Search

Background: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the merits and drawbacks between reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN) and unreamed intramedullary nailing (URIN) among adults.Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE database through the PubMed search engine, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase, VIPI (Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to March 2020. Outcomes of interest included nonunion rates, implant failure rates, secondary procedure rates, blood loss, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rates, and pulmonary complications rates.Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included. The result of nonunion rates shows that the nonunion rate is significantly lower in the RIN group (RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.09-0.48, Z = 3.63, P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences for the risk of implant failure rates (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.18-1.69, Z = 1.04, P = 0.30). The secondary procedure rates were significantly lower in the RIN group (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.12-0.66, Z = 2.91, P = 0.004). The result shows that the blood loss of URIN group is significantly lower (RR = 145.52, 95% CI = 39.68-251.36, Z = 2.69, P = 0.007). The result shows that there was no significant difference in the ARDS rates (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.37-6.29, Z = 0.59, P = 0.55) and the pulmonary complications rates between RIN group and URIN group (RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.61-4.17, Z = 0.94, P = 0.35).Conclusions: Reamed intramedullary nailing would lead to lower nonunion rate, secondary procedure rate and more blood loss. Unreamed intramedullary nailing is related to a higher nonunion rate, secondary procedure rate and less blood loss. No significant difference is found in implant failure rate, ARDS rate and pulmonary complication rate between the two groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Patients with orphan disease were easily overlooked during the COVID-19 pandemic. • We investigated the challenges of patients with spinal muscular atrophy. • The hospitalization and intensive care unit stay rate were significantly higher in type I patients. • This is the first large evidence-based survey on patients with spinal muscular atrophy in this context. To investigate the challenges of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) during the Omicron variant COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in China from January 02, 2023, to January 12, 2023, using a questionnaire that covered three aspects: (1) Demographic information; (2) SMA-related information; and (3) COVID-19-related information. We recruited patients with SMA from 33 provinces. The prevalence, course, and clinical manifestations of COVID-19 were calculated. The relationships between independent and outcome variables were investigated. In total, 677 patients (male: 349; female: 328) were included in this study (average age = 11.40 years); 534 (78.88%) suffered from COVID-19. The most common symptoms were fever (95.51%), cough (57.87%), and sputum (49.44%). Of the infected patients, 91.57% recovered with at-home care, and 8.43% were hospitalized; 1.31% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A positive correlation was observed between the SMA severity and hospitalization rate. The ICU stay rate in patients with SMA type I was significantly higher than that in other SMA types. This is the first large sample survey to timely reveal the living situation of patients with SMA during the COVID-19 pandemic's Omicron variant. Patients with SMA type I should be paid more attention in terms of hospitalization and ICU stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]