Search

Christopher W Root,1 David M Dudzinski,2 Bishoy Zakhary,3 Oren A Friedman,4 Akhilesh K Sista,5 James M Horowitz6 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 3Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; 4Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 5Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; 6Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA Abstract: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal disease with a broad range of treatment options that spans multiple specialties. The rapid evolution and expansion of novel therapies to treat PE make it a disease process that is well suited to a multidisciplinary approach. In order to facilitate a rapid, robust response to the diagnosis of PE, some hospitals have established multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs). The PERT model is based on existing multidisciplinary teams such as heart teams and rapid response teams. A PERT is composed of clinicians from the range of specialties involved in the treatment of PE, including pulmonology critical care, interventional radiology, cardiology, and cardiothoracic surgery among others. A PERT is a 24/7 consult service that is able to provide expert advice on the initial management of PE patients and convene in real time to develop a consensus treatment plan specifically tailored to the needs of a particular patient and consistent with the capabilities of the institution. In this review, we discuss the rationale for establishing a PERT and its potential benefits. We discuss considerations in forming a PERT and present case studies of several PERTs currently in operation at different institutions. We also discuss potential difficulties in forming a PERT and review evidence that has been generated by some of the PERTs that have been in operation the longest. Keywords: pulmonary embolism, pulmonary embolism response team, thrombosis, thrombolysis, venous thromboembolism

Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling describes the relation between right ventricular contractility and its afterload and is estimated as the ratio of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) by way of echocardiography. Whether TAPSE/PASP is reflective of invasive hemodynamics or occult shock in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is unknown. This was a single-center retrospective study over a 3-year period of consecutive patients with PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and simultaneous pulmonary artery catheterization with echocardiograms performed within 24 hours before the procedure. A total of 70 patients (81% intermediate risk) had complete invasive hemodynamic profiles and echocardiograms, with TAPSE/PASP calculated. The optimal cutoff for TAPSE/PASP as a predictor of a reduced cardiac index (CI) (CI ≤2.2 L/min/m 2 ) was 0.34 mm/mm Hg, with an area under the curve of 0.97 and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 97.3%, 90.9%, 92.3%, and 96.8%, respectively. Every 0.1 mm/mm Hg decrease in TAPSE/PASP was associated with a 0.24-L/min/m 2 decrease in the CI. This relation was similar when restricted to intermediate-risk PE. The TAPSE/PASP ratio was predictive of normotensive shock with an odds ratio of 2.63 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 4.76, p = 0.002) per unit decrease in the ratio. In conclusion, in patients with acute PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, TAPSE/PASP was a strong predictor of a reduced CI and normotensive shock. This means that noninvasive point-of-care assessment of hemodynamics may have added value in PE risk stratification., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Bangalore reports being part of the advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer (New York, New York), Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, and Argon. Dr. Horowitz receives funding from Inari Medical. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This consensus statement emerges from collaborative efforts among leading figures in critical care cardiology throughout the United States, who met to share their collective expertise on issues faced by those active in or pursuing contemporary critical care cardiology education. The panel applied fundamentals of adult education and curriculum design, reviewed requisite training necessary to provide high-quality care to critically ill patients with cardiac pathology, and devoted attention to a purposeful approach emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion in developing this nascent field. The resulting paper offers a comprehensive guide for current trainees, with insights about the present landscape of critical care cardiology while highlighting issues that need to be addressed for continued advancement. By delineating future directions with careful consideration and intentionality, this Expert Panel aims to facilitate the continued growth and maturation of critical care cardiology education and practice., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Elliott is the director of the Critical