patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pelvic organ prolapse surgery is performed via native tissue or graft augmented repair. Graft augmentation with synthetic mesh was introduced to improve long-term surgical outcomes compared with vaginal native tissue repairs. Vaginal hysteropexy has recently become increasingly popular due to patient preference and an improved morbidity profile over hysterectomy, while maintaining comparable efficacy. As long-term outcomes remain unanswered, mesh augmentation to vaginal hysteropexy has sought to improve efficacy while minimizing complications. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies have demonstrated superiority of vaginal mesh hysteropexy to vaginal hysterectomy with native tissue vault suspension. Short-term follow-up of vaginal mesh hysteropexy has also demonstrated lower blood loss and operative time with improved vaginal length compared with hysterectomy. Mesh exposure rates across studies were low and comparable to those of abdominally placed prolapse mesh. SUMMARY Vaginal mesh hysteropexy is a comparably well tolerated and effective surgical treatment option for women with uterovaginal prolapse. Although vaginal mesh kits are not commercially available, this procedure may be a viable treatment option in select patients.

Study Objective To compare clinical and anatomic outcomes as well as patient satisfaction in women undergoing vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA) and transvaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VUSLS) for the treatment of apical prolapse. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery unit at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. Patients Women with apical prolapse who underwent either vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system (uterine-preserving as well as after previous hysterectomy) or VUSLS from 2010 to 2019. Excluded were women with 1 month or less of follow-up. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results A total of 164 women were included in the study: 112 women underwent VUSLS, and 52 underwent colposuspension using the Uphold Lite mesh system. Age, body mass index, maximal birth weight, comorbidity rates, and pelvic organ prolapse severity were similar between the groups. The clinical cure rate was similarly high in both groups, with 91.1% in the women who underwent VUSLS and 88.5% in those in the Uphold Lite group (p = .60). No differences were noted between the groups with regard to anatomic cure rate or composite outcome success rate (73.9% vs 76.0%, p = .77 and 70.3% vs 74.0%, p = .63, in the VUSLS and Uphold Lite groups, respectively). An advantage was noted in the VUSLS group with regard to patient satisfaction with 98.1% of the women stating that their condition was very much better (Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire: A) or much better (Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire: B) compared with 83.9% of the women in the Uphold Lite group (p = .023). In an attempt to assess the association between different variables and the composite outcome, a multivariate analysis was performed in which increased body mass index, menopausal status, and increased preoperative genital hiatus were found to decrease composite outcome success. Conclusion Vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system and VUSLS for the treatment of apical prolapse have comparable results with high clinical success rates.

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To analyze the public data of hysterectomies performed in the only health system in the city of São Paulo between 2008 and 2018. METHODS: The following public health system data were extracted and analyzed: age, technique, number of surgeries, mortality during hospitalization, length of stay in the establishment (days), and amounts paid by the public network. RESULTS: A total of 20,119 procedures were analyzed. The most prevalent procedure was total hysterectomy (43.2%), followed by vaginal hysterectomy (26.7%), subtotal hysterectomy (24.3%), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (5.8%). Early discharge (hospital stay of up to 1 day) was more prevalent in cases of vaginal hysterectomy (39%). We observed a marked downward trend in the number of total hysterectomies. Total hysterectomy was the most expensive procedure; no significant difference was noted in the cost of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy. We noticed a trend of rising costs over the years. The most frequent hospital admission code was that of leiomyoma of the uterus in cases of total, subtotal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Despite the decrease in the number of hysterectomies over the 11-year study period in São Paulo, it remains in high demand mainly for the treatment of uterine leiomyomatosis. Laparoscopic hysterectomy has been gaining ground and showed a slightly upward trend with a shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy required less financial support from the health system than open surgery.

