Search

Injection experience; Neuroendocrine tumors; Somatostatin analog Experiència en injecció; Tumors neuroendocrins; Anàleg de la somatostatina Experiencia en inyección; Tumores neuroendocrinos; Análogo de la somatostatina Lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN) is a somatostatin analog used in first-line treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aim of HomeLAN was to evaluate the satisfaction with injection experience among patients with NETs receiving at-home LAN injection via patient support programs (PSPs). This was an international, non-interventional, cross-sectional, online survey in adults with NETs enrolled in PSPs, receiving LAN injections at home, administered by a healthcare professional (HCP) or administered independently (self or caregiver administering injection). The primary endpoint was satisfaction with the most recent LAN injection. Secondary endpoints included the level of anxiety prior to injection, impact on daily life, and the extents to which participants felt in control of their life and agreed that home administration met their medical needs. In total, 111 participants from Belgium, Greece, the Netherlands, and Spain completed the survey (50.5% male; mean age, 63.6 years; most common primary tumor site was intestine [47.7%]). For 99 participants, their most recent injection was administered by an HCP. Overall, 95.5% of all participants were satisfied with their most recent injection experience (95% confidence interval: 89.89%–98.06%); 67% reported experiencing no anxiety prior to injection, 91.0% reported that home injection had a “great deal” or “quite a bit” of positive impact on their daily life, and 85.6% strongly agreed that the PSP met their medical needs. In the HCP injection subgroup, 71.7% reported that this mode of administration helped them to feel in control of their lives. In this patient survey, satisfaction levels were high among patients with NETs receiving LAN injections at home via a LAN PSP. Most patients did not experience anxiety prior to their most recent injection and acknowledged that thanks to their treatment they had a good quality of life despite their disease. Most strongly agreed that the PSP met their medical needs, which highlights the valuable service that LAN PSPs provide for patients with NETs. This study was sponsored by Ipsen.

Introduction: Lanreotide autogel (LAN) and temozolomide (TMZ) are guidelines-recommended monotherapies for thoracic neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids; T-NETs), but prospective data for both combined and monotherapies are lacking. ATLANT (NCT02698410) evaluated efficacy and safety of LAN/TMZ in progressive T-NETs. Methods: ATLANT was a 12-month, Italian, phase 2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter pilot study. Eligible patients had unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic, well-/moderately differentiated T-NETs with radiological progression. Patients received subcutaneous LAN 120 mg every 28 days and oral TMZ 250 mg/day for 5 consecutive days every 28-day cycle. Main endpoints are disease control rate (DCR) at 9 months (primary; investigator-assessed), median progression-free survival (PFS), biomarkers, and safety. Results: The number of patients was 40; 60% were male. Primary tumor site was lung (90%) and thymus (10%). Carcinoid type was typical (20.0%) and atypical (52.5%). DCR at 9 months was 35.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.63–51.68; nonacceptability threshold ≤10%, p < 0.0001; not significantly above clinically relevant threshold ≥30%, p = 0.2968). DCR between 7.5 and 10.5 months (sensitivity analysis) was 45.0% (95% CI: 29.26–61.51) and clinically relevant (p = 0.0320 at ≥30% threshold). Median PFS was 37.1 (95% CI: 24.1–52.9) weeks. No association was observed between biomarker variations (chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, somatostatin receptor type-2, Ki-67, 6-O-methylguanine-DNA-methyl-transferase) and DCR or PFS. Most patients (97.5%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 72.5% had treatment-related TEAEs. TEAEs were mainly grade 1/2. No unanticipated TEAEs were reported. Conclusions: This study showed that the LAN/TMZ combination has promising efficacy in progressive T-NETs, and was well tolerated. Larger studies are warranted to support the clinical benefits of LAN/TMZ in patients with T-NETs.