Care Cardiology Education Summit; has received grant funding from the American College of Cardiology; and has received educational honoraria from Zoll. Dr Bartos has received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. Dr Barnett has received research funding from Merck; and has received educational honorarium from Zoll. Drs Barnett, Alviar, Gage, Horowitz, and Katz are co-course directors of the NYU Langone Critical Care Cardiology Symposium, and the course has received industry support. Dr Roswell is the chair of the American College of Cardiology Critical Care Cardiology member section; and chair-elect of the American Board of Internal Medicine Board of Directors. Dr Alviar has received research funds from Baxter; and has served on the Speakers Bureau for Zoll and Abiomed. Drs Bennett and Jentzer are co-course directors of Heart to Heart: Advances in Cardiovascular Critical Care and Resuscitation. Dr Berg has received institutional grants to Brigham & Women’s Hospital from AstraZeneca and Pfizer; has received honoraria from the Medical Education Speakers Network and USV Private Limited; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MobilityBio, Pfizer, and Youngene Therapeutics; and has served on clinical endpoint committees for studies sponsored by Beckman Coulter, Kowa Pharmaceuticals, and Tosoh Biosciences. Dr Bohula has received personal consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Servier, and Esperion; has served on an events adjudication committee for Kowa; and has received research support from Regeneron. Drs Dahiya and Senman are the founders of www.ccc1stop.com and CCCEnthusiasts, LLC, which has received unrestricted funding support from Zoll and CardioNerds. Dr Gage has served on the Speakers Bureau (historic) and received honoraria from Abiomed; and has received educational honoraria from Zoll. Dr Higgins has received educational honoraria from Abbott. Dr Horowitz has received research funds from Inari and Penumbra. Dr Katz has served on the data safety monitoring board member for the Abiomed RECOVER IV trial; has received research support from Abbott Corporation; and has received speaker honoraria from Zoll. Dr Lee has received educational honoraria from Getinge. Dr Metkus has received consulting fees/honoraria from TelaDoc, BestDoctors, and Oakstone-EBIX; and receives textbook royalties from McGraw-Hill. Dr Solomon has received intramural research funds from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center; and is the chair-elect of the American College of Cardiology Critical Care Cardiology member section. Dr Dudzinski is course director of 5C: Concepts in Contemporary Critical Care Cardiology, and this course has received educational grants from Abbott, Abiomed, and Zoll. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) commonly present with a significantly reduced cardiac index (CI). However, the identification of this more severe profile requires invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Whether inferior vena cava (IVC) contrast reflux, as a marker of worse right ventricular function, can predict invasive hemodynamics has not been explored., Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study over a 3-year period of consecutive patients with PE undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and simultaneous pulmonary artery catheterization. CT pulmonary angiograms were reviewed, and contrast reflux was graded as no/minimal reflux (limited to the IVC) or substantial (opacification including hepatic veins) based on an established scale., Results: Substantial contrast reflux was present in 29 of 85 patients (34 %) and associated with a lower CI (1.8 ± 0.4 L/min/m 2 v. 2.6 ± 1.0 L/min/m 2 , p < 0.001), higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (53.2 ± 19.5 mmHg v. 44.0 ± 12.1 mmHg, p = 0.025), and worse right ventricular systolic function. An IVC contrast reflux grade > 3 was a significant predictor for a CI ≤2.2 L/min/m 2 (OR: 22.5, 95 % CI: 4.8, 104.4, p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for substantial contrast reflux for a CI ≤2.2 L/min/m 2 were 62.6 %, 93.1 %, 94.6 %, and 56.2 %, respectively. These findings remained significant in a multivariable model and were similar when isolating for intermediate-risk patients (n = 72, 85 %)., Conclusions: The degree of contrast reflux is highly specific for a reduced cardiac index in PE even when isolating for intermediate-risk patients. Real-time prediction of a hemodynamic profile may have added value in the risk-stratification of PE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Sripal Bangalore - Advisory board- Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, Argon. JMH - funding from Inari Medical. EY, RSZ, PZ, Samuel Bernard, AAG, RP, VM, KH, LE, CLA, NMK report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the validity of a recently published consensus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic algorithm for differentiating degenerating leiomyomas from uterine sarcomas and other atypical appearing uterine malignancies., Methods: Atypical uterine