Search

Objectives To develop an intuitive and generally applicable system for the reporting, assessment, and documentation of ADC to complement standard BI-RADS criteria. Methods This was a multicentric, retrospective analysis of 11 independently conducted institutional review board–approved studies from seven institutions performed between 2007 and 2019. Breast Apparent Diffusion coefficient (ADC-B) categories comprised ADC-B0 (ADC non-diagnostic), ADC-B1 (no enhancing lesion), and ADC-B2-5. The latter was defined by plotting ADC versus cumulative malignancy rates. Statistics comprised ANOVA with post hoc testing and ROC analysis. p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results A total of 1625 patients (age: 55.9 years (± 13.8)) with 1736 pathologically verified breast lesions were included. The mean ADC (× 10−3 mm2/s) differed significantly between benign (1.45, SD .40) and malignant lesions (.95, SD .39), and between invasive (.92, SD .22) and in situ carcinomas (1.18, SD .30) (p 24.5%). At the latter threshold, a positive predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI 0.94–0.97) for invasive versus non-invasive breast carcinomas was reached. Conclusions The breast apparent diffusion coefficient system (ADC-B) provides a simple and widely applicable categorization scheme for assessment, documentation, and reporting of apparent diffusion coefficient values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI. Clinical relevance statement The ADC-B system, based on diverse MRI examinations, is clinically relevant for stratifying breast cancer risk via apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, and complements BI-RADS for improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Key Points • The breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system (ADC-B) is a simple tool for the assessment, documentation, and reporting of ADC values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI. • The categories comprise ADC-B0 for non-diagnostic examinations, ADC-B1 for examinations without an enhancing lesion, and ADC-B2-5 for enhancing lesions with an increasing malignancy rate. • The breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system may be used to complement BI-RADS in clinical decision-making.

Purpose:Diffusion-weighted imaging with the calculation of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been proposed as a quantitative biomarker on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the breast. There is a need to approve a generalizable ADC cutoff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a predefined ADC cutoff allows downgrading of BI-RADS 4 lesions on CE-MRI, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.Experimental Design:This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study. Data from five centers were pooled on the individual lesion level. Eligible patients had a BI-RADS 4 rating on CE-MRI. For each center, two breast radiologists evaluated the images. Data on lesion morphology (mass, non-mass), size, and ADC were collected. Histology was the standard of reference. A previously suggested ADC cutoff (≥1.5 × 10−3 mm2/second) was applied. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 or lower was considered as a rule-out criterion for breast cancer. Diagnostic performance indices were calculated by ROC analysis.Results:There were 657 female patients (mean age, 42; SD, 14.1) with 696 BI-RADS 4 lesions included. Disease prevalence was 59.5% (414/696). The area under the ROC curve was 0.784. Applying the investigated ADC cutoff, sensitivity was 96.6% (400/414). The potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies was 32.6% (92/282).Conclusions:An ADC cutoff of ≥1.5 × 10−3 mm2/second allows downgrading of lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast CE-MRI. One-third of unnecessary biopsies could thus be avoided.

Detailed results of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast, DWI, 3D 1H-MRSI and 18FDG PET the assigned final MRI BI-RADS® classification for benign and malignant lesions.

Supplemental Material 1-5

ROC curves illustrate the higher diagnostic accuracy that is reached by MP 18FDG-PET-MRI compared to assessment with a single parameter or with multiparametric MRI with combinations of two/three parameters.

Purpose: To assess whether multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (MP 18FDG PET-MRI) using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging (3D 1H-MRSI), and 18FDG-PET enables an improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors.Experimental Design: Seventy-six female patients (mean age, 55.7 years; range, 25–86 years) with an imaging abnormality (BI-RADS 0, 4–5) were included in this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study. Patients underwent fused PET-MRI of the breast with 18FDG-PET/CT and MP MRI at 3T. The likelihood of malignancy was assessed for all single parameters, for MP MRI with two/three parameters, and for MP 18FDG PET-MRI. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference. Appropriate statistical tests were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for each assessment combination.Results: There were 53 malignant and 23 benign breast lesions. MP 18FDG PET-MRI yielded a significantly higher area under the cure (AUC) of 0.935 than DCE-MRI (AUC, 0.86; P = 0.044) and the combination of DCE-MRI and another parameter (AUC, 0.761–0.826; P = 0.013–0.020). MP 18FDG PET-MRI showed slight further improvement to MP MRI with three parameters (AUC, 0.925; P = 0.317). Using MP 18FDG PET-MRI there would have been a reduction of the unnecessary breast biopsies recommended by MP imaging with one or two parameters (P = 0.002–0.011).Conclusion: This feasibility study shows that MP 18FDG PET-MRI enables an improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors when several MRI and PET parameters are combined. MP 18FDG PET-MRI may lead to a reduction in unnecessary breast biopsies. Clin Cancer Res; 20(13); 3540–9. ©2014 AACR.

