Search

Background: It has recently been suggested that statins could slow the progression of aortic stenosis, but this hypothesis has not been validated in large series. Moreover, there is little information about the role of statin treatment in patients with aortic valve sclerosis., Methods: From our database 1988--2002, we retrospectively identified 1136 consecutive patients with aortic valve sclerosis (peak aortic velocity [Vmax] > 1.5 and < 2 m/s), or mild to moderate aortic stenosis (Vmax 2.0-3.9 m/s) and with > or = 2 echocardiographic studies > or = 6 months apart; 121 (11 %) were treated with statins. As a control group we randomly selected 121 age-gender-matched patients not treated with statins, with similar initial Vmax., Results: The mean follow-up duration was 54+/-34 months in the statin group, and 50+/-33 months in controls (p = 0.35). There were no differences between statin-treated patients and controls with respect to age, gender, and prevalence of hypertension. More patients in the statin group had documented hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, or had proven coronary artery disease. Overall, the rate of change of Vmax was not different between statin-treated patients and controls (0.13+/-0.24 vs 0.14+/-0.19 m/s/year, p = 0.72). However, in the subgroup of patients with aortic valve sclerosis (n = 52, 26 statin-treated, 26 controls), the rate of change of Vmax was significantly lower in statin-treated patients (0.04+/-0.04 vs 0.08+/-0.06 m/s/year, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: The results of our retrospective study show that statins could be beneficial in retarding the progression of valvular aortic sclerosis to aortic stenosis. This suggests that statins retard the progression of aortic valve lesion in its early stage, a finding that may have important implications in the management of this very common disease.

Spontaneous closure of a postinfarction ventricular septal rupture is extremely rare. We present such a case in which the postinfarction ventricular septal rupture closed spontaneously during follow-up. We postulate that the spontaneous closure of the ventricular septal rupture was probably due to thrombosis in the apical and septal aneurysm.

Hypertension and aortic stenosis represent 2 different models of left ventricular systolic overload. Previous studies have observed different remodeling patterns in these conditions. There is, however, little information about patients with coexisting aortic stenosis and hypertension. Echocardiography was performed in 193 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (113 males, 80 females; mean age, 68+/-9 years). The prevalence of systemic hypertension was assessed. Left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were measured from M-mode echocardiography. Four different left ventricular remodeling patterns were identified: normal remodeling, concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy. A history of hypertension was present in 62 patients (32%), whereas 131 patients were normotensive. No significant differences were found between hypertensive and normotensive patients with respect to age, male/female ratio, mean New York Heart Association class, distribution of symptoms, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and remodeling patterns. In hypertensive patients, however, symptoms were present with larger aortic valve areas and lower stroke work loss. Systemic hypertension is not rare in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (32% in our series). Left ventricular remodeling patterns are quite similar in hypertensive and normotensive aortic stenosis. Our results suggest that symptoms of aortic stenosis develop with larger valve area and lower stroke work loss in hypertensive patients, probably because of the additional overload due to hypertension itself. It could suggest that in patients with coexisting hypertension and aortic stenosis, hypertension should be treated more aggressively to delay the occurrence of symptoms, and these patients should be followed-up more closely.

Background: Dual chamber pacing (DDD) in the elderly is still a controversial issue because of its short life expectancy and the risk of atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was 1) to evaluate the cumulative survival and the events capable of modifying it, 2) to evaluate the stability of sinus rhythm, and 3) to try to identify patients who are at a higher risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation after DDD implantation. We evaluated clinical, electrophysiological and pacing parameters at the time of implantation., Methods: We examined retrospectively a group of 135 consecutive patients who were > 80 years old and who were treated with DDD in the last decade., Results: At the time of evaluation (mean 33.51 +/- 27.10 months, range 4-148 months) after DDD implantation, 72% of patients were still alive. Sinus rhythm was documented in 96 (71%) patients (group A). Thirty-nine (29%) patients (group B) developed atrial fibrillation after a mean period of 28.56 +/- 30.9 months (range 1-125 months). The right atrial endocavitary signal amplitude was lower in group B compared to that observed in group A (2.6 +/- 1.16 vs 3.27 +/- 1.91 mV). The pacing and sensing atrioventricular delay were not statistically different in both groups. The minimum heart rate was higher in patients who developed atrial fibrillation (64.53 +/- 7.7 vs 67.7 +/- 5.72 b/min respectively in group A and in group B, p = 0.02). Group B patients had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation pre-implantation episodes. The incidences of sick sinus disease and of atrioventricular nodal disease were similar in both groups., Conclusions: In elderly patients the benefits of DDD are maintained for a long period of time before the development of atrial fibrillation. Episodes of atrial fibrillation prior to DDD, apart from sinus dysfunction alone, are predictive of the development of a permanent atrial fibrillation. Permanent atrial fibrillation does not seem to reduce life expectancy. A higher minimum heart rate does not seem to prevent atrial fibrillation. The capability of recording a right atrial signal amplitude > 3 mV seems to identify those patients with a lower risk of developing atrial fibrillation.

We report the case of a 56-year-old woman who was admitted because of left pulmonary embolism. An episode of ischemic stroke occurred during hospitalization. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a right atrial appendage thrombus and a patent foramen ovale with right to left shunting. This suggested paradoxical embolism across a patent foramen ovale as the most reasonable explanation of the ischemic stroke in this patient, in the presence of right cardiac overload secondary to the hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. The patient's clinical conditions dramatically improved after anticoagulant therapy.

Background: In addition to the conventional "flow-corrected" parameters (continuity equation and aortic valve resistance), new and simpler Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis have recently been introduced. These measures can be classified as "function-corrected" indexes (fractional shortening-velocity ratio and ejection fraction-velocity ratio) and "pressure-corrected" indexes (percent stroke work loss). Little information however is available about the diagnostic accuracy of each of these parameters in identifying patients with severe aortic stenosis in low-flow states, in which the diagnosis and clinical decision-making are more difficult and challenging., Methods: We analyzed 161 patients with aortic stenosis (96 males, 65 females, mean age 68 +/- 9 years) and a low cardiac output (thermodilution cardiac index < or = 2.5 l/min/m2). All patients underwent both cardiac catheterization and echocardiography within 48 hours one of the other. The invasive Gorlin valve area was used as gold standard (severe aortic stenosis = Gorlin < or = 0.8 cm2). Echocardiographic indexes were assessed by an investigator who was unaware of the hemodynamic findings., Results: The mean Gorlin aortic valve area was 0.7 +/- 0.3 cm2; cardiac catheterization allowed the identification of 129 patients with severe aortic stenosis and of 32 with mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the Doppler gradient alone was low (sensitivity 55%). The best linear correlation with the Gorlin value was found using the "function-corrected" ejection fraction-velocity ratio (r = 0.85). Similarly, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients with severe aortic stenosis, as assessed by cardiac catheterization, was observed using the ejection fraction-velocity ratio (sensitivity 87%, specificity 88%)., Conclusions: In patients with aortic stenosis and a low cardiac output, the "function-corrected" ejection fraction-velocity ratio offers the better diagnostic accuracy, as compared with the cardiac catheterization valve area calculation.