Search

The drivers of immune evasion are not entirely clear, limiting the success of cancer immunotherapies. Here we applied single-cell spatial and perturbational transcriptomics to delineate immune evasion in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer. To this end, we first mapped the spatial organization of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer by profiling more than 2.5 million cells in situ in 130 tumors from 94 patients. This revealed a malignant cell state that reflects tumor genetics and is predictive of T cell and natural killer cell infiltration levels and response to immune checkpoint blockade. We then performed Perturb-seq screens and identified genetic perturbations-including knockout of PTPN1 and ACTR8-that trigger this malignant cell state. Finally, we show that these perturbations, as well as a PTPN1/PTPN2 inhibitor, sensitize ovarian cancer cells to T cell and natural killer cell cytotoxicity, as predicted. This study thus identifies ways to study and target immune evasion by linking genetic variation, cell-state regulators and spatial biology.

* Context.--The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors that have DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability; however, the FDA provided no guidance on which specific clinical assays should be used to determine mismatch repair status. Objective.--To develop an evidence-based guideline to identify the optimal clinical laboratory test to identify defects in DNA mismatch repair in patients with solid tumor malignancies who are being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Design.--The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Using the National Academy of Medicine-endorsed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the recommendations were derived from available evidence, strength of that evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability derived from both polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, and tumor mutation burden derived from large panel next-generation sequencing were within scope. Results.--Six recommendations and 3 good practice statements were developed. More evidence and evidence of higher quality were identified for colorectal cancer and other cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than for cancers arising outside the GI tract. Conclusions.--An optimal assay depends on cancer type. For most cancer types outside of the GI tract and the endometrium, there was insufficient published evidence to recommend a specific clinical assay. Absent published evidence, immunohistochemistry is an acceptable approach readily available in most clinical laboratories. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0632-CP, Clinical laboratory assays for detection of high levels of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI-High) or loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) are familiar to many pathologists [...]

Aims: Recently, SOX17 has emerged as a promising biomarker for non‐mucinous Müllerian (ovarian and endometrial) carcinomas, demonstrating increased specificity in comparison to PAX8 while maintaining similar sensitivity. However, expression of SOX17 in mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma (MLA), a carcinoma of the female genital tract with uncertain, but probably Müllerian histogenesis, remains unexplored. This study aims to address this gap. Methods and results: SOX17 immunohistochemistry was performed on whole tissue sections from 68 MLAs originating from the endometrium or ovary and seven cervical mesonephric carcinomas, as well as six mesonephric remnants/hyperplasias. Using a four‐tiered scoring system based on distribution and intensity of staining, 68% of MLA displayed a negative/low (< 10%) SOX17 expression pattern, which contrasts with the high expression observed in most Müllerian carcinomas. However, 22% of MLA demonstrated high SOX17 expression, similar to other endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Similarly, five of seven (72%) mesonephric carcinomas of the cervix were SOX17‐negative, but two cases (28%) were positive. All mesonephric remnants/hyperplasias were SOX17 negative. Conclusions: The majority of MLA are negative or exhibit low SOX17 expression, in contrast to the diffuse and strong expression commonly seen in other types of Müllerian carcinoma. However, a subset of MLAs demonstrate high SOX17 expression. Therefore, absence of SOX17 staining is supportive for MLA when the differential includes another non‐mucinous Müllerian carcinoma. SOX17 may also be useful for differentiating mesonephric remnants/hyperplasias from Müllerian malignancies and benign Müllerian glandular lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: STK11 adnexal tumour is a rare, recently described malignant neoplasm that is associated with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. [Correction added on 3 October 2024, after first online publication: 'ST11' in preceding sentence has been corrected to 'STK11' in this version.] It predominantly originates from the para‐adnexal soft tissues and often shows secondary involvement of the