Search

Objectives: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common and carries significant personal and societal burden. Accurate assessment is necessary for good clinical and research practice but is highly dependent on the assessment technique used. Current practice with regards to UK/international clinical assessment is unknown. We aimed to capture current clinical practice, with reference to contemporaneously available guidelines. We further aimed to compare UK to international practice. Design: Anonymous online questionnaire with cross‐sectional non‐probability sampling. Subgroup analysis according to subspeciality training in rhinology ('rhinologists' and 'non‐rhinologists') was performed, with geographical comparisons only made according to subgroup. Participants: ENT surgeons who assess olfaction. Results: Responses were received from 465 clinicians (217 from UK and 17 countries total). Country‐specific response rate varied, with the lowest rate being obtained from Japan (1.4%) and highest from Greece (72.5%). Most UK clinicians do not perform psychophysical smell testing during any of the presented clinical scenarios—though rhinologists did so more often than non‐rhinologists. The most frequent barriers to testing related to service provision (e.g., time/funding limitations). Whilst there was variability in practice, in general, international respondents performed psychophysical testing more frequently than those from the UK. Approximately 3/4 of all respondents said they would like to receive training in psychophysical smell testing. Patient reported outcome measures were infrequently used in the UK/internationally. More UK respondents performed diagnostic MRI scanning than international respondents. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive UK‐based, and only international survey of clinical practice in the assessment of OD. We present recommendations to improve practice, including increased education and funding for psychophysical smell testing. We hope this will promote accurate and reliable olfactory assessment, as is the accepted standard in other sensory systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on a case of a 33-year-old man who was presented with a left retroauricular swelling and suffered with a similar problem few years ago in his right ear. A tract opening on a painful abscess was found behind the left ear, and a right retroauricular external opening without infection was also revealed during examination. He was diagnosed with a left posterior abscess which was treated by broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Purpose: To determine whether odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, either alone (OMSw/oFB) or in combination with fungus ball (OMSwFB), is associated with specific clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes compared to non-odontogenic maxillary sinusitis., Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent surgical treatment for chronic maxillary sinusitis between 2013 and 2021. OMSw/oFB and OMSwFB patients, were selected as the study group, while patients diagnosed with non-odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (non-OMS) were enrolled as the control group. Predictor variables were OMSw/oFB and OMSwFB. Outcomes were clinical presentation, postoperative complications, and treatment outcome. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were calculated, and the significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05., Results: The sample included 200 patients with a mean age of 49.6 ± 20.1 years and 57.5 % were men. Of the 200 patients, 123 (61.5 %) had non-OMS, 55 (27.5 %) had OMSw/oFB, and 22 (11 %) had OMSwFB. Multivariate analysis showed that OMSw/oFB was associated with more successful treatment rates (OR = 8.19, p < 0.01), whereas OMSwFB was associated with a less favorable outcome (OR = 0.27, p = 0.03). Age was associated with an unfavorable outcome in both OMS groups (OR: 0.98, p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively), but no significant associations with other outcomes were found., Conclusion: This study suggests that OMSwFB is a recalcitrant form of OMS associated with a higher risk of persistent symptoms and less favorable outcome. These patients should be informed about the challenging nature of the disease and closely monitored., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for [Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery] and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Olfactory disorders became known by large parts of the population since the Covid-19 pandemic. The causes of olfactory dysfunctions are manifold. Similar to other sensory impairments the disruption can be qualitative or quantitative. Quantitative olfactory disorders such as anosmia or hyposmia are well explored, whereas the knowledge on qualitative disorders such as parosmia or phantosmia is still limited. This article gives an update on the current clinical knowledge and workup of parosmia and phantosmia., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Olfactory disorders are common and may lead to severe consequences on quality of life. Medical management including treatment options can be proposed to the patients. For this reason, a correct diagnosis is important. Olfactory testing is one of the cornerstones for the diagnosis of smell impairment which helps to quantify the deficit. Despite good and widespread psychophysical olfactory tests, there are still many challenges in testing olfaction. Most of the current available test may not fully account for some cultural and genetic biases. Therefore it is difficult to develop olfactory tests and standardize them across different populations. In this paper we discuss an alternative method based on « white smells » which may help to overcome these issues.