masses on pelvic MRI were identified using a radiology report search engine and teaching files with the keywords "atypical leiomyoma," "atypical fibroid," and "sarcoma." All cases were pathology-proven. Two radiologists blinded to clinical, surgical, and pathologic reports retrospectively and independently reviewed 40 pelvic MRI examinations dated 1/2007-9/2022 to determine whether the masses appeared benign or malignant, using the 2022 consensus atypical uterine mass flow chart. Imaging features assessed included intermediate/high signal intensity (SI) at T2-weighted imaging, high diffusion weighted imaging SI (equal or higher SI than endometrium or lymph nodes on high b value imaging), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value ≤0.905 × 10-3 mm2/s, peritoneal metastases, and abnormal lymph nodes., Results: Among the 40 atypical uterine mass cases reviewed, 24 masses were benign (22 leiomyomas, 1 adenomyoma, and 1 borderline ovarian tumor) and 16 masses were malignant (6 leiomyosarcomas, 6 carcinosarcomas, 2 endometrial stromal sarcomas, 1 high-grade adenosarcoma, and 1 low-grade uterine sarcoma). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of whether a mass was benign or malignant were 75%, 95.8%, 92.3%, and 85% for reader 1, and 81.2%, 91.7%, 86.7%, and 88% for reader 2, respectively. Interrater agreement was strong, with a kappa statistic of 0.89. When excluding nonleiomyosarcoma uterine malignancies, sensitivity and negative predictive value improved to 100%., Conclusions: The new consensus pelvic MRI algorithm for evaluating atypical uterine masses has good specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for determining malignancy, particularly for uterine sarcomas that are leiomyosarcomas. However, if ADC value is near but not below 0.905 × 10-3 mm2/s, the mass may still be malignant, especially if a b value lower than 1000 is used. If the atypical uterine mass is predominantly endometrial, morphological features on T2 and postgadolinium sequences should guide suspicion, as some atypical appearing nonleiomyosarcoma uterine malignancies may have an ADC value greater than 0.905 × 10-3 mm2/s., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent advances in therapy and the promulgation of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism teams show great promise to improve management and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the absence of randomized evidence and lack of consensus leads to tremendous variations in treatment and compromises the wide implementation of new innovations. Moreover, the changing landscape of health care, where quality, cost, and accountability are increasingly relevant, dictates that a broad spectrum of outcomes of care must be routinely monitored to fully capture the impact of modern PE treatment. We set out to standardize data collection in patients with PE undergoing evaluation and treatment, and thus establish the foundation for an expanding evidence base that will address gaps in evidence and inform future care for acute PE. To do so, >100 international PE thought leaders convened in Washington, DC, in April 2022 to form the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative. Participants included physician experts, key members of the US Food and Drug Administration, patient representatives, and industry leaders. Recognizing the multidisciplinary nature of PE care, the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative was created with representative experts from stakeholder medical subspecialties, including cardiology, pulmonology, vascular medicine, critical care, hematology, cardiac surgery, emergency medicine, hospital medicine, and pharmacology. A list of critical evidence gaps was composed with a matching comprehensive set of standardized data elements; these data points will provide a foundation for productive research, knowledge enhancement, and advancement of clinical care within the field of acute PE, and contribute to answering urgent unmet needs in PE management. Evidence produced through the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative, as it is applied to data collection, promises to provide crucial knowledge that will ultimately produce a robust evidence base that will lead to standardization and harmonization of PE management and improved outcomes., Competing Interests: Dr Rosenfield reports consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Contego, Imperative Care, Johnson & Johnson, Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Neptune Medical, and Philips; board membership for the PERT (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) Consortium; and stock or stock options in Access Vascular, Althea Medical, Auxetics, Contego, Endospan, Imperative Care, Innova Vascular, InspireMD, JanaCare, Magneto, MedAlliance, Neptune Medical, Orchestra, Sealonix, Shockwave, Skydance, Summa Therapeutics, Thrombolex, Vantis Vascular, Vasorum, Viz.ai, and Vumedi. Dr Bowers reports consulting fees from Truvic, Inc, lecture fees from Janssen and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS)-Pfizer, payment