Search

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant global health challenge due to its poor prognosis and limited therapeutic modalities. Anoikis and ErbB signaling pathways are pivotal in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis, but their relevance in HCC remains insufficiently explored.MethodsThis study evaluates the prognostic significance of anoikis and ErbB signaling pathways in HCC by utilizing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), three additional independent validation cohorts, and an in-house cohort. Advanced bioinformatics analyses and 167 machine learning models based on leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) were used to predict HCC prognosis and assess outcomes of immune-targeted therapies. Additionally, key biological processes of the anoikis and ErbB signaling pathways in HCC were further investigated.ResultsThe single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed a strong correlation between upregulated ErbB signaling in high anoikis-expressing tumors and poor clinical outcomes. The development of the Anoikis-ErbB Related Signature (AERS) using the LASSO + RSF model demonstrated robust predictive capabilities, as validated across multiple patient cohorts, and proved effective in predicting responses to immune-targeted therapies. Further investigation highlighted activated NOTCH signaling pathways and decreased macrophage infiltration was associated with resistance to sorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors, as evidenced by bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq).ConclusionAERS provides a novel tool for clinical prognosis and paves the way for immune-targeted therapeutic approaches, underscoring the potential of integrated molecular profiling in enhancing treatment strategies for HCC.

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is a critical component of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), though patient response varies significantly. The variability in treatment outcomes is partly due to the resistance conferred by cancer stem cells (CSCs) and tumor immune microenvironment (TiME). This study investigates the role of EIF5A in radiotherapy response and its impact on the CSCs and TiME.MethodsPredictive models for preoperative radiotherapy (preRT) response were developed using machine learning, identifying EIF5A as a key gene associated with radioresistance. EIF5A expression was analyzed via bulk RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). Functional assays and in vivo experiments validated EIF5A’s role in radioresistance and TiME modulation.ResultsEIF5A was significantly upregulated in radioresistant colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues. EIF5A knockdown in CRC cell lines reduced cell viability, migration, and invasion after radiation, and increased radiation-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, EIF5A promoted cancer stem cell (CSC) characteristics through the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Analysis of the TiME revealed that the radiation-resistant group had an immune-desert phenotype, characterized by low immune cell infiltration. In vivo experiments showed that EIF5A knockdown led to increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages, and decreased M2 macrophages and Tregs following radiation therapy, thereby enhancing the radiotherapy response.ConclusionEIF5A contributes to CRC radioresistance by promoting CSC traits via the Hedgehog pathway and modulating the TiME to an immune-suppressive state. Targeting EIF5A could enhance radiation sensitivity and improve immune responses, offering a potential therapeutic strategy to optimize radiotherapy outcomes in CRC patients.

BackgroundTransarterial chemo(embolization) is preferred for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC); however, because of emerging immune-targeted therapies, its efficacy is at stake. This systematic review pioneers to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy for uHCC patients.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing immune-targeted therapy with or without transarterial chemo(embolization) until 31 May 2024. The complete response (CR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemo(embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy, along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome.ResultsSixteen studies, encompassing 1,789 patients receiving transarterial chemo(embolization) plus immune-targeted therapy and 1,215 patients receiving immune-targeted therapy alone, were considered eligible. The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy demonstrated enhanced outcomes in CR (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.35–3.31), ORR (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.15–3.61), DCR (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.72–3.52), PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50–0.70), and OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.44–0.59), albeit accompanied by a surge in ALT (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.28–3.68) and AST (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.42–3.65). The advantages of additional transarterial chemo(embolization) to immune-targeted therapy were also verified in subgroups of first-line treatment, intervention techniques, with or without extrahepatic metastasis, Child–Pugh grade A or B, and with or without tumor thrombus.ConclusionThe combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy seems to bolster local control and long-term efficacy in uHCC, albeit at the expense of hepatic complications.Systematic review registrationhttp://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier 474669.

Background and AimsRegardless of great progress in early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), unresectable HCC (uHCC) still accounts for the majority of newly diagnosed HCC with poor prognosis. With the promising results of a double combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a more aggressive strategy, a triple combination of transarterial chemo(embolization), TKIs, and ICIs has been tried in the recent years. Hence, we aimed to conduct a systematic review to verify the safety and efficacy of the triple therapy for uHCC.MethodsPubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge were used to screen the eligible studies evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of triple therapy for patients with uHCC up to April 25th 2022, as well as Chinese databases. The endpoints were the complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsA total of 15 studies were eligible with 741 patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with TKIs and ICIs. The pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for CR, ORR, and DCR were 0.124 (0.069–0.190), 0.606 (0.528–0.682), and 0.885 (0.835–0.927). The pooled rates for PFS at 0.5 years and 1 year were 0.781 (0.688–0.862) and 0.387 (0.293–0.486), respectively. The pooled rates for OS at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.690 (0.585–0.786), 0.212 (0.117–0.324), and 0.056 (0.028–0.091), respectively. In addition, the pooled rate and 95%CI for the conversion surgery was 0.359 (0.153–0.595). The subgroup analysis of control studies showed that triple therapy was superior to TACE+TKIs, TKIs+ICIs, and TKIs in CR, ORR, and DCR, conversion rate; PFS; and OS. No fatal AEs were reported, and the top three most common AEs were elevated ALT, elevated AST, and hypertension, as well as severe AEs (grading ≥3).ConclusionWith the current data, we concluded that the triple therapy of TACE/HAIC, TKIs, and ICIs would provide a clinical benefit for uHCC both in short- and long-term outcomes without increasing severe AEs, but the conclusion needs further validation.Systematic Review Registrationhttp://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Review registry: CRD42022321970.

Background: Transarterial chemo(embolization) is preferred for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC); however, because of emerging immune-targeted therapies, its efficacy is at stake. This systematic review pioneers to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemo (embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy for uHCC patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing immune-targeted therapy with or without transarterial chemo (embolization) until 31 May 2024. The complete response (CR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemo (embolization) combined with immune-targeted therapy, along with progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome. Results: Sixteen studies, encompassing 1,789 patients receiving transarterial chemo(embolization) plus immune-targeted therapy and 1,215 patients receiving immune-targeted therapy alone, were considered eligible. The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy demonstrated enhanced outcomes in CR (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.35-3.31), ORR (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.15-3.61), DCR (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.72-3.52), PFS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50-0.70), and OS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.44-0.59), albeit accompanied by a surge in ALT (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.28-3.68) and AST (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.42-3.65). The advantages of additional transarterial chemo(embolization) to immune-targeted therapy were also verified in subgroups of first-line treatment, intervention techniques, with or without extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh grade A or B, and with or without tumor thrombus. Conclusion: The combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and immune-targeted therapy seems to bolster local control and long-term efficacy in uHCC, albeit at the expense of hepatic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]