Search

Introduction: The optimal pathway for ultra-early diagnostics and treatment in patients with acute stroke remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate how three different methods of simulated, rural prehospital computed tomography (CT) affected the time to prehospital treatment decision in acute stroke., Materials and Methods: In this pragmatic, simulation, pilot study of prehospital CT we investigated a conventional ambulance with transport to a standard care rural stationary CT machine managed by paramedics, a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU), and a helicopter with a simulated CT machine. Each modality completed 20 real-life dispatches combined with simulation of predetermined animated patient cases with acute stroke symptoms and CT images. The primary endpoint of the study was the time from alarm to treatment decision., Results: Median time from alarm to the treatment decision differed significantly between the three groups ( p  = 0.0005), with 38 min for rural CT, 33 min for the MSU, and 30 min for the helicopter. There was no difference in time when comparing rural CT with MSU, nor when comparing the MSU with the helicopter. There was a difference in time to treatment decision between the rural CT and the helicopter ( p  < 0.0001). The helicopter had significantly lower estimated time from treatment decision to hospital ( p  = 0.001)., Disscussion/conclusion: Prehospital CT can be organized in several ways depending on geography, resources and need. Further research on paramedic run rural CT, MSU in rural areas, and helicopter CT is needed to find the optimal strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Patients with convulsive seizures constitute a significant group in acute neurology. No common European clinical practice guidelines on prehospital seizure management exist, and today most patients are brought to hospital for seizure treatment, with great variation in which prehospital treatment is provided. Only 33 % of status epilepticus patients receive a benzodiazepine as first anti-seizure medication (ASM). The aim of this study is to assess the prehospital seizure control protocols in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Norway, and compare these with current evidence for acute management., Method: We performed a descriptive analysis of the 18 regional EMS protocols in Norway and compared the findings with recent evidence on prehospital treatment. We analysed recommended drug and dosage, route of medication administration, number of additional rescue doses permitted, requirements for registration of type of seizures and seizure duration., Results: The protocols vary in terms of preferred medication, administration method, dosage and recommendations regarding first- and second-line therapies. 33 % of protocols explicitly define status epilepticus according to contemporary guidelines, and 16.7 % have an operational definition of when to administer benzodiazepines. All protocols showed variations in dosing and administration instructions and only 28 % had a clearly stated first line treatment., Conclusion: There are disparities in the prehospital seizure management protocols within the Norwegian healthcare system, a system comparable to other European countries. To improve seizure management there is a need for standardised guidelines for prehospital treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCC) have a key role in the prehospital chain-of-stroke-survival by recognizing stroke patients and reducing prehospital delay. However, studies on EMCC stroke recognition report both substantial undertriage and overtriage. Since mis-triage at the EMCC challenges the whole chain-of-stroke-survival, by occupying limited resources for non-stroke patients or failing to recognize the true stroke patients, there is a need to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the dispatchers' routines and experiences. The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting EMCC dispatcher's decision-making in stroke calls., Materials and Methods: A qualitative exploratory study, based on individual semi-structured interviews of 15 medical dispatchers from EMCC Oslo, Norway. Interviews were conducted during August and October 2022 and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis., Results: We identified four themes: [1] Pronounced stroke symptoms are easy to identify [2]. Non-specific neurological symptoms raise suspicion of acute stroke but are difficult to differentiate from other medical conditions [3]. Consistent use of the Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) protocol may increase EMCC overtriage [4]. Contextual conditions at EMCC can affect dispatchers' decision-making process and the ability for experiential learning., Conclusions: Medical dispatchers at the EMCC perceive vague and non-specific stroke symptoms, such as dizziness, confusion or altered behaviour, challenging to differentiate from symptoms of other less time-critical medical conditions. They also perceive the current CBD protocol in use as less supportive in assessing such symptoms. High workload and strict EMCC response time interval requirements hinder the gathering of essential patient information and the ability to seek guidance in cases of doubt, potentially exacerbating both EMCC undertriage and overtriage. The absence of feedback loops and other strategies for experiential learning in the EMCC hampers the medical dispatcher's ability to evaluate their own assessments and improve dispatch accuracy., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study is part of The Dispatch –Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (Dispatch