Search

Ammonium persulfate (APS), an oxidizing agent used in hair products, manufacturing, and pool/spa water, can cause skin reactions, including allergic contact dermatitis.To characterize positive patch test reactions to APS (2.5% petrolatum).Retrospective analysis of patients tested to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series from 2015 to 2018.Of 10,526 patients, 193 (1.8%) had positive patch test reactions to APS. Compared with APS-negative patients, APS-positive patients were significantly more likely to be male (43.2% vs 28.0%; P .0001); have primary hand dermatitis (30.2% vs 22.0%; P = .0064), scattered generalized dermatitis (25.5% vs 17.9%; P = .0064), or trunk dermatitis (8.9% vs 4.9%; P = .0123); and have dermatitis that is occupationally related (22.2% vs 10.9%; P .0001). More than half of the APS-positive reactions were currently relevant (57.0%); 19 (9.8%) were related to occupation, especially hairdressers (68.4%). Swimming pools/spas (23.3%) and hair care products (19.2%) were the most common sources of APS.Immediate reactions and follow-up testing were not captured.The proportion of patients positive to APS was 1.8%. APS positivity was significantly associated with male sex and hand dermatitis. Swimming pool/spa chemicals were important sources of APS exposure.

Dermatitis localized to hands (HD), feet (FD), or both hands and feet (HFD) has multiple etiologies, including atopic dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis. Unfortunately, little is known about clinical differences between patients with HD, FD, and HFD.To characterize differences in demographics, etiology, and patch testing results among patients presenting with HD, FD, or HFD referred for patch testing.A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group between 2001 and 2018.Of 43,677 patients who were patch tested, 22.8% had HD, 2.9% had FD, and 3.7% had HFD. Allergic and currently relevant patch test reactions to ≥1 North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening allergen occurred in similar proportions in all 3 study groups. However, HD (18.0%) had higher proportions of occupationally relevant reactions than HFD (8.9%) or FD (4.0%). Nickel and fragrance mix I were in the top 5 currently relevant allergens for HD, FD, and HFD. Other top allergens, as well as allergen sources, differed between HD, FD, and HFD.No data on HD or FD morphology or distribution.HD, FD, and HFD have several differences with respect to patient characteristics, etiologies, and clinically relevant allergens.

Identification of allergens causing medical adhesive contact allergy is difficult.To characterize the demographics, clinical characteristics, patch test results, and occupational data for North American Contact Dermatitis Group patients with medical adhesive contact allergy.A retrospective study of 43,722 North American Contact Dermatitis Group patients patch tested from 2001 to 2018 with medical adhesive (tapes/bandaids/adhesive aids/suture glue) sources, positive patch test results, and final primary diagnoses of allergic contact dermatitis.In total, 313 (0.7%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with other patients with final primary diagnoses of allergic contact dermatitis, patients with a medical adhesive allergy were less likely to be male (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77) and/or aged40 years (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96). The most common North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series allergens were colophony (80.7%), balsam of Peru (3.9%), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.7%), and carba mix (2.7%). One-fourth of the patients (79/313, 25.2%) had positive patch test reactions to supplemental allergens/materials, and 54 (17.3%) of the 313 patients only had reactions to supplemental allergens/materials.Results of comprehensive patch testing may be prone to referral population selection bias and may not be representative of the general dermatology population.Colophony was the most common allergen. Supplemental allergens and materials should be tested in the evaluation of a suspected medical adhesive contact allergy.

ObjectiveCompare the relevance of flow-through versus static diffusion cells data as relates to bioequivalence.MethodsSearch was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar. Keywords utilized: static cells, flow-through cells, percutaneous permeation, percutaneous absorption, dermal absorption, and types of permeation.ResultsFifteen articles were identified with no consistent significant differences between flow-through and static diffusion cells identified; any differences could exist for two main reasons. (1) Sampling time differences and (2) physical chemistry (lipophilic vs hydrophilic) of the penetrant examined.ConclusionEven though there was no consistent significant difference observed, labs have generally adapted to the method they regularly use, which is usually stated in their respective articles. Well-designed multicentered prospective comparative experiments should clarify potential advantages and disadvantages for each. For flow-through systems, the flow rate that most approximates to comparable in vivo data for animals and humans may be preferable.

Soap and water are often considered the gold standard for dermal decontamination. However, recent systematic reviews have shown that these methods often result in incomplete decontamination and may even induce contaminant absorption due to the "wash-in" effect. Therefore, it is important to gain insight on other decontamination methods. A literature search was done using PubMed to find experimental studies relating to dry decontamination performed with readily available items. Seven studies met eligibility criteria, and the study model, dry decontaminant, method of dry decontamination, method of analyzing decontamination, and main conclusions from each study were extracted, summarized, and compared. Important conclusions include that all studies investigated found that dry decontamination yielded decreases in contamination. In addition, it was shown by multiple studies that not only the decontaminant, but the manner in which it is used (method used [blotting, rubbing, etc.], amount used, and whether decontamination instructions are provided to exposed individuals) is vital to success. Finally, in all four studies that investigated wet and dry decontamination combination protocols, combinations were more efficacious than dry decontamination alone. However, this means that dry improvised decontamination can be performed while waiting for the deployment and arrival of further formal decontaminants. These conclusions deserve consideration in the event that universal decontamination guidelines are designed. However, more studies are required in order to draw definitive conclusions regarding the important topic of dermal decontamination.

ImportanceThe common use of isothiazolinones as preservatives is a global cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Differences in allowable concentrations of methylisothiazolinone (MI) exist in Europe, Canada, and the US.ObjectiveTo compare the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to the methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) combination and MI alone in North America and Europe from 2009 to 2018.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group, European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA), and the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) databases included data from patients presenting for patch testing at referral patch test clinics in North America and Europe.ExposuresPatch tests to MCI/MI and MI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrevalence of allergic contact dermatitis to MCI/MI and MI.ResultsFrom 2009 to 2018, participating sites in North America and Europe patch tested a total of 226 161 individuals to MCI/MI and 118 779 to MI. In Europe, positivity to MCI/MI peaked during 2013 and 2014 at 7.6% (ESSCA) and 5.4% (IVDK) before decreasing to 4.4% (ESSCA) and 3.2% (IVDK) during 2017 and 2018. Positive reactions to MI were 5.5% (ESSCA) and 3.4% (IVDK) during 2017 and 2018. In North America, the frequency of positivity to MCI/MI increased steadily through the study period, reaching 10.8% for MCI/MI during 2017 and 2018. Positive reactions to MI were 15.0% during 2017 and 2018.Conclusions and RelevanceThe study results suggest that in contrast to the continued increase in North America, isothiazolinone allergy is decreasing in Europe. This trend may coincide with earlier and more stringent government regulation of MI in Europe.

Purpose of reviewPityriasis lichenoides (PL) is a spectrum of dermatological conditions involving polymorphous lesions. Natural history of the condition ranges from acute to chronic. Cases of PL following SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination have been reported, but not yet comprehensively reviewed. Hence, the objective of this article is to review and summarize cases of PL following SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination in order to guide clinicians in its diagnosis and management.Recent findingsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles. Thirteen articles, consisting of 14 cases of PL following SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination, were identified. Males represented 64.3% of cases, and the average age of those affected was 41.4years. The majority of cases (N = 9, 64.3%) were following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the most commonly implicated being Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 8/10, 80%), while four (28.6) followed infection. The overall latency period ranged from 5days to 1month. Treatments varied greatly. However, at the time of follow-up, 12/14 patients (85.7%) had either marked improvement or complete resolution of lesions.SummaryThis review cannot determine causality. However, a temporal association was observed with the case reports, and one case of PL followed SARS-CoV-2 infection and recurred with subsequent vaccination, suggesting an association. Nevertheless, risk of developing PL following SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination is likely extremely low. There is also the possibility these cases are purely coincidental. Still, clinicians should be aware of this possible etiology when diagnosing a new or exacerbated case of PL. Finally, given that the majority of patients had marked improvement or complete resolution of lesions at the time of follow-up, clinicians should provide reassurance to their affected patients.

Dermatological diseases are widespread and have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients; however, access to appropriate care is often limited. Improved early training during medical school represents a potential upstream solution. This scoping review explores dermatology education during medical school, with a focus on identifying the factors associated with optimizing the preparation of future physicians to provide care for patients with skin disease. A literature search was conducted using online databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus) to identify relevant studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews was used, including quantitative and qualitative data analysis following a grounded theory approach. From 1490 articles identified, 376 articles were included. Most studies were from the USA (46.3%), UK (16.2%), Germany (6.4%) and Canada (5.6%). Only 46.8% were published as original articles, with a relatively large proportion either as letters (29.2%) or abstracts (12.2%). Literature was grouped into three themes: teaching content, delivery and assessment. Core learning objectives were country dependent; however, a common thread was the importance of skin cancer teaching and recognition that diversity and cultural competence need greater fostering. Various methods of delivery and assessment were identified, including computer-aided and online, audiovisual, clinical immersion, didactic, simulation and peer-led approaches. The advantages and disadvantages of each need to be weighed when deciding which is most appropriate for a given learning outcome. The broader teaching–learning ecosystem is influenced by (i) community health needs and medical school resources, and (ii) the student and their ability to learn and perform. Efforts to optimize dermatology education may use this review to further investigate and adapt teaching according to local needs and context.

BACKGROUND Few studies explored the relationship between stasis dermatitis (SD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVE To examine trends, associations, and clinical relevance of ACD in patients referred for patch testing who had a final SD diagnosis. METHODS Retrospective analysis from 2001 to 2016 of 38,723 patients from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. RESULTS After patch testing, 303 (0.7%) patients were diagnosed with SD; 46.7% had a concomitant diagnosis of ACD. Patients with vs. without a final SD diagnosis had similar proportions of ≥ 1 positive allergic reaction (59.7% vs. 64.7%; Chi-square, P = 0.0724) but higher odds of allergic reactions to fragrance mix I, bacitracin, quaternium-15, Myroxylon pereirae, benzalkonium chloride, ethyleneurea melamine formaldehyde, diazolidinyl urea, and propylene glycol. The most commonly relevant allergens in patients with final SD diagnosis were fragrance mix I, Myroxylon pereirae, bacitracin, quaternium-15, and formaldehyde. The most common allergen sources were personal care products, topical medications and other health aid products. CONCLUSION Nearly half of patients with a final SD diagnosis were also diagnosed with ACD, supporting the role of patch testing in select SD patients.

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin condition that commonly presents with red, thickened, and scaling plaques. Given the prominent cutaneous manifestations of psoriasis, more subtle ophthalmic findings of the disease may initially go undetected, with the potential for significant ocular morbidity. Associated ocular disease can involve nearly any structure of the eye, with the eyelids most commonly being affected, resulting in relatively common signs and symptoms of ocular surface discomfort. The presence of intraocular inflammation (i.e., uveitis) or retinal involvement carry a heightened risk of vision loss, and are often more difficult to diagnose outside of the ophthalmology clinic. Early detection and treatment of ocular disease can limit morbidity and are critical to the management of these patients, which requires coordination of care between dermatologists and ophthalmologists. The objective of this article was to review the most common ocular conditions that affect psoriatic patients, when to consider referral to an ophthalmologist, and to summarize the adverse ocular effects of current psoriasis treatments.

Differences in consumer product availability, distribution, and use may lead to national differences in contact sensitization frequencies. Objective The aim of the study was to describe the differences in contact allergy between the United States (US) and Canada. Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group data from 2005 to 2016. Frequencies of demographics, clinical characteristics, positive reactions, trends, and occupations were calculated. Results A total of 28,640 patients underwent patch testing. At least 1 positive patch test was observed in 18,599 patients (US, 11,641 [66.5%]; Canada, 6958 [62.5%]). When comparing the 2 groups, US positive reactions were more likely to occur in male patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31-1.49), older than 40 years (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.22-1.38), Black (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 2.24-3.19) or Hispanic race (OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 2.61-4.78), and/or patients with scattered generalized dermatitis (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.80-2.13). They were less likely to occur in patients with eczema (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.57-0.65) and Asian race (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.44-0.56). Nickel (US, 16.0%; Canada, 22.4%) and methylisothiazolinone (US, 13.4%; Canada, 11.0%) were the top allergens. The third most frequent was neomycin (US, 11.7%) and fragrance mix I (Canada, 10.2%). Conclusions National differences in allergen prevalence and trends exist in North America.

Photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) is an unusual but not rare form of photosensitivity with an etiology similar to that of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), with the added requirement of concomitant exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light.1 Photopatch testing (PPT) is a critical tool for diagnosing PACD. There are only a few large studies of photoallergens from North America.2-4 We present a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) PPT results from 1999-2009.

