Search

The purpose of this survey was to determine nurse administrators and hospital directors’ perspectives about nurses’ abilities in performing specific medical practices in hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture. The nurse administrators and hospital directors of all hospitals （１１３ hospitals） in Tokushima Prefecture were invited to respond to a survey questionnaire by mail posted during the period between February and March of ２０１５. Responses were received from ４６ nurse administrators （response rate, ４１％） and ３８ hospital directors （response rate, ３４％）. The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the narrative descriptions summarized. Majority of responses from nurse administrators and hospital directors were accepting that nurses have responsibilities for administering medicines such as tranquilizers, anti-anxiety and anticonvulsant drugs. This result was not affected by the size of the hospital, in which fifty four percent （５４％） of respondents were from hospitals with less than １００ beds. In Japan, only hospitals with １００ beds or more may have procedures involving highly invasive treatments. Because of this, many of the respondents answered “not applicable” to statements in the questionnaire which were related to invasive treatments. Recruitment of nurses, strategies to cope with accidents and education curriculum were important concerns of nurse administrators and hospital directors which remain to be answered in future investigations.

Los objetivos son analizar el significado de autoridad que ejerce la enfermera gerente en instituciones de salud y comparar el tipo de autoridad ejecutada por dirigentes de enfermería en México y Portugal. Investigación cualitativa, descriptiva y comparativa, participaron 24 gerentes de enfermería, el instrumento fue una guía de entrevista, basada en las dimensiones: significado y tipo de autoridad, se discutió el significado de autoridad según teoría de interaccionismo simbólico. Los resultados permitieron reflejar el significado de autoridad; para las gerentes mexicanas es un valor moral del dirigente y para los portugueses una competencia en función de la posición designada; respecto al tipo de autoridad que ejercen, en las primeras predominó, justicia, comprensión e igualdad hacia los demás, para los segundos democrática participativa y aceptación. Concluyéndose que no existe la misma dimensión de autoridad entre gerentes de ambos países, su divergencia radica en la perspectiva final de sus decisiones. Foram objetivos do estudo analisar o significado da autoridade exercida pela enfermeira gerente em instituições de saúde e comparar o tipo de autoridade de dirigentes de enfermagem no México e em Portugal. Pesquisa qualitativa, descritiva e comparativa, da qual participaram 24 gerentes de enfermagem. O instrumento utilizado foi o de roteiro de entrevista, com base nas dimensões: significado e tipo de autoridade.Discutiu-se o significado de autoridade de acordo com a teoria do interacionismo simbólico. Os resultados possibilitaram refletir sobre o significado de autoridade, revelando-se que, para as gerentes mexicanas, é um valor moral do gestor e, para os portugueses, uma competência inerente à posição. No que concerne ao tipo de autoridade exercido, para as primeiras predominou justiça, compreensão e igualdade em relação aos demais. Para os segundos,esta deve ser democrática, participativa e de aceitação. Conclui-se que não há confluência sobre a autoridade entre gerentes de ambos os países e que sua divergência incide na perspectiva final de suas decisões. The study aimed to analyze the meaning of the authority exercised by the nurse-manager in health institutions and to compare the type of authority of nurse-managers in Mexico and in Portugal. This study is qualitative, descriptive and comparative. A total of 24 nurse-managers participated. The instrument used was an interview script, based in the following dimensions: meaning and type of authority. The meaning of authority was discussed in accordance with the theory of symbolic interactionism. The results made it possible to reflect on the meaning of authority, revealing that – for the Mexican managers – it is a moral value on the part of the manager; while for the Portuguese, it is a skill which is inherent to the position. Regarding the type of authority exercised, for the former, justice, comprehension and equality in relation to the other employees predominated. For the latter, the authority must be democratic, participative and based on acceptance. It is concluded that among the managers from both countries there is no confluence regarding authority, and that their divergence affects the final perspective of their decisions.

Resumo O presente artigo analisa a tomada de decisão da alta administração de hospitais públicos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) em relação a projetos que foram elaborados com a intencionalidade de mudar a gestão da clínica. O desenho metodológico é de natureza qualitativa, baseado na perspectiva hermenêutica-dialética. Em termos de resultados, destaca-se que os diretores dos hospitais perceberam que os projetos de gestão da clínica mudaram a realidade hospitalar, aprimorando sua organização, mobilizando seus servidores no sentido de ordenar e sistematizar as ações e os recursos disponíveis. A racionalidade técnica foi a principal fundamentação presente nas tomadas de decisão dos gestores, apesar de, por vezes, os contextos organizacionais fragmentados impedirem a utilização de outros aspectos relacionados com a racionalidade, como a análise econômico-financeira. O modelo incremental e o político também se manifestaram nos discursos. Conclui-se que a tomada de decisão é prática de enorme dimensão que contempla aspectos racionais, como uso de técnicas de gestão e da capacidade de análise, interpretação e síntese, e aspectos subjetivos, como seleção de valores e vivências pessoais, visto que os problemas gerenciais são mais amplos, ambíguos, complexos e menos estruturados na prática. Abstract This paper analyses the decision making process for senior management in public hospitals that are a part of the National Health Service in Brazil (hereafter SUS) in relation to projects aimed at changing clinical management. The methodological design of this study is qualitative in nature taking a hermeneutics-dialectics perspective in terms of results. Hospital directors noted that clinical management projects changed the state of hospitals through: improving their organizations, mobilizing their staff in order to increase a sense of order and systemizing actions and available resources. Technical rationality was the principal basis used in the decision making process for managers. Due to the reality of many hospitals having fragmented organizations, this fact impeded the use of aspects related to rationality, such as economic and financial factors in the decision making process. The incremental model and general politics also play a role in this area. We concluded that the decision making process embraces a large array of factors including rational aspects such as the use of management techniques and the ability to analyze, interpret and summarize. It also incorporates subjective elements such as how to select values and dealing with people’s working experiences. We recognized that management problems are wide in scope, ambiguous, complex and do not come with a lot of structure in practice.