1. Duration of adenosine-induced myocardial hyperaemia: insights from quantitative 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
- Author
-
Garefa C, Sager DF, Heiniger PS, Markendorf S, Albertini T, Jurisic S, Gajic M, Gebhard C, Benz DC, Pazhenkottil AP, Giannopoulos AA, Kaufmann PA, Slomka PJ, and Buechel RR
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Aged, Hyperemia chemically induced, Hyperemia diagnostic imaging, Coronary Circulation drug effects, Coronary Circulation physiology, Time Factors, Exercise Test, Cohort Studies, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging methods, Adenosine administration & dosage, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Nitrogen Radioisotopes, Ammonia, Vasodilator Agents
- Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to assess the impact of adenosine on quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) in a rapid stress-rest protocol compared with a rest-stress protocol using 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and to gain insights into the time dependency of such effects., Methods and Results: Quantitative MBF at rest (rMBF) and during adenosine-induced stress (sMBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were obtained from 331 retrospectively identified patients who underwent 13N-ammonia PET MPI for suspected chronic coronary syndrome and who all exhibited no perfusion defects. Of these, 146 (44.1%) underwent a rapid stress-rest protocol with a time interval (Δtstress-rest) of 20 ± 4 min between adenosine infusion offset and rest imaging, as per clinical routine. The remaining 185 (55.9%) patients underwent a rest-stress protocol and served as the reference. Groups did not differ regarding demographics, risk factors, medication, left ventricular function, and calcium scores. rMBF was significantly higher in the stress-rest vs. the rest-stress group [0.80 (interquartile range 0.66-1.00) vs. 0.70 (0.58-0.83) mL·min-1·g-1, P < 0.001], and, as sMBF was identical between groups [2.52 (2.20-2.96) vs. 2.50 (1.96-3.11), P = 0.347], MFR was significantly lower in the stress-rest group [3.07 (2.43-3.88) vs. 3.50 (2.63-4.10), P = 0.007]. There was a weak correlation between Δtstress-rest and rMBF (r = -0.259, P = 0.002) and between Δtstress-rest and MFR (r = 0.163, P = 0.049), and the proportion of patients with abnormally high rMBF was significantly decreasing with increasing Δtstress-rest., Conclusion: Intravenously applied adenosine induces a long-lasting hyperaemic effect on the myocardium. Consequently, rapid stress-rest protocols could lead to an overestimation of rMBF and an underestimation of MFR., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF