Search

Background: A previous prospective multicenter study revealed the change of the oncologists' chemotherapy advice due to the 70-Gene signature (GS) test result in half of the estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) invasive early-stage breast cancer patients with disputable chemotherapy indication. This resulted in less patients receiving chemotherapy. This study aims to complement these results by the 7-year oncological outcomes according to the 70-GS test result and the oncologists' pre-test advice., Methods: Patients operated for early-stage ER+ breast cancer with disputable chemotherapy indication, had been prospectively included between 2013 and 2015. Oncologists were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant chemotherapy before deployment of the 70-GS test. Information on adjuvant systemic treatment and oncological outcome was obtained through active follow-up by data managers of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint of this study was distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) according to the genomic risk. Exploratory analyses were done to evaluate DMFS in relation to the oncologists' pre-test advice., Results: After a median follow-up of 7 years, distant metastases were diagnosed in 23 of the 606 patients (3.8%) and 36 (5.9%) patients had died. The DMFS rate for the 357 70-GS genomic low-risk patients was 94.2% (95% CI 91.2-96.2) and 89.1% for the 249 genomic high-risk patients (95% CI 84.3-92.4). Of the low-risk patients 3% had received chemotherapy compared to 80% of the high-risk patients. For the subgroups based on the pre-test oncologists' advice (no chemotherapy/chemotherapy/unsure) there were no clinically relevant differences in DMFS (89.8, 93.2 and 92.0%, respectively), while comparable proportions of patients had received chemotherapy., Conclusions: In patients with early-stage ER+ breast cancer with a disputable chemotherapy indication it is sensible to deploy the 70-GS to better select patients for adjuvant chemotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Besides second-generation hormone therapy (sHT), upfront docetaxel along with androgen deprivation therapy is the current standard of care for metastasized hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Evidence on second-line therapy upon progression on chemohormonal treatment outside clinical trials is scarce., Objective: To comparatively assess the efficacy of subsequent therapy after upfront docetaxel in mHSPC in a real-world setting., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis. Males with mHSPC on androgen-deprivation therapy progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after upfront docetaxel., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and time to progression 2 (TTP2) were assessed. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for univariate comparison between the sHT and non-sHT (other therapies) cohorts. Median time to event was tested by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis regression was performed with the Cox proportional-hazard model., Results and Limitations: Sixty-five patients were included in the final analysis. Median TTP2 was 20 mo, median PFS2 was 29 mo, and median OS was not reached; sHT was an independent predictor of favorable PFS2 as compared with non-sHT. Time to CRPC was also confirmed to be the strongest predictor for novel endpoints PFS2 and TTP2. Time to CRPC >18 mo conferred advantage to sHT over non-sHT in relation to PFS2 and OS. Second-line therapies were well tolerated. The analysis is prone to inherent flaws and biases due to its retrospective nature., Conclusions: In real-world patients progressing after upfront docetaxel, sHT is independently associated with favorable PFS2 favoring drug class switch. Longer time to CRPC predicts strongly for superior PFS2 and TTP2. Further prospective research is warranted in order to guide treatment sequencing and improve outcomes and quality of life of males with metastasized prostate cancer., Patient Summary: We analyzed the efficacy of second-line therapy after docetaxel in hormone-dependent metastatic prostate cancer. Novel hormone therapy appears to be a preferable option for deferring progression optimally. Larger patient databases are eagerly awaited., (Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Docetaxel (D) or secondary hormonal therapy (SHT) each combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) represent possible treatment options in males with metastasized hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Real-world data comparing different protocols are lacking yet. Thus, our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA)+ADT versus D+ADT in mHSPC., Methods: In a retrospective multicenter analysis including males with mHSPC treated with either of the aforementioned protocols, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival 1 (PFS1), and progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) were assessed for both cohorts. Median time to event was tested by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The Cox-proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate regression analyses., Results: Overall, 196 patients were included. The AA+ADT cohort had a longer PFS1 in the log-rank testing (23 vs. 13 mos., p < 0.001), a longer PFS2 (48 vs. 33 mos., p = 0.006), and longer OS (80 vs. 61 mos., p = 0.040). In the multivariate analyses AA+ADT outperformed D+ADT in terms of PFS1 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.183-0.623; p = 0.001) and PFS2 (HR = 0.33 95% CI = 0.128-0.827; p = 0.018), respectively, while OS and toxicity rate were similar between both groups., Conclusions: AA+ADT is mainly associated with a similar efficacy and overall toxicity rate as D+ADT. Further prospective research is required for validation of the clinical value of the observed benefit of AA+ADT for progression-free end-points., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is positively associated with the quality of care, but its impact on emotional functioning is ambiguous. This study investigated the association between perceptions of ACP involvement and emotional functioning in patients with advanced cancer., Methods: This study analyzed baseline data of 1,001 patients of the eQuiPe study, a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, observational study on quality of care and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer in the Netherlands. Patients with metastatic solid cancer were asked to participate between November 2017 and January 2020. Patients' perceptions of ACP involvement were measured by three self-administered statements. Emotional functioning was measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30. A linear multivariable regression analysis was performed while taking gender, age, migrant background, education, marital status, and symptom burden into account., Results: The majority of patients (87%) reported that they were as much involved as they wanted to be in decisions about their future medical treatment and care. Most patients felt that their relatives (81%) and physicians (75%) were familiar with their preferences for future medical treatment and care. A positive association was found between patients' perceptions of ACP involvement and their emotional functioning (b=0.162, p<0.001, 95%CI[0.095;0.229]) while controlling for relevant confounders., Conclusions: Perceptions of involvement in ACP are positively associated with emotional functioning in patients with advanced cancer. Future studies are needed to further investigate the effect of ACP on emotional functioning., Trial Registration Number: NTR6584 Date of registration: 30 June 2017 IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patients' emotional functioning might improve from routine discussions regarding goals of future care. Therefore, integration of ACP into palliative might be promising.