Apical suspension, including uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF), is the standard of care at vaginal hysterectomy. Although the equivalence of anatomic and clinical outcomes after USLS and SSLF is established, comparing surgical complications specific to patients undergoing concurrent vaginal hysterectomy further informs decision making regarding operative approach.This study aims to compare complications in the first 30 days after surgery in patients undergoing USLS and SSLF at vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.This retrospective, population-based cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients undergoing USLS or SSLF at vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of surgical complications excluding urinary tract infection (UTI). Odds of the primary outcome, readmission, reoperation, and UTI were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression models.Of 10,210 eligible patients, 7,127 patients underwent USLS and 3,083 patients underwent SSLF. Uterosacral ligament suspension was associated with a 25% lower odds of the composite complication outcome that excluded UTI compared with SSLF (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.90). Urinary tract infection was the most common complication and occurred more commonly in patients undergoing USLS (6.5% vs 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.56). There was no significant difference in Clavien-Dindo class IV complications, readmission, or reoperation between approaches.Uterosacral ligament suspension was associated with a lower odds of complications excluding UTI compared with SSLF. Urinary tract infection was more common among patients having USLS. The odds of serious complications, readmission, and reoperation were low and comparable between groups.

Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy are considered the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (ECC). Minimal Invasive approach to this surgery has been debated after the publication of a recent prospective randomized trial (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer, LACC trial). It demonstrated poorer oncological outcomes for Minimal Invasive Surgery in ECC. However, the reasons are still an open debate. Laparo-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVRH) seems to be a logical option to Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy (ARH). This meta-analysis has the aim to prove it.Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, the Pubmed database and Scopus database were systematically searched in January 2022 since early first publications. No limitation of the country was made. Only English article were considered. The studies containing data about Disease-free Survival (DFS) and/or Overall Survival (OS) and/or Recurrence Rate (RcR) were included.19 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. 9 comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning surgical approach (Laparo-Assisted Vaginal Radical Hysterectomy) and compared with ARH Oncological outcomes such as DFS and OS were considered. 3196 patiets were included for the review. Meta-analysis of 1988 0f them highlighted a non-statistic significant difference between LARVH and ARH (RR 0.8 [95% CI 0.55-1.16] p = 0.24; ILARVH does not appear to affect DFS and OS in ECC patients. The proposed results seem to be comparable with the open approach group of the LACC trial, which today represents the reference standard for the treatment of this pathology. More studies will be needed to test the safety and efficacy of LARVH in the ECC.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare body image and sexual activity and function changes up to 3 years after sacrospinous ligament fixation with t graft hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (hysterectomy). METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized trial of women undergoing prolapse repair with mesh hysteropexy versus hysterectomy. Women were masked to intervention. The modified Body Image Scale (BIS), sexual activity status and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) scores were reported at baseline and 1.5, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgery. We compared mean BIS and PISQ-IR scores, the proportion of women whose BIS scores met a distribution-based estimate of the minimally important difference (MID), and sexual activity status. Comparisons were analyzed with linear and logistic repeated measures models adjusted for site, intervention, visit, and intervention by visit interaction. RESULTS: Eighty-eight women underwent mesh hysteropexy; 87 underwent hysterectomy. Women were similar in baseline characteristics: Mean age 65.9 +/− 7.3 years and most had stage III or IV prolapse (81%). Baseline mean BIS scores were not significantly different, ,improved in both groups by 1.5 months and were sustained through 36 months with no differences between groups (all p>0.05). The estimated BIS MID was 3; and by 36 months, more women in the mesh hysteropexy group achieved the MID than in the hysterectomy group (62% vs 44%, p=0.04). The makeup of the sexually active cohort changed throughout the study, making function comparisons difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Body image improves following prolapse surgery whether or not hysterectomy is performed or transvaginal mesh is used at the time of repair; sexual activity status changes over time following prolapse surgery.

