1. Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer
- Author
-
Seok-Soo Byun, Hak Jong Lee, Sung Kyu Hong, Sung Il Hwang, Gheeyoung Choe, Joongyub Lee, Hyungwoo Ahn, Sangchul Lee, and Hyoung Sim Suh
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Prostate ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Prostatectomy ,Reproducibility ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Ultrasound ,Capsule ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Reproducibility of Results ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,ROC Curve ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Adenocarcinoma ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
To validate how established markers of extraprostatic extension (EPE) are applied to anterior prostate cancers (APCs), and to investigate other novel markers if available. Among 614 histopathologically confirmed APCs from 2011 to 2016, 221 lesions with PiRADS (verion 2) scores ≥ 4 on 3-T multi-parametric MRI were analyzed retrospectively. Two radiologists independently assessed capsular morphology qualitatively with 5-point scale (normal, thinning, bulging, loss, extracapsular disease), and capsule contact length (arc), tumor dimension, and their ratio (arc-dimension ratio) quantitatively. Reproducibility in measurement was assessed with κ and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regression analysis was done to find meaningful indicators of EPE. Diagnostic performance of markers was compared to one another with generalized linear model and multi-reader multi-case ROC analysis. Reproducibility was moderate to substantial (κ 0.45–0.73) for qualitative, and moderate to almost perfect (ICC 0.50–0.87) for quantitative features of EPE. Capsular morphology (odds ratio [OR] 1.818), capsule contact length (OR 1.115), tumor dimension (OR 1.035), and arc-dimension ratio (OR 1.846) were independently associated with EPE (p ≤ 0.019). Capsular bulging and capsule contact length of 10 mm as thresholds of EPE demonstrated sensitivity/specificity of 0.58/0.85 and 0.77/0.68, respectively. Capsule contact length yielded greatest AUC (0.784), followed by capsular morphology (0.778), arc-dimension ratio (0.749), and tumor dimension (0.741). Diagnostic performance of capsular morphology, capsule contact length, and arc-dimension ratio was comparable in predicting EPE. Existing markers of EPE applicable regardless of locations of tumors apply similarly to APCs. Arc-dimension ratio may be a novel marker of EPE of APCs. • Existing imaging markers of extraprostatic extension (EPE) which have been applied regardless of locations of tumors are reflected similarly to anterior prostate cancers (APCs). • Measuring tumor dimension without capsular assessment may result in insufficient pre-operative prediction of EPE of APCs. • Arc-dimension ratio (capsule contact length divided by tumor dimension) exhibited highest OR and comparable performance to existing features in predicting EPE of APCs.
- Published
- 2019