NASPP). The study was performed according to the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki and was based on informed, voluntary, and written informed consent to participate, including the right to withdraw from the study at any time. We informed all participants about the principles for anonymity and confidentiality concerning publication of the results from the interviews. We emphasized that the researchers would not exchange information with the department management regarding individuals’ performances or answers. Protocol for the Dispatch NASPP project was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical Research Ethics South East Norway, University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine (REC) (ref. no. 2018/1909) and the local data protection officer at OUS (ref. no. 18/25297). Informed Consent to participate was deemed unnecessary according to the Norwegian Health Research Act. All patient data collected are anonymized and registered using Medinsight® Release 2.17.4.0 and TSD - Service for Sensitive Data, at the University of Oslo, Norway, a platform to collect, store, analyze and share sensitive data in compliance with the Norwegian regulation regarding individual’s privacy. Consent for publication Not applicable. Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Early diagnosis and triage of patients with ischemic stroke is essential for rapid reperfusion therapy. The prehospital delay may be substantial and patients from rural districts often arrive at their local hospital too late for disability-preventing thrombolytic therapy due to prolonged transport times., Methods: Hallingdal District Medical Centre (HDMC) is located in a rural area of Norway and is equipped with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. We established emergency pathways of CT imaging and thrombolytic treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke at HDMC. During office hours these pathways were managed by a radiographer and a general physician supported by videoconference from the Primary Stroke Centre. Outside office hours we remotely controlled the CT exam and supported telestroke guided paramedics handling and examining the patients. With a primary aim of demonstrating the feasibility of this de novo concept we enrolled patients in the period 2017-2021 into a comparative cohort observational study. We compared patients treated at HDMC (the Rural CT group) to patients from two other rural regions in Norway with similar distances to their local hospital but without access to a rural CT scanner (the Reference group)., Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the Rural CT group (mean age 74, 52% male, 43% stroke mimics), and 69 patients were included in the Reference group (mean age 70, 42% male, 28% stroke mimics). Median time from onset of symptoms to completed CT examination was 93 min in the Rural CT group as compared to 240 min in the Reference group ( p  < 0.05). In patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis time from onset of symptoms to treatment was median 124 min in the Rural CT group and 213 min in the Reference group, p  < 0.05. The frequency of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the two groups., Conclusion: Combining prehospital rural CT examination with telestroke guided diagnosis and thrombolytic treatment by paramedics may facilitate earlier initiation of thrombolysis for patients with ischemic stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Purpose: Timely prehospital stroke recognition was explored in the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) by implementation of stroke education for paramedics and use of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) through a mobile application. The study tested triage and facilitated communication between paramedics and stroke physicians. To complement the quantitative results of the clinical trial, a qualitative approach was used to identify factors that influence triage decisions and diagnostic accuracy in prehospital stroke recognition experienced by paramedics and stroke physicians., Method: Semi-structured qualitative individual interviews were performed following an interview guide. Informants were recruited from the enrolled paramedics and stroke physicians who participated in the ParaNASPP trial from Oslo University Hospital. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and approached inductively using the principles of thematic analysis., Results: Fourteen interviews were conducted, with seven paramedics and seven stroke physicians. Across both groups two overarching themes were identified related to triage decisions and diagnostic accuracy in prehospital stroke recognition: prehospital NIHSS reliably improves clinical assessment and communication quality; overtriage is widely accepted whilst undertriage is not., Conclusion: Paramedics and stroke physicians described how prehospital NIHSS improved communication quality and reliably improved prehospital clinical assessment. The qualitative results support a rationale of an application algorithm to decide which NIHSS items should prompt immediate prenotification rather than a complete NIHSS as default., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Objectives: In this study we aimed to explore EMCC triage of suspected and confirmed stroke patients to gain more knowledge about the initial phase of the acute stroke response chain. Accurate dispatch at the Emergency Medical Communication Center (EMCC) is crucial for optimal resource utilization in the prehospital service, and early identification of acute stroke is known to improve patient outcome., Materials and Methods: We conducted a