for expert testimony, and participation on Advisory Board of Truvic, Inc. Dr Barnett reports payment for expert testimony. Dr Davis reports travel support for attending the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative meeting. Dr Giri reports research support from Boston Scientific, Inc, and Inari Medical; consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Inc, Cordis, and Abbott Vascular; support for attending meetings from Inari Medical; participation on an advisory board for Angiodynamics, Inc, and Boston Scientific, Inc; participation in leadership at Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention and the PERT Consortium; and stock or stock options in Endovascular Engineering. Dr Horowitz reports research support from Inari Medical; consultation and personal lecture fees from Inari Medical and Penumbra, Inc; and support for attending meetings from Inari Medical. Dr Keeling reports consulting fees from Angiodynamics, Inc, Penumbra, Inc, Viz.ai, and Dexcom. Dr Klok reports institutional research support from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Actelion, Boston Scientific, Inc, Leo Pharma, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Dutch Thrombosis Association, the Dutch Heart Foundation, and the Horizon Europe program; service on the Board of the Rembrandt Institute of Cardiovascular Science; Chair of the Board of the Dutch Society of Vascular Medicine; nucleus member of the European Society of Cardiology work group on pulmonary circulation and RV function; nucleus member of ISTH SSC diagnostic and predictive variables; Chair of the Board of the Dutch Thrombosis Network; and medical lead, Anticoagulation Clinic Leiden. Dr Konstantinides reports personal and institutional consulting fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Boston Scientific, Inc, and personal lecture fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer–Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boston Scientific, Inc. Dr Lookstein reports consulting fees from Penumbra, Inc, Boston Scientific, Inc, Medtronic, Cordis, Becton Dickinson, Abbott Vascular, Neptune Medical, Imperative Care, and Aidoc; payment for expert testimony; participation on advisory boards for Magneto, Boston Scientific, Inc, Medtronic, and Trireme; leadership roles at the PERT Consortium, Critical Limb Ischemia Global Society, and Society of Interventional Radiology; and stock or stock options in Imperative Vascular, Thrombolex, Innova Vascular, and Summa Vascular. Dr Moriarty reports research support from Angiodynamics, Inc, and Penumbra, Inc; consulting fees from Angiodynamics, Inc, Penumbra Inc, Inquis Medical, Innova Vascular, Boston Scientific Inc, Auxetics, and Retriever Medical; and participation on the data safety monitoring board for Penumbra, Inc. Dr Ní Áinle reports institutional research support from Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, the Irish Health Research Board, Bayer, and Boston Scientific, Inc; patents pending for European Application No. 20166826.6; past member of World Thrombosis Day International Steering Committee; Director at Large and Member, International Network of Venous ThromboEmbolism Research Networks Council; Co-Director, InVite; Co-Founder and member of Executive Committee of Venous Thromboembolism Ireland; Advisory Committee for Human Medicines; member of “Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitals” Collaborative Advisory Group; Board Member, Thrombosis Ireland Patient Organization and Charity; and National Lead, Irish Venous Thromboembolism Patient Safety Programme. Dr Rosovsky reports research support from BMS and Janssen; consulting fees from Abbott, BMS, Dova, Inari Medical, Janssen, and Penumbra, Inc; participation on the data safety monitoring board for the Pepper Trial and Harvard Cancer Center; unpaid President-Elect of the PERT Consortium; and unpaid member of ASH Committee on Quality. Dr Secemsky reports research support from NIH/NHLBINIH/NHBLI K23HL150290, Food and Drug Administration, Becton-Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Inc, Cook Medical, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Laminate Medical, Medtronic, and Philip; consulting fees and personal lecture fees from Abbott, Bayer, Becton-Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Inc, Cook, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Inari Medical, Medtronic, Philips, Shockwave, and VentureMed; and participation on data safety monitoring boards for LIFE BTK, BIOMIMCS3D, HI-PEITHO, and Transcend. Dr Sharp reports consulting and lecture fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Inc, Philips, Recor Medical, and Penumbra, Inc. Dr Sista reports research support from NIH/NHLBI as principal investigator of U34 and UG3 awards, unpaid participation on data safety monitoring boards for Angiodynamics, Inc, and Thrombolex, Inc; and participation on the Board of Directors for the Society of Interventional Radiology. Dr Wells reports participation on the data safety monitoring board for Anthos. The other authors report no conflicts.

