Search

Inattention plays a critical role in the accuracy of threshold measurements, e.g., when using mobile devices. To describe the influence of distraction, long- and short-term inattention models based on either a stationary or a non-stationary psychometric function were developed and used to generate three simulated listeners: fully-, moderately-, and non-concentrated listeners. Six established adaptive procedures were assessed via Monte-Carlo simulations in combination with the inattention models and compared with a newly proposed method: the graded response bracketing procedure (GRaBr). Robustness was examined by bias and root mean square error between the "true" and estimated thresholds while efficiency was evaluated using rates of convergence and a normalized efficiency index. The findings show that inattention has a detrimental impact on adaptive procedure performance-especially for the short-term inattentive listener-and that several model-based procedures relying on a consistent response behavior of the listener are prone to errors owing to inattention. The model-free procedure GRaBr, on the other hand, is considerably robust and efficient in spite of the (assumed) inattention. As a result, adaptive techniques with desired properties (i.e., high robustness and efficiency) as revealed in our simulations-such as GRaBr-appear to be advantageous for mobile devices or in laboratory tests with untrained subjects., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Plomp introduced an empirical separation of the increased speech recognition thresholds (SRT) in listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss into an Attenuation (A) component (which can be compensated by amplification) and a non-compensable Distortion (D) component. Previous own research backed up this notion by speech recognition models that derive their SRT prediction from the individual audiogram with or without a psychoacoustic measure of suprathreshold processing deficits. To determine the precision in separating the A and D component for the individual listener with various individual measures and individualized models, SRTs with 40 listeners with a variation in hearing impairment were obtained in quiet, stationary noise, and fluctuating noise (ICRA 5-250 and babble). Both the clinical audiogram and an adaptive, precise sweep audiogram were obtained as well as tone-in-noise detection thresholds at four frequencies to characterize the individual hearing impairment. For predicting the SRT, the FADE-model (which is based on machine learning) was used with either of the two audiogram procedures and optionally the individual tone-in-noise detection thresholds. The results indicate that the precisely measured swept tone audiogram allows for a more precise prediction of the individual SRT in comparison to the clinical audiogram (RMS error of 4.3 dB vs. 6.4 dB, respectively). While an estimation from the precise audiogram and FADE performed equally well in predicting the individual A and D component, the further refinement of including the tone-in-noise detection threshold with FADE led to a slight improvement of prediction accuracy (RMS error of 3.3 dB, 4.6 dB and 1.4 dB, for SRT, A and D component, respectively). Hence, applying FADE is advantageous for scientific purposes where a consistent modeling of different psychoacoustical effects in the same listener with a minimum amount of assumptions is desirable. For clinical purposes, however, a precisely measured audiogram and an estimation of the expected D component using a linear regression appears to be a satisfactory first step towards precision audiology., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Spatial noise reduction algorithms ("beamformers") can considerably improve speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. The goal of this study was to model SRTs and SRT-benefit due to beamformers for bimodal CI users. Two existing model approaches varying in computational complexity and binaural processing assumption were compared: (i) the framework of auditory discrimination experiments (FADE) and (ii) the binaural speech intelligibility model (BSIM), both with CI and aided hearing-impaired front-ends. The exact same acoustic scenarios, and open-access beamformers as in the comparison clinical study Zedan et al. (2021) were used to quantify goodness of prediction. FADE was capable of modeling SRTs ab-initio, i.e., no calibration of the model was necessary to achieve high correlations and low root-mean square errors (RMSE) to both, measured SRTs (r = 0.85, RMSE = 2.8 dB) and to measured SRT-benefits (r = 0.96). BSIM achieved somewhat poorer predictions to both, measured SRTs (r = 0.78, RMSE = 6.7 dB) and to measured SRT-benefits (r = 0.91) and needs to be calibrated for matching average SRTs in one condition. Greatest deviations in predictions of BSIM were observed in diffuse multi-talker babble noise, which were not found with FADE. SRT-benefit predictions of both models were similar to instrumental signal-to-noise ratio (iSNR) improvements due to the beamformers. This indicates that FADE is preferrable for modeling absolute SRTs. However, for prediction of SRT-benefit due to spatial noise reduction algorithms in bimodal CI users, the average iSNR is a much simpler approach with similar performance., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: A model-based determination of the average supra-threshold ("distortion") component of hearing impairment which limits the benefit of hearing aid amplification., Design: Published speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were predicted with the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE), which simulates recognition processes, the speech intelligibility index (SII), which exploits frequency-dependent signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and a modified SII with a hearing-loss-dependent band importance function (PAV). Their attenuation-component-based prediction errors were interpreted as estimates of the distortion component., Study Sample: Unaided SRTs of 315 hearing-impaired ears measured with the German matrix sentence test in stationary noise., Results: Overall, the models showed root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of 7 dB, but for steeply sloping hearing loss FADE and PAV were more accurate (RMSE = 9 dB) than the SII (RMSE = 23 dB). Prediction errors of FADE and PAV increased linearly with the average hearing loss. The consideration of the distortion component estimate significantly improved the accuracy of FADE's and PAV's predictions., Conclusions: The supra-threshold distortion component-estimated by prediction errors of FADE and PAV-seems to increase with the average hearing loss. Accounting for a distortion component improves the model predictions and implies a need for effective compensation strategies for supra-threshold processing deficits with increasing audibility loss.