BACKGROUND Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an MRI technique with the potential to serve as an unenhanced breast cancer detection tool. Synthetic b-values produce images with high diffusion weighting to suppress residual background signal, while avoiding additional measurement times and reducing artifacts. PURPOSE To compare acquired DWI images (at b = 850 s/mm2 ) and different synthetic b-values (at b = 1000-2000 s/mm2 ) in terms of lesion visibility, image quality, and tumor-to-tissue contrast in patients with malignant breast tumors. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION Fifty-three females with malignant breast lesions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE T2 w, DWI EPI with STIR fat-suppression, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1 w at 3T. ASSESSMENT From acquired images using b-values of 50 and 850 s/mm2 , synthetic images were calculated at b = 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, and 2000 s/mm2 . Four readers independently rated image quality, lesion visibility, preferred b-value, as well as the lowest and highest b-value, over the range of b-values tested, to provide a diagnostic image. STATISTICAL TESTS Medians and mean ranks were calculated and compared using the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Reproducibility was analyzed by intraclass correlation (ICC), Fleiss, and Cohen's κ. RESULTS Relative signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios decreased with increasing b-values, while the signal-intensity ratio between tumor and tissue increased significantly (P

Purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging with the calculation of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been proposed as a quantitative biomarker on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the breast. There is a need to approve a generalizable ADC cutoff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a predefined ADC cutoff allows downgrading of BI-RADS 4 lesions on CE-MRI, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Experimental Design: This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study. Data from five centers were pooled on the individual lesion level. Eligible patients had a BI-RADS 4 rating on CE-MRI. For each center, two breast radiologists evaluated the images. Data on lesion morphology (mass, non-mass), size, and ADC were collected. Histology was the standard of reference. A previously suggested ADC cutoff (≥1.5 × 10−3 mm2/second) was applied. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 or lower was considered as a rule-out criterion for breast cancer. Diagnostic performance indices were calculated by ROC analysis. Results: There were 657 female patients (mean age, 42; SD, 14.1) with 696 BI-RADS 4 lesions included. Disease prevalence was 59.5% (414/696). The area under the ROC curve was 0.784. Applying the investigated ADC cutoff, sensitivity was 96.6% (400/414). The potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies was 32.6% (92/282). Conclusions: An ADC cutoff of ≥1.5 × 10−3 mm2/second allows downgrading of lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast CE-MRI. One-third of unnecessary biopsies could thus be avoided.

In this multicentric study, individual patient data from 3 different centers were analyzed. Consecutive patients receiving standardized multiparametric breast magnetic resonance imaging for standard nonscreening indications were included. At each center, 2 experienced radiologists with more than 5 years of experience retrospectively interpreted the examinations in consensus and applied the KS to every histologically verified lesion. The corresponding mean ADC of each lesion was measured using a Wielema type 4 region of interest. According to established methods, the KS and ADC were combined, yielding the KS+ score. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ (DeLong test). Likewise, the potential to help avoid unnecessary biopsies was compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ based on established high sensitivity thresholds (McNemar test).A total of 450 lesions in 414 patients (mean age, 51.5 years; interquartile range, 42-60.8 years) were included, with 219 lesions being malignant (48.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-53.4%). The performance of the KS (AUROC, 0.915; CI, 0.886-0.939) was significantly better than that of the ADC (AUROC, 0.848; CI, 0.811-0.880; P0.001). The largest difference between these parameters was observed when assessing subcentimeter lesions (AUROC, 0.909 for KS; CI, 0.849-0.950 vs 0.811 for ADC; CI, 0.737-0.871; P = 0.02).The use of the KS+ (AUROC, 0.918; CI, 0.889-0.942) improved the performance slightly, but without any significant difference relative to a single KS or ADC reading (P = 0.64).When applying high sensitivity thresholds for avoiding unnecessary biopsies, the KS and ADC achieved equal sensitivity (97.7% for both; cutoff values,4 for KS and ≤1.4 × 10-3 mm2/s for ADC). However, the rate of potentially avoidable biopsies was higher when using the KS (specificity: 65.4% for KS vs 32.9% for ADC; P0.0001). The KS was superior to the KS+ in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.Both the KS and ADC may be used to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. However, KS proved superior in this task including, most of all, when assessing small lesions less than 1 cm. Using the KS may avoid twice as many unnecessary biopsies, and the combination of both the KS and ADS does not improve diagnostic performance.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the potential of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (NC-MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in characterization of breast lesions in comparison to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) at 3 T.Materials and MethodsConsecutive patients with co

Rationale and Objectives This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features to differentiate between mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic livers. Materials and Methods This study, performed between 2001 and 2013, included 64 baseline magnetic resonance imaging examinations with pathohistologically proven liver cirrhosis, presenting with either ICC (n = 32) or HCC (n = 32) tumors. To distinguish ICC form HCC tumors, 20 qualitative single-lesion descriptors were evaluated by two readers, in consensus, and statistically classified using the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) methodology. Diagnostic performance was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results The CHAID algorithm identified three independent categorical lesion descriptors, including (1) liver capsular retraction; (2) progressive or persistent enhancement pattern or wash-out on the T1-weighted delayed phase; and (3) signal intensity appearance on T2-weighted images that could help to reliably differentiate ICC from HCC, which resulted in an AUC of 0.807, and a sensitivity and specificity of 68.8 and 90.6 (95% confidence interval 75.0–98.0), respectively. Conclusions The proposed CHAID algorithm provides a simple and robust step-by-step classification tool for a reliable and solid differentiation between ICC and HCC tumors in cirrhotic livers.

