Search

Encephalitis associated with cancer therapies is a rare but serious complication that can significantly impact patients' quality of life and it requires prompt identification and management. Over the past two decades, immunotherapy-particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors-has become a cornerstone of cancer treatment, with up to half of metastatic cancer patients in economically developed countries now receiving these therapies. The widespread adoption of immunotherapy has led to improved survival rates and long-term remissions, even in patients with advanced metastatic disease. However, as immune modulators, these therapies can trigger a range of immune-related adverse events, including a variety of novel neurological toxicities. Among these, encephalitis is of particular concern due to its potential severity, which can compromise treatment outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on this condition, highlighting optimal diagnostic strategies and management approaches to mitigate the risk of significant morbidity, while also comparing encephalitis induced by immunotherapy with that caused by traditional chemotherapies and targeted oncologic treatments.

Glioblastoma recurrence is currently inevitable despite extensive standard-of-care treatment. In preclinical studies, an alternative strategy of targeting tumor-associated macrophages and microglia through CSF-1R inhibition was previously found to regress established tumors and significantly increase overall survival. However, recurrences developed in ∼50% of mice in long-term studies, which were consistently associated with fibrotic scars. This fibrotic response is observed following multiple anti-glioma therapies in different preclinical models herein and in patient recurrence samples. Multi-omics analyses of the post-treatment tumor microenvironment identified fibrotic areas as pro-tumor survival niches that encapsulated surviving glioma cells, promoted dormancy, and inhibited immune surveillance. The fibrotic treatment response was mediated by perivascular-derived fibroblast-like cells via activation by transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling and neuroinflammation. Concordantly, combinatorial inhibition of these pathways inhibited treatment-associated fibrosis, and significantly improved survival in preclinical trials of anti-colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests A.Z. is a current employee of Genmab; D.C. received consulting fees from Seed Biosciences S.A. and is a current employee of Novigenix; S.N. is a current employee of Roche Pharmaceuticals; A.F.H. has served on advisory boards and speaker’s bureau for Novocure and Bayer; M.E.H. has an advisory role at TME Pharma; J.A.J. received a speaker honorarium from Bristol Meyers Squibb, and served on the scientific advisory board of Pionyr Immunotherapeutics; J.A.J. and D.H. serve on the Cancer Cell editorial advisory board., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Status epilepticus (SE) represents a neurological emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. SE in patients with primary brain tumors received only limited attention to date; detailed analysis of treatment flow is lacking, especially as compared to other SE causes. This study aims to describe the frequency and treatment flow of tumor-related SE and compare it to other SE etiologies., Methods: Retrospective cohort study based on an institutional SE registry (SERCH) comprising adult SE (excluding post-anoxic causes), treated between January 2013 and December 2022, comparing SE management, frequency of refractory SE, and clinical outcome, among four patients' groups stratified by SE etiology: Non-neoplastic, Gliomas, Brain metastases, Other brain tumors., Results: We analyzed 961 episodes in 831 patients (Non-neoplastic: 649, Gliomas: 85, Metastases: 77, Other brain tumors: 20). Although tumor-patients presented more often with focal episodes and less consciousness impairment than non-neoplastic patients, administration of benzodiazepines as first-line treatment (>75% across all groups), and utilization of second-line ASM were similar across groups. Treatment adequacy was marginally higher in glioma patients compared to the non-neoplastic population (p: 0.049), while refractory SE was comparable in all groups (p: 0.269). No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed (mortality: non-neoplastic (89/649, 13.7%), glioma (8/85, 9.4%), metastases (14/77, 18.2%), other tumors (5/20, 25.0%), p: 0.198; non-neoplastic vs. glioma, p: 0.271) CONCLUSION: Tumor-associated SE represents 1/5 of all SE episodes, and is managed similarly to other SE causes. Treatment responsiveness and short-term clinical outcomes also exhibit comparable results., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Up to 46% of patients with presumed autoimmune limbic encephalitis are seronegative for all currently known central nervous system (CNS) antigens. We developed a cell-based assay (CBA) to screen for novel neural antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using neurons and astrocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)., Methods: Human iPSC-derived astrocytes or neurons were incubated with serum/CSF from 99 patients [42 with inflammatory neurological diseases (IND) and 57 with non-IND (NIND)]. The IND group included 11 patients with previously established neural antibodies, six with seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), 12 with suspected autoimmune encephalitis/paraneoplastic syndrome (AIE/PNS), and 13 with other IND (OIND). IgG binding to fixed CNS cells was detected using fluorescently-labeled antibodies and analyzed through automated fluorescence measures. IgG neuronal/astrocyte reactivity was further analyzed by flow cytometry. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used as CNS-irrelevant control target cells. Reactivity profile was defined as positive using a Robust regression and Outlier removal test with a false discovery rate at 10% following each individual readout., Results: Using our CBA, we detected antibodies recognizing hiPSC-derived neural cells in 19/99 subjects. Antibodies bound specifically to astrocytes in nine cases, to neurons in eight cases, and to both cell types in two cases, as confirmed by microscopy single-cell analyses. Highlighting the significance of our comprehensive 96-well CBA assay, neural-specific antibody binding was more frequent in IND (15 of 42) than in NIND patients (4 of 57) (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0005). Two of four AQP4+ NMO and four of seven definite AIE/PNS with intracellular-reactive antibodies [1 GFAP astrocytopathy, 2 Hu+, 1 Ri+ AIE/PNS)], as identified in diagnostic laboratories, were also positive with our CBA. Most interestingly, we showed antibody-reactivity in two of six seronegative NMOSD, six of 12 probable AIE/PNS, and one of 13 OIND. Flow cytometry using hiPSC-derived CNS cells or PBMC-detected antibody binding in 13 versus zero patients, respectively, establishing the specificity of the detected antibodies for neural tissue., Conclusion: Our unique hiPSC-based CBA allows for the testing of novel neuron-/astrocyte-reactive antibodies in patients with suspected immune-mediated neurological syndromes, and negative testing in established routine laboratories, opening new perspectives in establishing a diagnosis of such complex diseases., Competing Interests: RBV received travel grants from Roche and received speaker honoraria from Novartis. None were related to this work. AH has served as an expert in advisory boards from Novocure and Bayer and received speaker honoraria from Novocure, all paid to the institution and not related to this work. AZ has patents submitted for Tensacin-R IgG, PDE10A-IgG, and DACH1-IgG as biomarkers of neurological autoimmunity, receives research funding from Roche/Genetech non-relevant to this work, and has consulted for Alexion Pharmaceutical without personal compensation. MT has served as an expert in advisory boards for Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, and Roche; received travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, and Roche; and received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck. None were related to this work. CP has served as an expert in advisory boards and received travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, and Roche. None were related to this work. RDP has served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and has received funding for travel or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Mathias, Perriot, Jones, Canales, Bernard-Valnet, Gimenez, Torcida, Oberholster, Hottinger, Zekeridou, Theaudin, Pot and Du Pasquier.)