Due to threats posed by Chemical Warfare Agents (CWAs) and accidents with Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs), the need for highly effective skin decontamination remains relevant. Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL), composed of Dekon 139 and 2,3-butanedione monoxime, has been shown highly effective against CWAs and TICs. This systematic review compares RSDL efficacy to other decontaminating agents. Online search engines PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were explored, and all literature containing quantitative data, comparing RSDL to other decontaminating agents, investigated. Year of publication, type of study (in vitro or in vivo), model (animal or human), toxin tested, and result of each relevant article were recorded. In total, 15 relevant papers, comprising a total of 18 experimental models, were identified. Nine studies concluded that RSDL was the most effective decontaminant tested against the toxin of interest. Four studies concluded that RSDL was not the most effective decontaminant tested against the toxin of interest. The remaining 5 studies concluded RSDL displayed similar efficacy to at least one of the other decontaminating agents tested against the toxin of interest. There is substantial evidence supporting the efficacy of RSDL as a decontaminating agent. However, there remains to be insufficient data on this important topic, and limitations on the usefulness of current data, when applied to the broad array of potential exposures.

BACKGROUND Vitamin E (tocopherol) a naturally occurring mixture of antioxidants commonly used in topical skin care products, may cause allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to characterize positive patch test reactions to tocopherol and tocopherol acetate. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test data to tocopherols (dl-α-tocopherol 100% and/or dl-α-tocopherol acetate 100%) from 2001 to 2016. RESULTS Of the 38,699 patients patch tested to tocopherol and/or tocopherol acetate, 349 (0.9%) had positive reactions; of these, 87.6% were currently relevant. Most (51.4%) were weak (+) and/or not related to occupation (99.1%). Compared with tocopherol-negative patients, tocopherol-positive individuals were more likely to be female (72.5% vs 67.2%, P = 0.0355), have a final primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (74.2% vs 52.6%, P < 0.0001), and have dermatitis in a scattered generalized distribution (23.8% vs 18.2%, P = 0.0072); they were also less likely to have hand involvement (16.6% vs 22.3%, P = 0.0064). The most common source of tocopherol was personal care products, especially moisturizers. CONCLUSIONS Positive patch test reactions to tocopherols were relatively rare given their widespread use. When positive, current clinical relevance was high. Tocopherol-positive patients were more likely to be female and presented with dermatitis on the face or in a scattered generalized pattern.

An updated understanding of allergic contact cheilitis is needed.To characterize clinical characteristics and allergen relevance in patients with cheilitis referred for patch testing.Retrospective analysis of 43 772 patients patch tested with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) screening series from 2001 to 2018.Overall, 2094 patients (4.8%) had lips as one of three sites of dermatitis, 1583 (3.6%) had lips as the primary site and 1167 (2.7%) had lips as the sole site of dermatitis. Prevalences of cheilitis at any, primary, and sole sites significantly increased throughout the study cycle from 2001-2002 (2.7%, 2.2% and 1.7%) to 2017-2018 (7.8%, 5.2% and 3.7%). Approximately 60% of patients with any, a primary, or a sole site of cheilitis had one or more positive allergic patch-test reactions compared to 65% of those without cheilitis.Patients with cheilitis who were referred for patch testing had high rates of positive and relevant allergens. More than one in four patients with any, primary, or sole cheilitis had a positive reaction to non-NACDG screening allergens (28.0%, 26.8%, 31.1% vs. 21.6%) compared to patients without cheilitis, emphasizing the need for expanded patch test series in cheilitis.

Purpose of review: contact urticaria syndrome includes contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Underreport, underdiagnosis, or misdiagnosis of entities within the contact urticaria syndrome is believed to be common, especially in the occupational setting. This review provides a structured overview of the entities comprised in this syndrome as well as the diagnostic work-up and management strategies. Recent findings: contact urticaria syndrome has been increasingly described due to personal protective equipment and hand sanitizers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of legal cannabis products has led to a rise in occupational cases of contact urticaria to cannabis. A declining trend in the evolution of contact urticaria has been described for natural rubber latex allergy due to the use of synthetic gloves. Prick test has been proposed as a screening method, particularly if multiple products are to be tested, instead of the classical sequential scheme. Summary: physicians should be aware of the growing number of culprit agents leading to contact urticaria syndrome. Clinical presentation may be challenging since it includes immediate urticaria and/or eczema and even more generalized reactions. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, detailed occupational history, and complementary tests, including skin testing. The best treatment is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and to implement preventive measures.