To determine whether 3D acquisitions provide equivalent image quality, lesion delineation quality and PI-RADS v2 performance compared to 2D acquisitions in T2-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T. This IRB-approved, prospective study included 150 consecutive patients (mean age 63.7 years, 35–84 years; mean PSA 7.2 ng/ml, 0.4–31.1 ng/ml). Two uroradiologists (R1, R2) independently rated image quality and lesion delineation quality using a five-point ordinal scale and assigned a PI-RADS score for 2D and 3D T2-weighted image data sets. Data were compared using visual grading characteristics (VGC) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC)/area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Image quality was similarly good to excellent for 2D T2w (mean score R1, 4.3 ± 0.81; R2, 4.7 ± 0.83) and 3D T2w (mean score R1, 4.3 ± 0.82; R2, 4.7 ± 0.69), p = 0.269. Lesion delineation was rated good to excellent for 2D (mean score R1, 4.16 ± 0.81; R2, 4.19 ± 0.92) and 3D T2w (R1, 4.19 ± 0.94; R2, 4.27 ± 0.94) without significant differences (p = 0.785). ROC analysis showed an equivalent performance for 2D (AUC 0.580–0.623) and 3D (AUC 0.576–0.629) T2w (p > 0.05, respectively). Three-dimensional acquisitions demonstrated equivalent image and lesion delineation quality, and PI-RADS v2 performance, compared to 2D in T2-weighted imaging of the prostate. Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging could be used to considerably shorten prostate MRI protocols in clinical practice. • 3D shows equivalent image quality and lesion delineation compared to 2D T2w. • 3D T2w and 2D T2w image acquisition demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance. • Using a single 3D T2w acquisition may shorten the protocol by 40%. • Combined with short DCE, multiparametric protocols of 10 min are feasible.

To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI. Two independent reviewers performed a literature review and data extraction. Data collection included study characteristics, number/type of BI-RADS 3 lesions, final diagnosis (histopathology and/or follow-up). Sources of bias (QUADAS-2) were assessed. Meta-analysis included data-pooling, heterogeneity testing, and meta-regression. Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence was reported in 11 studies (range: 1.2-24.3%). Malignancy rates ranged between 0.5-10.1% (pooled 61/2814, 1.6%, 95%-CI:0.9-2.3% (random-effects-model), I2=53%, P=0.007). In a subgroup of 11 studies (2183 lesions), highest malignancy rates were observed in non-mass lesions (pooled 25/714, 2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%, I2=52%, P=0.021) followed by mass lesions (pooled 15/771, 1.5%, 95%-CI:0.7-2.4%, I2=0%, P=0.929), and foci (pooled 10/698, 1%, 95%-CI:0.3-1.7%, I2=0%, P=0.800). There was non-significant negative association between prevalence and malignancy rates (P=0.077). Malignant lesions were diagnosed at all follow-up time points. While prevalence of MRI BI-RADS 3 lesions was strongly heterogeneous, pooled malignancy rates met BI-RADS benchmarks (

Purpose To determine which of three gadoxetic acid injection techniques best reduced the contrast-related arterial-phase motion artifacts. Materials and Methods This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, retrospective study included a cohort of 78 consecutive patients who each had serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver (0.025 mmol/kg body weight) performed with at least two of three injection techniques: M1 test bolus, undiluted, power-injected 1 mL/s; M2 test bolus, diluted 50% with saline, power-injected 1 mL/s; M3 fixed delay, undiluted, manually injected. Blinded to the injection method, three readers independently rated the randomized images for arterial-phase motion artifacts, arterial-phase timing, and arterial-phase lesion visibility using a four-point Likert scale. Results Regarding respiratory artifacts, gadoxetic acid arterial-phase images were judged better with M3 (2.7 ± 0.7) and were significantly less than those with M1 (2.1 ± 1.1) (P = 0.0001). Arterial-phase M2 (2.50 ± 0.89) images were rated significantly better than arterial-phase M1 images (P = 0.012), but the difference between arterial-phase images with M3 and M2 scores was not statistically significant (P = 0.49). Arterial-phase timing was significantly better for M1 compared to M3, and for M2 compared to M3 (P < 0.0001 for both). The area under the curve was 0.59–0.68. However, there was no significant difference between M1 and M2 (P = 0.35). With regard to arterial-phase lesion visibility, there was no significant difference in the ratings between any of the three injection techniques (P = 0.29–0.72). Interreader agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.41–0.62). Conclusion A diluted, power-injected protocol (M2) seems to provide good timing and minimize artifacts compared with two other injection methods. No significant difference was found in lesion visibility between these three methods. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1107–1114.

AIM To report prostate cancer (PCa) prevalence in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) categories and investigate the potential to avoid unnecessary, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsies by adding clinical and biochemical patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present institutional review board-approved, prospective study on 137 consecutive men with 178 suspicious lesions on 3 T MRI was performed. Routine data collected for each patient included patient characteristics (age, prostate volume), clinical background information (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels, PSA density), and PI-RADS v2 scores assigned in a double-reading approach. RESULTS Histopathological evaluation revealed a total of 93/178 PCa (52.2%). The mean age was 66.3 years and PSA density was 0.24 ng/ml2 (range, 0.04–0.89 ng/ml). Clinically significant PCa (csPCa, Gleason score >6) was confirmed in 50/93 (53.8%) lesions and was significantly associated with higher PI-RADS v2 scores (p=0.0044). On logistic regression analyses, age, PSA density, and PI-RADS v2 scores contributed independently to the diagnosis of csPCa (p=7.9×10−7, p=0.097, and p=0.024, respectively). The resulting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to predict csPCa was 0.76 for PI-RADS v2, 0.59 for age, and 0.67 for PSA density. The combined regression model yielded an AUC of 0.84 for the diagnosis of csPCa and was significantly superior to each single parameter (p≤0.0009, respectively). Unnecessary biopsies could have been avoided in 50% (64/128) while only 4% (2/50) of csPCa lesions would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS Adding age and PSA density to PI-RADS v2 scores improves the diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. A combination of these variables with PI-RADS v2 can help to avoid unnecessary in-bore biopsies while still detecting the majority of csPCa.