Background: Diagnosis of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is challenging and often delayed. MRI imaging, CSF cytology and flow cytometry have a low sensitivity and even brain biopsies can be misleading. We report three cases of PCNSL with various clinical presentation and radiological findings where the diagnosis was suggested by novel CSF biomarkers and subsequently confirmed by brain biopsy or autopsy., Case Presentations: The first case is a 79-year-old man with severe neurocognitive dysfunction and static ataxia evolving over 5 months. Brain MRI revealed a nodular ventriculitis. An open brain biopsy was inconclusive. The second case is a 60-year-old woman with progressive sensory symptoms in all four limbs, evolving over 1 year. Brain and spinal MRI revealed asymmetric T2 hyperintensities of the corpus callosum, corona radiata and corticospinal tracts. The third case is a 72-year-old man recently diagnosed with primary vitreoretinal lymphoma of the right eye. A follow-up brain MRI performed 4 months after symptom onset revealed a T2 hyperintense fronto-sagittal lesion, with gadolinium uptake and perilesional edema. In all three cases, CSF flow cytometry and cytology were negative. Mutation analysis on the CSF (either by digital PCR or by next generation sequencing) identified the MYD88 L265P hotspot mutation in all three cases. A B-cell clonality study, performed in case 1 and 2, identified a monoclonal rearrangement of the immunoglobulin light chain lambda (IGL) and kappa (IGK) gene. CSF CXCL-13 and IL-10 levels were high in all three cases, and IL-10/IL-6 ratio was high in two. Diagnosis of PCNSL was later confirmed by autopsy in case 1, and by brain biopsy in case 2 and 3., Conclusions: Taken together, 5 CSF biomarkers (IL-10, IL-10/IL-6 ratio, CXCL13, MYD88 mutation and monoclonal IG gene rearrangements) were strongly indicative of a PCNSL. Using innovative CSF biomarkers can be sensitive and complementary to traditional CSF analysis and brain biopsy in the diagnosis of PCNSL, potentially allowing for earlier diagnosis and treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Awake craniotomy (AC) is recommended for the resection of tumors in eloquent areas. It is traditionally performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC), which relies on hypnotics and opioids. Hypnosis-assisted AC (HAAC) is an emerging technique that aims to provide psychological support while reducing the need for pharmacological sedation and analgesia. We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent AC under HAAC or MAC., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, anesthetic, surgical, and neuropsychological data of patients who underwent awake surgical resection of eloquent brain tumors under HAAC or MAC. We used Mann-Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and repeated-measures analyses of variance to identify statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level., Results: A total of 22 patients were analyzed, 14 in the HAAC group and 8 in the MAC group. Demographic, radiological, and surgical characteristics as well as postoperative outcomes were similar. Patients in the HAAC group received less remifentanil ( p = 0.047) and propofol ( p = 0.002), but more dexmedetomidine ( p = 0.025). None of them received ketamine as a rescue analgesic. Although patients in the HAAC group experienced higher levels of perioperative pain ( p < 0.05), they reported decreasing stress levels ( p = 0.04) and greater levels of satisfaction (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: HAAC is a safe alternative to MAC as it reduces perioperative stress and increases overall satisfaction. Further research is necessary to assess whether hypnosis is clinically beneficial.

Purpose: to evaluate an SRT approach in patients with at least 10 lesions at the time of BM initial diagnosis., Methods: This is a monocentric prospective cohort of patients treated by SRT, followed by a brain MRI every two months. Subsequent SRT could be delivered in cases of new BMs during follow-up. The main endpoints were local control rate (LCR), overall survival (OS), and strategy success rate (SSR). Acute and late toxicity were evaluated., Results: Seventy patients were included from October 2014 to January 2019, and the most frequent primary diagnosis was non-small-cell lung cancer (N = 36, 51.4%). A total of 1174 BMs were treated at first treatment, corresponding to a median number of 14 BMs per patient. Most of the patients (N = 51, 72.6%) received a single fraction of 20-24 Gy. At 1 year, OS was 62.3%, with a median OS of 19.2 months, and SSR was 77.8%. A cumulative number of 1537 BM were treated over time, corresponding to a median cumulative number of 16 BM per patient. At 1-year, the LCR was 97.3%, with a cumulative incidence of radio-necrosis of 2.1% per lesion. Three patients (4.3%) presented Grade 2 toxicity, and there was no Grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The number of treated BMs and the treatment volume did not influence OS or SSR ( p > 0.05)., Conclusions: SRT was highly efficient in controlling the BM, with minimal side effects. In this setting, an SRT treatment should be proposed even in patients with ≥10 BMs at diagnosis.

Ischemic stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The underlying mechanisms linking cancer and stroke are not completely understood. Long-standing and more recent evidence suggests that cancer-associated prothrombotic states, along with treatment-related vascular toxicity, such as with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, contribute to an increased risk of ischemic stroke in cancer patients. Novel biomarkers, including coagulation, platelet and endothelial markers, cell-free DNA, and extracellular vesicles are being investigated for their potential to improve risk stratification and patient selection for clinical trials and to help guide personalized antithrombotic strategies. Treatment of cancer-related stroke poses unique challenges, including the need to balance the risk of recurrent stroke and other thromboembolic events with that of bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. In addition, how and when to restart cancer treatment after stroke remains unclear. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying ischemic stroke in cancer, propose an etiological classification system unique to cancer-related stroke to help guide patient characterization, provide an overview of promising biomarkers and their clinical utility, and discuss the current state of evidence-based management strategies for cancer-related stroke. Ultimately, a personalized approach to stroke prevention and treatment is required in cancer patients, considering both the underlying cancer biology and the individual patient's risk profile., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are reshaping the prognosis of many cancers, but often cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among neurological irAEs, myositis is the most frequently reported. Our aim is to describe clinical and non-clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of all irMyositis (skeletal limb-girdle and/or ocular myositis) and irMyocarditis cases in our reference center., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled all irMyositis/irMyocarditis patients seen between 2018 and 2022. We reviewed demographics, clinical characteristics, biological, neurophysiological, imaging workup, treatment and outcome., Results: We included 14 consecutive patients. The most frequent treatments were pembrolizumab (35%) or ipilimumab-nivolumab combination (35%). Limb-girdle, ocular (non-fluctuating palpebral ptosis and/or diplopia with or without ophthalmoparesis) and cardiac phenotypes were equally distributed, overlapping in 40% of cases. Ocular involvement was frequently misdiagnosed; review of brain MRIs disclosed initially missed signs of skeletal myositis in one patient and ocular myositis in 3. Seven patients had other co-existing irAEs. When performed, myography showed a myogenic pattern. CK was elevated in 8/15 patients, troponin-T in 12/12 and troponin-I in 7/9 tested patients. ICI were discontinued in all cases, with further immunosuppressive treatment in nine patients. In most cases, neurological and cardiological outcome was good at last follow-up., Conclusion: Myositis is a potentially severe irAE. Despite its heterogeneous presentation, some highly suggestive clinical symptoms, such as ocular involvement, or radiological signs should raise physicians' attention to avoid misdiagnosis. We thus recommend a multidisciplinary assessment (including complete neuromuscular evaluation) even in case of isolated myocarditis. Our series underlines the importance of an early diagnosis, since suspension of ICI and adequate treatment are usually associated with good functional outcome., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Demographics, clinical characteristics, stroke mechanisms and long-term outcomes were compared between acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with active cancer (AC) versus non-cancer patients., Methods: Using data from 2003 to 2021 in the Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne, a retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients with AC, including previously known and newly diagnosed cancers, with non-cancer patients. Patients with inactive cancer were excluded. Outcomes were the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months, death and cerebrovascular recurrences at 12 months before and after propensity score matching., Results: Amongst 6686 patients with AIS, 1065 (15.9%) had a history of cancer. After excluding 700 (10.4%) patients with inactive cancer, there were 365 (5.5%) patients with AC and 5621 (84%) non-cancer AIS patients. Amongst AC patients, 154 (42.2%) strokes were classified as cancer related. In multivariable analysis, patients with AC were older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.03), had fewer vascular risk factors and were 48% less likely to receive reperfusion therapies (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76). Three-month mRS scores were not different in AC patients (aOR 2.18, 95% CI 0.96-5.00). At 12 months, death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.50-2.43) and risk of cerebrovascular recurrence (sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.31) before and after propensity score matching were higher in AC patients., Conclusions: In a large institutional registry spanning nearly two decades, AIS patients with AC had less past cerebrovascular disease but a higher 1-year risk of subsequent death and cerebrovascular recurrence compared to non-cancer patients. Antithrombotic medications at discharge may reduce this risk in AC patients., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Brain metastasis (BrM) is a common malignancy, predominantly originating from lung, melanoma, and breast cancers. The vasculature is a key component of the BrM tumor microenvironment with critical roles in regulating metastatic seeding and progression. However, the heterogeneity of the major BrM vascular components, namely endothelial and mural cells, is still poorly understood. We perform single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing of sorted vascular cell types and detect multiple subtypes enriched specifically in BrM compared to non-tumor brain, including previously unrecognized immune regulatory subtypes. We integrate the human data with mouse models, creating a platform to interrogate vascular targets for the treatment of BrM. We find that the CD276 immune checkpoint molecule is significantly upregulated in the BrM vasculature, and anti-CD276 blocking antibodies prolonged survival in preclinical trials. This study provides important insights into the complex interactions between the vasculature, immune cells, and cancer cells, with translational relevance for designing therapeutic interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.E.H. has an advisory role at TME Pharma., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Glioblastoma cells synthesize and secrete large quantities of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, driving epilepsy, neuronal death, tumor growth and invasion. Moreover, neuronal networks interconnect with glioblastoma cell networks through glutamatergic neuroglial synapses, activation of which induces oncogenic calcium oscillations that are propagated via gap junctions between tumor cells. The primary objective of this study is to explore the efficacy of brain-penetrating anti-glutamatergic drugs to standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma., Methods/design: GLUGLIO is a 1:1 randomized phase Ib/II, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter trial of gabapentin, sulfasalazine, memantine and chemoradiotherapy (Arm A) versus chemoradiotherapy alone (Arm B) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Planned accrual is 120 patients. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include overall and seizure-free survival, quality of life of patients and caregivers, symptom burden and cognitive functioning. Glutamate levels will be assessed longitudinally by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Other outcomes of interest include imaging response rate, neuronal hyperexcitability determined by longitudinal electroencephalography, Karnofsky performance status as a global measure of overall performance, anticonvulsant drug use and steroid use. Tumor tissue and blood will be collected for translational research. Subgroup survival analyses by baseline parameters include segregation by age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance status, O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status, steroid intake, presence or absence of seizures, tumor volume and glutamate levels determined by MR spectroscopy. The trial is currently recruiting in seven centers in Switzerland., Trial Registration: NCT05664464. Registered 23 December 2022., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Incidence rates of glioblastoma in very old patients are rising. The standard of care for this cohort is only partially defined and survival remains poor. The aims of this study were to reveal current practice of tumor-specific therapy and supportive care, and to identify predictors for survival in this cohort., Methods: Patients aged 80 years or older at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis were retrospectively identified in 6 clinical centers in Switzerland and France. Demographics, clinical parameters, and survival outcomes were annotated from patient charts. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify parameters associated with survival., Results: Of 107 patients, 45 were diagnosed by biopsy, 30 underwent subtotal resection, and 25 had gross total resection. In 7 patients, the extent of resection was not specified. Postoperatively, 34 patients did not receive further tumor-specific treatment. Twelve patients received radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, but only 2 patients had maintenance temozolomide therapy. Fourteen patients received temozolomide alone, 35 patients received radiotherapy alone, 1 patient received bevacizumab, and 1 took part in a clinical trial. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.2 months. Among patients who received any postoperative treatment, median PFS was 3.9 months and median OS was 7.2 months. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70%, gross total resection, and combination therapy were associated with better outcomes. The median time spent hospitalized was 30 days, accounting for 23% of the median OS. End-of-life care was mostly provided by nursing homes ( n  = 20; 32%) and palliative care wards ( n  = 16; 26%)., Conclusions: In this cohort of very old patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, a large proportion was treated with best supportive care. Treatment beyond surgery and, in particular, combined modality treatment were associated with longer OS and may be considered for selected patients even at higher ages., Competing Interests: E.L.R. has received a research grant from BMS, and honoraria for advisory board participation from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, and Servier. A.F.H. has received honoraria for advisory board participation from Novocure and Bayer. T.H. has received consulting fees and travel expenses from Amicus therapeutics, Sanofi Genzyme, Bayer AG, and NovoCure and received research grants from Bayer AG. H.L. received travel grants and consultant fees from BMS and Merck, Sharp and Dohme (MSD). H.L. received research support from BMS and Palleon Pharmaceuticals. H.L. is member of the scientific advisory board of GlycoEra and InterVenn. H.L. is co-founder of Singenavir Ltd. M.W. has received research grants from Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Philogen, Roche, and Sandoz. P.R. has received honoraria for lectures, consulting, or advisory board participation from Alexion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Debiopharm, MSD, Midatech Pharma, Novocure, QED, and Roche and research support from MSD and Novocure. C.S., D.G., U.R., S.H., K.S., and H.G.W. declare no conflict of interests., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Neutrophils are abundant immune cells in the circulation and frequently infiltrate tumors in substantial numbers. However, their precise functions in different cancer types remain incompletely understood, including in the brain microenvironment. We therefore investigated neutrophils in tumor tissue of glioma and brain metastasis patients, with matched peripheral blood, and herein describe the first in-depth analysis of neutrophil phenotypes and functions in these tissues. Orthogonal profiling strategies in humans and mice revealed that brain tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) differ significantly from blood neutrophils and have a prolonged lifespan and immune-suppressive and pro-angiogenic capacity. TANs exhibit a distinct inflammatory signature, driven by a combination of soluble inflammatory mediators including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-ɑ) and Ceruloplasmin, which is more pronounced in TANs from brain metastasis versus glioma. Myeloid cells, including tumor-associated macrophages, emerge at the core of this network of pro-inflammatory mediators, supporting the concept of a critical myeloid niche regulating overall immune suppression in human brain tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests D.C. has received consulting fees from Seed Biosciences S.A.; P.W. has provided consulting for Almax, Bayer, Sanofi, and Genentech. A.H. is a paid consultor for Flagship Pioneering, Inc. for matters unrelated to this study; M.E.H. has an advisory role at TME Pharma; J.A.J. received an honorarium for speaking at a Bristol Meyers Squibb research symposium and previously served on the scientific advisory board of Pionyr Immunotherapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas., Methods: In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed., Results: A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo., Conclusions: In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) represent an independent predictor of better survival in patients with gliomas. We aimed to assess grade and IDH mutation status in patients with untreated gliomas, by evaluating the respective value of 18 F-FET PET/CT via dynamic and texture analyses. A total of 73 patients (male: 48, median age: 47) who underwent an 18 F-FET PET/CT for initial glioma evaluation were retrospectively included. IDH status was available in 61 patients (20 patients with WHO grade 2 gliomas, 41 with grade 3-4 gliomas). Time-activity curve type and 20 parameters obtained from static analysis using LIFEx© v6.30 software were recorded. Respective performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and stepwise multivariate regression analysis adjusted for patients' age and sex. The time-activity curve type and texture parameters derived from the static parameters showed satisfactory-to-good performance in predicting glioma grade and IDH status. Both time-activity curve type (stepwise OR: 101.6 (95% CI: 5.76-1791), p = 0.002) and NGLDM coarseness (stepwise OR: 2.08 × 10 43 (95% CI: 2.76 × 10 12 -1.57 × 10 74 ), p = 0.006) were independent predictors of glioma grade. No independent predictor of IDH status was found. Dynamic and texture analyses of 18 F-FET PET/CT have limited predictive value for IDH status when adjusted for confounding factors. However, they both help predict glioma grade.