Objectives There is conflicting research on the effect of therapeutic suggestion in the perioperative period. This study systematically compared subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, urinary and bowel function, and global perception of symptomatic improvement between participants receiving perioperative therapeutic suggestion versus routine perioperative care during minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery. Methods This was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of participants undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and concomitant prolapse repairs. The intervention group received perioperative therapeutic suggestion, whereas the control group did not. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and analgesic use. Secondary outcomes included a postoperative nausea and vomiting scale, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-Short Form 20, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale, and time to return of bowel and bladder function. Results Sixteen participants were randomized to each group. Final analysis included 15 intervention and 14 control participants. Overall measures of postoperative pain and analgesic use were low across all participants without a significant difference between intervention and control groups (opioid: 52.5; interquartile range [IQR], 25.5-58.9 vs 66 IQR, 7.3-125.8; morphine milligram equivalents; P = 0.64; acetaminophen: 2225 mg; IQR, 500-2600 mg vs 2800 mg; IQR, 650-4775 mg; P = 0.38). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes of urinary symptoms, bowel function, and subjective improvement of prolapse symptoms. Conclusions No differences in postoperative pain, analgesic use, return of bowel and bladder function, or pelvic organ prolapse symptoms were noted in participants receiving perioperative therapeutic suggestion versus routine perioperative care.

Objective: To compare urodynamic changes before and after hysterectomy (laparoscopic vs. vaginal approach) for benign gynecological diseases.Patients and methods: A total of 90 women with a mean age of 56.36-years were enrolled in this study between August 2019 and April 2021. They were divided into two equal groups(45 patients each). Group, I had a vaginal hysterectomy, and Group II had a laparoscopic hysterectomy. All patients were assessed clinically using ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaire and a uro-dynamic study before and six months after surgery. Results: Both vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy did not significantly change the maximum flow rate, voiding time, and average flow rate. The increase in residual urine volume in group I was not significant (p = 0.129), as was in Group II(p = 0.217). All the modifications, however, were within permis-sible limits. According to the cystometry result, volume at initial sensation rose in both groups after surgery, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.364). After both forms of hysterecto-my, maximum bladder capacity did not vary considerably. Preoperatively, all study participants exhibited no overactivity of the detrusor muscle; nevertheless, following surgery, overac-tivity was noted in 9 patients after vaginal hysterectomy com-pared to three patients after laparoscopic hysterectomy, and all the alterations were within a clinically acceptable range. In addition, the ICIQ-FLUTS score was not significantly different between the study groups. Conclusions: According to the urodynamic study, hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions, whether vaginal or laparoscopic did not adversely affect urinary bladder function.

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of preemptive local analgesia (LA) on postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing VH.A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov ) was performed for articles published up to January 2021. All randomized controlled trials that presented outcomes of patients who underwent VH due to pelvic floor disorders or other benign gynecological disorders and received local infiltration analgesia were finally included.A total of 5 studies with 277 women (138 LA group vs 199 no-LA group) who underwent a VH were included in the present meta-analysis. Mean pain scores at both 30 minutes to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (220 patients: mean difference [MD], -1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -0.74; P = 0.0007; and 220 patients: MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.28 to 1.09; P0.00001, respectively). Morphine/narcotic opioid-based consumption up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (197 patients MD, -9.47 mg; 95% CI, -16.51 to -2.43; P = 0.008).The use of preemptive LA during VH seems to be beneficial especially with regard to short-term postoperative pain and opioid use. However, further studies are needed to identify the optimal anesthetic regimen, the dosage, and sites of application aiming to achieve the optimal benefit in the postoperative management.

Transvaginal repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) often involves vaginal hysterectomy (VH) followed by fixation of the vaginal vault to either the sacrospinous or the uterosacral ligaments. To date, only a few studies have compared the results of these two vaginal vault fixation techniques.To compare short and medium-term results and complications of sacrospinous versus high uterosacral ligament fixation of the vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of advanced POP.This was a retrospective study obtaining data from the medical records of patients who underwent transvaginal repair of advanced POP with a VH in our institution between the years 2006 and 2017. Demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative complications and medium-term follow-up data were documented for all patients.We identified 118 women who underwent uterosacral and 46 women who underwent sacrospinous vaginal vault fixation. The overall incidence of perioperative complications was significantly lower in the sacrospinous as compared to the uterosacral fixation group (17.8% vs. 39.3%, P = 0.01). Medium term recurrence rates of moderate to severe POP were similar in both groups (33.3% vs. 35.8%). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the rates of postoperative urinary or gastrointestinal symptoms.Sacrospinous fixation of the vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy was found to involve a lower rate of perioperative complications as compared to uterosacral ligament fixation. However, the rates of prolapse recurrence and the incidence of postoperative urinary tract and gastrointestinal symptoms were found to be similar in both groups.According to the current study, it is not possible to determine a clear superiority for one method of vaginal vault fixation over the other. Both surgical techniques are acceptable, involve reasonable success rates and relatively low postoperative complication rates.