fallopian tube and ovary. STK11 adnexal tumours have a broad differential diagnosis due to their variable morphology and non‐specific immunoprofile, and diagnostic confirmation currently requires sequencing to identify an STK11 mutation. We investigate the diagnostic utility of STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a cohort of STK11 adnexal tumours and morphological mimics. Methods and results: IHC for STK11 was performed on 122 tumours, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics (10 female adnexal tumours of Wolffian origin, 22 adult granulosa cell tumours, 10 juvenile granulosa cell tumours, four Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours, two Leydig cell tumours, one Sertoli cell tumour, one steroid cell tumour, four extra‐ovarian sex cord‐stromal tumours, 16 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, eight tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinomas, five ovarian mesonephric‐like adenocarcinomas, 14 ovarian carcinosarcomas, five peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas, two pelvic plexiform leiomyomata and one ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumour). All STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic staining for STK11. All other tumour types showed retained cytoplasmic staining, except for one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation which showed complete loss of STK11 expression and a high‐grade serous carcinoma with subclonal loss. Conclusions: STK11 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour from its histological mimics, and can obviate the need for confirmatory molecular studies in the appropriate morphological context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The 2023 FIGO staging criteria for endometrial cancer (EC) introduced marked changes from the 2009 version. The full implication of these changes for patient diagnosis and treatment is unknown. We evaluate the differences in staging and prognostication between the two systems, with and without inclusion of molecular classification. Methods and results: We assigned (1) FIGO 2009, (2) 2023 molecular‐agnostic and (3) 2023 molecular‐informed stages to 404 fully staged and molecularly classified patients with EC. Disease‐specific and progression/relapse‐free survival were analysed via the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log‐rank testing; 118 of 252 (47%) FIGO 2009 stage I patients were upstaged based on histopathological findings alone. Stage I/II subgroup survival distribution analysis showed a worse prognosis in FIGO 2023 IIB and IIC patients. In the molecular‐informed FIGO 2023 system, three of 15 (20%) POLE‐mutated stage I/II cases were downstaged from FIGO 2009 and eight (53%) were downstaged from molecular‐agnostic FIGO 2023. Fifty‐one of 60 (85%) p53‐abnormal tumours were upstaged from the FIGO 2009, whereas 13 of 60 (22%) were upstaged from the 2023 molecular‐agnostic stage. Molecular classification improved prognostic stratification for both 2009 and 2023 FIGO systems. Conclusions: Downstaging based on POLE mutation more accurately represents patient outcomes. However, in the absence of known POLE status, applying molecular‐agnostic FIGO 2023 criteria for stage I/II disease should be conducted with caution. For aggressive histotypes, additionally reporting FIGO 2009 stage should be considered. Upstaging based on substantial lymphovascular space invasion, aggressive histotype with any myometrial invasion and abnormal p53 improves prognostic discernment. Further subdivisions within stage I/II provide minimal additional prognostic information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Decreased oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a marker of poor prognosis in endometrial carcinomas (EC) of no specific molecular profile (NSMP), but the optimal cut‐off to separate high‐risk 'low ER' versus low‐risk 'high ER' expression has not been defined. Here we characterised the distribution of ER staining in a cohort of ECs. Methods and results: Biopsy specimens from 120 cases of NSMP EC were stained for ER and assigned an Allred score. In 66 additional cases ER staining of matched biopsy and hysterectomy were compared. Twelve of 120 tumours had an Allred score of 0–3, including three endometrioid carcinomas (EEA) (one G1, two G3), four clear cell carcinomas (CCC), two mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma (MLA) and one each of: gastric‐type adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma NOS. Three had Allred scores of 4–5: two MLA and one high‐grade carcinoma with yolk sac differentiation. Five had Allred scores of 6: four EEA (one G1, one G2, two G3) and one mixed clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. The remaining 100 tumours with Allred scores ≥ 7 were all EEA (66 G1, 28 G2, five G3 and one grade unknown). Comparing the biopsy versus hysterectomy ER staining (n = 66), the results were within a single Allred score point, except two cases with strong diffuse expression in the biopsy (Allred 8) and moderate expression in the hysterectomy (Allred 5). Conclusions: Most NSMP ECs (> 80%) show high ER