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients face health issues relevant to dermatologists, such as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD); however, there is a lack of information surrounding common allergens causing ACD that disproportionally affect SGM patients.Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles studying ACD in the SGM population.Common allergens associated with ACD in SGM patients include nitrates, fragrance mix, methylisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone-methylchloroisothiazolinone, topical antibiotics, and allergens seen in chest binders. Common anatomic sites included the chest, cheeks, perioral region, nasal orifices, and the anogenital region.Certain allergens and body sites affected by ACD are more common among the SGM community. This can help guide patch testing as a diagnostic tool. Further research must be conducted regarding ACD in SGM patients.

This study developed a novel MoS2 nanoflakes platform for the drug delivery (erythromycin) into the skin. MoS2 nanoflakes were synthesized using one-step hydrothermal method and characterized for the structural and optical properties by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopies. Then, the photothermal experiment was performed for the MoS2 sample with the concentrations (100, 200, 300, and 400 ppm). The highest photothermal heat was produced in the sample with 400 ppm concentration. Erythromycin loaded MoS2 nanoflakes (ERY/MoS2) were successfully prepared by the different ratios of ERY to MoS2 nanoflakes (1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1). ERY/MoS2 with the ratio of 5:1 showed the highest entrapment efficiency (EE%) (62.8%) which was selected as the optimized formulation. The sample was further studied for in-vitro ERY release and ex-vivo skin permeation patterns with and without the laser irradiation (808 nm). Results indicated that in the presence of near-infrared (NIR) laser radiation (1 W/cm2), the optimized ERY/MoS2 sample showed a controlled drug release of 47.3% through a silicon membrane which reached a sustained flux of 201.83 μg/cm2 through human skin after 24 h. MoS2 nanoflakes with an appropriate sustained release pattern were suggested as suitable carriers in the dermal drug delivery system for ERY.

“Soak and smear” method, water soaking to induce skin hydration followed by topical corticoids application suggests effectiveness in clinical dermatological practice. We investigate one possible me...

Increasing emphasis is being placed on using in vitro permeation test (IVPT) results for topical products as a surrogate for their in vivo behaviour. This study sought to relate in vivo plasma concentration - time pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles after topical application of drug products to IVPT findings with mechanistic diffusion and compartment models that are now widely used to describe permeation of solutes across the main skin transport barrier, the stratum corneum. Novel in vivo forms of the diffusion and compartment-in-series models were developed by combining their IVPT model forms with appropriate in vivo disposition functions. Available in vivo and IVPT data were then used with the models in data analyses, including the estimation of prediction intervals for in vivo plasma concentrations derived from IVPT data. The resulting predicted in vivo plasma concentration - time profiles for the full models corresponded closely with the observed results for both nitroglycerin and rivastigmine at all times. In contrast, reduced forms of these in vivo models led to discrepancies between model predictions and observed results at early times. A two-stage deconvolution procedure was also used to estimate the in vivo cumulative amount absorbed and shown to be linearly related to that from IVPT, with an acceptable prediction error. External predictability was also shown using a separate set of in vitro and in vivo data for different nitroglycerin patches. This work suggests that mechanistic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic models can be used to predict in vivo behaviour from IVPT data for topical products.

In vitro drug release test has become one of the most important tools for drug development and approval process of semisolid dosage forms. In vitro release test (IVRT) has the ability to reflect the combined effects of several physicochemical characteristics, particle or droplet size, viscosity, microstructure arrangement of the matter and state of aggregation of dosage form. Genesis of IVRT, its principles and rank order relationship with pharmacodynamic response such as vasoconstriction or dermatopharmacokinetic (skin stripping) results and the evolution of test requirements for regulatory approval is discussed. IVRT reflects various parameters and is an essential part of the stepwise approach to compare topical formulation and its ability to release active in similar quantity at similar rate. Therefore, it is an essential tool, in addition to similar qualitative and quantitative composition (Q1 Q2), to assess the similarity of microstructural arrangement (Q3) as proposed in the Topical drug Classification System (TCS) approach of classes 1 and 3. The TCS system along with evolving concept for topical dermatological drug products from Q1, Q2, Q3 sameness to Q1, Q2, Q3 similar allowing greater permissiveness in formulation changes is discussed.