Emergent reperfusion, most commonly with the administration of thrombolytic agents, is the recommended management approach for patients presenting with high-risk, or hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism. However, a subset of patients with a more catastrophic presentation, including refractory shock and impending or active cardiopulmonary arrest, may require immediate circulatory support. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can be deployed rapidly by the well-trained team and provide systemic perfusion allowing for hemodynamic stabilization. Subsequent embolectomy or a standalone strategy allowing for thrombus autolysis may be followed with decannulation after several days. Retrospective studies and registry data suggest favorable clinical outcomes with the use of VA-ECMO as an upfront stabilization strategy even among patients presenting with cardiopulmonary arrest. In this review, we discuss the physiologic rationale, evidence base, and an approach to ECMO deployment and subsequent management strategies among select patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest EY and JB have no conflicts of interest to disclose. CA – Speakers Bureau Zoll and Abiomed, Research grant Baxter, Consulting Zolland Abbott. Sripal Bangalore - Advisory board- Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, Argon. JMH - funding from Inari Medical., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and normotensive shock may have worse outcomes. However, diagnosis of normotensive shock requires invasive hemodynamics. Our objective was to assess the predictive value of McConnell's sign in identifying normotensive shock in patients with intermediate-risk PE., Methods: Patients with intermediate-risk PE who underwent percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy between August 2020 and April 2023 at a large academic public hospital were included in the study. Normotensive shock was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg without vasopressor support with pre-procedural invasive measures of cardiac index ≤2.2 L/min/m 2 and clinical evidence of hypoperfusion (i.e. elevated lactate, oliguria). The primary outcome was the association between McConnell's sign and normotensive shock., Results: Those with McConnell's sign (29/40, 72.5 %) had higher heart rate (114 vs 99 beats/min, p = 0.008), higher rates of elevated lactate (86 % vs 55 %, p = 0.038), lower cardiac index (1.9 vs 3.1 L/min/m 2 , p = 0.003), and higher rates of normotensive shock (76 % vs 27 %, p = 0.005). McConnell's sign had a sensitivity of 88 % and specificity of 53 % for identifying intermediate-risk PE patients with normotensive shock. Patients with McConnell's sign had an increased odds (odds ratio 8.38, confidence interval: 1.73-40.53, p = 0.008; area under the curve 0.70, 95 % confidence interval: 0.56-0.85) of normotensive shock., Conclusion: This is the first study to suggest that McConnell's sign may identify those in the intermediate-risk group who are at risk for normotensive shock. Larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Sripal Bangalore - Advisory board - Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, Argon. Dr. Allison Greco - Board Member of ABIM Critical Care., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clot-in-transit is associated with high mortality, but optimal management strategies remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with clot-in-transit., Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with documented clot-in-transit in the right heart on echocardiography across 2 institutions between January 2020 and October 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation., Results: Among 35 patients included in the study, 10 patients (28.6%) received anticoagulation alone and 2 patients (5.7%) received systemic thrombolysis, while 23 patients (65.7%) underwent catheter-based therapy (CBT; 22 mechanical thrombectomy and 1 catheter-directed thrombolysis). Over a median follow-up of 30 days, 9 patients (25.7%) experienced the primary composite outcome. Compared with anticoagulation alone, patients who received CBT or systemic thrombolysis had significantly lower rates of the primary composite outcome (12% versus 60%; log-rank P <0.001; hazard ratio, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.03-0.54]; P =0.005) including a lower rate of death (8% versus 50%; hazard ratio, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.02-0.55]; P =0.008), resuscitated cardiac arrest (4% versus 30%; hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01-1.15]; P =0.067), or hemodynamic deterioration (4% versus 30%; hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01-1.15]; P =0.067)., Conclusions: In this study of CBT in patients with clot-in-transit, CBT or systemic thrombolysis was associated with a significantly lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes, including a lower rate of death compared with anticoagulation alone driven by the CBT group. CBT has the potential to improve outcomes. Further large-scale studies are needed to test these associations., Competing Interests: Dr Bangalore is on the Advisory Board of Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Reata, Inari, and Truvic. The other authors report no conflicts.