expression (Allred score ≥ 7). All non‐endometrioid carcinomas and a few endometrioid carcinomas had lower ER expression (Allred score ≤ 6) or were completely negative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Molecular classification according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) improves endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) prognostication and has specific treatment implications; however, original data were skewed towards low‐grade and low‐stage tumours. Herein, we molecularly classify EECs metastatic at the time of diagnosis or with subsequently documented recurrent/metastatic disease to examine correlation with clinical outcomes. Methods: TCGA categories include POLE‐mutated, microsatellite instability (MSI), p53 abnormal (p53 abnl) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). POLE targeted sequencing at exons 9, 11, 13 and 14 and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PMS2, MSH6 and p53 were performed to establish molecular classification. Results: The distribution in our cohort of 141 EECs was similar to that generally reported in EEC, with nine POLE‐mutated (6%), 45 MSI (32%), 16 p53 abnl (11%) and 71 NSMP (50%), with similar distributions between low‐ and high‐stage cohorts. We demonstrate that when stratified by molecular subtype, disease‐specific survival from the time of high‐stage (stages III–IV) presentation or time of recurrence in low‐stage (stages I–II) disease among metastatic and/or recurrent EEC is strongly associated with TCGA classification (high‐stage P = 0.02, low‐stage P = 0.017). Discordant molecular classification between primary and metastatic/recurrent tumours occurred in four of 105 (3.8%) patients, two related to PMS2/MSH6 IHC and two related to p53 IHC. Conclusions: We demonstrate that molecular classification is prognostically relevant not only at the time of diagnosis, but also at the time of recurrence and in the metastatic setting. Rare subclonal alterations occur and suggest a role for confirming TCGA classification in recurrent/metastatic tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC) is a rare and lethal subtype of ovarian cancer. LGSC is pathologically, biologically, and clinically distinct from the more common high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). LGSC arises from serous borderline ovarian tumours (SBTs). The mechanism of transformation for SBTs to LGSC remains poorly understood. To better understand the biology of LGSC, we performed whole proteome profiling of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue blocks of LGSC (n = 11), HGSC (n = 19), and SBTs (n = 26). We identified that the whole proteome is able to distinguish between histotypes of the ovarian epithelial tumours. Proteins associated with the tumour microenvironment were differentially expressed between LGSC and SBTs. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a protein expressed in cancer‐associated fibroblasts, is the most differentially abundant protein in LGSC compared with SBT. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) for immune markers (CD20, CD79a, CD3, CD8, and CD68) was performed to determine the presence of B cells, T cells, and macrophages. The LGSC FAP+ stroma was associated with greater abundance of Tregs and M2 macrophages, features not present in SBTs. Our proteomics cohort reveals that there are changes in the tumour microenvironment in LGSC compared with its putative precursor lesion, SBT. These changes suggest that the tumour microenvironment provides a supportive environment for LGSC tumourigenesis and progression. Thus, targeting the tumour microenvironment of LGSC may be a viable therapeutic strategy. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian cancer is not a single disease and can be subdivided into at least five different histological subtypes that have different identifiable risk factors, cells of origin, molecular compositions, clinical features and treatments. Ovarian cancer is a global problem, is typically diagnosed at a late stage and has no effective screening strategy. Standard treatments for newly diagnosed cancer consist of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. In recurrent cancer, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are used, and immunological therapies are currently being tested. High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most commonly diagnosed form of ovarian cancer and at diagnosis is typically very responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, in addition to the other histologies, HGSCs frequently relapse and become increasingly resistant to chemotherapy. Consequently, understanding the mechanisms underlying platinum resistance and finding ways to overcome them are active areas of study in ovarian cancer. Substantial progress has been made in identifying genes that are associated with a high risk of ovarian cancer (such as BRCA1 and BRCA2), as well as a precursor lesion of HGSC called serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, which holds promise for identifying individuals at high risk of developing the disease and for developing prevention strategies.