To investigate the influence of region-of-interest (ROI) placement and different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters on ADC values, diagnostic performance, reproducibility and measurement time in breast tumours. In this IRB-approved, retrospective study, 149 histopathologically proven breast tumours (109 malignant, 40 benign) in 147 women (mean age 53.2) were investigated. Three radiologists independently measured minimum, mean and maximum ADC, each using three ROI placement approaches:1 – small 2D-ROI, 2 – large 2D-ROI and 3 – 3D-ROI covering the whole lesion. One reader performed all measurements twice. Median ADC values, diagnostic performance, reproducibility, and measurement time were calculated and compared between all combinations of ROI placement approaches and ADC parameters. Median ADC values differed significantly between the ROI placement approaches (p

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) provides insights into tissue microstructure by visualization and quantification of water diffusivity. Quantitative evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from DWI has been proven helpful for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions, for cancer subtyping in breast cancer patients, and for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, to further establish DWI of breast lesions it is important to evaluate the quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy. In this intra-individual prospective clinical study 40 consecutive patients with suspicious findings, scheduled for biopsy, underwent an identical 3T breast MRI protocol of the breast on two consecutive days (>24 h). Mean ADC of target lesions was assessed (two independent readers) in four separate sessions. Reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy between examinations (E1, E2), readers (R1, R2), and measurements (M1, M2) were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficients of variation (CVs), Bland–Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with calculation of the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The standard of reference was either histopathology (n = 38) or imaging follow-up of up to 24 months (n = 2). Eighty breast MRI examinations (median E1–E2, 2 ± 1.7 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1–2 days, range 1–11 days) in 40 patients (mean age 56, standard deviation (SD) ±14) were evaluated. In 55 target lesions (mean size 25.2 ± 20.8 (SD) mm, range 6–106 mm), mean ADC values were significantly (P 0.9, CVs 3.2–8%), indicating little variation. Bland–Altman plots demonstrated no systematic differences, and diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different in the two repeated examinations (all ROC curves >0.91, P > 0.05). High reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy of DWI provide reliable characteristics for its use as a potential QIB, to further improve breast lesion detection, characterization, and treatment monitoring of breast lesions.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of fat-water separation and spatial resolution in MRI on the results of automated quantitative measurements of fibroglandular breast tissue (FGT). Ten healthy volunteers (age range, 28-71 years; mean, 39.9 years) were included in this Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study. All measurements were performed on a 1.5-T scanner (Siemens, AvantoFit) using an 18-channel breast coil. The protocols included isotropic (Di) [TR/TE1 /TE2 = 6.00 ms/2.45 ms/2.67 ms; flip angle, 6.0°; 256 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; 1 mm isotropic; field of view, 360°; acquisition time (TA) = 3 min 38 s] and anisotropic (Da) (TR/TE1 /TE2 = 10.00 ms/2.39 ms/4.77 ms; flip angle, 24.9°; 80 slices; matrix 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm(3) ; field of view, 360°; TA = 1 min 25 s) T1 three-dimensional (3D) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) Dixon sequences, and a T1 3D FLASH sequence with the same resolution (T1 ) without (TR/TE = 11.00 ms/4.76 ms; flip angle, 25.0°; 80 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm(3) ; field of view, 360°; TA = 50 s) and with (TR/TE = 29.00 ms/4.76 ms; flip angle, 25.0°; 80 slices; matrix, 360 × 360; voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 2.0 mm(3) ; field of view, 360°; TA = 2 min 35 s) fat saturation. Repeating volunteer measurements after 20 min and repositioning were used to assess reproducibility. An automated and quantitative volumetric breast density measurement system was used for FGT calculation. FGT with Di, Da and T1 measured 4.6-63.0% (mean, 30.6%), 3.2-65.3% (mean, 32.5%) and 1.7-66.5% (mean, 33.7%), respectively. The highest correlation between different MRI sequences was found with the Di and Da sequences (R(2) = 0.976). Coefficients of variation (CVs) for FGT calculation were higher in T1 (CV = 21.5%) compared with Dixon (Di, CV = 5.1%; Da, CV = 4.2%) sequences. Dixon-type sequences worked well for FGT measurements, even at lower resolution, whereas the conventional T1 -weighted sequence was more sensitive to decreasing resolution. The Dixon fat-water separation technique showed superior repeatability of FGT measurements compared with conventional sequences. A standard dynamic protocol using Dixon fat-water separation is best suited for combined diagnostic purposes and prognostic measurements of FGT. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements to obviate unnecessary biopsies in multiparametric MRI-detected PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.This retrospective, institutional review board-approved study investigated 101 PI-RADS 4 and 5 prostate lesions (52 malignant, 49 benign) verified by in-bore MRI-guided biopsy in 101 men (mean age, 62.8 years). Two readers, who were not aware of the biopsy results independently and repeatedly measured minimum, mean, and maximum ADC from diffusion-weighted imaging measurements (in line with PI-RADS v2 recommendations) using a 2-dimensional region of interest drawn around the biopsied lesions. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic statistics and reproducibility statistics were calculated.The best diagnostic performance (overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] R1: 0.801; R2: 0.796 peripheral zone AUC R1:0.814, R2: 0.805; transitional zone AUC R1:0.786, R2:0.779) and the tightest limits of interreader agreement (-8.6% to 9.9%) were found in minimum ADC values. Rule-in and rule-out thresholds for diagnosis of prostate cancer were identified, demonstrating a potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies in 32.7% (16/49).Quantitative ADC measurement in multiparametric MRI-detected PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions has the potential to avoid unnecessary MRI-guided biopsies in up to 33%.