descriptive retrospective study based on data from the Emergency Department and EMCC records at a comprehensive stroke center in Oslo, Norway, during a six-month period (2019-2020). Patients dispatched with EMCC stroke criteria and/or discharged with a stroke diagnosis were included. We identified EMCC true positive, false positive and false negative stroke patients and estimated EMCC stroke sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Furthermore, we analyzed prehospital time intervals and identified patient destinations to gain knowledge on ambulance services assessments., Results: We included 1298 patients. EMCC stroke sensitivity was 77% (95% CI: 72 - 82%), and PPV was 16% (95% CI: 14 - 18%). EMCC false negative stroke patients experienced an increased median prehospital delay of 11 min (p < 0.001). Upon arrival at the scene, 68% of the EMCC false negative patients were identified as suspected stroke cases by the ambulance services. Similarly, 68% of the false positive stroke patients were either referred to a GP, out-of-hours GP acute clinic, local hospitals or left at the scene by the ambulance services, indicating that no obvious stroke symptoms were identified by ambulance personnel upon arrival at the scene., Conclusions: This study reveals a high EMCC stroke sensitivity and an extensive number of false positive stroke dispatches. By comparing the assessments made by both the EMCC and the ambulance service, we have identified specific patient groups that should be the focus for future research efforts aimed at improving the sensitivity and specificity of stroke recognition in the EMCC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Training prehospital personnel in identifying patients with acute stroke is key to providing rapid treatment. This study aimed to investigate whether game-based digital simulation training is a feasible alternative to standard in-person simulation training., Methods: Second-year paramedic bachelor students at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway were invited to participate in a study to compare game-based digital simulation (intervention) to standard in-person training (control). For 2 months, students were encouraged to practice the NIHSS, and both groups logged their simulations. Then, they performed a clinical proficiency test, and their results were assessed using a Bland-Altman plot with corresponding 95% limits of agreement (LoA)., Results: Fifty students participated in the study. Individuals in the game group (n = 23) spent an average (SD) of 42:36 min (36) on gaming and performed 14.4 (13) simulations on average, whereas the control group (n = 27) spent 9:28 min (8) simulating and performed 2.5 (1) simulations. Comparing time variables collected during the intervention period, the mean time for each simulated assessment was significantly shorter in the game group (2:57 min vs. 3:50 min, p = 0.004). In the final clinical proficiency test, the mean difference from the true NIHSS score was 0.64 (LoA: - 1.38 to 2.67) in the game group and 0.69 (LoA: - 1.65 to 3.02) in the control group., Conclusion: Game-based digital simulation training is a feasible alternative to standard in-person simulation training to acquire competence in NIHSS assessment. Gamification seemed to give an incentive to simulate considerably more and to perform the assessment faster, with equal accuracy., Trial Registration: The study was approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (reference no. 543238)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the most validated clinical scale for stroke recognition, severity grading, and symptom monitoring in acute care and hospital settings. Numerous modified prehospital stroke scales exist, but these scales contain less clinical information and lack compatibility with in-hospital stroke scales. In this real-life study, we aimed to investigate if NIHSS conducted by paramedics in the field is a feasible and accurate prehospital diagnostic tool., Methods: This prospective cohort study is part of Treat-NASPP (Treat-Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project) conducted at a single medical center in Østfold, Norway. Sixty-three paramedics were trained and certified in NIHSS, and the prehospital NIHSS scores were compared with the scores obtained by in-hospital stroke physicians. Interrater agreement was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement. In secondary analysis, Cohen κ was used for the clinical categories NIHSS score of 0 to 5 and ≥6. As a safety measure, prehospital time was compared between paramedics conducting NIHSS and conventional paramedics., Results: We included 274 patients. The mean difference in NIHSS scores between the paramedics and the stroke physicians was 0.92 with limits of agreement from -5.74 to 7.59. Interrater agreement for the 2 clinical categories was moderate with a κ of 0.58. The prehospital NIHSS scoring was performed mean (SD) 42 (14) minutes earlier than the in-hospital scoring. Prehospital time was not significantly increased in the NIHSS-trained paramedic group compared with conventional paramedics (median [interquartile range] on-scene-time 18 [13-25] minutes versus 16 [11-23] minutes, P =0.064 and onset-to-hospital time 86 [65-128] minutes versus 84 [56-140] minutes, P =0.535)., Conclusions: Paramedics can use NIHSS as an accurate and time efficient prehospital stroke severity quantification tool. Introducing NIHSS in the emergency medical services will enable prehospital evaluation of stroke progression and provide a common language for stroke assessment between paramedics and stroke physicians., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03158259.