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR mCRC) benefit from immunotherapy. Interpretation of the single-arm immunotherapy trials is complicated by insignificant survival data during systemic non-immunotherapy. We present survival data on a large, comprehensive cohort of dMMR mCRC patients, treated with or without systemic non-immunotherapy., Methods: Two hundred and eighty-one dMMR mCRC patients (n = 54 from three prospective Phase 3 CAIRO trials; n = 227 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry). Overall survival was analysed from diagnosis of mCRC (OS), from initiation of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) systemic treatment. Cox regression analysis examined prognostic factors. As comparison for OS 2746 MMR proficient mCRC patients were identified., Results: Of 281 dMMR patients, 62% received first-line and 26% second-line treatment. Median OS was 16.0 months (13.8-19.6) with antitumour therapy and 2.5 months (1.8-3.5) in untreated patients. OS1 was 12.8 months (10.7-15.2) and OS2 6.2 months (5.4-8.9) in treated dMMR patients. Treated dMMR patients had a 7.6-month shorter median OS than pMMR patients., Conclusion: Available data from immunotherapy trials lack a control arm with standard systemic treatment. Given the poor outcome compared to the immunotherapy results, our data strongly suggest a survival benefit of immunotherapy in dMMR mCRC patients.

Aim: Adjuvant chemotherapy treatment of women with breast cancer is frequently complicated by toxic side-effects, resulting in dose reduction and delay. In Dutch guidelines, a relative dose intensity (RDI) of at least 85% is recommended for optimal treatment. The aim was to investigate predictors of low RDI and its effect on prognosis., Methods: All patients treated in the St. Antonius Hospital with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer between 2008 and 2013 were included (N = 605). RDI was calculated for each single chemotherapeutic agent and for chemotherapy regimens in total. Incidence and causes of RDI <85% were studied, as well as the effect of RDI on prognosis., Results: About 10% of 605 patients had RDIs <85%. Predictive factors included age, episodes of febrile neutropenia and grade III or IV hypersensitivity reaction to taxanes. Other adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy, did not affect RDI. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in the 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclofosfamide, docetaxel (FEC-D) protocol was 24% and therefore was above the threshold set by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer for primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis. No relationship between RDI and (disease-free) survival was found with a median follow-up of 38 months. Apart from the stage of disease, obesity is a predictor of poor outcome., Conclusions: RDI <85% is predicted by patients' age, febrile neutropenia and hypersensitivity reactions to taxanes. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in FEC-D treatment indicates primary prophylaxis with G-CSF following docetaxel treatment. No relationship was found between RDI and (disease-free) survival, but longer follow-up is needed., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)