Search

Purpose: Our purpose was to determine changes in patient-reported hematuria and urinary symptoms after hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) treatment for radiation cystitis (RC). Materials and Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the Multicenter Registry for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Consortium accumulated within a week of beginning and ending HBO2. Measures included the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Hematuria Scale, Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form, and EuroQol Five Dimension Five Level instrument. RTOG hematuria and Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form scores were compared using the sign test. Logistic regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with hematuria improvement. Results: A total of 470 registry patients had RC. The median age, number of HBO2 sessions, and years after radiation were 73 (IQR 12) years, 39 (IQR 10) sessions, and 5 (IQR 8) years, respectively. Eighty-four percent of patients (393/470) had prostate cancer--related radiation. EuroQol Five Dimension Five Level scores improved from 0.83 (IQR 0.14) to 0.85 (IQR 0.22; P < .001. Three hundred seventy patients had complete RTOG hematuria scores that improved from 2 (IQR 2) to 0 (IQR 2; P < .001. Two hundred forty-six patients had complete Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form ratings that decreased from 33.3 (IQR 44) to 22.2 (IQR 33; P < .001). Regression analysis of those with visible hematuria before HBO2 showed lower improvement odds associated with higher HBO2 hematuria scores (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73; P < .01), a smoking history (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92; P [ .03), or a nonprostate cancer history (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10-0.99; P [ .05). Conclusions: HBO2 for RC improved reported hematuria, urinary function, and quality of life. Higher baseline hematuria scores, smoking, and nonprostate cancer history were associated with lower odds of hematuria improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate YouTube content about metoidioplasty on completeness of perioperative information, actionability, understandability, degree of misinformation, quality, and presence of commercial bias., Methods: A YouTube search for "Metoidioplasty" was conducted and the first 100 video results were watched by five independent reviewers. Videos in English <30 minutes in length were included and videos primarily showing surgical footage were excluded. Videos were evaluated between January 2022 and June 2022. Each video was evaluated for presenter demographics, channel/video statistics, and whether it covered topics including anatomy, treatment options, outcomes, procedure risks, and misinformation, and whether it had a clickbait title. Calculated scores for validated DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) metrics were the primary outcome variables used to quantify quality, actionability, and understandability. For PEMAT, a cutoff of 75% was used to differentiate between "poor" versus "good/sufficient." Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess correlations among primary outcome variables and other variables., Results: Of the 79 videos analyzed, 24% (n=19) were of high quality; 99% (n=78) had poor understandability and 100% (n=79%) had poor actionability. Patients/consumers were the most common publisher type (n=71, 90%)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates metoidioplasty content available on YouTube is not comprehensive and is of poor quality, and poor actionability and understandability, demonstrating a clear need for more relevant, accessible, comprehensible, and accurate content.