Pityrosporum folliculitis (PF) is a fungal acneiform disease of the hair follicles that often presents with pruritic papules and pustules on the upper body and face

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to cobalt is more common in children and adolescents than adults. However, detailed information on sites and sources of cobalt ACD is limited.To assess trends in positive and clinically relevant patch test reactions to cobalt in children and associated patient characteristics, common sources and body sites affected.A retrospective analysis of children (18 years) patch tested to cobalt by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group between 2001 and 2018.Of 1919 children patch tested, 228 (11.9%) and 127 (6.6%) had a positive/allergic or currently relevant patch test reaction to cobalt, respectively. The most common primary body sites affected were scattered generalized (30.0%), face, not otherwise specified (10.6%) and trunk (10.1%). Patients with allergic and currently relevant allergic patch test reactions were more likely to have a primary site of trunk (p = 0.0160 and p = 0.0008) and ears (p = 0.0005 and p 0.0001). Affected body site(s) varied by cobalt source among patients with currently relevant reactions, especially for less common sources. The most commonly identified sources of cobalt included jewellery, belts and clothing.Positive patch test reactions to cobalt were common in children. The most common body site was scattered generalized and the sources of cobalt varied by body site.

Background Little is known about the relationship between psoriasis and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Objective To examine the associations with ACD, related clinical characteristics, and common positive and clinically relevant allergens of patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis who were referred for patch testing. Methods Retrospective analysis of 38,723 patients from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Results Patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis had lower proportions of ACD than those without psoriasis (32.7% vs 57.8%). In multivariable logistic regression models, psoriasis was inversely associated with female sex, black or Asian race, history of atopic dermatitis and hay fever. Patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis were less likely to have one or more positive allergic patch test reactions or to have a current clinically relevant patch test reaction to the majority of the most commonly positive and/or relevant allergens. The most clinically relevant allergens included nickel sulfate, methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mix I. Conclusion Approximately one-third of patients who were referred for patch testing with a final diagnosis of psoriasis were also diagnosed with ACD. In select patients with suspected psoriasis who also have a clinical presentation suggestive of ACD, patch testing may be helpful. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

To investigate effect of scratching and friction on human skin function and functional differences between scratching and friction.Forty healthy volunteers were enrolled. Scratching and friction behavior was modeled by scalpel and sandpaper simulation to forearm for 80 times, respectively. Noninvasive bioengineering devices were used to measure basic skin physiological parameters and exfoliated stratum corneum collected and protein quantified. Parameters were recorded at baseline (BL) and after every 20 times interventions (20, 40, 60, and 80 times).Compared to BL, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) value increased significantly at both scratched and friction sites (P .001) with a significant higher value for friction (P .001). There was no significant difference in stratum corneum hydration (SCH) value postscratching (P .05), while it decreased first and then increased significantly at friction site (P .001). Roughness values (contract (CONT), variety (VAR), and scaliness (SEsc)) were raised significantly at both sites (P .001). Net change in CONT and SEsc values of friction was higher than scratched sites (P .05). There was no significant difference in blood flow after both scratching and friction (P .05). Quantity of keratinocyte protein from friction sites was statistically higher than scratching after 80 times interventions (P .05).Both noninvasive detections and protein quantification indicated more damage from friction, which may have significance for behavior guidance of patients with pruritus and implication for further investigation.

Patch testing, used in the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis, is ideally avoided in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy because of concerns with reductions in accuracy; however, this is not well characterized in the literature. This systematic review summarizes patch testing results in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. We identified 16 studies, comprising 195 patients with dermatitis or psoriasis, who were patch tested while receiving immunosuppressants. Of these, 7 studies, comprising 85 patients with dermatitis, patch tests were performed before and during immunosuppression. Overall, 67.9% (n = 19) of the dermatitis patients receiving dupilumab maintained positive reactions to an allergen that previously graded as a 2+/3+ reaction. Several immunosuppressants were also associated with positive patch test results for various allergens. These include dupilumab, cyclosporine, and low-dose prednisone (≤10 mg/d) for dermatitis, and tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, ustekinumab, and methotrexate for psoriasis. Ideally, it is preferable to patch test when patients are not receiving oral immunosuppressants or immunomodulators. However, clinicians may choose to assess the risks and benefits of patch testing for each patient given the impact of allergic contact dermatitis on patient quality of life.