Aim of the study Evaluation of the treatment, epidemiology and outcome of cardiac arrest in the television franchise Star Trek. Methods Retrospective cohort study of prospective events. Screening of all episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Star Trek: Voyager for cardiac arrest events. Documentation was performed according to the Utstein guidelines for cardiac arrest documentation. All adult, single-person cardiac arrests were included. Patients were excluded if cardiac arrest occurred during mass casualties, if the victims were annihilated by energy weapons or were murdered and nobody besides the assassin could provide first aid. Epidemiological data, treatment and outcome of cardiac arrest victims in the 24th century were studied. Results Ninety-six cardiac arrests were included. Twenty-three individuals were female (24%). Cardiac arrest was witnessed in 91 cases (95%), trauma was the leading cause ( n =38; 40%). Resuscitation was initiated in 17 cases (18%) and 12 patients (13%) had return of spontaneous circulation. Favorable neurological outcome and long-term survival was documented in nine patients (9%). Technically diagnosed cardiac arrest was associated with higher rates of favorable neurological outcome and long-term survival. Neurological outcome and survival did not depend on cardiac arrest location. Conclusion Cardiac arrest remains a critical event in the 24th century. We observed a change of etiology from cardiac toward traumatic origin. Quick access to medical help and new prognostic tools were established to treat cardiac arrest.

Recently, molecular imaging, using various techniques, has been assessed for breast imaging. Molecular imaging aims to quantify and visualize biological, physiological, and pathological processes at the cellular and molecular levels to further elucidate the development and progression of breast cancer and the response to treatment. Molecular imaging enables the depiction of tumor morphology, as well as the assessment of functional and metabolic processes involved in cancer development at different levels. To date, molecular imaging techniques comprise both nuclear medicine and radiological techniques. This review aims to summarize the current and emerging functional and metabolic techniques for the molecular imaging of breast tumors.

To determine which of three gadoxetic acid injection techniques best reduced the contrast-related arterial-phase motion artifacts.This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, retrospective study included a cohort of 78 consecutive patients who each had serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver (0.025 mmol/kg body weight) performed with at least two of three injection techniques: M1 test bolus, undiluted, power-injected 1 mL/s; M2 test bolus, diluted 50% with saline, power-injected 1 mL/s; M3 fixed delay, undiluted, manually injected. Blinded to the injection method, three readers independently rated the randomized images for arterial-phase motion artifacts, arterial-phase timing, and arterial-phase lesion visibility using a four-point Likert scale.Regarding respiratory artifacts, gadoxetic acid arterial-phase images were judged better with M3 (2.7 ± 0.7) and were significantly less than those with M1 (2.1 ± 1.1) (P = 0.0001). Arterial-phase M2 (2.50 ± 0.89) images were rated significantly better than arterial-phase M1 images (P = 0.012), but the difference between arterial-phase images with M3 and M2 scores was not statistically significant (P = 0.49). Arterial-phase timing was significantly better for M1 compared to M3, and for M2 compared to M3 (P0.0001 for both). The area under the curve was 0.59-0.68. However, there was no significant difference between M1 and M2 (P = 0.35). With regard to arterial-phase lesion visibility, there was no significant difference in the ratings between any of the three injection techniques (P = 0.29-0.72). Interreader agreement was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.41-0.62).A diluted, power-injected protocol (M2) seems to provide good timing and minimize artifacts compared with two other injection methods. No significant difference was found in lesion visibility between these three methods.3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1107-1114.

To develop and assess a combined reading for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (CE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) adapted to the BI-RADS for multiparametric MRI of the breast at 3 T.A total of 247 patients with histopathologically verified breast lesions were included in this IRB-approved prospective study. All patients underwent CE-MR and DWI at 3 T. MRIs were classified according to BI-RADS and assessed for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. A reading method that adapted ADC thresholds to the assigned BI-RADS classification was developed. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and the area under the curve were calculated. BI-RADS-adapted reading was compared with previously published reading methods in the same population. Inter- and intra-reader variability was assessed.Sensitivity of BI-RADS-adapted reading was not different from the high sensitivity of CE-MRI (P = 0.4). BI-RADS-adapted reading maximised specificity (89.4 %), which was significantly higher compared with CE-MRI (P 0.001). Previous reading methods did not perform as well as the BI-RADS method except for a logistic regression model. BI-RADS-adapted reading was more sensitive in non-mass-like enhancements (NMLE) and was more robust to inter- and intra-reader variability.Multiparametric 3-T MRI of the breast using a BI-RADS-adapted reading is fast, simple to use and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI. KEYPOINTS : • Multiparametric breast 3-T MRI with BI-RADS-adapted reading improves diagnostic accuracy. • BI-RADS-adapted reading of CE-MRI and DWI is based on established reporting guidelines. • BI-RADS-adapted reading is fast and easy to use in routine clinical practice. • BI-RADS-adapted reading is robust to intra- and inter-reader variability.

