Search

Reduction–oxidation (redox) chemistry plays a vital role in human homeostasis. These reactions play critical roles in energy generation, as part of innate immunity, and in the generation of secondary messengers with various functions such as cell cycle progression or the release of neurotransmitters. Despite this cornerstone role, if left unchecked, the body can overproduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) or reactive nitrogen species (RNS). When these overwhelm endogenous antioxidant systems, oxidative stress (OS) occurs. In neonates, OS has been associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), leukomalacia, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Given its broad spectrum of effects, research has started to examine whether OS plays a role in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). In this paper, we will discuss the basics of redox chemistry and how the human body keeps these in check. We will then discuss what happens when these go awry, focusing mostly on NEC in neonates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains one of the highest causes of mortality and of acute and long-term morbidity in premature infants. Multiple factors are involved in the pathophysiology of NEC including the immaturity of the immune system and the complex changing composition of the intestinal microbiome. This is compounded by the fact that the premature infant should ideally still be a developing fetus and has an immature intestinal tract. Because these complexities are beyond the scope of studies in single-cell cultures, animal models are absolutely essential to understand the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of NEC and the effects of inflammation on the immature intestinal tract. To this end, investigators have utilized many different species (e.g., rats, mice, rabbits, quails, piglets, and non-human primates) and conditions to develop models of NEC. Each animal has distinct advantages and drawbacks related to its preterm viability, body size, genetic variability, and cost. The choice of animal model is strongly influenced by the scientific question being addressed. While no model perfectly mimics human NEC, each has greatly improved our understanding of disease. Examples of recent discoveries in NEC pathogenesis and prevention underscore the importance of continued animal research in NEC.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) affects up to 10% of premature infants, has a mortality of 30%, and can leave surviving patients with significant morbidity. Neuregulin-4 (NRG4) is an ErbB4-specific ligand that promotes epithelial cell survival. Thus, this pathway could be protective in diseases such as NEC, in which epithelial cell death is a major pathologic feature. We sought to determine whether NRG4-ErbB4 signaling is protective in experimental NEC. NRG4 was used i) in the newborn rat formula feeding/hypoxia model; ii) in a recently developed model in which 14- to 16-day-old mice are injected with dithizone to induce Paneth cell loss, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae infection to induce intestinal injury; and iii) in bacterially infected IEC-6 cells in vitro. NRG4 reduced NEC incidence and severity in the formula feed/hypoxia rat model. It also reduced Paneth cell ablation-induced NEC and prevented dithizone-induced Paneth cell loss in mice. In vitro, cultured ErbB4(-/-) ileal epithelial enteroids had reduced Paneth cell markers and were highly sensitive to inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, NRG4 blocked, through a Src-dependent pathway, Cronobacter muytjensii-induced IEC-6 cell apoptosis. The potential clinical relevance of these findings was demonstrated by the observation that NRG4 and its receptor ErbB4 are present in human breast milk and developing human intestine, respectively. Thus, NRG4-ErbB4 signaling may be a novel pathway for therapeutic intervention or prevention in NEC.

Background: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the leading gastrointestinal cause of death of premature neonates. NEC is associated with prematurity, a hyperinflammatory response, and dysregulation of intestinal barrier function. We hypothesize that patients with NEC will have, and continue to have after recovery, an increased hyperinflammatory intestinal response compared to those patients without NEC.Methods: Neonates with NEC, those that have recovered from NEC, and those without NEC undergoing intestinal resections had specimens collected and snap frozen or generated into enteroids. The enteroids were treated with 100ug/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and subjected to 24 hr of hypoxia together, then compared with untreated controls. Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) were evaluated via RT-qPCR and ELISA to measure inflammatory response. ANOVA determined statistical significance (p< 0.05).Results: There was no difference in inflammatory markers in recovered NEC tissue compared to non-NEC tissue on RTqPCR (p=0.701 TNF-α and 0.861 IL-8). However, recovered NEC enteroids demonstrate elevated levels of inflammatory markers after treatment compared to non-NEC enteroids after treatment on RTqPCR (p=0.0485 TNF-α, p=0.0057 IL-8) and ELISA (p=0.0354 TNF-α, p=0.0011 IL-8). Recovered NEC enteroids that underwent treatment demonstrated increased inflammatory markers compared to recovered NEC enteroids without treatment on RTqPCR (p=0.0045 TNF-α, p=0.0002 IL-8) and ELISA (p=0.034 TNF-α, p=0.0002 IL-8) suggesting a heightened inflammatory response to a second hit.Conclusion: Intestinal tissue resected from neonates with NEC has an elevated hyperinflammatory response compared to neonates recovered from NEC and neonates without NEC. Enteroids generated from patients that have recovered from NEC have a heightened inflammatory response in response to NEC inducing stimuli compared to controls. This tendency towards an increased hyperinflammatory state may be correlated with an infant's proclivity to develop NEC and demonstrates the significance of a second hit on this tissue creating a heightened inflammatory response. This could be correlated with the impact and trajectory of an illness post recovery from NEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The function of the intestinal barrier is partially dependent on host maturity and the colonization patterns of the microbiome to which it is exposed. Premature birth and stressors of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-related support (e.g., antibiotics, steroids, etc.) can alter the host internal environment resulting in changes in the intestinal barrier. Pathogenic microbial proliferation and breach of the immature intestinal barrier are proposed to be crucial steps in the development of neonatal diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis. This article will review the current literature on the intestinal barrier in the neonatal gut, the consequences of microbiome development for this defense system, and how prematurity can influence neonatal susceptibility to gastrointestinal infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]