Search

Your search keyword '"Hultcranz, R."' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Hultcranz, R."
3 results on '"Hultcranz, R."'

1. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative

Author

Kaminski, M.F. (Michal), Thomas-Gibson, S. (Siwan), Bugajski, M. (Marek), Bretthauer, M. (Michael), Rees, C. (Colin), Dekker, E. (Evelien), Hoff, G. (G.), Jover, R. (Rodrigo), Suchanek, S. (Stephan), Ferlitsch, M. (Monika), Anderson, J. (John), Roesch, T. (Thomas), Hultcranz, R. (Rolf), Racz, I. (Istvan), Kuipers, E.J. (Ernst), Garborg, K. (K.), East, J.E., Rupinski, M. (Maciej), Seip, B. (Birgitte), Bennett, C. (Cathy), Senore, C. (Carlo), Minozzi, S. (S.), Bisschops, R. (Raf), Domagk, D. (Dirk), Valori, R.M. (Roland ), Spada, C. (Cristiano), Hassan, C. (Cesare), Dinis-Ribeiro, M. (Ma´rio), Rutter, M.D. (Matthew D), Kaminski, M.F. (Michal), Thomas-Gibson, S. (Siwan), Bugajski, M. (Marek), Bretthauer, M. (Michael), Rees, C. (Colin), Dekker, E. (Evelien), Hoff, G. (G.), Jover, R. (Rodrigo), Suchanek, S. (Stephan), Ferlitsch, M. (Monika), Anderson, J. (John), Roesch, T. (Thomas), Hultcranz, R. (Rolf), Racz, I. (Istvan), Kuipers, E.J. (Ernst), Garborg, K. (K.), East, J.E., Rupinski, M. (Maciej), Seip, B. (Birgitte), Bennett, C. (Cathy), Senore, C. (Carlo), Minozzi, S. (S.), Bisschops, R. (Raf), Domagk, D. (Dirk), Valori, R.M. (Roland ), Spada, C. (Cristiano), Hassan, C. (Cesare), Dinis-Ribeiro, M. (Ma´rio), and Rutter, M.D. (Matthew D)

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, u

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

Author

Kaminski, M. F., Thomas-Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E. J., Garborg, K., East, J. E., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., Bennett, C., Senore, C., Minozzi, S., Bisschops, R., Domagk, D., Valori, R., Spada, Cristiano, Hassan, C., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Rutter, M. D., Spada C. (ORCID:0000-0002-5692-0960), Kaminski, M. F., Thomas-Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E. J., Garborg, K., East, J. E., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., Bennett, C., Senore, C., Minozzi, S., Bisschops, R., Domagk, D., Valori, R., Spada, Cristiano, Hassan, C., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Rutter, M. D., and Spada C. (ORCID:0000-0002-5692-0960)

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 Rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90 %); 2 Cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90 %); 3 Adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25 %); 4 Appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80 %); 5 Complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 Patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 Appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

Published
2017

3. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Author

Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, Hoff G, Jover R, Suchanek S, Ferlitsch M, Anderson J, Roesch T, Hultcranz R, Racz I, Kuipers EJ, Garborg K, East JE, Rupinski M, Seip B, Bennett C, Senore C, Minozzi S, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Spada C, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, and Rutter MD

Subjects
Appointments and Schedules, Cathartics therapeutic use, Cecum, Colonic Polyps surgery, Colonoscopy adverse effects, Humans, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Selection, Postoperative Complications etiology, Time Factors, Adenoma diagnostic imaging, Colonoscopy standards, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Intubation standards, Population Surveillance
Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 Rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90 %); 2  Cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90 %); 3 Adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25 %); 4 Appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80 %); 5 Complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 Patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 Appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results