Search

Several molecular markers, such as NPM1, FLT3 and CEBPA, have been incorporated into both the World Health Organization and European LeukemiaNet classifications as routine assessments for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Lipocalin 2 ( LCN2) is related to cancer development and is believed to be associated with the outcome of cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML. In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic effects and interactions of LCN2 expression (by molecular analysis, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction [qRT-PCR]) with neucleophosmin 1, fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ( FLT3) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha mutations in 85 patients with CN-AML receiving intensive induction chemotherapy. Our results indicate that patients with higher LCN2 mRNA expression in the bone marrow ( LCN2high), especially in combination with wild type FLT3-ITD, had better prognoses. FLT3-ITD compensated LCN2-overexpression-enhanced oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in cell line studies. In conclusion, LCN2high was associated with better prognosis, and FLT3 status had an adjuvant effect on overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented discussing the case study of a patient with subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma whose positron-emission tomography findings indicated the involvement of the whole body skin in the lymphoma.

Background: The outcome of allotransplants in patients with chronic -phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who progressed to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) following imatinib failure, especially those without preceding suboptimal response, remains unclear., Patients and Methods: One hundred and five patients with newly-diagnosed CML-CP were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-six patients received first-line imatinib therapy, 26 received interferon followed by imatinib, and 13 received front-line allotransplants., Results: No significant differences were found in overall survival (p=0.57) and blast-free survival (p=0.25) between different first-line therapies. Among 66 imatinib-treated patients, 18 (27.3%) developed imatinib failure, 14 (21.2%) progressed to AP/BP, including eight without preceding suboptimal response. Compared to front-line allotransplant, patients with imatinib failure had a significantly worse overall survival after allotransplants (p=0.015), mainly due to an increase of treatment-related mortality., Conclusion: Early recognition of imatinib-treated patients who should receive an allotransplant is important rather than waiting until imatinib failure with disease progression.