To demonstrate the accuracy of fully automated, quantitative, volumetric measurement of the amount of fibroglandular breast tissue (FGT), using MRI, and to investigate the impact of different MRI sequences using anthropomorphic breast phantoms as the ground truth. In this study, 10 anthropomorphic breast phantoms that consisted of different known fractions of adipose and protein tissue, which closely resembled normal breast parenchyma, were developed. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms were imaged with a 1.5 T unit (Siemens, Avantofit) using an 18-channel breast coil. The sequence protocol consisted of an isotropic Dixon sequence (Di), an anisotropic Dixon sequence (Da), and T1 3D FLASH sequences with and without fat saturation (T1). Fully automated, quantitative, volumetric measurement of FGT for all anthropomorphic phantoms and sequences was performed and correlated with the amounts of fatty and protein components in the phantoms as the ground truth. Fully automated, quantitative, volumetric measurements of FGT with MRI for all sequences ranged from 5.86 to 61.05% (mean 33.36%). The isotropic Dixon sequence yielded the highest accuracy (median 0.51%–0.78%) and precision (median range 0.19%) compared with anisotropic Dixon (median 1.92%–2.09%; median range 0.55%) and T1-weighted sequences (median 2.54%–2.46%; median range 0.82%). All sequences yielded good correlation with the FGT content of the anthropomorphic phantoms. The best correlation of FGT measurements was identified for Dixon sequences (Di, R2 = 0.999; Da, R2 = 0.998) compared with conventional T1-weighted sequences (R2 = 0.971). MRI yields accurate, fully automated, quantitative, volumetric measurements of FGT, an increasingly important and sensitive imaging biomarker for breast cancer risk. Compared with conventional T1 sequences, Dixon-type sequences show the highest correlation and reproducibility for automated, quantitative, volumetric FGT measurements using anthropomorphic breast phantoms as the ground truth.

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) provides insights into tissue microstructure by visualization and quantification of water diffusivity. Quantitative evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from DWI has been proven helpful for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions, for cancer subtyping in breast cancer patients, and for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, to further establish DWI of breast lesions it is important to evaluate the quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy. In this intra-individual prospective clinical study 40 consecutive patients with suspicious findings, scheduled for biopsy, underwent an identical 3T breast MRI protocol of the breast on two consecutive days (24 h). Mean ADC of target lesions was assessed (two independent readers) in four separate sessions. Reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy between examinations (E1, E2), readers (R1, R2), and measurements (M1, M2) were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficients of variation (CVs), Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with calculation of the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The standard of reference was either histopathology (n = 38) or imaging follow-up of up to 24 months (n = 2). Eighty breast MRI examinations (median E1-E2, 2 ± 1.7 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1-2 days, range 1-11 days) in 40 patients (mean age 56, standard deviation (SD) ±14) were evaluated. In 55 target lesions (mean size 25.2 ± 20.8 (SD) mm, range 6-106 mm), mean ADC values were significantly (P 0.0001) higher in benign (1.38, 95% CI 1.27-1.49 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s) compared with malignant (0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.91 × 10(-) (3) mm(2) /s) lesions. Reproducibility and repeatability showed high agreement for repeated examinations, readers, and measurements (all ICCs0.9, CVs 3.2-8%), indicating little variation. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated no systematic differences, and diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different in the two repeated examinations (all ROC curves0.91, P 0.05). High reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy of DWI provide reliable characteristics for its use as a potential QIB, to further improve breast lesion detection, characterization, and treatment monitoring of breast lesions.

Purpose To compare the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2 (v2) and version 1 (v1) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) on multiparametric MRI. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included 65 consecutive biopsy-naive or biopsy-negative patients suspicious for PCa (mean age: 65 years, mean PSA: 10.8 ng/ml) who were undergoing MR-guided biopsy after multiparametric 3T prostate MRI (T2w, DWI, DCE). Two independent readers (R1; R2) scored the prostate lesions according to the v2 score and the v1 sum score. Diagnostic measures (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC-curve) were compared for all cases and stratified by location (transitional zone, TZ, peripheral zone, PZ). Inter-reader agreement was assessed by kappa statistics. Results Inter reader agreement for v2 and v1 was substantial to almost perfect (kappa v2: 0.71, v1: 0.81). Overall, sensitivity between both readers and methods did not differ (p > 0.05). Overall specificity was higher using v1 compared to v2 (R1: p = 0.0078, R2: p = 0.0313) In the TZ, v2 showed a higher AUC (0.81–0.84) compared to v1 (AUC 0.77–0.78). Here, the sensitivity of v2 (87.5–100%) was higher than that of v1 (75%) while v2 specificity (50%–56.3%) was lower than that of v1 (68.8–75%). In the PZ, AUCs were higher using v1 (AUC 0.82–0.83) compared to v2 (AUC 0.61–0.63). The specificity for v1 was higher (43.8–62.3%) than that for v2 (12.5–18.8%) while both v2 and v1 achieved 100% sensitivity. Conclusion PI-RADS v2 and v1 inter-reader agreement is excellent, but their diagnostic performance differs. While v2 appears to be the preferable method for the evaluation of TZ lesions, v1 performs better in the PZ.

