Search

Background and Aim Methods Results Conclusions Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation could develop after withdrawal following a finite course of nucleoside analog (NA) therapy, leading to virological and clinical relapses. The genetic heterogeneity in the HBV surface and polymerase genes during finite NA therapy has not been carefully studied.Seven chronic HBV‐infected patients experiencing relapses following entecavir (ETV; n = 5; Patients 1 to 5) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; n = 2; Patients 6 and 7) withdrawal were included. Sera obtained before treatment and at relapses were retrieved and submitted for DNA extraction and amplicon‐specific deep sequencing.ETV‐treated patients had a longer time‐to‐relapse than that of TDF‐treated patients (P = 0.0357). No drug‐resistance related polymerase mutation was detected during relapses, except for a low percentage (1.4%) of rtM204I mutation in Patient 1. Two surface truncation mutations (sW216*; 40.9% and sW182*; 4.7%) detected before treatment in two TDF‐treated patients (Patients 6 and 7, respectively) were overtaken by the wild types during subsequent drug‐withdrawal‐related relapses. The simultaneous presence of sG44E (T‐cell epitope) and sE164G (B‐cell epitope) mutations was associated with failure of HBV e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance in ETV‐treated patients.In conclusion, HBV genome continues to evolve during the courses of finite antiviral therapies. Pre‐existing surface truncation mutations can be overtaken by the wild types after relapses. The sG44E/sE164G mutations are associated with failure of HBeAg seroclearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impacts of patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) I148M‐rs738409, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) Ala222Val‐rs1801133, and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) Glu504Lys‐rs671 on the outcomes of Taiwanese patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD) have remained elusive. An 8‐year prospective cohort study of patients with (n = 546) and without (n = 580) SLD (controls) was undertaken in a Taiwanese tertiary care center. The 546 SLD patients comprised 306 (56.0%) men and 240 (44.0%) women with mean ages of 53.3 and 56.4 years, respectively. Compared with the controls, SLD patients had an increased frequency of the PNPLA3 I148M‐rs738409 GG genotype (25.5 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.001). Among the SLD patients, 236 (43.1%) suffered cardiovascular events, 52 (9.5%) showed extrahepatic cancers, 13 (2.38%) experienced hepatic events, including hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3, 0.5%) and liver cirrhosis (n = 8, 1.47%), and none died. The Fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) scores were associated with extrahepatic cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 1.325; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.038–1.691) and cirrhosis development (HR 1.532; 95% CI, 1.055–2.224), and the PNPLA3 I148M‐rs738409 G allele (β = 0.158, 95% CI, 0.054–0.325) was associated with the FIB‐4 score. Stratified analyses showed that the impact of the FIB‐4 score on extrahepatic cancer development was evident only in SLD patients with the PNPLA3 I148M‐rs738409 GG genotype (HR 1.543; 95% CI, 1.195–1.993) and not in patients with the GC or CC genotype. Moreover, the ALDH2 Glu504Lys‐rs671 G allele had a dose‐dependent effect on alcoholism, and the MTHFR and ALDH2 genotypes were not significantly associated with SLD patient outcomes. In conclusion, special vigilance should be exercised for emerging extrahepatic cancer in SLD patients with the PNPLA3 I148M‐rs738409 GG genotype and high FIB‐4 scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A complete investigation of the clinical outcomes after treatment cessation in HBeAg‐positive patients with HBeAg loss is limited. We retrospectively recruited 242 HBeAg‐positive patients with HBeAg loss after a median duration of 37.2 months with tenofovir (TDF, n = 77) or entecavir (ETV, n = 165) treatment. There were 77 (31.8%) patients with sustained virological remission (SVR), 85 (35.1%) with HBeAg‐reversion virological relapse, 80 (33.1%) with HBeAg‐negative virological relapse after treatment cessation, and 23 (9.5%) with HBsAg loss. Clinical data at baseline, on‐treatment and during off‐treatment follow‐up were analyzed. The 3‐year cumulative incidences of overall, HBeAg‐reversion and HBeAg‐negative virological relapse were 70.2%, 54%, and 53.5%, respectively. The common factors associated with HBeAg‐reversion and HBeAg‐negative virological relapse were tenofovir treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.411, p < 0.001; HR = 2.066, p = 0.006, respectively) and HBsAg at end of treatment (EOT) (HR = 1.461, p = 0.001; HR = 1.303, p = 0.019, respectively). The 5‐year cumulative incidence of HBsAg loss in SVR patients was 13.7% and EOT HBsAg was the only associated factor (HR = 0.524, p = 0.024). Compared to that of ETV‐treated patients, TDF‐treated patients had a significantly higher 3‐year cumulative incidence of virological relapse (87.3% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001), earlier HBeAg‐reversion virological relapse (2.9 vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.001), a higher rate of HBeAg‐reversion virological relapse (53.2% vs. 26.7%) and a lower SVR rate (15.6% vs. 39.4%) (p < 0.001). In summary, the clinical outcomes after treatment cessation in HBeAg‐positive patients with HBeAg loss were composed of HBeAg‐reversion virological relapse, HBeAg‐negative virological relapse and SVR. TDF was significantly associated with off‐treatment virological relapse. EOT HBsAg plays an important role in HBsAg loss among SVR patients and posttreatment virological relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication is dependent on the activity of its reverse transcriptase, an error-prone enzyme, which results in the accumulation of genomic mutations. In the natural course of [...]

Simple Summary: Gut dysbiosis with an impaired intestinal barrier is differentially associated with liver diseases and, therefore, alters the systemic immunological milieu through the gut–liver axis. As a result, it plays a prominent role in liver inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis. Here, a list of network features common to patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), regardless of etiology, was identified. In addition, disease-specific signatures were identified. This study provides novel insights that suggest alterations in gut microbial/viral composition may either confer pre-HCC disorders or contribute to the metabolic reprogramming and/or inflammatory microenvironment for HCC development. Gut bacterial/viral dysbiosis, changes in circulating metabolites, and plasma cytokines/chemokines have been previously associated with various liver diseases. Here, we analyzed the associations between fecal microbial composition, circulating metabolites, and plasma cytokines/chemokines in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We recruited 10 HCC patients, 18 LC patients, and 17 healthy individuals. Their stool samples were used for gene sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA and viral genomes, while plasma samples were utilized for the determination of endotoxin, zonulin, metabolite, and cytokine/chemokine levels. Dysbiosis was observed among gut bacteria and viruses, with significant changes in abundance at the genus and species levels, respectively. However, no differences were found between cohorts in the alpha and beta diversity. Plasma lipopolysaccharides and zonulin, but not trimethylamine N-oxide, were progressively increased in LC and HCC subjects. Profiling plasma metabolites and selected cytokines/chemokines revealed differential changes in the LC and HCC cohorts. Following joint correlation and correlation network analyses, regardless of etiology, common network signatures shared by LC and HCC patients were characterized by the gut virus Stenotrophomonas virus DLP5 and the uncultured Caudovirales phage, plasma metabolites pyruvic acid and acetic acid, and plasma cytokines/chemokines eotaxin and PDGF-AB/BB, respectively. Additionally, LC- and HCC-specific correlation networks were also identified. This study provides novel insights into altered gut microbial/viral composition that may contribute to pre-HCC disorders, metabolic reprogramming, or inflammatory microenvironments for hepatocarcinogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]