Background: Less than 50% of stroke patients in Norway reach hospital within 4 h of symptom onset. Early prehospital identification of stroke and triage to the right level of care may result in more patients receiving acute treatment. Quality of communication between paramedics and the stroke centre directly affects prehospital on-scene time, emphasising this as a key factor to reduce prehospital delay. Prehospital stroke scales are developed for quick and easy identification of stroke, but have poor sensitivity and specificity compared to an in-hospital assessment with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The aim of the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) is to assess whether a structured learning program, prehospital NIHSS and a mobile application facilitating communication with the stroke physician may improve triage of acute stroke patients., Methods: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled intervention design will be used in this trial in Oslo, Norway. Paramedics at five ambulance stations will enrol adult patients with suspected stroke within 24 h of symptom onset. All paramedics will begin in a control phase with standard procedures. Through an e-learning program and practical training, a random and sequential switch to the intervention phase takes place. A mobile application for NIHSS scoring, including vital patient information for treatment decisions, transferring data from paramedics to the on-call stroke physician at the Stroke Unit at Oslo University Hospital, will be provided for the intervention. The primary outcome measure is positive predictive value (PPV) for prehospital identification of patients with acute stroke defined as the proportion of patients accepted for stroke evaluation and discharged with a final stroke diagnosis. One thousand three hundred patients provide a 50% surplus to the 808 patients needed for 80% power to detect a 10% increase in PPV., Discussion: Structured and digital communication using a common scale like NIHSS may result in increased probability for better identification of stroke patients and less stroke mimics delivered to a stroke team for acute diagnostics and treatment in our population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04137874 . Registered on October 24, 2019., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Acute stroke treatment in mobile stroke units (MSU) is feasible and reduces time-to-treatment, but the optimal staffing model is unknown. We wanted to explore if integrating thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in an anesthesiologist-based emergency medical services (EMS) reduces time-to-treatment and is safe., Methods: A nonrandomized, prospective, controlled intervention study., Inclusion Criteria: age ≥18 years, nonpregnant, stroke symptoms with onset ≤4 h. The MSU staffing is inspired by the Norwegian Helicopter Emergency Medical Services crew with an anesthesiologist, a paramedic-nurse and a paramedic. Controls were included by conventional ambulances in the same catchment area. Primary outcome was onset-to-treatment time. Secondary outcomes were alarm-to-treatment time, thrombolytic rate and functional outcome. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality., Results: We included 440 patients. MSU median (IQR) onset-to-treatment time was 101 (71-155) minutes versus 118 (90-176) minutes in controls, p = 0.007. MSU median (IQR) alarm-to-treatment time was 53 (44-65) minutes versus 74 (63-95) minutes in controls, p < 0.001. Golden hour treatment was achieved in 15.2% of the MSU patients versus 3.7% in the controls, p = 0.005. The thrombolytic rate was higher in the MSU (81% vs 59%, p = 0.001). MSU patients were more often discharged home (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 2.36 [1.11-5.03]). There were no other significant differences in outcomes., Conclusions: Integrating thrombolysis of AIS in the anesthesiologist-based EMS reduces time-to-treatment without negatively affecting outcomes. An MSU based on the EMS enables prehospital assessment of acute stroke in addition to other medical and traumatic emergencies and may facilitate future implementation., (© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Biomarkers indicative of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may help triage acute stroke patients in the pre-hospital phase. We hypothesized that serum concentration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in combination with ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), measured by a rapid bio-assay, could be used to distinguish ICH from ischemic stroke., Methods: This prospective two-center study recruited patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke both in the pre-hospital phase and at hospital admission (within 4 and 6 h after symptom onset, respectively). Blood samples were analyzed for concentrations of GFAP and UCH-L1 using ELISA techniques. The reference standard was the diagnosis of ICH, ischemic stroke, or stroke mimicking condition achieved after clinical workup including brain imaging., Results: A total of 251 patients were included (mean age [± SD] 72 ± 15 years; 5 ICH, 23 ischemic strokes and 14 stroke mimics in the pre-hospital part; and 59 ICH, 148 ischemic strokes and 2 stroke mimics in the in-hospital part). Mean delay (± SD) from symptom onset to blood withdrawal was 130 ± 79 min for the pre-hospital patients and 136 ± 86 min for the in-hospital patients. Both GFAP and UCH-L1 serum concentrations were higher in patients having ICH as compared to other diagnoses (GFAP: median 330 ng/L [interquartile range 64-7060, range 8-56,100] vs. 27.5 ng/L [14-57.25, 0-781], p < 0.001; UCH-L1: 401 ng/L [265-764, 133-1812] vs. 338 ng/L [213-549.5, 0-2950], p = 0.025). Area-under-the-curve values were 0.866 (95% CI 0.809-0.924, p < 0.001) for GFAP, and 0.590 (0.511-0.670, p = 0.033) for UCH-L1. Regarding overall diagnostic accuracy, UCH-L1 did not add significantly to the performance of GFAP., Conclusions: GFAP may differentiate ICH from ischemic stroke and stroke mimics. A point-of-care test to distinguish between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes might facilitate triage to different treatment pathways or locations, or be used to select patients for trials of ultra-early interventions.

Background: Cerebral revascularization in acute stroke requires robust diagnostic tools close to symptom onset. The quantitative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital, whereas shorter and less specific stroke scales are used in the prehospital field. This study explored the accuracy and potential clinical benefit of using NIHSS prehospitally., Patients and Methods: Thirteen anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care enrolled patients with suspected acute stroke in a mobile stroke unit. NIHSS was completed twice in the acute phase: first prehospitally and then by an on-call resident neurologist at the receiving hospital. The agreement between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was assessed by a Bland-Altman plot, and inter-rater agreement for predefined clinical categories was tested using Cohen's κ., Results: This Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project study included 40 patients for analyses. The mean numerical difference between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was 0.85, with corresponding limits of agreement from - 5.94 to 7.64. Inter-rater agreement (κ) for the corresponding clinical categories was 0.38. A prehospital diagnostic workup (NIHSS and computed tomographic examination) was completed in median (quartiles) 10 min (range: 7-14 min). Time between the prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was median (quartiles) 40 min (32-48 min)., Conclusion: Critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit may use the NIHSS as a clinical tool in the assessment of patients experiencing acute stroke. The disagreement in NIHSS scores was mainly for very low values and would not have changed the handling of the patients.

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a medical emergency. The outcome is closely linked to the time elapsing from symptom onset to treatment, and seemingly small delays can mean the difference between full recovery and physical and cognitive dysfunction. Recanalization to allow blood to reenter the affected area is most efficient immediately after symptoms occur, and intravenous thrombolysis must be initiated no later than 4.5 hours after the symptom onset. A liable diagnosis is mandatory to administer the appropriate treatment. Prehospital diagnosis and, in cases where contraindications are ruled out, prehospital initiation of intravenous thrombolysis have been shown to significantly decrease the time from alarm to the treatment., Objective: The objective of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of prehospital thrombolysis as measured by (1) time spent from symptom onset to treatment and (2) the number of patients treated within 4.5 hours. In addition, we want to conduct explorative studies. These will include (1) the use of biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic use where we will collect blood samples from various time points, including the hyperacute phase and (2) the study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images at day 1 to determine the infarct volume and if the time to thrombolysis has an influence on this., Methods: This is a prospective controlled intervention study. The intervention will involve a computed tomography (CT) and thrombolysis in a physician-manned ambulance called a mobile stroke unit (MSU). The control will be the conventional pathway where the patient is transported to the hospital for CT, and thrombolysis as per current procedure., Results: Patient inclusion has started and a total of 37 patients are enrolled (control and intervention combined). The estimated time to completed inclusion is 36 months, starting from May 2017. The results of this study will be analyzed and published at the end of the trial., Conclusions: This trial aims to document the feasibility of saving time for all stroke patients by providing prehospital diagnostics and treatment, as well as transport to appropriate level of care, in a safe environment provided by anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03158259; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03158259 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6wxNEUMUD)., (©Kristi G Bache, Maren Ranhoff Hov, Karianne Larsen, Volker Moræus Solyga, Christian G Lund. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 28.02.2018.)

Background and Purpose: In acute stroke, thromboembolism or spontaneous hemorrhage abruptly reduces blood flow to a part of the brain. To limit necrosis, rapid radiological identification of the pathological mechanism must be conducted to allow the initiation of targeted treatment. The aim of the Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project is to determine if anesthesiologists, trained in prehospital critical care, may accurately assess cerebral computed tomography (CT) scans in a mobile stroke unit (MSU)., Methods: In this pilot study, 13 anesthesiologists assessed unselected acute stroke patients with a cerebral CT scan in an MSU. The scans were simultaneously available by teleradiology at the receiving hospital and the on-call radiologist. CT scan interpretation was focused on the radiological diagnosis of acute stroke and contraindications for thrombolysis. The aim of this study was to find inter-rater agreement between the pre- and in-hospital radiological assessments. A neuroradiologist evaluated all CT scans retrospectively. Statistical analysis of inter-rater agreement was analyzed with Cohen's kappa., Results: Fifty-one cerebral CT scans from the MSU were included. Inter-rater agreement between prehospital anesthesiologists and the in-hospital on-call radiologists was excellent in finding radiological selection for thrombolysis (kappa .87). Prehospital CT scans were conducted in median 10 minutes (7 and 14 minutes) in the MSU, and median 39 minutes (31 and 48 minutes) before arrival at the receiving hospital., Conclusion: This pilot study shows that anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care may effectively assess cerebral CT scans in an MSU, and determine if there are radiological contraindications for thrombolysis., (© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Neuroimaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Neuroimaging.)

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with higher mortality in the acute phase than other stroke types. There is a particular risk of early and devastating re-bleeding. Patients therefore need urgent assessment in a neurosurgical department, and the shorter the time from symptom onset to diagnosis the better., Case Presentation: The Norwegian Acute Stroke Pre-hospital Project (NASPP) has developed a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) model, which is staffed with anesthesiologists also trained in pre-hospital clinical assessment of acute stroke patients and interpretation of computerized tomography (CT). The MSU was operated on-call from the local dispatch center in a rural area 45-160 km away from a neurosurgical department. Two patients presented with clinical symptoms and signs compatible with SAH. In both cases, the CT examination confirmed the diagnosis of SAH. Both were transported directly from patient location to the regional neurosurgical department, saving at least 2-2.5 h of pre-neurosurgical time., Conclusion: The Norwegian MSU model staffed with anesthesiologists can rapidly establish an exact diagnosis of SAH, which in a rural area significantly reduces time to neurosurgical care., Trial Registration: Study data are retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrail.gov. NCT03036020 Unique Protocol ID: NASPP-2 Brief Title: The Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project Overall Status: Completed Primary Completion Date: January 2016 [Actual] Verification Date: January 2017.

Background and Purpose: It is essential to diagnose ischaemic stroke as soon as possible after symptom onset, so that thrombolytic treatment can be initiated as quickly as possible. This might be greatly facilitated if cerebral CT could be carried out in a pre-hospital setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate if anaesthesiologists, who in Norway provide pre-hospital medical care, could be trained to assess cerebral CT scans to exclude radiological contraindications for thrombolytic stroke treatment., Methods: Thirteen anaesthesiologists attended an 8-h course in acute stroke assessment, including a 2-h introduction to the neuroradiology of acute stroke. Each participant then assessed 12 non-contrast cerebral CT examinations of acute stroke patients with specific regard to radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Test results were compared with those of three experienced neuroradiologists. Inter-rater agreement between anaesthesiologists and neuroradiologists was calculated using Cohen's Kappa statistics. Robustness of the results was assessed using the non-parametric bootstrap., Results: Among the neuroradiologists, Kappa was 1 for detecting radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Twelve of the 13 anaesthesiologists showed good or excellent agreement (Kappa > 0.60) with the neuroradiologists. The anaesthesiologists spent a median time of 2 min and 18 s on each CT scan., Conclusions: This study suggests that anaesthesiologists who are experienced in pre-hospital care may be quickly trained to assess cerebral CT examinations in acute stroke patients with regard to radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy., (© 2015 The Authors. The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)