To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on standard single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in patients with breast cancer at 3.0 T.Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-seven patients with 49 histopathologically verified lesions were included in this study. In all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters, was performed with a 3.0-T MR imager. Two independent readers visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, geometric distortions) were quantified. Regions of interest were drawn in all lesions (28 malignant, 21 benign) and in the normal breast parenchyma to investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on the basis of an ADC threshold of 1.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec.Each reader found a higher diagnostic accuracy for readout-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging. The area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026). There was no significant difference in the ADC obtained by using either DW imaging method. Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P.001). Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a factor of three.DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Purpose: To assess whether multiparametric 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (MP 18FDG PET-MRI) using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging (3D 1H-MRSI), and 18FDG-PET enables an improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors. Experimental Design: Seventy-six female patients (mean age, 55.7 years; range, 25–86 years) with an imaging abnormality (BI-RADS 0, 4–5) were included in this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study. Patients underwent fused PET-MRI of the breast with 18FDG-PET/CT and MP MRI at 3T. The likelihood of malignancy was assessed for all single parameters, for MP MRI with two/three parameters, and for MP 18FDG PET-MRI. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference. Appropriate statistical tests were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for each assessment combination. Results: There were 53 malignant and 23 benign breast lesions. MP 18FDG PET-MRI yielded a significantly higher area under the cure (AUC) of 0.935 than DCE-MRI (AUC, 0.86; P = 0.044) and the combination of DCE-MRI and another parameter (AUC, 0.761–0.826; P = 0.013–0.020). MP 18FDG PET-MRI showed slight further improvement to MP MRI with three parameters (AUC, 0.925; P = 0.317). Using MP 18FDG PET-MRI there would have been a reduction of the unnecessary breast biopsies recommended by MP imaging with one or two parameters (P = 0.002–0.011). Conclusion: This feasibility study shows that MP 18FDG PET-MRI enables an improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors when several MRI and PET parameters are combined. MP 18FDG PET-MRI may lead to a reduction in unnecessary breast biopsies. Clin Cancer Res; 20(13); 3540–9. ©2014 AACR.

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a single parameter to multiparametric (MP) MRI with 2 (DCE MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) and 3 (DCE MRI, DWI, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging [3D H-MRSI]) parameters in breast cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained in all patients. One hundred thirteen female patients (mean age, 52 years; range, 22-86 years) with an imaging abnormality (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 0, 4-5) were included in this study. Multiparametric MRI of the breast at 3 T with DCE MRI, DWI, and 3D H-MRSI was performed. The likelihood of malignancy was assessed for DCE MRI and MP MRI with 2 (DCE MRI and DWI) and 3 (DCE MRI, DWI, and 3D H-MRSI) parameters separately. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference. Appropriate statistical tests were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for each assessment combination. RESULTS There were 74 malignant and 39 benign breast lesions. Multiparametric MRI with 3 MRI parameters yielded significantly higher areas under the curve (0.936) in comparison with DCE MRI alone (0.814) (P

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Imaging plays a key role in the early detection of breast cancer, and there is strong evidence that mammography screening has proven to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality. Organized mammography screening programmes have been established around the globe, mostly in developed countries. Screening is important for an early diagnosis; however, the follow-up of patients with breast cancer is of importance, too. This review article is divided into two sections. The first section provides a general overview of mammography screening, including quality standards, controversial issues and aspects of high-risk screening. In the second section, we describe the potential uses of imaging modalities in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

To identify which breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS® MRI lexicon are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer when performing breast MR imaging at 3 T.150 patients underwent breast MR imaging at 3 T. Lesion size, morphology and enhancement kinetics were assessed according to the BI-RADS® classification. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. The effects of the BI-RADS® descriptors on sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Data were analysed using logistic regression. Histopathological diagnoses were used as the standard of reference.The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI at 3 T was 99%, 81% and 93%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the final diagnosis of malignancy was positively associated with irregular shape (p 0.001), irregular margin (p 0.001), heterogeneous enhancement (p 0.001), Type 3 enhancement kinetics (p = 0.02), increasing patient age (p = 0.02) and larger lesion size (p 0.001). In multivariate analysis, significant associations with malignancy remained for mass shape (p = 0.06), mass margin (p 0.001), internal enhancement pattern (p = 0.03) and Type 3 enhancement kinetics (p = 0.06).The ACR BI-RADS® breast lesion descriptors that are mostly strongly associated with breast cancer in breast MR imaging at 3 T are lesion shape, lesion margin, internal enhancement pattern and Type 3 enhancement kinetics.• 3 Tesla breast MRI allows an accurate diagnosis of breast cancer • The BI-RADS® descriptors help provide a confident diagnosis • The shape, margin, enhancement pattern and kinetics are the most important features • An irregular shape and margin, heterogeneous enhancement and type-3 kinetics indicate malignancy.

11093 Background: Recently, functional imaging techniques such as diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) have been added to routine MR and have shown great potential for improving breast cancer diagnosis. DWI depicts cellular diffusivity on a molecular level and can be quantified using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). In malignant tumors diffusivity is restricted, leading to lower ADC values than benign tumors. The aim of this study was to proof, that DWI can be used to differentiate benign from malignant tumors and to elucidate if ADC can serve as an imaging biomarker for breast cancer invasiveness. Methods: In this IRB-approved study 250 patients with 267 suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS IV-V) were included. All patients underwent routine MR at 3T. A DWI-sequence was added to a standard imaging protocol, increasing measurement time by 2:30 min. The lesions were identified in routine MR and DWI sequences and ADC values of the lesions were calculated. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference for all lesions. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare the ADC values of benign and malignant tumors (cut-off value 1.25×10-3mm²/s), of invasive and non-invasive disease and between different invasive tumor subtypes. Results: There were 91 benign (mean ADC 1.58×10-3mm²/s) and 176 malignant (.94×10-3mm²/s) lesions, sensitivity and specificity were 94.3% (PPV 95.4%, CI 0.91-0.98) and 91.2% (NPV 89.2%, CI 0.81-0.94). 155 lesions were invasive cancers (median ADC .90×10-3mm²/s), while 21 were non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (1.22×10-3mm²/s). The invasive cancers were 130 invasive ductal (median ADC .91×10-3mm²/s) and 25 invasive lobular cancers (.83×10-3mm²/s). ADC was significantly different between benign and malignant lesions (p

