Search

The increasing use of hyaluronic acid (HA) implants has made adverse effects more apparent. Here, we present a rare case of massive allergic dermatitis due to HA injections. We performed dermoscopy and color ultrasound, which clarified that this was an allergic dermatitis caused by fillers, and analyzed the possible causes of the allergy. Common treatments were compared, and the advantages of 5-FU-based treatment regimens and their associated mechanisms were noted. A low dose of 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide was administered to the patient's entire face and neck, and significant efficacy was achieved. We aimed to gather evidence on extensive dermatitis caused by HA injection, provide new perspectives and solutions for subsequent HA injections, and promote further research on the potential mechanisms of extensive skin inflammation and allergies caused by local HA injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The injection of botulinum toxin into the masseter muscle is an important method for improving hypertrophy. However, some patients may experience adverse reactions, such as sagging of the lower jaw. Therefore, we proposed a method of injecting botulinum toxin into the masseter and platysma muscles that would reduce masseter size and enhance the jawline. Objectives The aim of this study was to reduce the masseter size while enhancing the jawline. Methods Twenty patients received botulinum toxin injections into the masseter and platysma muscles. Pain levels were evaluated with the visual analog scale. All patients were photographed before and 6 months after treatment. Evaluations were performed based on standardized criteria. The lift index, reduction index, and symmetry index were performed to assess the degree of jawline elevation, masseter size reduction, and jawline symmetry before and after treatment. Results The mean visual analog scale score of the 20 patients was 2.80 (±1.24). The mean lift index score decreased from 4.93 (±0.34) to 4.53 (±0.37), P <.05. The mean reduction index score decreased from 3.13 (±0.27) to 2.74 (±0.27), P <.05. The mean symmetry index score changed from 0.0393 (±0.0296) to 0.0257 (±0.0246), P <.05. Conclusions Botulinum toxin injections into the masseter and platysma muscles through nerve block reduced the masseter size, elevated the jawline, and improved symmetry. Level of Evidence: 4 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The demand for mammaplasty has increased in recent years, and infection remains one of the common and serious post‐operative complications. In this study, we analyzed the pathogen distribution and antibiotic susceptibility of breast plastic surgery infections, and compared the differences in pathogenic species between surgical procedures. Methods: The number of each species was counted in the microbial samples of breast plastic surgery infections in Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to December 2021. The in vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing data were analyzed using WHONET 5.6 software. The surgical techniques, the period of infection, and other details were gathered in accordance with the clinical data. Results: There were a total of 42 cases included, and 43 different types of pathogenic bacteria, mostly gram‐positive bacteria, were found. CoNS (13/43) and Staphylococcus aureus (22/43) made up the majority. The most prevalent of the five Gram‐negative bacteria was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Results of drug sensitivity tests indicate that S. aureus is highly sensitive to vancomycin, cotrimoxazole, and linezolid, whereas CoNS is highly sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, and chloramphenicol. Both of these bacteria show high resistance to erythromycin and penicillin. Breast augmentation, breast reconstruction, and breast reduction surgery were the most frequently associated breast surgery procedures in this study with infections, with the highest number of infections occurring following breast augmentation with fat grafting, breast reduction surgery, and breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. Various breast plastic surgery procedures have different common pathogens of infection, but the most prevalent are CoNS and S. aureus. Additionally, the majority of the infections in this study were in the early stages. Conclusions: Gram‐positive bacteria were the predominant cause of breast plastic surgery infections, and the types of infection strains, the period of infection onset, and the antibiotic susceptibility of prevalent strains varied between breast plastic procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]