Lanreotide; Progression-free survival; Somatostatin Lanreótido; Supervivencia libre de progresión; Somatostatina Lanreòtid; Supervivència lliure de progressió; Somatostatina Introduction This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel (LAN) administered at a reduced dosing interval in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) after LAN standard regimen. Methods Patients had metastatic or locally advanced, grade 1 or 2 midgut NETs or pancreatic NETs (panNETs) and centrally assessed disease progression on LAN 120 mg every 28 days. They were treated with LAN 120 mg every 14 days for up to 96 weeks (midgut cohort) or 48 weeks (panNET cohort). The primary end-point was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). PFS by Ki-67 categories was analysed post hoc. Secondary end-points included quality of life (QoL) and safety. Results Ninety-nine patients were enrolled (midgut, N = 51; panNET, N = 48). Median (95% CI) PFS was 8.3 (5.6–11.1) and 5.6 (5.5–8.3) months, respectively. In patients with Ki-67 ≤ 10%, median (95% CI) PFS was 8.6 (5.6–13.8) and 8.0 (5.6–8.3) months in the midgut and panNET cohorts, respectively. Patients’ QoL did not deteriorate during the study. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events and only two withdrawals for treatment-related adverse events (both in the panNET cohort). Conclusions In patients with progressive NETs following standard-regimen LAN, reducing the dosing interval to every 14 days provided encouraging PFS, particularly in patients with a Ki-67 ≤ 10% (post hoc); no safety concerns and no deterioration in QoL were observed. Increasing LAN dosing frequency could therefore be considered before escalation to less well-tolerated therapies. This study was sponsored by Ipsen.

Introduction: Patients with acromegaly have substantially reduced quality of life (QoL). This study evaluated QoL in patients with acromegaly treated with lanreotide autogel. Material and methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-centre study conducted in Poland (NCT02396966). We included patients with acromegaly, who received treatment with lanreotide autogel 120 mg for ≥ 3 months and < 3 years. Patients were assessed approximately every 4–5 months for two years (six visits). QoL was measured with the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL). Results: Of 152 patients enrolled from November 2014 to May 2018 in 37 centres, 24 were excluded due to major protocol deviations. The results are reported for the study population (n = 128). At baseline, the median [95% confidence interval (CI)] time from diagnosis was 3.3 (2.8, 4.2) years, and the median time since lanreotide initiation was 13.4 (9.9, 17.3) months. Symptoms of acromegaly were present at baseline in 86% of patients (headache, 57%; sweating, 58%; joint symptoms, 64%); symptoms remained unchanged at two years in 82% of patients. At baseline, 27% of patients had hormonal control (growth hormone < 2.5 μg/L and insulin-like growth factor-1 within the normal range); hormonal control status did not change during the study period in over 81% of patients. At baseline, 88% of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with treatment; treatment satisfaction was unchanged in 62% of patients over the study period. Mean (95% CI) AcroQoL scores at baseline were as follows: total, 50.3 (47.3, 53.3); physical dimension, 48.8 (45.2, 52.4); psychological dimension, 51.3 (48.2, 54.4); appearance subdimension, 40.7 (37.5, 43.8); and personal relations subdimension, 62.5 (58.8, 66.2). The psychological appearance subscore improved by 3.8 points (1.2, 6.5) over the two years; scores in the remaining dimensions and subdimensions did not change substantially. The total AcroQoL score remained unchanged over the two years, regardless of prior acromegaly treatment, surgery or radiotherapy, hormonal control, or lanreotide dosing interval. No new safety findings were identified. Conclusions: AcroQoL total scores and physical and psychological subscores remained stable but impaired among patients with long-lasting acromegaly treated with lanreotide autogel for two years. The psychological appearance subdimension improved numerically.

Reported incidences of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) appear to be increasing, possibly due to greater disease awareness and increased accuracy of diagnosis. Approximately 20% of patients with NETs develop carcinoid syndrome (CS), which arises from elevated secretion of bioactive compounds, including serotonin, from NETs. This leads to symptoms including diarrhea and flushing, which result in weight loss and are associated with considerable negative impact on patients' quality of life. We previously reported significant weight gain and improved nutritional status in patients with NETs who were treated with telotristat ethyl (TE) for 12 weeks. In this follow-up analysis, using pooled data from the 36-week open-label extensions of the TELESTAR (NCT01677910) and TELECAST (NCT02063659) phase III trials, we demonstrate that improvements in weight and nutritional parameters were sustained or further improved in patients with CS through to week 48 of treatment with TE. At week 48/end of study, 68.7% of all patients maintained a stable weight or had weight gain and the mean changes from baseline in cholesterol and albumin levels in patients treated with TE were +0.41 mmol/L and -0.34 g/L, respectively. These results indicate that TE, alongside routine clinical practice, may provide long-term benefits in nutritional intake and weight evolution in patients with CS.