10570 Background: To evaluate if PET-MRI of breast tumors improves staging of breast cancer and obviates unnecessary breast biopsies. Methods: 106 patients with breast tumors detected by mammography or ultrasound and classified as BIRADS 3-5 were included in this IRB approved prospective study. All patients were examined with dedicated 18FDG-PET-CT and 3T multiparametric MRI of the breast. Examinations were scheduled no longer than 7 days apart. MRI protocol included: a diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI), a T2-w sequence and a contrast-enhanced combined high temporal and spatial resolution 3D-T1-w sequence before and after application of a standard dose Gd-DOTA. For PET-CT patients fasted at least 6 h before injection of approx. 300 MBq 18F-FDG based on the patients weight. Scanning was started 45 min after injection. Blood glucose levels were 18F-FDG–avidity and classified as positive when 18F-FDG-uptake was greater than blood-pool activity. Additionally, nodal status was recorded for each technique and patient. Histopathology was used as the standard of reference. Results: PET-MRI achieved an excellent sensitivity of 100%. Specificity was increased from 68% to 80% as compared to routinely used MRI. Diagnostic accuracy of PET-MRI for diagnosis of breast cancer was 95%. PET-MRI would have obviated unnecessary breast biopsies in 80% of benign breast lesions without missing any cancers. Additionally, PET-MRI increased sensitivity in the detection of lymphnode metastases from 70% to 87% compared to MRI alone. Conclusions: With PET-MRI unnecessary breast biopsies can be obviated without missing any cancers. PET-MRI increases overall diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymphnode metastases for an accurate staging.

The purpose of this study was to compare three different biopsy devices on false-negative and underestimation rates in MR-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of MRI-only lesions. This retrospective, single-center study was IRB-approved. Informed consent was waived. 467 consecutive patients underwent 487 MR-guided VABB using three different 8-10-gauge-VABB devices (Atec-9-gauge,A; Mammotome-8-gauge,M; Vacora-10-gauge,V). VABB data (lesion-type, size, biopsy device, histopathology) were compared to final diagnosis (surgery, n = 210 and follow-up, n = 277). Chi-square, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were applied. P values

Background Multiparametric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (mpPET/MRI) shows clinical potential for detection and classification of breast lesions. Yet, the contribution of features for computer-aided segmentation and diagnosis (CAD) need to be better understood. We proposed a data-driven machine learning approach for a CAD system combining dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET. Methods The CAD incorporated a random forest (RF) classifier combined with mpPET/MRI intensity-based features for lesion segmentation and shape features, kinetic and spatio-temporal texture features, for lesion classification. The CAD pipeline detected and segmented suspicious regions and classified lesions as benign or malignant. The inherent feature selection method of RF and alternatively the minimum-redundancy-maximum-relevance feature ranking method were used. Results In 34 patients, we report a detection rate of 10/12 (83.3%) and 22/22 (100%) for benign and malignant lesions, respectively, a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.665 for segmentation, and a classification performance with an area under the curve at receiver operating characteristics analysis of 0.978, a sensitivity of 0.946, and a specificity of 0.936. Segmentation but not classification performance of DCE-MRI improved with information from DWI and FDG-PET. Feature ranking revealed that kinetic and spatio-temporal texture features had the highest contribution for lesion classification. 18F-FDG-PET and morphologic features were less predictive. Conclusion Our CAD enables the assessment of the relevance of mpPET/MRI features on segmentation and classification accuracy. It may aid as a novel computational tool for exploring different modalities/features and their contributions for the detection and classification of breast lesions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41747-019-0096-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained through diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T can be used as an imaging biomarker to differentiate invasive breast cancer from noninvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).One hundred seventy-six histopathologically verified primary malignant breast tumors were retrospectively evaluated in 170 patients. All patients had undergone a standardized 3-T magnetic resonance imaging protocol, containing a diffusion-weighted sequence with 2 b values and a series of dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Apparent diffusion coefficient was measured manually by a reader blinded to the histopathological results. The ADC values were correlated with histopathological results. Mean ADC values were compared between invasive cancers and DCIS as well as between different tumor grades. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to calculate diagnostic performance.There were 155 invasive cancers and 21 noninvasive DCIS. Mean (SD) values differed significantly between the invasive cancers (0.9 [0.15] ×10 mm/s) and the DCIS (1.24 [0.23] ×10 mm/s, P0.001). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.895 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.840-0.936). A threshold of 1.01 ×10 mm/s or less allowed an identification of invasive cancers with a sensitivity of 78.06% (95% CI, 70.7%-84.3%) and a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI, 69.6%-98.8%). No significant ADC differences were found among different tumor grades (P0.05).Apparent diffusion coefficient could be used as an imaging biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer. It seems to be a valuable noninvasive quantitative biomarker to assess breast cancer invasiveness. Thus, ADC measurements provide the potential to reduce overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment.