Search

OBJECTIVES: Quantitative MRI techniques such as T2 and T1$\rho$ mapping are beneficial in evaluating cartilage and meniscus. We aimed to evaluate the MIXTURE (Multi-Interleaved X-prepared Turbo-Spin Echo with IntUitive RElaxometry) sequences that provide morphologic images with clinical turbo spin-echo (TSE) contrasts and additional parameter maps versus reference TSE sequences in an in-situ model of human cartilage defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively, standardized cartilage defects of 8mm, 5mm, and 3mm diameter were created in the lateral femora of 10 human cadaveric knee specimens (81$\pm$10 years, nine male/one female). Using a clinical 3T MRI scanner and knee coil, MIXTURE sequences combining (i) proton-density weighted fat-saturated (PD-w FS) images and T2 maps and (ii) T1-weighted images and T1$\rho$ maps were acquired before and after defect creation, alongside the corresponding 2D TSE and 3D TSE reference sequences. Defect delineability, bone texture, and cartilage relaxation times were quantified. Inter-sequence comparisons were made using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Overall, defect delineability and texture features were not significantly different between the MIXTURE and reference sequences. After defect creation, relaxation times increased significantly in the central femur (for T2) and all regions combined (for T1$\rho$). CONCLUSION: MIXTURE sequences permit time-efficient simultaneous morphologic and quantitative joint assessment based on clinical image contrasts. While providing T2 or T1$\rho$ maps in clinically feasible scan time, morphologic image features, i.e., cartilage defect delineability and bone texture, were comparable between MIXTURE and corresponding reference sequences., Comment: 12 pages (main body), 3 tables, 6 figures

Introduction: Quantitative MRI techniques such as T2 and T1\r{ho} mapping are beneficial in evaluating knee joint pathologies; however, long acquisition times limit their clinical adoption. MIXTURE (Multi-Interleaved X-prepared Turbo-Spin Echo with IntUitive RElaxometry) provides a versatile turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence platform for simultaneous morphologic and quantitative joint imaging yet lacks comparative evaluation in basic and translational research contexts. Methods: Two MIXTURE sequences were designed along clinical requirements: (i) MIX1, combining proton density (PD)-weighted fat-saturated (FS) images and quantitative T2 mapping (acquisition time: 4:59 min), and (ii) MIX2, combining T1-weighted images with quantitative T1\r{ho} mapping (6:38 min). MIXTURE sequences and their reference 2D and 3D TSE counterparts were acquired from ten human cadaveric knee joints using a clinical 3T MRI scanner and knee coil. Contrast, contrast-to-noise ratios, and coefficients of variation were comparatively evaluated using parametric tests. Clinical radiologists (n=3) assessed diagnostic quality as a function of sequence and anatomic structure using 5-point Likert scales and ordinal regression. The significance level was set to {\alpha}=0.01. Results: MIX1 and MIX2 had at least equal diagnostic quality compared to the 2D and 3D TSE sequences of the same image weighting. Contrast, contrast-to-noise ratios, and coefficients of variation were largely similar for the PD-weighted FS and T1-weighted images. Discussion: In clinically feasible scan times, the MIXTURE sequence platform yields (i) morphologic images of diagnostic quality and adjustable TSE-based contrasts and (ii) quantitative parameter mapping with additional insights on soft tissue composition and ultrastructure., Comment: 13 pages (main text), 7 figures, 3 tables

Detecting misleading patterns in automated diagnostic assistance systems, such as those powered by Artificial Intelligence, is critical to ensuring their reliability, particularly in healthcare. Current techniques for evaluating deep learning models cannot visualize confounding factors at a diagnostic level. Here, we propose a self-conditioned diffusion model termed DiffChest and train it on a dataset of 515,704 chest radiographs from 194,956 patients from multiple healthcare centers in the United States and Europe. DiffChest explains classifications on a patient-specific level and visualizes the confounding factors that may mislead the model. We found high inter-reader agreement when evaluating DiffChest's capability to identify treatment-related confounders, with Fleiss' Kappa values of 0.8 or higher across most imaging findings. Confounders were accurately captured with 11.1% to 100% prevalence rates. Furthermore, our pretraining process optimized the model to capture the most relevant information from the input radiographs. DiffChest achieved excellent diagnostic accuracy when diagnosing 11 chest conditions, such as pleural effusion and cardiac insufficiency, and at least sufficient diagnostic accuracy for the remaining conditions. Our findings highlight the potential of pretraining based on diffusion models in medical image classification, specifically in providing insights into confounding factors and model robustness.