Search

Your search keyword '"Huang, Gene O."' showing total 27 results
Start Over Author "Huang, Gene O."
27 results on '"Huang, Gene O."'

8. WITHDRAWN: Open versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation: Hospital Charges Analysis and Outcomes at a Single Institution

Author

Elizondo, Rodolfo A., primary, Au, Jason K., additional, Song, Sang Hoon, additional, Huang, Gene O., additional, Zhang, Wei, additional, Zhu, Huirong, additional, Janzen, Nicolette, additional, Seth, Abhishek, additional, Roth, David R., additional, Tu, Duong T., additional, and Koh, Chester J., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Surgical interventions and anesthesia in the 1st year of life for lower urinary tract obstruction

Author

Puttmann, Kathleen T., primary, White, Jeffrey T., additional, Huang, Gene O., additional, Sheth, Kunj, additional, Elizondo, Rodolfo, additional, Zhu, Huirong, additional, Braun, Michael C., additional, Mann, David G., additional, Olutoye, Olutoyin A., additional, Tu, Duong D., additional, Ruano, Rodrigo, additional, Belfort, Michael, additional, Brandt, Mary L., additional, Roth, David R., additional, and Koh, Chester J., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Pediatric medical device development by surgeons via capstone engineering design programs

Author

Sack, Bryan S., primary, Elizondo, Rodolfo A., additional, Huang, Gene O., additional, Janzen, Nicolette, additional, Espinoza, Jimmy, additional, Sanz-Cortes, Magdalena, additional, Dietrich, Jennifer E., additional, Hakim, Julie, additional, Richardson, Eric S., additional, Oden, Maria, additional, Hanks, John, additional, Haridas, Balakrishna, additional, Hury, James F., additional, and Koh, Chester J., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Detection of Uric Acid Stones in the Ureter Using Low- and Conventional-dose Computed Tomography

Author

Huang, Gene O., primary, Engebretsen, Steven R., additional, Smith, Jason C., additional, Wallner, Caroline L., additional, Culpepper, David J., additional, Creech, Jonathan D., additional, Ng, Caleb C., additional, Mai, Andrew T., additional, Chung, Christopher S., additional, Olgin, Gaudencio, additional, Arnold, Don C., additional, and Baldwin, D. Duane, additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: Hospital charges analysis and outcomes at a single institution.

Author

Elizondo RA, Au JK, Song SH, Huang GO, Zhang W, Zhu H, Janzen N, Seth A, Roth DR, Tu DT, and Koh CJ

Abstract

Purpose: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has previously been described as a viable minimally invasive option to open surgery. However, concerns for robotic surgery have been raised owing to assumed higher costs and heterogeneous clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that similar hospital charges and clinical outcomes occur when comparing open and robotic cases in matched cohorts., Materials and Methods: Open and robotic reimplantation cases from 2013 to 2015 for primary vesicoureteral reflux were matched by age using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching. The matched cohorts were analyzed and compared for their direct itemized hospital charges per surgical case, complications, and clinical outcomes., Results: There were 38 patients in each group after age-matching the 135 patients. Operating room charges were higher for the robotic group compared to the open group (p=0.002), whereas pharmacy and laboratory costs were lower for the robotic group. However, there were no significant differences in total overall charges between the open and robotic groups with cystoscopy or without cystoscopy (p=0.345, p=0.533), since the median hospital stay length was shorter for the robotic group (p<0.001). Clinical success rates were identical for the two groups (open 94.8% vs robotic 94.8%). There were also no significant differences in number of complications between the two cohorts., Conclusions: This is the first age-matched study comparing hospital charges and clinical outcomes of pediatric open and robotic reimplantation. While operating room charges were higher for the robotic cohort, lower hospitalization charges led to comparable overall hospital charges, as well as equivalent clinical outcomes for both cohorts., Level of Study: Level III (Retrospective comparative study) TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Study., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Evidence-Based Management of Patients with 45,X/46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis and Male Sex Assignment: from Infancy to Adulthood.

Author

Colindres JV, Axelrad M, McCullough L, Smith EO, Huang GO, Tu DD, Bercaw-Pratt JL, Cheni MJ, Mendiratta M, Gunn S, Sutton R, Macias C, and Karaviti LP

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Gonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XY diagnosis, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Sex Reassignment Procedures standards, Evidence-Based Practice standards, Gonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XY therapy, Sex Reassignment Procedures statistics & numerical data
Abstract

45,X/46,XY gonadal dysgenesis is a disorder of sexual differentiation with a wide clinical presentation, ranging from Turner-like females to individuals with genital ambiguity to azoospermic but otherwise normal-appearing males. Hence, patients can be assigned female or male sex. Female patients are managed according to the Turner Syndrome Guidelines, whereas males are managed on a case-by-case basis. Male patients present with multiple medical challenges: undervirilization, hypogonadism, gonadoblastoma risk, and short stature. Many require surgeries and hormonal treatments that are time-sensitive and irreversible. Nonetheless, these therapeutic decisions are made without evidence-based guidelines. This review describes the medical concerns and possible interventions in male patients with 45,X/46,XY dysgenesis for each stage of development. Interventions should be addressed within a patient-centered framework by a multidisciplinary team and after thorough discussion with the family. We use the GRADE system to appraise the existing evidence and provide recommendations based on the available evidence.

Published
2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results