Search

In 2010, under the guidance of the DGAI (German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) and DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine), twelve German medical societies published the “Evidence- and Consensus-based Guidelines on the Management of Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium in Intensive Care”. Since then, several new studies and publications have considerably increased the body of evidence, including the new recommendations from the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) in conjunction with Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) from 2013. For this update, a major restructuring and extension of the guidelines were needed in order to cover new aspects of treatment, such as sleep and anxiety management. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated using the criteria of the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine. The body of evidence used to formulate these recommendations was reviewed and approved by representatives of 17 national societies. Three grades of recommendation were used as follows: Grade “A” (strong recommendation), Grade “B” (recommendation) and Grade “0” (open recommendation). The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence and consensus-based set of level 3 guidelines. This publication was designed for all ICU professionals, and takes into account all critically ill patient populations. It represents a guide to symptom-oriented prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium, anxiety, stress, and protocol-based analgesia, sedation, and sleep-management in intensive care medicine.

BackgroundIt is unknown whether lung-protective ventilation is applied in burn patients and whether they benefit from it. This study aimed to determine ventilation practices in burn intensive care units (ICUs) and investigate the association between lung-protective ventilation and the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 (VFD-28).MethodsThis is an international prospective observational cohort study including adult burn patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Low tidal volume (V T) was defined as V T ≤ 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). Levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and maximum airway pressures were collected. The association between V T and VFD-28 was analyzed using a competing risk model. Ventilation settings were presented for all patients, focusing on the first day of ventilation. We also compared ventilation settings between patients with and without inhalation trauma.ResultsA total of 160 patients from 28 ICUs in 16 countries were included. Low V T was used in 74% of patients, median V T size was 7.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.2-8.3] mL/kg PBW and did not differ between patients with and without inhalation trauma (p = 0.58). Median VFD-28 was 17 (IQR 0-26), without a difference between ventilation with low or high V T (p = 0.98). All patients were ventilated with PEEP levels ≥5 cmH2O; 80% of patients had maximum airway pressures

Background: It is unknown whether lung-protective ventilation is applied in burn patients and whether they benefit from it. This study aimed to determine ventilation practices in burn intensive care units (ICUs) and investigate the association between lung-protective ventilation and the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 (VFD-28)., Methods: This is an international prospective observational cohort study including adult burn patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Low tidal volume ( V T ) was defined as V T  ≤ 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). Levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and maximum airway pressures were collected. The association between V T and VFD-28 was analyzed using a competing risk model. Ventilation settings were presented for all patients, focusing on the first day of ventilation. We also compared ventilation settings between patients with and without inhalation trauma., Results: A total of 160 patients from 28 ICUs in 16 countries were included. Low V T was used in 74% of patients, median V T size was 7.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.2-8.3] mL/kg PBW and did not differ between patients with and without inhalation trauma ( p  = 0.58). Median VFD-28 was 17 (IQR 0-26), without a difference between ventilation with low or high V T ( p  = 0.98). All patients were ventilated with PEEP levels ≥5 cmH 2 O; 80% of patients had maximum airway pressures <30 cmH 2 O., Conclusion: In this international cohort study we found that lung-protective ventilation is used in the majority of burn patients, irrespective of the presence of inhalation trauma. Use of low V T was not associated with a reduction in VFD-28., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02312869. Date of registration: 9 December 2014., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: More than half a million patients suffer from minor burns in Germany per year. In 2018, almost 2000 patients needed intensive care for their burn injuries. Despite high standards of burn care, mortality remains high. Burn injuries may lead to long-term sequelae. In order to provide up-to-date burn care, guidelines are available online with public access., Methods and Results: This overview presents a summary of the German AWMF guideline for the treatment of thermal injuries in adults (https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/044-001.html). Experts of eleven different medical organisations and specialties have contributed to this S2k guideline with their expertise. The focus of the article is on acute burn wound assessment, the indication for specialised care in burn centres, the management of the burn wound at the trauma scene and in hospitals as well as scar management and rehabilitation., Conclusion: This overview reports on the consensus-based treatment of acute burn wounds in adults in Germany. The article is intended to guide doctors and professional caretakers to perform state-of-the-art burn care. The current guideline aims to improve burn outcome., Competing Interests: HOR war beratend tätig für die Firma Birken und hat eine bezahlte Autorentätigkeit für uptodate. UM hat eine Studie für die DIZG durchgeführt. CH war beratend tätig für Acelity und hat Honorar für Vorträge der Firma Integra und Mediwound erhalten. JH war beratend tätig für Mediwound und hat Honorar für Vorträge der Firma Juzo und Thuasne erhalten, sowie eine Studie für die Firma OrionPharma durchgeführt. BH war beratend für die DIZG, die Firmen Polymedics und Mediwound tätig und hat bezahlte Vorträge für die Firmen Juzo und Mediwound gehalten, sowie eine klinische Studie für die Firma Mediwound durchgeführt. ML hat Honorar für Vorträge der Firma Serag Wiesner erhalten. HP hat bezahlte Vorträge für die Berufsfachschule für Orthopädietechnik gehalten, sowie Eigentümerinteressen am Sanitätshaus Pauli und Sanitätshaus Aktuell AG. JLS hat eine Studie für die Firma Prevor durchgeführt. MS hat Honorar für Vorträge der Firma Polymedics erhalten. SW hat bezahle Vorträge für die Firmen Juzo und Thuasne gehalten. SZ hat bezahlte Vorträge für Pfizer, bioMerieux, sifin diagnostics und Aurosan gehalten. HZ hat Honorare für Vorträge für die Firmen Thuasne, Juzo, Albrecht, Smith&Nephew sowie die Bundesfachschule für Orthopädietechnik erhalten. Die übrigen Autoren haben keine Interessenskonflikte., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)