Search

Simple Summary: Cancer immune evasion poses a significant challenge in developing effective cancer treatments. The interplay between the immune system and tumors influences cancer growth at various stages. While traditional treatments like surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted drugs remain fundamental, the emergence of immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer care. Harnessing the body's immune system, immunotherapy significantly improves patient outcomes, prompting efforts to enhance treatment efficacy. This review explores recent advancements in understanding cancer immune evasion mechanisms and evaluates various immunotherapy approaches, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and antibody-based treatments. It covers a broad spectrum of treatments, from established ones to those still under investigation, offering important insights for developing new anticancer immunotherapies. By analyzing resistance mechanisms, exploring combination strategies, and employing personalized approaches, the review aims to illuminate pathways for more effective treatments. Overall, this review aims to summarize recent developments in cancer immunology and immunotherapy, detailing new insights into cancer immune evasion mechanisms for identifying novel treatments. Cancer immune evasion represents a leading hallmark of cancer, posing a significant obstacle to the development of successful anticancer therapies. However, the landscape of cancer treatment has significantly evolved, transitioning into the era of immunotherapy from conventional methods such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted drug therapy. Immunotherapy has emerged as a pivotal component in cancer treatment, harnessing the body's immune system to combat cancer and offering improved prognostic outcomes for numerous patients. The remarkable success of immunotherapy has spurred significant efforts to enhance the clinical efficacy of existing agents and strategies. Several immunotherapeutic approaches have received approval for targeted cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trials. This review explores recent progress in unraveling the mechanisms of cancer immune evasion and evaluates the clinical effectiveness of diverse immunotherapy strategies, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and antibody-based treatments. It encompasses both established treatments and those currently under investigation, providing a comprehensive overview of efforts to combat cancer through immunological approaches. Additionally, the article emphasizes the current developments, limitations, and challenges in cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, by integrating analyses of cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanisms and exploring combination strategies and personalized approaches, it offers valuable insights crucial for the development of novel anticancer immunotherapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most frequently occurring malignant tumor within the kidney cancer subtype. It has low sensitivity to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the optimal treatment for localized ccRCC has been surgical resection, but even with complete resection the tumor will be eventually developed into metastatic disease in up to 40% of localized ccRCC. For this reason, it is crucial to find early diagnostic and treatment markers for ccRCC. Methods: We obtained anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) integrated from Genecards and Harmonizome dataset. The anoikis-related risk model was constructed based on 12 anoikis-related lncRNAs (ARlncRNAs) and verified by principal component analysis (PCA), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and the role of the risk score in ccRCC immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression levels, and drug sensitivity was evaluated by various algorithms. Additionally, we divided patients based on ARlncRNAs into cold and hot tumor clusters using the ConsensusClusterPlus (CC) package. Results: The AUC of risk score was the highest among various factors, including age, gender, and stage, indicating that the model we built to predict survival was more accurate than the other clinical features. There was greater sensitivity to targeted drugs like Axitinib, Pazopanib, and Sunitinib in the high-risk group, as well as immunotherapy drugs. This shows that the risk-scoring model can accurately identify candidates for ccRCC immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Furthermore, our results suggest that cluster 1 is equivalent to hot tumors with enhanced sensitivity to immunotherapy drugs. Conclusion: Collectively, we developed a risk score model based on 12 prognostic lncRNAs, expected to become a new tool for evaluating the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, providing different immunotherapy strategies by screening for hot and cold tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immunotherapy has become a new direction of current research because the effect of traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not satisfactory. T cell proliferation-related genes (TRGs) play a pivotal role in tumor progression by regulating the proliferation, activity, and function of immune cells. The purpose of our study is to construct and verify a prognostic model based on TRGs and to identify tumor subtypes that may guide treatment through comprehensive bioinformatics analyses. Methods: RNA sequencing data, clinical information, and