Background: Median survival with glioblastoma remains in the range of 12 months on population levels. Only few patients survive for more than 5 years. Patient and disease features associated with long-term survival remain poorly defined., Methods: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1419 (ETERNITY) is a registry study supported by the Brain Tumor Funders Collaborative in the US and the EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Patients with glioblastoma surviving at least 5 years from diagnosis were identified at 24 sites in Europe, US, and Australia. In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype tumours, prognostic factors were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. A population-based reference cohort was obtained from the Cantonal cancer registry Zurich., Results: At the database lock of July 2020, 280 patients with histologically centrally confirmed glioblastoma (189 IDH wildtype, 80 IDH mutant, 11 incompletely characterised) had been registered. In the IDH wildtype population, median age was 56 years (range 24-78 years), 96 patients (50.8%) were female, 139 patients (74.3%) had tumours with O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Median overall survival was 9.9 years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 7.9-11.9). Patients without recurrence experienced longer median survival (not reached) than patients with one or more recurrences (8.92 years) (p < 0.001) and had a high rate (48.8%) of MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumours., Conclusions: Freedom from progression is a powerful predictor of overall survival in long-term survivors with glioblastoma. Patients without relapse often have MGMT promoter-unmethylated glioblastoma and may represent a distinct subtype of glioblastoma., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: C.H. has received a research grant for protected time by the Filling the Gap foundation and honoraria for lecture from Vifor; E.L.R. has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board from Bayer, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Seattle Genetics; J.C. has received research funding from Servier and Merck and consultant for Servier; R.S. reports consultation for Bayer, Astra Zeneca; W.W. reports consultation for Apogenix, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Enterome, Medac, MSD and Roche/Genentech with honoraria paid to the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg; F.D. has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation from Novocure; P.R. has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Debiopharm, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Midatech, Novocure, QED, and Roche and research support from Merck Sharp and Dohme and Novocure; P.H. has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Lilly, medac, Novartis, Novocure and Seagen; A.H. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Novocure and Novartis; G.L. has received funding for a consulting or advisory role from Bayer, AbbVie, Orbus Therapeutics, BrainFarm, Health4U, Novartis, Braun and Janssen, and funding for travel from Roche, Bayer, and Ipsen; D.K. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Novocure and BrainLab; M.G. reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis, UCB, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Novocure, Seagen, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, Merck, Kyowa Kirin, travel support from Novocure and Medac, research grant from Novocure; D.R. reports support from Agenus, Agios; AnHeart Therapeutics, Avita Biomedical, Inc., Blue Rock Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Biomedica, CureVac AG, Del Mar Pharma, DNAtrix, Enterome, Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd, Imvax, Janssen, Kiyatec, Medicenna Therapeutics, Neuvogen, Novartis, Novocure, Pyramid Bio, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma. Vivacitas Oncology, Inc, Y-mabs Therapeutics; M.v.d.B has received honoraria for consultancy from Genenta, Servier, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Carthera, Nerviano, Chimerix, Roche, Fore Biotherapeutics, Menarini-Stemline, Incyte and Sumitomo Pharma Oncology; F.L. received research funding from the Fonds Erasme; U.H. reports honoraria for lectures and and/or advisory board participation from Medac, Janssen, Bayer; E.R. reports travels grants BMS, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, Roche, Karyo labs Honorarium MSD, Servier; AF.C. received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory board participation from Gilead, Novartis; R.Ru. has received honoraria for lectures or consultation or advisory board from UCB, Novocure, Bayer, Genenta; M.P. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals; P.W. has received research support from Astra Zeneca/Medimmune, Beigene, Celgene, Chimerix, Eli Lily, Genentech/Roche, Kazia, MediciNova, Merck, Novartis, Nuvation Bio, Puma, Servier, Vascular Biogenics, VBI Vaccines and honoraria for advisory board participation or serving on data safety monitoring board from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Black Diamond, Celularity, Chimerix, Day One Bio, Genenta, Novartis, Prelude Therapeutics, Sapience, Servier, Sagimet, Vascular Biogenics, VBI Vaccines; MW has received research grants from Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Medac, Merck (EMD), Novartis, Orbus, and Philogen. All remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The immune-specialized environment of the healthy brain is tightly regulated to prevent excessive neuroinflammation. However, after cancer development, a tissue-specific conflict between brain-preserving immune suppression and tumor-directed immune activation may ensue. To interrogate potential roles of T cells in this process, we profiled these cells from individuals with primary or metastatic brain cancers via integrated analyses on the single-cell and bulk population levels. Our analysis revealed similarities and differences in T cell biology between individuals, with the most pronounced differences observed in a subgroup of individuals with brain metastasis, characterized by accumulation of CXCL13-expressing CD39 + potentially tumor-reactive T (pTRT) cells. In this subgroup, high pTRT cell abundance was comparable to that in primary lung cancer, whereas all other brain tumors had low levels, similar to primary breast cancer. These findings indicate that T cell-mediated tumor reactivity can occur in certain brain metastases and may inform stratification for treatment with immunotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Lisavanbulin (BAL101553) is the prodrug of avanbulin (BAL27862), a microtubule-destabilizing agent. The goal of this study (NCT02895360) was to characterize the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of lisavanbulin administered as a 48-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 70 mg/m 2 . Results from the Phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the study identifying the RP2D have been previously reported. Here, we present the findings from the Phase 2a portion of this study. Methods. This multi-center, open-label study included patients with ovarian, fallopian-tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that was either platinum-resistant or refractory (11 patients), or with first recurrence of glioblastoma (12 patients). Lisavanbulin was administered as a 48-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results. Lisavanbulin was well tolerated in both patient cohorts. Thirteen patients (56.5%) developed 49 adverse events assessed as related to study treatment. The majority were mild or moderate; four were grade 3/4. Sixteen SAEs were reported in nine patients (39.1%), with none considered related to study treatment. No AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Three patients in the ovarian cancer cohort had stable disease with lesion size reductions after two cycles of treatment; in the glioblastoma cohort, one patient showed partial response with a > 90% glioblastoma area reduction as best response, and one patient had stable disease after eight cycles of treatment. Conclusion. This study demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile of 48-hour continuous IV infusion of lisavanbulin in patients with solid extracranial tumors or glioblastoma. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02895360., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Brain metastases (BrMs) are the most common form of brain tumors in adults and frequently originate from lung and breast primary cancers. BrMs are associated with high mortality, emphasizing the need for more effective therapies. Genetic profiling of primary tumors is increasingly used as part of the effort to guide targeted therapies against BrMs, and immune-based strategies for the treatment of metastatic cancer are gaining momentum. However, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BrM is extremely heterogeneous, and whether specific genetic profiles are associated with distinct immune states remains unknown. Here, we perform an extensive characterization of the immunogenomic landscape of human BrMs by combining whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing of immune cell populations, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and tissue imaging analyses. This revealed unique TIME phenotypes in genetically distinct lung- and breast-BrMs, thereby enabling the development of personalized immunotherapies tailored by the genetic makeup of the tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests F.K. is currently an employee at Sophia Genetics; V.Z. is a consultant for Cellestia Biotech; S.B. has received honoraria from Eli Lilly (Advisory Board) and research funding to the institution from Roche and Basilea (last 3 years); M.E.H. has an advisory role at TME Pharma; J.A.J. has received honoraria for speaking at research symposia organized by Bristol Meyers Squibb and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals (last 3 years) and currently serves on the scientific advisory board of Pionyr Immunotherapeutics., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumour in adults and driven by various genomic alterations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) provides timely information about the genetic landscape of tumours and might detect targetable mutations. To date, differences exist in the application and NGS assays used as it remains unclear to what extent these variants may affect clinical decision making. In this survey-based study, we investigated the use of NGS in adult patients with glioblastoma in Switzerland., Methods: All eight primary care centres for Neuro-Oncology in Switzerland participated in this survey. The NGS assays used as well as the criteria for the application of NGS in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were investigated. Decision trees were analysed for consensus and discrepancies using the objective consensus methodology., Results: Seven out of eight centres perform NGS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma using custom made or commercially available assays. The criteria most relevant to decision making were age, suitability of standard treatment and fitness. NGS is most often used in fitter patients under the age of 60 years who are not suitable for standard therapy, while it is rarely performed in patients in poor general health., Conclusion: NGS is frequently applied in glioblastomas in adults in Neuro-Oncology centres in Switzerland