Real-world data evaluating patients' injection experiences using the latest devices/formulations of the long-acting (LA) somatostatin analogs (SSAs) lanreotide Autogel/Depot (LAN; Somatuline®) and octreotide LA release (OCT; Sandostatin®) are limited.PRESTO 2 was a 2020/2021 e-survey comparing injection experience of adults with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or acromegaly treated with LAN prefilled syringe versus OCT syringe for 3 months in Canada, Ireland, the UK and the USA (planned sample size, 304).the proportion of patients with injection-site pain lasting 2 days after their most recent injection, analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Secondary endpoints included interference with daily life due to injection-site pain and technical injection problems in patients with current SSA use for ≥ 6 months.There were 304 respondents (acromegaly, n = 85; NETs, n = 219; LAN, n = 168; OCT, n = 136; 69.2% female; mean age, 59.6 years). Fewer patients had injection-site pain lasting 2 days after the most recent injection with LAN (6.0%) than OCT (22.8%); the odds of pain lasting 2 days were significantly lower for LAN than OCT, adjusted for disease subgroup and occurrence of injection-site reactions (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.13 [0.06-0.30]; p 0.0001). Injection-site pain interfered with daily life "a little bit" or "quite a bit" in 37.2% and 3.8% (LAN) versus 52.5% and 7.5% (OCT) of patients, respectively. Among patients with ≥ 6 months' experience with current SSA (92.4% of patients), technical injection problems never occurred in 76.8% (LAN) and 42.9% (OCT) of patients.Compared with OCT, significantly fewer patients using LAN had injection-site pain lasting 2 days after their most recent injection. Also, fewer LAN-treated patients experienced technical problems during injection. These findings demonstrate the importance of injection modality for overall LA SSA injection experience for patients with acromegaly or NETs.Patients with neuroendocrine tumors or acromegaly often receive long-term monthly treatment with somatostatin analogs. These injectable drugs stop the body from making an excess of certain hormones. Understanding patients’ experiences of these injections helps to provide better care. The PRESTO 2 online study surveyed 304 patients in Canada, Ireland, the UK and the USA with neuroendocrine tumors or acromegaly who were being treated with a somatostatin analog, either lanreotide Autogel/Depot (LAN) or octreotide long-acting release (OCT). The survey asked about injection experience, including injection-site pain lasting2 days and how it affected patients’ lives, anxiety before injections and technical problems during injections (like syringe blockages). The survey showed fewer patients receiving LAN than OCT had injection-site pain that lasted2 days, and fewer said that the pain interfered with their daily lives. There were fewer technical injection problems with LAN than with OCT. However, more patients receiving LAN than OCT felt anxious before their injection. In some countries (including Canada, Ireland and the UK, but not the USA), the patient (or family member/friend) can inject LAN if they are on a stable dose, their doctor agrees, and they received training. A nurse/doctor must inject OCT. In PRESTO 2, about 40% of non-US patients who were eligible injected themselves (or were helped by a family member/friend). This may explain why more patients reported anxiety in the LAN group. PRESTO 2 provides important insights into patients’ experiences of receiving somatostatin analogs and helps identify areas for improving patient care.

Context: Treatment-induced mucositis commonly affects cancer patients, and ketamine oral rinse solution has shown efficacy for refractory pain. Although intranasal ketamine as systemic therapy has previously been studied, there are no reports on intranasal ketamine spray for topical pain treatment. Objective: To present the novel use of atomized intravenous ketamine solution for topical treatment of sinonasal mucositis pain. Patient case: A patient with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma presented with refractory treatment-related intranasal mucositis pain. Following initiation of atomized ketamine solution delivered topically into the nostrils, pain improved, and opioid use decreased. After dose adjustment for confusion, the patient continued ketamine therapy for several weeks with good effect. Conclusion: Atomized ketamine solution delivered intranasally may be a safe and effective topical treatment for mucositis pain of the sinuses. Interpretation of safety of the initial dosing used was affected by several confounding factors. However, a reduced dose appeared efficacious and was well tolerated.