1. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of adjustment disorder new module-20 in breast cancer patients
- Author
-
Ling-Chao Deng, Andreas Maercker, Jun Zhang, Hui-Hua Xiong, Heng Meng, Hai-Yan Tang, University of Zurich, and Meng, Heng
- Subjects
Adult ,China ,Correlation coefficient ,Psychometrics ,Adjustment disorders ,Population ,lcsh:BF1-990 ,Validity ,Breast Neoplasms ,Adjustment Disorder New Module-20(ADNM-20) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Adjustment Disorders ,0302 clinical medicine ,Breast cancer ,Cronbach's alpha ,Asian People ,Adjustment disorder ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Factorial validity ,General Psychology ,Reliability (statistics) ,Aged ,education.field_of_study ,10093 Institute of Psychology ,Reproducibility of Results ,3200 General Psychology ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Reliability ,Exploratory factor analysis ,030227 psychiatry ,Psychometric properties ,lcsh:Psychology ,Female ,Psychology ,150 Psychology ,Self-rating scale ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Clinical psychology ,Research Article - Abstract
Background After the new definition of adjustment disorder (AjD) by the International Classification of Diseases-11(ICD-11), AjD has attracted more and more attention. Adjustment disorder new module-20 (ADNM-20), which is used to diagnose AjD, has been verified in some countries, but it has not been verified in China. As a result, the purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Adjustment disorder new module-20 (ADNM-20) in female breast cancer patients. Methods The ADNM-20 translated into Chinese employed the translation and back translation technique. Three hundred fifty four newly diagnosed ( Results ADNM-20 core symptoms included 8 items and two factors, which were extracted by using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). It could explain 61.74% of the total variance. ADNM-20 accessory symptoms including 12 items and four factors, which were extracted by using EFA. It could explain 68.34% of the total variance. Cronbach’s α coefficient for ADNM-20 was 0.93, split-half reliability was 0.87, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.74. The correlation coefficient between each subscale was ranged from 0.53 to 0.71 (P P Conclusions The study verified the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of ADNM-20. It is applicable to measure the prevalence of adjustment disorder in the breast cancer population.
- Published
- 2020