despite seldom changing the course of treatment to date., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Brain metastases (BM) are a common occurrence of systemic cancers. Technical improvements in neuroimaging offer additional tools for an early detection of BM, to target them precisely and differentiate these lesions from other cerebral pathologies. The therapeutic tools have also evolved from neurosurgery and whole brain therapy to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted and immune therapies. Given the numerous treatment options available, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to offer the patient a personalized approach to optimize the sequence and combination of treatments to offer the best outcome possible. This article aims to review key elements of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern treatment paradigms in the diagnosis and management of BM., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Purpose: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic treatment modality that interfere with glioblastoma (GBM) cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity, alternating electric fields to the tumor. A previous analysis from the pivotal EF-14 trial demonstrated a clear correlation between TTFields dose density at the tumor bed and survival in patients treated with TTFields. This study tests the hypothesis that the antimitotic effects of TTFields result in measurable changes in the location and patterns of progression of newly diagnosed GBM., Methods and Materials: Magnetic resonance images of 428 newly diagnosed GBM patients who participated in the pivotal EF-14 trial were reviewed, and the rates at which distant progression occurred in the TTFields treatment and control arm were compared. Realistic head models of 252 TTFields-treated patients were created, and TTFields intensity distributions were calculated using a finite element method. The TTFields dose was calculated within regions of the tumor bed and normal brain, and its relationship with progression was determined., Results: Distant progression was frequently observed in the TTFields-treated arm, and distant lesions in the TTFields-treated arm appeared at greater distances from the primary lesion than in the control arm. Distant progression correlated with improved clinical outcome in the TTFields patients, with no such correlation observed in the controls. Areas of normal brain that remained normal were exposed to higher TTFields doses compared with normal brain that subsequently exhibited neoplastic progression. Additionally, the average dose to areas of the enhancing tumor that returned to normal was significantly higher than in the areas of the normal brain that progressed to enhancing tumor., Conclusions: There was a direct correlation between TTFields dose distribution and tumor response, confirming the therapeutic activity of TTFields and the rationale for optimizing array placement to maximize the TTFields dose in areas at highest risk of progression, as well as array layout adaptation after progression., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults., Methods: ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature., Results: Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified., Recommendations: Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines., Competing Interests: Reprint Requests: 2318 Mill Road, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314; guidelines@asco.org. Nimish A. MohileResearch Funding: Vascular Biogenics, Boston Biomedical, Quell, Tocagen Na Tosha GatsonHonoraria: NovocureConsulting or Advisory Role: NovocureTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novocure Andreas F. HottingerConsulting or Advisory Role: Ideogen (Inst), Bayer Roche (Inst), Novocure (Inst)Research Funding: Novocure (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Novocure, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm Therapeutics Andrew LassmanHonoraria: Abbott MolecularConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sapience Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, FORMA Therapeutics, Bayer, Orbus Therapeutics, BioClinica, Novocure, Elsevier, Vivacitas OncologyResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Aeterna Zentaris (Inst), Celldex (Inst), Kadmon (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), VBI Vaccines (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Millennium (Inst), Oncoceutics (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), QED Therapeutics (Inst), Agios (Inst), Orbus Therapeutics (Inst), BMS (Inst), RTOG Foundation (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: ElsevierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, BioClinica, Abbott Molecular, FORMA Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, VBI Vaccines Douglas NeyConsulting or Advisory Role: DNAtrixResearch Funding: Orbus Therapeutics, Denovo Biopharma (Inst) Phioanh Leia NghiemphuConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVieResearch Funding: Novartis Adriana OlarConsulting or Advisory Role: Guardant Health, Anuncia Inc Jeffery OlsonConsulting or Advisory Role: American Cancer Society David SchiffConsulting or Advisory Role: Orbus Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, PRAResearch Funding: Bayer (Inst) Helen A. ShihHonoraria: UpToDate Roy StrowdConsulting or Advisory Role: Monteris Medical, NovocureResearch Funding: Southeastern Brain Tumor Foundation, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, NIH, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Alpha Omega AlphaOther Relationship: American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Martin van den BentThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Employment: AstraZeneca (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Agios, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Carthera, Genenta Science, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Boston PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst) Mateo ZiuStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead Sciences Jaishri BlakeleyConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Exelixis, VertexResearch Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: ExelixisUncompensated Relationships: SpringWorks Therapeutics (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/747718No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Vismodegib specifically inhibits Sonic Hedgehog (SHH). We report results of a phase I/II evaluating vismodegib + temozolomide (TMZ) in immunohistochemically defined SHH recurrent/refractory adult medulloblastoma., Methods: TMZ-naïve patients were randomized 2:1 to receive vismodegib + TMZ (arm A) or TMZ (arm B). Patients previously treated with TMZ were enrolled in an exploratory cohort of vismodegib (arm C). If the safety run showed no excessive toxicity, a Simon's 2-stage phase II design was planned to explore the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6). Stage II was to proceed if arm A PFS-6 was ≥3/9 at the end of stage I., Results: A total of 24 patients were included: arm A (10), arm B (5), and arm C (9). Safety analysis showed no excessive toxicity. At the end of stage I, the PFS-6 of arm A was 20% (2/10 patients, 95% unilateral lower confidence limit: 3.7%) and the study was prematurely terminated. The overall response rates (ORR) were 40% (95% CI, 12.2-73.8) and 20% (95% CI, 0.5-71.6) in arm A and B, respectively. In arm C, PFS-6 was 37.5% (95% CI, 8.8-75.5) and ORR was 22.2% (95% CI, 2.8-60.0). Among 11 patients with an expected sensitivity according to new generation sequencing (NGS), 3 had partial response (PR), 4 remained stable disease (SD) while out of 7 potentially resistant patients, 1 had PR and 1 SD., Conclusion: The addition of vismodegib to TMZ did not add toxicity but failed to improve PFS-6 in SHH recurrent/refractory medulloblastoma. Prediction of sensitivity to vismodegib needs further refinements., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Understudied elderly patients comprise a large segment of high-risk patients with glioblastoma (GBM) that are challenging to treat. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) is a locoregional, noninvasive, antimitotic therapy delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields to the tumor. In the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, TTFields (200 kHz) improved median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) when added concomitantly to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). This EF-14 subgroup analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of TTFields in elderly patients., Methods: All 134 patients who are ≥65 years of age were included (TTFields/TMZ combination, n=89; TMZ monotherapy, n=45; 2:1 ratio of randomization). PFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology (α=0.05). Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30 supplemented with the brain tumor module (QLQ-BN20). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v4.0., Results: The PFS was 6.5 months in patients randomized to the treatment group with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 3.9 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.74; P =0.0236). The OS was 17.4 months in patients treated with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 13.7 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.77; P =0.0204). Annual survival rates with TTFields/TMZ versus TMZ monotherapy were 39% (95% CI, 29-50%) versus 27% (95% CI, 15-41%; P =0.072) at 2 years, 19% (95% CI, 11-29%) versus 11% (95% CI, 4-23%; P =0.135) at 3 years, and 15% (95% CI, 7-25%) versus 0% at 5 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in the preselected items of HRQoL assessment. Grade ≥3 systemic AEs were 46% in the TTFields/TMZ group versus 40% in the TMZ monotherapy group, without statistically significant difference between the two groups. The only TTFields-related AEs were reversible scalp skin reactions, with grades 1-2 and grade 3 skin reactions reported by 51% and 2% of patients, respectively., Conclusions: Combining TTFields with maintenance TMZ significantly improved PFS and OS in elderly patients with ndGBM in the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, without significant increases in systemic toxicity or negatively affecting patient HRQoL. TTFields-related skin AEs were low-grade and manageable., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00916409, identifier: NCT00916409., Competing Interests: ZR received research grants from and is a paid consultant of Novocure. AH received a research grant from Novocure, paid to the institution. AI received research grants and travel funding from Carthera, Leo Pharma and Novocure, research grants from Air Liquide, Nutritheragene, Sanofi, and Transgene, and travel funding from Leo Pharma, and served on received honorarium for advisory boards from Novocure and Leo Pharma. J-JZ received funding paid to the institution from Boston Biomedical Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Global Oncology, Novocure, Inc., and NRG consortium of National Cancer Institute (NCI) and an honorarium from the Hong Kong Precision Oncology Society. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Novocure. The funder had the following involvement with the study: design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, andinterpretation of the data; and preparation and review of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2021 Ram, Kim, Hottinger, Idbaih, Nicholas and Zhu.)

The invasive behavior of glioblastoma, the most aggressive primary brain tumor, is considered highly relevant for tumor recurrence. However, the invasion zone is difficult to visualize by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and is protected by the blood brain barrier, posing a particular challenge for treatment. We report biological features of invasive growth accompanying tumor progression and invasion based on associated metabolic and transcriptomic changes observed in patient derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOX) in the mouse and the corresponding patients' tumors. The evolution of metabolic changes, followed in vivo longitudinally by 1 H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ( 1 H MRS) at ultra-high field, reflected growth and the invasive properties of the human glioblastoma transplanted into the brains of mice (PDOX). Comparison of MRS derived metabolite signatures, reflecting temporal changes of tumor development and invasion in PDOX, revealed high similarity to spatial metabolite signatures of combined multi-voxel MRS analyses sampled across different areas of the patients' tumors. Pathway analyses of the transcriptome associated with the metabolite profiles of the PDOX, identified molecular signatures of invasion, comprising extracellular matrix degradation and reorganization, growth factor binding, and vascular remodeling. Specific analysis of expression signatures from the invaded mouse brain, revealed extent of invasion dependent induction of immune response, recapitulating respective signatures observed in glioblastoma. Integrating metabolic profiles and gene expression of highly invasive PDOX provided insights into progression and invasion associated mechanisms of extracellular matrix remodeling that is essential for cell-cell communication and regulation of cellular processes. Structural changes and biochemical properties of the extracellular matrix are of importance for the biological behavior of tumors and may be druggable. Ultra-high field MRS reveals to be suitable for in vivo monitoring of progression in the non-enhancing infiltration zone of glioblastoma., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Slow walking speed (WS) is predictive of mortality but may be difficult to measure, which compromises the assessment of frailty, based on Fried et al's phenotype. The timed Moberg picking-up test (MPUT), developed to evaluate hand's function, was found moderately but significantly correlated with WS. We compared the relationship between slowness, assessed by MPUT and WS tests, and mortality., Design: Observational (prospective cohort study)., Setting and Participants: 4731 community-dwelling adults included in 2004, 2009, or 2014 in the ongoing Lausanne cohort 65+ (Lc65+) were assessed at the age of 66-71 years., Method: Mortality was compared for individuals above and below percentile 80 of MPUT, and respectively WS performance time, according to the Fried criterion. Multivariable analysis using Cox's regression models were adjusted for age, sex, height and grip strength. The predictive capability of MPUT and WS was assessed in adjusted models using Harrell C., Results: Slowness in MPUT and in WS test was associated with mortality at 4, 9, and 14 years (P < .001). Survival curves showed lower survival rates in the highest percentile for both tests (P < .001), regardless of the follow-up period. Cox models indicated a higher risk of death at 4 years [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): MPUT, 2.1 (1.5-3.0); WS, 2.2 (1.5-3.1)], 9 years [MPUT 1.7 (1.3-2.3); WS 2.0 (1.5-2.6)] and 14 years [MPUT 1.8 (1.4-2.3); WS 1.8 (1.4-2.4)] for participants above the 80th percentile (all P < .001). The 2 tests had similar predictive capability (Harrell C: MPUT, between 61% and 68%; WS, between 62% and 69%)., Conclusions and Implications: Poor performance in MPUT is associated with increased mortality at the short and long term among community-dwelling older adults. This alternative to WS in the assessment of slowness has similar predictive capability for mortality and avoids biased estimates because of nonrandom exclusion of individuals unable to complete WS., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and the most aggressive brain tumor. It is notoriously resistant to current treatments, and the prognosis remains dismal. Immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of numerous cancer types and generate great hope for glioblastoma, alas without success until now. In this review, the rationale underlying immune targeting of glioblastoma, as well as the challenges faced when targeting these highly immunosuppressive tumors, are discussed. Innovative immune-targeting strategies including cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses, checkpoint blockade inhibitors, adoptive cell transfer, and CAR T cells that have been investigated in glioblastoma are reviewed. From a clinical perspective, key clinical trial findings and ongoing trials are discussed for each approach. Finally, limitations, either biological or arising from trial designs are analyzed, and strategies to overcome them are presented. Proof of efficacy for immunotherapy approaches remains to be demonstrated in glioblastoma, but our rapidly expanding understanding of its biology, its immune microenvironment, and the emergence of novel promising combinatorial approaches might allow researchers to finally fulfill the medical need for GBM patients.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed excessive strain on health care systems and is especially evident in treatment decision-making for cancer patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are among the most vulnerable due to increased incidence in the elderly and the short survival time. A virtual meeting was convened on May 9, 2020 with a panel of neuro-oncology experts with experience using Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). The objective was to assess the risk-to-benefit ratio and provide guidance for using TTFields in GBM during the COVID-19 pandemic., Panel Discussion: Topics discussed included support and delivery of TTFields during the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant use of TTFields with chemotherapy, and any potential impact of TTFields on the immune system in an intrinsically immunosuppressed GBM population. Special consideration was given to TTFields' use in elderly patients and in combination with radiotherapy regimens. Finally, the panel discussed the need to better capture data on COVID-19positive brain tumor patients to analyze longitudinal outcomes and changes in treatment decision-making during the pandemic., Expert Opinion: TTFields is a portable home-use device which can be managed via telemedicine and safely used in GBM patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. TTFields has no known immunosuppressive effects which is important during a crisis where other treatment methods might be limited, especially for elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities. It is too early to estimate the full impact of COVID-19 on the global healthcare system and on patient outcomes and the panel strongly recommended collaboration with existing cancer COVID-19 registries to follow CNS tumor patients., Competing Interests: PH was employed by Novocure Inc. NG, JB-S, JD, RH, AH, PH, VP, DT, EW, and MG served on the May 2020 Advisory Board for Novocure, and declare that they received funding from Novocure for their attendance. CK received funding in support of its overall program in 2020 from Novocure. MG has received an honorarium from Novocure, is on a Novocure advisory board, and received funding from Novocure for a phase I/II trial. AH has received travel support for medical meeting to present trial results (paid to his institution). The authors declare that this study received funding from Novocure Inc. The funder had the following involvement with the study: Novocure provided editorial support only for the development of this manuscript: which is a summary of the authors opinions, discussions, and recommendations that were garnered from the Advisory Board., (Copyright 2021 Gatson, Barnholtz-Sloan, Drappatz, Henriksson, Hottinger, Hinoul, Kruchko, Puduvalli, Tran, Wong and Glas.)

Background: EORTC study 22033-26033 showed no difference in progression-free survival between high-risk low-grade glioma receiving either radiotherapy (RT) or temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy alone as primary treatment. Considering the potential long-term deleterious impact of RT on memory functioning, this study aims to determine whether TMZ is associated with less impaired memory functioning., Methods: Using the Visual Verbal Learning Test (VVLT), memory functioning was evaluated at baseline and subsequently every 6 months. Minimal compliance for statistical analyses was set at 60%. Conventional indices of memory performance (VVLT Immediate Recall, Total Recall, Learning Capacity, and Delayed Recall) were used as outcome measures. Using a mixed linear model, memory functioning was compared between treatment arms and over time., Results: Neuropsychological assessment was performed in 98 patients (53 RT, 46 TMZ). At 12 months, compliance had dropped to 66%, restricting analyses to baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. At baseline, patients in either treatment arm did not differ in memory functioning, sex, age, or educational level. Over time, patients in both arms showed improvement in Immediate Recall (P = 0.017) and total number of words recalled (Total Recall; P < 0.001, albeit with delayed improvement in RT patients (group by time; P = 0.011). Memory functioning was not associated with RT gross, clinical, or planned target volumes., Conclusion: In patients with high-risk low-grade glioma there is no indication that in the first year after treatment, RT has a deleterious effect on memory function compared with TMZ chemotherapy., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Purpose: To explore a prognostic or predictive role of MRI and O-(2- 18 F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ( 18 FET) PET parameters for outcome in the randomized multicenter trial ARTE that compared bevacizumab plus radiotherapy with radiotherpay alone in elderly patients with glioblastoma., Patients and Methods: Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma ages 65 years or older were included in this post hoc analysis. Tumor volumetric and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of serial MRI scans from 67 patients and serial 18 FET-PET tumor-to-brain intensity ratios (TBRs) from 31 patients were analyzed blinded for treatment arm and outcome. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was done to account for established prognostic factors and treatment arm., Results: Overall survival benefit from bevacizumab plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone was observed for larger pretreatment MRI contrast-enhancing tumor [HR per cm 3 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.99] and for higher ADC (HR 0.18; CI, 0.05-0.66). Higher 18 FET-TBR on pretreatment PET scans was associated with inferior overall survival in both arms. Response assessed by standard MRI-based Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria was associated with overall survival in the bevacizumab plus radiotherapy arm by trend only ( P = 0.09). High 18 FET-TBR of noncontrast-enhancing tumor portions during bevacizumab therapy was associated with inferior overall survival on multivariate analysis (HR 5.97; CI, 1.16-30.8)., Conclusions: Large pretreatment contrast-enhancing tumor mass and higher ADCs identify patients who may experience a survival benefit from bevacizumab plus radiotherapy. Persistent 18 FET-PET signal of no longer contrast-enhancing tumor after concomitant bevacizumab plus radiotherapy suggests pseudoresponse and predicts poor outcome., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose of Review: Glioblastoma (GBM) patients have a poor prognosis despite the use of modern synergistic multimodal treatment strategies, with a progression-free survival estimated at 7-8 months, a median survival of 14-16 months and 5-year overall survival of 9.8%., Recent Findings: Physical methods hold the promise to act synergistically with classical treatments to improve the outcome of GBM patients. Fluorescent guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid and tumor-treating fields therapy have already shown positive results in randomized phase III trials and have been incorporated in the standard management. Other techniques such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) and focused ultrasound, often combined whit microbubbles, are reaching clinical development., Summary: Several clinical trials to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound devices to disrupt the blood-brain barrier are ongoing. PDT enables the creation of a safety margin or treatment of non-resecable tumors. However, randomized trials are urgently required to validate the efficacy of these promising approaches. We aim to critically review physical approaches to treat GBM, focusing on available clinical trial data.

Gliomas are intrinsic brain tumours, which are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) into different grades of malignancy, with glioblastoma being the most frequent and most malignant subtype (WHO grade IV). Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 genes are frequent in lower (WHO II/III) grade tumours but typically absent in classical glioblastoma. IDH mutations are associated with a better prognosis compared with IDH wild-type tumours of the same WHO grade. Following detection of a tumour mass by imaging, maximum safe surgery as feasible is commonly performed to reduce mass effect and to obtain tissue allowing histopathological diagnosis and molecular assessment. Radiotherapy has been the mainstay in the treatment of diffuse gliomas for several decades. It provides improved local control, but is not curative. Furthermore, several randomised trials have shown that the addition of alkylating chemotherapy, either temozolomide or nitrosourea-based regimens, to radiotherapy results in prolonged survival. Tumour-treating fields (TTFields) have emerged as an additional treatment option in combination with maintenance temozolomide treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Treatment at recurrence is less standardised and depends on the patient&rsquo;s performance status, symptom burden and prior treatments. Bevacizumab prolongs progression-free survival in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, but does not impact overall survival. However, in Switzerland and some other countries, it is still considered a valuable treatment option to reduce clinical symptom burden. Given the generally poor outcome for these patients, various novel treatment approaches are currently being explored within clinical trials including immunotherapeutic strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibition and the brain-penetrant proteasome inhibitor marizomib.

The COVID-19 outbreak is posing unprecedented risks and challenges for all communities and healthcare systems, worldwide. There are unique considerations for many adult patients with gliomas who are vulnerable to the novel coronavirus due to older age and immunosuppression. As patients with terminal illnesses, they present ethical challenges for centers that may need to ration access to ventilator care due to insufficient critical care capacity. It is urgent for the neuro-oncology community to develop a pro-active and coordinated approach to the care of adults with gliomas in order to provide them with the best possible oncologic care while also reducing their risk of viral infection during times of potential healthcare system failure. In this article, we present an approach developed by an international multi-disciplinary group to optimize the care of adults with gliomas during this pandemic. We recommend measures to promote strict social distancing and minimize exposures for patients, address risk and benefit of all therapeutic interventions, pro-actively develop end of life plans, educate patients and caregivers and ensure the health of the multi-disciplinary neuro-oncology workforce. This pandemic is already changing neuro-oncologic care delivery around the globe. It is important to highlight opportunities to maximize the benefit and minimize the risk of glioma management during this pandemic and potentially, in the future., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is widely established for older generation AEDs, whereas there is limited evidence about newer AEDs. Our aim is to assess the benefit of TDM of newer generation AEDs in epilepsy., Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing systematic with rescue TDM of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, brivaracetam, zonisamide, or pregabalin. Participants were adults with epilepsy, in whom treatment with newer generation AEDs was initiated or needed adjustment. In the systematic TDM arm, AED plasma levels were available at each appointment, whereas in the rescue TDM arm, levels were known only if a study endpoint was reached (inefficacy or adverse events). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants followed 1 year without reaching one of the predefined endpoints., Results: A total of 151 participants were enrolled; global retention in the study was similar in both arms (56% overall, 58% in the systematic, and 53% in the rescue TDM arm, p = 0.6, Cox regression). There was no difference in terms of outcome regarding treatment efficacy or tolerability. Partial adherence of clinicians to TDM (adjusting or not AED dosage based on blood levels) did not explain this lack of benefit., Interpretation: This study provides class A evidence that systematic drug level monitoring of newer generation AEDs does not bring tangible benefits in the management of patients with epilepsy. Poor correlation between clinical effects and drug levels likely accounts for this finding. However, TDM is useful in several situations, such as pregnancy, as well as when there are compliance issues. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:22-29., (© 2019 American Neurological Association.)

Aims: Recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is a disease with poor prognosis. Although several therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy, irradiation or surgery have been investigated, there is no established standard therapy. A recent survey among Swiss neuro-oncology centres has shown considerable controversy in the treatment recommendations for any specific scenario of recurrent GBM. In view of the cost differences of the available treatment alternatives, the aim of our study was assess the financial impact of different institutional therapeutic strategies for recurrent GBM in Switzerland., Methods: We created a decision analytic model for each of the eight centres participating in the initial study with a centre-specific treatment algorithm to evaluate the average treatment cost per patient. The probability of decision criteria was varied by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis over a wide range to account for the high level of uncertainty. Treatment costs were calculated from the perspective of the Swiss healthcare payer., Results: Mean treatment costs per patient calculated on the basis of the institutional treatment algorithms ranged from CHF 13,748 to CHF 22,072 depending on the probability of individual decision criteria. The most influential decision factors for the mean treatment costs were the probability of fit patients and the proportion of patients with resectable tumour recurrences. There was a significant correlation between the complexity of treatment algorithms in a centre and the resulting mean treatment costs., Conclusions: Institutional treatment algorithms can be used to estimate the average treatment costs per patient, which are, however, highly sensitive to probability changes of individual decision criteria. Our study demonstrates a high variability in treatment costs for recurrent GBM among eight Swiss neuro-oncology centres based on individual institutional treatment algorithms.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) have revolutionised the treatment of melanoma by significantly increasing survival rates and disease control. However, ICPis can have specific immune-related adverse events, including rare but severe neurological toxicity., Case Presentation: We report a 44-year-old man diagnosed with stage IIIB melanoma who developed metastatic disease (pulmonary and brain metastases) and was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and nivolumab immunotherapy. He developed asymptomatic multifocal diffuse white matter lesions consistent with active central nervous system demyelination seen on brain MRI. One month after cessation of the immunotherapy, spontaneous regression of the demyelinating lesions was observed, suggesting a nivolumab-related toxicity., Conclusion: We report the first case of a melanoma patient with an asymptomatic and spontaneously reversible central nervous system demyelination following nivolumab immunotherapy. This case highlights the need for better recognition of such atypical and rare neurological toxicities which could be mistaken for progressive brain metastases. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial to reduce severity and duration of these toxicities, especially for patients with less favourable evolution.

The management of women with brain tumors in the early post-partum period may be demanding as the patho-physiological changes that occur during pregnancy may also manifest in the early post-partum period. The aim of our paper is to report a case of late-onset post-partum pre-eclampsia after brain tumor surgery, complicated by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). Hemicraniectomy and intensive care management were necessary to obtain a favorable neurological outcome. The inherent literature on the subject is also analyzed through a systematic research. This is the first case of supratentorial decompressive hemicraniectomy in post-partum PRES, while there has been only one other case of posterior fossa decompression described in this cohort of patients. PRES and RCVS can complicate the neurosurgical management of women in the postpartum period. A careful evaluation of the clinical presentation is necessary as in some particular cases an aggressive medical and surgical treatment is required to obtain a favorable outcome., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGGs) are rare and incurable tumors. Whereas maximal safe, functional-based surgical resection is the first-line treatment, the timing and choice of further treatments (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or combined treatments) remain controversial., Methods: An online survey on the management of DLGG patients was sent to 28 expert centers from the European Low-Grade Glioma Network (ELGGN) in May 2015. It contained 40 specific questions addressing the modalities of use of chemotherapy in these patients., Results: The survey demonstrated a significant heterogeneity in practice regarding the initial management of DLGG patients and the use of chemotherapy. Interestingly, radiation therapy combined with the procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), and vincristine regimen has not imposed itself as the gold-standard treatment after surgery, despite the results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9802 study. Temozolomide is largely used as first-line treatment after surgical resection for high-risk DLGG patients, or at progression., Conclusions: The heterogeneity in the management of patients with DLGG demonstrates that many questions regarding the postoperative strategy and the use of chemotherapy remain unanswered. Our survey reveals a high recruitment potential within the ELGGN for retrospective or prospective studies to generate new data regarding these issues.

Purpose of Review: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) represent novel therapies recently approved to treat a number of human cancers. As both approaches modulate the immune system, they can generate a number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including a large spectrum of novel neurological toxicities. These are of special interest given their potential severity and risk of compromising further oncologic treatment. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and discuss their optimal management., Recent Findings: In contrast to irAEs involving other organs, neurological complications of ICPI are uncommon, may present throughout the course of treatment and involve the peripheral and central nervous system, including polyneuropathy, myositis, myasthenia gravis, demyelinating polyradiculopathy, myelitis, encephalitis and others. If started early, ICPI-related neurologic irAEs are usually responsive to steroids. In contrast, as many as 40% of patients undergoing CAR-T therapy will develop neurologic complications in the form of a cytokine-release-associated encephalopathy. It includes delirium, aphasia, tremor/myoclonus, seizure and seizure-like activity., Summary: irAEs associated with CAR-T and ICPI therapy constitute new entities. Early identification and treatment are essential to optimize the functional outcome and further oncologic management of the patient.

Background: The addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT → TMZ) did not prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in phase III trials. Elderly and frail patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, but early reports suggested preferential benefit in this population., Patients and Methods: ARTE was a 2 : 1 randomized, multi-center, open-label, non-comparative phase II trial of hypofractionated RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions) with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg×14 days) (arm A, N = 50) or without bevacizumab (arm B, N = 25) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged ≥65 years. The primary objective was to obtain evidence for prolongation of median OS by the addition of bevacizumab to RT. Response was assessed by RANO criteria. Quality of life (QoL) was monitored by the EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20 modules. Exploratory studies included molecular subtyping by 450k whole methylome and gene expression analyses., Results: Median PFS was longer in arm A than in arm B (7.6 and 4.8 months, P = 0.003), but OS was similar (12.1 and 12.2 months, P = 0.77). Clinical deterioration was delayed and more patients came off steroids in arm A. Prolonged PFS in arm A was confined to tumors with the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) I methylation subtype (HR 0.25, P = 0.014) and proneural gene expression (HR 0.29, P = 0.025). In a Cox model of OS controlling for established prognostic factors, associations with more favorable outcome were identified for age <70 years (HR 0.52, P = 0.018) and Karnofsky performance score 90%-100% (HR 0.51, P = 0.026). Including molecular subtypes into that model identified an association of the RTK II gene methylation subtype with inferior OS (HR 1.73, P = 0.076)., Conclusion: Efficacy outcomes and exploratory analyses of ARTE do not support the hypothesis that the addition of bevacizumab to RT generally prolongs survival in elderly glioblastoma patients. Molecular biomarkers may identify patients with preferential benefit from bevacizumab., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01443676.