Search

Many GPCR models have been built over the years for many different purposes, of which drug-design undoubtedly has been the most frequent one. The release of the structure of bovine rhodopsin in August 2000 enabled us to analyze models built before that period to learn things for the models we build today. We conclude that the GPCR modeling field is riddled with "common knowledge". Several characteristics of the bovine rhodopsin structure came as a big surprise, and had obviously not been predicted, which led to large errors in the models. Some of these surprises, however, could have been predicted if the modelers had more rigidly stuck to the rule that holds for all models, namely that a model should explain all experimental facts, and not just those facts that agree with the modeler's preconceptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Driven by past successes and the detailed knowledge of signalling cascades and physiological processes, G-protein-coupled receptors are taking a prominent place in the portfolios of many pharmaceutical companies. To successfully address this target class, scientists need not only a good understanding of the specific receptor under investigation, but also the right tools from assay technology, reagent production to a hit-to-lead process that acknowledges the importance of parameters beyond potency and embraces the gain in knowledge of the last decade. This manuscripts attempts to summarise some of the changes and progress made across the pharmaceutical industry to design an efficient and effective strategy for finding and optimising small molecules modulating the activity of GPCRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) fulfil a broad diversity of physiological functions in areas such as neurotransmission, respiration, cardiovascular action, pain and more. Consequently, they are considered as the most successful group of therapeutic targets on the pharmaceutical market, and the search for compounds that interfere with GPCR function in a specific and selective way is a major focus of the pharmaceutical industry. High Content Screening (HCS), a combination of fluorescence microscopic imaging and automated image analysis, has become a frequently employed tool to study test compound effects in cellular disease modelling systems. One way to functionally analyse the effect of test compounds on GPCRs by HCS relies on the broadly observed phenomenon of desensitisation. Agonist stimulation of most GPCRs leads to their intracellular phosphorylation and subsequent internalisation, resulting in the termination of receptor signalling and the seclusion of the GPCR from further extracellular stimulation. Complementary to other functional GPCR drug discovery assays, GPCR internalisation assays enable a desensitisation-focussed pharmacological analysis of test compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have traditionally been thought to adopt two conformations: the inactive unliganded conformation and the active ligand-bound conformation. Interactions with G-proteins in cells and membranes are known to modulate the affinity of the receptor for ligand and therefore the conformation of the receptor. Such observations led to the proposal of the ternary complex model. However, subsequent studies of constitutively active GPCRs led to the development of an extended version of this model to account for active conformations of the receptor in the absence of agonist. A significant difficulty with many of the studies, upon which this latter model was based, is the lack of knowledge of receptor and G-protein concentrations due to the two-dimensional nature of the membranes used to perform the measurements. Over the past decade, we have studied the interaction of GPCRs, G-proteins, arrestins, and ligands in solubilized systems, where the concentration of each component can be defined. Here we summarize results of these studies as they pertain to the regulation of GPCR conformations and affinities for interacting species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G-protein-coupled receptors constitute one of the major families of drug targets. Orphan receptors, for which the ligands and function are still unknown, are an attractive set of future targets for presently unmet medical needs. Screening strategies have been developed over the years in order to identify the natural ligands of these receptors. Natural or chimeric G-proteins that can redirect the natural coupling of receptors toward intracellular calcium release are frequently used. Potential problems include poor expression or trafficking to the cell surface, constitutive activity of the receptors, or the presence of endogenous receptors in the cell types used for functional expression, leading to nonspecific responses. Many orphan receptors characterized over the last 10 years have been associated with previously known bioactive molecules. However, new and unpredicted biological mediators have also been purified from complex biological sources. A few old and recent examples, including nociceptin, chemerin, and the F2L peptide are illustrated. Future challenges for the functional characterization of the remaining orphan receptors include the potential requirement of specific proteins necessary for quality control, trafficking or coupling of specific receptors, the possible formation of obligate heterodimers, and the possibility that some constitutively active receptors may lack ligands or respond only to inverse agonists. Adapted expression and screening strategies will be needed to deal with these issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G-protein-coupled receptors encoded by herpesviruses such as EBV, HCMV and KSHV are very interesting illustrations of the (patho)physiological importance of constitutive GPCR activity. These viral proteins are expressed on the cell surface of infected cells and often constitutively activate a variety of G-proteins. For some virus-encoded GPCRs, the constitutive activity has been shown to occur in vivo, i.e., in infected cells. In this paper, we will review the occurrence of virus-encoded GPCRs and describe their known signaling properties. Moreover, we will also review the efforts, directed towards the discovery of small molecule antagonist, that so far have been mainly focused on the HCMV-encoded GPCR US28. This virus-encoded receptor might be involved in cardiovascular diseases and cancer and seems an interesting target for drug intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A wide range of techniques have been employed to examine the quaternary structure of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although it is well established that homo-dimerisation is common, recent studies have sought to explore the physical basis of these interactions and the role of dimerisation in signal transduction. Growing evidence hints at the existence of higher-order organisation of individual GPCRs and the potential for hetero-dimerisation between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs. Here we consider how both homo-dimerisation/oligomerisation and hetero-dimerisation can regulate signal transduction through GPCRs and the potential consequences of this for function of therapeutic medicines that target GPCRs. Hetero-dimerisation is not the sole means by which co-expressed GPCRs may regulate the function of one another. Heterologous desensitisation may be at least as important and we also consider if this can be the basis for physiological antagonism between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs. Although there may be exceptions (Meyer et al. 2006), a great deal of recent evidence has indicated that most G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) do not exist as monomers but rather as dimers or, potentially, within higher-order oligomers (Milligan 2004b; Park et al. 2004). Support for such models has been provided by a range of studies employing different approaches, including co-immunoprecipitation of differentially epitope-tagged but co-expressed forms of the same GPCR, co-operativity in ligand binding and a variety of resonance energy transfer techniques (Milligan and Bouvier 2005). Only for the photon receptor rhodopsin has the organisational structure of a GPCR been studied in situ. The application of atomic force microscopy to murine rod outer segment discs indicated that rhodopsin is organised in a series of parallel arrays of dimers (Liang et al. 2003) and based on this, molecular models were constructed to try to define and interpret regions of contact between the monomers (Fotiadis et al. 2004). Only for relatively few other GPCRs are details of the molecular basis of dimerisation available but within this limited data set, recent studies on the dopamine D2 receptor suggest a means by which information on the binding of an agonist can be transmitted between the two elements of the dimer via the dimer interface (Guo et al. 2005). Although the availability of cDNAs encoding molecularly defined GPCRs has allowed high-throughput screening for ligands that modulate GPCR function, this is performed almost exclusively in heterologous cell lines transfected to express only the specific GPCR of interest. Given that the human genome contains some 400-450 genes encoding non-chemosensory GPCRs, it is clear that any individual cell of the body may express a considerable number of GPCRs. Interactions between these, either via hetero-dimerisation, via heterologous desensitisation or via the integration of downstream signals can potentially alter the pharmacology, sensitivity and function of receptor agonists and hence produce varied responses. In this article, we will use specific examples to consider the role of homo-dimerisation/oligomerisation in GPCR function and whether either direct hetero-dimerisation or heterologous desensitisation between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs affects the function of the receptor pairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug discovery has successfully exploited the superfamily of seven transmembrane receptors (7TMR), with over 35% of clinically marketed drugs targeting them. However, it is clear that there remains an undefined potential within this protein family for successful drugs of the future. The human genome sequencing project identified approximately 720 genes that belong to the 7TMR superfamily. Around half of these genes encode sensory receptors, while the other half are potential drug targets. Natural ligands have been identified for approximately 215 of these, leaving 155 receptors classified as orphan 7TMRs having no known ligand. Deorphanisation of these receptors by identification of natural ligands has been the traditional method enabling target validation by use of these ligands as tools to define biological relevance and disease association. Such ligands have been paired with their cognate receptor experimentally by screening of small molecule and peptide ligands, reverse pharmacology and the use of bioinformatics to predict candidate ligands. In this manuscript, we review the methodologies developed for the identification of ligands at orphan 7TMRs and exemplify these with case studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Certain kinds of ligand substructures recur frequently in pharmacologically successful synthetic compounds. For this reason they are called privileged structures. In seeking an explanation for this phenomenon, it is observed that the privileged structure represents a generic substructure that matches commonly recurring conserved structural motifs in the target proteins, which may otherwise be quite diverse in sequence and function. Using sequence-handling tools, it is possible to identify which other receptors may respond to the ligand, as dictated on the one hand by the nature of the privileged substructure itself or by the rest of the ligand in which a more specific message resides. It is suggested that privileged structures interact with the partially exposed receptor machinery responsible for the switch between the active and inactive states. Depending on how they have been designed to interact, one can predispose these substructures to favour either one state or the other; thus privileged structures can be used to create either agonists or antagonists. In terms of the mechanism of recognition, the region that the privileged structures bind to are rich in aromatic residues, which explains the prevalence of aromatic groups and atoms such as sulphur or halogens in many of the ligands. Finally, the approach described here can be used to design drugs for orphan receptors whose function has not yet been established experimentally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GPCR ligands represent not only one of the major classes of current drugs but the major continuing source of novel potent pharmaceutical agents. Because 3D structures of GPCRs as determined by experimental techniques are still unavailable, ligand-based drug discovery methods remain the major computational molecular modeling approaches to the analysis of growing data sets of tested GPCR ligands. This paper presents an overview of modern Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling. We discuss the critical issue of model validation and the strategy for applying the successfully validated QSAR models to virtual screening of available chemical databases. We present several examples of applications of validated QSAR modeling approaches to GPCR ligands. We conclude with the comments on exciting developments in the QSAR modeling of GPCR ligands that focus on the study of emerging data sets of compounds with dual or even multiple activities against two or more of GPCRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From the point of view of a participant observer, I tell the discovery stories of trimeric G-proteins and GPCRs, beginning in the 1970s. As in most such stories, formidable obstacles, confusion, and mistakes make eventual triumphs even more exciting. Because these pivotally important signaling molecules were discovered before the recombinant DNA revolution, today's well-trained molecular biologist may find it amazing that we learned anything at all. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]