somatic mutation data of ccRCC are obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We identified the prognosis-related TRGs which were differentially expressed between normal and tumor tissues. After dividing the patients into a train set and a test set according to proportion 1:1 randomly, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to construct a risk-stratified model. Its prediction performance was verified. Then, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), principal component analysis (PCA), tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) prediction were performed between the different groups of patients. To further discuss the immunotherapy between hot and cold tumors, we divided all patients into two clusters based on TRGs through unsupervised learning. Analyzing the gene mutation and calculating the tumor mutation burden (TMB), we further explored the relationship between somatic mutations and grouping or clustering. Results: Risk-stratified model and nomogram predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients accurately. Functional enrichment analyses suggested that TRGs mainly focused on the biological pathways related to tumor progression and immune response. Different tumor microenvironment, drug resistance, and TMB can be distinguished clearly according to both risk stratification and tumor subtype clustering. Conclusion: In this study, a new stratification model of ccRCC based on TRGs was established, which can accurately predict the prognosis of patients. IC50 prediction may guide the application of anti-tumor drugs. The distinction between hot and cold tumors provides a reference for clinical immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In reference to previous studies, necroptosis played an important role in cancer development. Our team decided to explore the potential prognostic values of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with necroptosis in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) and their relationship with the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the immunotherapeutic response for accurate dose. Methods: To obtain the required data, bladder urothelial carcinoma transcriptome data were searched from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). We used co-expression analysis, differential expression analysis, and univariate Cox regression to screen out prognostic lncRNAs associated with necroptosis in BLCA. Then the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was conducted to construct the necroptosis-associated lncRNAs model. Based on this model, we also performed the Kaplan-Meier analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to estimate the prognostic power of risk score. Multivariate and univariate Cox regression analysis were performed to build up a nomogram. Calibration curves, and time-dependent ROC were also conducted to evaluate nomogram. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a difference between high- and low-risk groups. In addition, we explored immune analysis, gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), and evaluation of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in constructed model. Finally, the entire samples were divided into three clusters based on model of necroptosis-associated lncRNAs to further compare immunotherapy in cold and hot tumors. Results: A model was built up based on necroptosis-associated lncRNAs. The model revealed good consistence between calibration plots and prognostic prediction. The area of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.707, 0.679, and 0.675. Risk groups could be helpful for systemic therapy due to the markedly diverse IC50 between risk groups. To our delight, clusters could effectively identify cold and hot tumors, which would be beneficial to accurate mediation. Clusters 2 and 3 were considered the hot tumor, which was more sensitive to immunotherapeutic drugs. Conclusions: The outcomes of our study suggested that necroptosis-associated lncRNAs could effectively predict patients with BLCA prognosis, which may be helpful for distinguishing the cold and hot tumors and improving individual treatment of BLCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Tumors responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a higher level of immune infiltrates and/or an Interferon (IFN) signature indicative of a T-cell-inflamed phenotype. Melanoma and lung cancer demonstrate high response rates to ICIs and are commonly referred to as “hot tumors”. These are in sharp contrast to tumors with low immune infiltrates called “cold tumors” or non-T-cell-inflamed cancers, such as those from the prostate and pancreas. Classification of tumors based on their immune phenotype can partially explain clinical response to ICIs. However, this model alone cannot fully explain the lack of response among many patients treated with ICIs. Dichotomizing tumors based on their mutation profile into high tumor mutation burden (TMB) or low TMB, such as many childhood malignancies, can also, to some extent, explain the clinical response to immunotherapy. This model mainly focuses on a tumor’s genotype rather than its immune phenotype. High TMB tumors often have higher levels of neoantigens that can be recognized by the immune system. In the current era of immunotherapy, with the lack of definitive biomarkers, we need to evaluate tumors based on both their immune phenotype and genomic mutation profile to determine which patients have a higher likelihood of responding to treatment with ICIs.

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most frequently occurring malignant tumor within the kidney cancer subtype. It has low sensitivity to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the optimal treatment for localized ccRCC has been surgical resection, but even with complete resection the tumor will be eventually developed into metastatic disease in up to 40% of localized ccRCC. For this reason, it is crucial to find early diagnostic and treatment markers for ccRCC., Methods: We obtained anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) integrated from Genecards and Harmonizome dataset. The anoikis-related risk model was constructed based on 12 anoikis-related lncRNAs (ARlncRNAs) and verified by principal component analysis (PCA), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and the role of the risk score in ccRCC immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression levels, and drug sensitivity was evaluated by various algorithms. Additionally, we divided patients based on ARlncRNAs into cold and hot tumor clusters using the ConsensusClusterPlus (CC) package., Results: The AUC of risk score was the highest among various factors, including age, gender, and stage, indicating that the model we built to predict survival was more accurate than the other clinical features. There was greater sensitivity to targeted drugs like Axitinib, Pazopanib, and Sunitinib in the high-risk group, as well as immunotherapy drugs. This shows that the risk-scoring model can accurately identify candidates for ccRCC immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Furthermore, our results suggest that cluster 1 is equivalent to hot tumors with enhanced sensitivity to immunotherapy drugs., Conclusion: Collectively, we developed a risk score model based on 12 prognostic lncRNAs, expected to become a new tool for evaluating the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, providing different immunotherapy strategies by screening for hot and cold tumors., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Hao, Li, Lu, He, Shen, Wang and Qiu.)

Background: Immunotherapy has become a new direction of current research because the effect of traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not satisfactory. T cell proliferation-related genes (TRGs) play a pivotal role in tumor progression by regulating the proliferation, activity, and function of immune cells. The purpose of our study is to construct and verify a prognostic model based on TRGs and to identify tumor subtypes that may guide treatment through comprehensive bioinformatics analyses. Methods: RNA sequencing data, clinical information, and somatic mutation data of ccRCC are obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We identified the prognosis-related TRGs which were differentially expressed between normal and tumor tissues. After dividing the patients into a train set and a test set according to proportion 1:1 randomly, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to construct a risk-stratified model. Its prediction performance was verified. Then, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), principal component analysis (PCA), tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) prediction were performed between the different groups of patients. To further discuss the immunotherapy between hot and cold tumors, we divided all patients into two clusters based on TRGs through unsupervised learning. Analyzing the gene mutation and calculating the tumor mutation burden (TMB), we further explored the relationship between somatic mutations and grouping or clustering. Results: Risk-stratified model and nomogram predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients accurately. Functional enrichment analyses suggested that TRGs mainly focused on the biological pathways related to tumor progression and immune response. Different tumor microenvironment, drug resistance, and TMB can be distinguished clearly according to both risk stratification and tumor subtype clustering. Conclusion: In this study, a new stratification model of ccRCC based on TRGs was established, which can accurately predict the prognosis of patients. IC50 prediction may guide the application of anti-tumor drugs. The distinction between hot and cold tumors provides a reference for clinical immunotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Huang, Cai, Hong, Gao, Tang, Zhang and Xu.)

Background: In reference to previous studies, necroptosis played an important role in cancer development. Our team decided to explore the potential prognostic values of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with necroptosis in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) and their relationship with the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the immunotherapeutic response for accurate dose., Methods: To obtain the required data, bladder urothelial carcinoma transcriptome data were searched from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). We used co-expression analysis, differential expression analysis, and univariate Cox regression to screen out prognostic lncRNAs associated with necroptosis in BLCA. Then the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was conducted to construct the necroptosis-associated lncRNAs model. Based on this model, we also performed the Kaplan-Meier analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to estimate the prognostic power of risk score. Multivariate and univariate Cox regression analysis were performed to build up a nomogram. Calibration curves, and time-dependent ROC were also conducted to evaluate nomogram. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed a difference between high- and low-risk groups. In addition, we explored immune analysis, gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), and evaluation of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in constructed model. Finally, the entire samples were divided into three clusters based on model of necroptosis-associated lncRNAs to further compare immunotherapy in cold and hot tumors., Results: A model was built up based on necroptosis-associated lncRNAs. The model revealed good consistence between calibration plots and prognostic prediction. The area of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.707, 0.679, and 0.675. Risk groups could be helpful for systemic therapy due to the markedly diverse IC50 between risk groups. To our delight, clusters could effectively identify cold and hot tumors, which would be beneficial to accurate mediation. Clusters 2 and 3 were considered the hot tumor, which was more sensitive to immunotherapeutic drugs., Conclusions: The outcomes of our study suggested that necroptosis-associated lncRNAs could effectively predict patients with BLCA prognosis, which may be helpful for distinguishing the cold and hot tumors and improving individual treatment of BLCA., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Liu, Xu, Chang, Ma, Wang, Sun, Chen, Xu and Zhang.)