Lateral occlusion prior to TLH has been suggested to reduce perioperative bleeding, operative time, and hospital stay. Furthermore, reducing the amount of bleeding and the length of the operation may affect parameters such as postoperative pain and the number of patients with postoperative vaginal vault hematoma.This RCT was conducted at a single center at Odense University Hospital in Denmark. Between February 2016 and February 2019, a total of 58 patients undergoing TLH and bilateral salpingectomy for benign cases were recruited to the study.The mean operating time was significantly longer in the LA group with a mean difference between the two groups of six minutes. No other discrepancy regarding the primary outcomes was observed between the two groups. Total blood loss was similar in the two groups as well as the average hospital stay and the VAS score during the first seven days. 93% of the patients were discharged from the hospital within the first 24 h postoperatively.This RCT demonstrates that lateral occlusion of the uterine artery prior to TLH does not improve outcome for the patients and should therefore not be used as a standard procedure.

Objectives: Vaginal hysterectomy is one of the oldest but still rarely used minimally invasive techniques. Although new surgical methods making use of robots in laparoscopy have been introduced recently, when compared with vaginal hysterectomy, these approaches do not offer significant benefits for the patients and the doctors operating on them. The purpose of this study was a thorough analysis of vaginal removal of non-prolapsed uterus with benign pathology. Material and methods: The analysis included data of 1148 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy in the Clinic of Surgical, Endoscopic and Oncological Gynecology between 2002 and 2014. A group of patients operated on were assessed, and data from the surgeries were obtained paying attention to such aspects as the operating time, the evaluation of morphotic blood elements, the type of perioperative complications, and the length of postoperative hospital stay. Additionally, all vaginal hysterectomies were divided into groups and analyzed taking into consideration uterus weight. Results: Vaginal hysterectomy was performed even in cases of earlier abdominal surgeries. The mean operating time was and 69.51 ± 28.32 minutes. The patients left hospital after 2.93 days on average. The mean uterus weight was 179.69 ± 113.54 g. What is important, the enlarged uterus was not a significant obstacle during the surgery. In case of heavy uteri of more than 580g, when the fundus of the uterus reached above the navel, the attention was drawn to the need for careful preparatory procedures, which reduced the number of perioperative complications and thus had a significant influence on the length of the operation (p = 0.0170). Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy is an operating technique which is relatively easy to perform and safe for the patients because it involves a slight decrease of morphotic blood elements and a small number of mid- and postoperative complications. Vaginal hysterectomy is not a contraindication in case of large uteri, even those of more than 1000 g; however, in such cases, a longer operating time and an increased number of perioperative complications must be taken into consideration.

STUDY OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to provide a contemporary description of hysterectomy practice and temporal trends in Canada. DESIGN A national whole-population retrospective analysis of data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. SETTING Canada. PATIENTS All women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indication from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2017, in Canada. INTERVENTIONS Hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 369 520 hysterectomies were performed in Canada during the 10-year period, during which the hysterectomy rate decreased from 313 to 243 per 100 000 women. The proportion of abdominal hysterectomies decreased (59.5% to 36.9%), laparoscopic hysterectomies increased (10.8% to 38.6%), and vaginal hysterectomies decreased (29.7% to 24.5%), whereas the national technicity index increased from 40.5% to 63.1% (p