Eyelid dermatitis is a common dermatologic complaint.To characterize patients with eyelid dermatitis.Retrospective analysis (1994-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data.Of 50,795 patients, 2332 (4.6%) had eyelid dermatitis only, whereas 1623 (3.2%) also had dermatitis of the eyelids and head or neck. Compared with patients without eyelid involvement (n = 26,130), groups with eyelid dermatitis only and dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck were significantly more likely to be female, white, and older than 40 years, and to have a history of hay fever, atopic dermatitis, or both (P .01). Final primary diagnoses included allergic contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 43.4%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 53.5%), irritant contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 17.0%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 9.8%), and atopic dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 13.1%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 13.8%). Top 5 currently relevant allergens included nickel sulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 18.6%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 22.5%), fragrance mix I (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 18.3%), methylisothiazolinone (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 17.7%), gold sodium thiosulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 14.7%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 11.4%), and balsam of Peru (eyelid dermatitis only: 11.9%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 12.6%). Both eyelid-involvement groups were significantly more likely to react to gold sodium thiosulfate, carmine, shellac, dimethylaminopropylamine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, and thimerosal (P .05) compared with the no eyelid involvement group.Lack of specific distribution patterns of eyelid dermatitis and no long-term follow-up data.Patch testing remains a critical tool in evaluating patients with eyelid dermatitis.

Background Hand eczema (HE) is a heterogeneous and burdensome disorder. Objective To characterize the clinical characteristics, etiologies and allergen relevance in adults with HE referred for patch testing. Methods Retrospective analysis (2000-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (n = 37,113). Results Overall, 10,034 patients had HE, with differences of overlap between allergic contact, irritant contact, and atopic dermatitis. Allergic contact HE fluctuated, whereas atopic HE steadily increased, and irritant HE decreased over time. HE was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests (67.5% vs 63.8%; χ2, P Limitations No data on HE phenotype. Conclusion HE in adults was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests, with a heterogeneous profile of allergens. Patch testing remains an important tool in the evaluation of patients with HE.

Background Scalp conditions are often multifactorial. Objective To characterize patients with scalp involvement and patch-testing outcomes. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (1996-2016). Study groups included patients with scalp involvement (≤3 anatomic sites coded) with or without additional sites. Results A total of 4.8% of patients (2331/48,753) had scalp identified as 1 of up to 3 affected anatomic sites. Approximately one-third of "scalp-only" individuals had a specific primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (38.6%), followed by seborrheic dermatitis (17.2%) and irritant contact dermatitis (9.3%). When adjacent anatomic sites were affected, allergic contact dermatitis was more frequently identified as the primary diagnosis (>50%). The top 5 currently clinically relevant allergens in scalp-only patients were p-phenylenediamine, fragrance mix I, nickel sulfate, balsam of Peru, and cinnamic aldehyde. Methylisothiazolinone sensitivity was notable when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. The top 3 specifically identified sources for scalp-only allergens were hair dyes, shampoo/conditioners, and consumer items (eg, hair appliances, glasses). Limitations Tertiary referral population. Conclusion Isolated scalp involvement was less likely to be associated with allergic contact dermatitis than when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. Overlap with multiple diagnoses was frequent, including seborrheic dermatitis, irritant dermatitis, other dermatoses, or all 3. p-Phenylenediamine was the most common allergen.

Background Few studies examined the relationship between nummular (discoid) eczema (NE) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Objective To examine the trends, associations, and clinical relevance of ACD in NE patients referred for patch testing. Methods Retrospective analysis of 38,723 patients from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Results Overall, 748 (1.9%) patients were diagnosed with NE; 23.9% had a concomitant diagnosis of ACD. The prevalence of NE fluctuated over time between 2001-2016, with no overall change in prevalence in diagnosed NE. In multivariable logistic regression models, NE steadily increased with age and was associated with male sex, Asian and other race/ethnicity, and inversely associated with a history of AD and hay fever. Patients with NE had lower proportions of ≥1 positive allergic reaction and lower odds of a positive reaction in multiple, individual allergens. The most commonly relevant allergens in patients with NE were formaldehyde 2.0% aq., methylisothiazolinone, quaternium-15, fragrance mix I, and propylene glycol. Conclusion NE is a heterogeneous disorder with distinct subsets of lesional distribution and profile of relevant allergens, especially formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Nearly 1 in 4 NE patients had ACD, supporting the role of patch testing in NE patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.