Developing and selecting hearing aids is a time consuming process which is simplified by using objective models. Previously, the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE) accurately simulated benefits of hearing aid algorithms with root mean squared prediction errors below 3 dB. One FADE simulation requires several hours of (un)processed signals, which is obstructive when the signals have to be recorded. We propose and evaluate a data-reduced FADE version (DARF) which facilitates simulations with signals that cannot be processed digitally, but that can only be recorded in real-time. DARF simulates one speech recognition threshold (SRT) with about 30 min of recorded and processed signals of the (German) matrix sentence test. Benchmark experiments were carried out to compare DARF and standard FADE exhibiting small differences for stationary maskers (1 dB), but larger differences with strongly fluctuating maskers (5 dB). Hearing impairment and hearing aid algorithms seemed to reduce the differences. Hearing aid benefits were simulated in terms of speech recognition with three pairs of real hearing aids in silence (≥8 dB), in stationary and fluctuating maskers in co-located (stat. 2 dB; fluct. 6 dB), and spatially separated speech and noise signals (stat. ≥8 dB; fluct. 8 dB). The simulations were plausible in comparison to data from literature, but a comparison with empirical data is still open. DARF facilitates objective SRT simulations with real devices with unknown signal processing in real environments. Yet, a validation of DARF for devices with unknown signal processing is still pending since it was only tested with three similar devices. Nonetheless, DARF could be used for improving as well as for developing or model-based fitting of hearing aids., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Listeners with hearing impairment show sub-optimal processing of acoustic signals which affects their ability to recognize speech. In this contribution, three effective signal processing deficits are proposed to simulate sensorineural hearing impairment and their effect on simulated speech recognition performance is studied. Psychoacoustic and speech recognition experiments were simulated with the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE). Loss in absolute hearing threshold was modeled as lower level limit, supra-threshold loss in envelope amplitude resolution as multiplicative noise, and reduced spectral resolution was simulated with an increase of the analysis bandwidth. Their effects on the speech recognition performance with the German matrix test in quiet and noise, the audiogram, and tone in (notched) noise detection experiments were systematically examined. The simulations indicate that each psychoacoustic experiment relates to at least one signal processing deficit. This indicates the possibility to determine individual model parameters from the outcome of psychoacoustic experiments. Moreover, absolute hearing thresholds yield the highest effects on simulated speech recognition thresholds, followed by supra-threshold loss in envelope amplitude resolution, and-to a much smaller degree-spectral resolution. A reduced spectral resolution only affected recognition performance in fluctuating masker for normal hearing thresholds, indicating its potential relevance for more complex listening conditions. In contrast to popular interpretations in the literature, the simulations reveal that reduced spectral resolution plays a minor role compared to a reduced envelope amplitude resolution in characterizing supra-threshold hearing loss at least in stationary noise., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The benefit in speech-recognition performance due to the compensation of a hearing loss can vary between listeners, even if unaided performance and hearing thresholds are similar. To accurately predict the individual performance benefit due to a specific hearing device, a prediction model is proposed which takes into account hearing thresholds and a frequency-dependent suprathreshold component of impaired hearing. To test the model, the German matrix sentence test was performed in unaided and individually aided conditions in quiet and in noise by 18 listeners with different degrees of hearing loss. The outcomes were predicted by an individualized automatic speech-recognition system where the individualization parameter for the suprathreshold component of hearing loss was inferred from tone-in-noise detection thresholds. The suprathreshold component was implemented as a frequency-dependent multiplicative noise (mimicking level uncertainty) in the feature-extraction stage of the automatic speech-recognition system. Its inclusion improved the root-mean-square prediction error of individual speech-recognition thresholds (SRTs) from 6.3 dB to 4.2 dB and of individual benefits in SRT due to common compensation strategies from 5.1 dB to 3.4 dB. The outcome predictions are highly correlated with both the corresponding observed SRTs ( R 2  = .94) and the benefits in SRT ( R 2  = .89) and hence might help to better understand-and eventually mitigate-the perceptual consequences of as yet unexplained hearing problems, also discussed in the context of hidden hearing loss.

Sound onsets provide particularly valuable cues for musical instrument identification by human listeners. It has remained unclear whether this onset advantage is due to enhanced perceptual encoding or the richness of acoustical information during onsets. Here this issue was approached by modeling a recent study on instrument identification from tone excerpts [Siedenburg. (2019). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145(2), 1078-1087]. A simple Hidden Markov Model classifier with separable Gabor filterbank features simulated human performance and replicated the onset advantage observed previously for human listeners. These results provide evidence that the onset advantage may be driven by the distinct acoustic qualities of onsets.

In many applications in which speech is played back via a sound reinforcement system such as public address systems and mobile phones, speech intelligibility is degraded by additive environmental noise. A possible solution to maintain high intelligibility in noise is to pre-process the speech signal based on the estimated noise power at the position of the listener. The previously proposed AdaptDRC algorithm [Schepker, Rennies, and Doclo (2015). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 2692-2706] applies both frequency shaping and dynamic range compression under an equal-power constraint, where the processing is adaptively controlled by short-term estimates of the speech intelligibility index. Previous evaluations of the algorithm have focused on normal-hearing listeners. In this study, the algorithm was extended with an adaptive gain stage under an equal-peak-power constraint, and evaluated with eleven normal-hearing and ten mildly to moderately hearing-impaired listeners. For normal-hearing listeners, average improvements in speech reception thresholds of about 4 and 8 dB compared to the unprocessed reference condition were measured for the original algorithm and its extension, respectively. For hearing-impaired listeners, the average improvements were about 2 and 6 dB, indicating that the relative improvement due to the proposed adaptive gain stage was larger for these listeners than the benefit of the original processing stages.