Search

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are part of a growing class of epigenetic therapies used for the treatment of cancer. Although HDACis are effective in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas, treatment of solid tumors with this class of drugs has not been successful. Overexpression of the multidrug resistance protein P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by ABCB1, is known to confer resistance to the HDACi romidepsin in vitro, yet increased ABCB1 expression has not been associated with resistance in patients, suggesting that other mechanisms of resistance arise in the clinic. To identify alternative mechanisms of resistance to romidepsin, we selected MCF-7 breast cancer cells with romidepsin in the presence of the P-gp inhibitor verapamil to reduce the likelihood of P-gp-mediated resistance. The resulting cell line, MCF-7 DpVp300, does not express P-gp and was found to be selectively resistant to romidepsin but not to other HDACis such as belinostat, panobinostat, or vorinostat. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed upregulation of the mRNA coding for the putative methyltransferase, METTL7A, whose paralog, METTL7B, was previously shown to methylate thiol groups on hydrogen sulfide and captopril. As romidepsin has a thiol as the zinc-binding moiety, we hypothesized that METTL7A could inactivate romidepsin and other thiol-based HDACis via methylation of the thiol group. We demonstrate that expression of METTL7A or METTL7B confers resistance to thiol-based HDACis and that both enzymes are capable of methylating thiol-containing HDACis. We thus propose that METTL7A and METTL7B confer resistance to thiol-based HDACis by methylating and inactivating the zinc-binding thiol., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Aim: Ferroptosis is a non-apoptotic form of cell death caused by lethal lipid peroxidation. Several small molecule ferroptosis inducers (FINs) have been reported, yet little information is available regarding their interaction with the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) and ABCG2. We thus sought to characterize the interactions of FINs with P-gp and ABCG2, which may provide information regarding oral bioavailability and brain penetration and predict drug-drug interactions. Methods: Cytotoxicity assays with ferroptosis-sensitive A673 cells transfected to express P-gp or ABCG2 were used to determine the ability of the transporters to confer resistance to FINs; confirmatory studies were performed in OVCAR8 and NCI/ADR-RES cells. The ability of FINs to inhibit P-gp or ABCG2 was determined using the fluorescent substrates rhodamine 123 or purpuin-18, respectively. Results: P-gp overexpression conferred resistance to FIN56 and the erastin derivatives imidazole ketone erastin and piperazine erastin. P-gp-mediated resistance to imidazole ketone erastin and piperazine erastin was also reversed in UO-31 renal cancer cells by CRISPR-mediated knockout of ABCB1 . The FINs ML-162, GPX inhibitor 26a, and PACMA31 at 10 µM were able to increase intracellular rhodamine 123 fluorescence over 10-fold in P-gp-expressing MDR-19 cells. GPX inhibitor 26a was able to increase intracellular purpurin-18 fluorescence over 4-fold in ABCG2-expressing R-5 cells. Conclusion: Expression of P-gp may reduce the efficacy of these FINs in cancers that express the transporter and may prevent access to sanctuary sites such as the brain. The ability of some FINs to inhibit P-gp and ABCG2 suggests potential drug-drug interactions., Competing Interests: All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19945.].

Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by many cancers correlates with aggressive clinical behavior. As part of the initial studies in a project whose goal was to quantify CXCR4 expression on cancers non-invasively, we examined CXCR4 expression in cancer samples by immunohistochemistry using a validated anti-CXCR4 antibody. Among solid tumors, we found expression of CXCR4 on significant percentages of major types of kidney, lung, and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and, notably, on metastases of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. We found particularly high expression of CXCR4 on adrenocortical cancer (ACC) metastases. Microarrays of ACC metastases revealed correlations between expression of CXCR4 and other chemokine system genes, particularly CXCR7/ACKR3 , which encodes an atypical chemokine receptor that shares a ligand, CXCL12, with CXCR4. A first-in-human study using 64 Cu-plerixafor for PET in an ACC patient prior to resection of metastases showed heterogeneity among metastatic nodules and good correlations among PET SUVs, CXCR4 staining, and CXCR4 mRNA. Additionally, we were able to show that CXCR4 expression correlated with the rates of growth of the pulmonary lesions in this patient. Further studies are needed to understand better the role of CXCR4 in ACC and whether targeting it may be beneficial. In this regard, non-invasive methods for assessing CXCR4 expression, such as PET using 64 Cu-plerixafor, should be important investigative tools., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: The mechanism of sensitivity and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is incompletely understood, particularly in cancers other than non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To understand the variable response to this class of drugs, we used the NCI60 cancer cell lines. We aimed to determine if there are interactions between EGFR expression, mutations, polymorphisms, and gene amplification, and whether these factors are associated with variability in response to EGFR inhibitors., Experimental Design: The EGFRVIII and tyrosine kinase (TK) domain mutations were examined in the NCI60 cancer cell lines. Five polymorphisms, -216G/T, -191C/A, intron 1 (CA)n, R497K, and 2607A/G, were genotyped. EGFR amplification was also assessed with high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism chip and real-time PCR, respectively. The results were correlated with cytotoxicity data for erlotinib and other 11 EGFR inhibitors, as well as other publicly available data for these lines., Results: All 12 inhibitors behaved similarly. No EGFRVIII but putative TK mutations in two cell lines were found. Both mutant cell lines were insensitive to all inhibitors. Meanwhile, response did not correlate with EGFR amplification but with EGFR gene expression, especially in the cell lines with relatively normal gene status. In addition, EGFR expression was associated with the -216G/T polymorphism but not with the intron 1 (CA)n polymorphism. A combination of -216G/T and R497K polymorphisms was weakly associated with drug response., Conclusions: These observations suggest that in addition to TK mutations, germ-line variability may also contribute to the pharmacodynamics of EGFR inhibitors, particularly when EGFR is genetically normal.

The development of drug resistance in the treatment of cancer remains a major problem. The hallmark of multidrug resistance is cross-resistance to multiple structurally unrelated compounds. The MDR-1 gene encoding P-glycoprotein mediates one of the most extensively studied mechanisms of drug resistance. Previous studies led to the proposal that two promoters control expression of the MDR-1 gene, and these were designated the upstream and downstream promoters. In the present article, we provide evidence that transcripts originating from the putative upstream promoter of MDR-1 are in fact aberrant transcripts whose expression is regulated by nearby genomic sequences that include a human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR). Expression of this LTR occurs in all cells. We show that following drug selection, especially in cases where gene amplification has occurred, MDR-1 transcripts can begin near this retroviral LTR with transcription proceeding in the direction opposite of the usual LTR transcription. Because expression of these aberrant MDR-1 transcripts (AMT) is found primarily in drug-resistant cell lines, we conclude that the development of drug resistance or the attendant drug exposure might have a role in the activation of this phenomenon or the selection of cells expressing AMTs. Demonstration of similar aberrant transcripts in tumor samples obtained from patients with relapsed lymphoma suggests that this phenomenon may also occur clinically.