Pathologic conditions of the biliary system, although common, can be difficult to diagnose clinically. Challenges in biliary imaging include anatomic variants and the dynamic nature of the biliary tract, which can change with age and intervention, blurring the boundaries of normal and abnormal. Choledochal cysts can have numerous appearances and are important to diagnose given the risk of cholangiocarcinoma potentially requiring surgical resection. Choledocholithiasis, the most common cause of biliary dilatation, can be difficult to detect at US and CT, with MRI having the highest sensitivity. However, knowledge of the imaging pitfalls of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography is crucial to avoid misinterpretation. Newer concepts in biliary tract malignancy include intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms that may develop into cholangiocarcinoma. New paradigms in the classification of cholangiocarcinoma correspond to the wide range of imaging appearances of the disease and have implications for prognosis. Accurately staging cholangiocarcinoma is imperative, given expanding curative options including transplant and more aggressive surgical options. Infections of the biliary tree include acute cholangitis or recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, characterized by obstruction, strictures, and central biliary dilatation. Inflammatory conditions include primary sclerosing cholangitis, which features strictures and fibrosis but can be difficult to differentiate from secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis, including more recently described entities such as immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis and COVID-19 secondary sclerosing cholangitis. The authors describe a wide variety of benign and malignant biliary tract abnormalities, highlight differentiating features of the cholangitides, provide an approach to interpretation based on the pattern of imaging findings, and discuss pearls and pitfalls of imaging to facilitate accurate diagnosis. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Background: In hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock (CPES) score predicts normotensive shock. However, it is unknown if CPES predicts adverse clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether the CPES score predicts in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic deterioration., Methods: Patients with acute intermediate-risk PE admitted from October 2016 to July 2019 were included. CPES was calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome. The association of CPES with primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated., Results: Among the 207 patients with intermediate-risk PE (64.7% with intermediate-high risk PE), 29 (14%) patients had a primary outcome event. In a multivariable model, a higher CPES score was associated with a worse primary composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.29-2.54]; P =0.001). Moreover, a higher CPES score predicted death (aHR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.04-2.96]; P =0.033), resuscitated cardiac arrest (aHR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.17-3.38]; P =0.011), and hemodynamic decompensation (aHR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.34-2.89]; P =0.001). A high CPES score (≥3) was associated with the worse primary outcome when compared with patients with a low CPES score (22% versus 2.4%; P =0.003; aHR, 6.48 [95% CI, 1.49-28.04]; P =0.012). CPES score provided incremental prognostic value for the prediction of primary outcome over baseline demographics and European Society of Cardiology intermediate-risk subcategories (global Χ 2 value increased from 0.63 to 1.39 to 13.69; P =0.005)., Conclusions: In patients with acute intermediate-risk PE, the CPES score effectively risk stratifies and prognosticates patients for the prediction of clinical events and provides incremental value over baseline demographics and European Society of Cardiology intermediate-risk subcategories., Competing Interests: Dr Bangalore participated in advisory board at Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, Argon. The other authors report no conflicts.

Aims: Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, the cardiac index (CI) is frequently reduced even among those without a clinically apparent shock. The purpose of this study is to describe the mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gradient (CO2 gap), a surrogate of perfusion adequacy, among patients with acute PE undergoing mechanical thrombectomy., Methods and Results: This was a single-centre retrospective study of consecutive patients with PE undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and simultaneous pulmonary artery catheterization over a 3-year period. Of 107 patients, 97 had simultaneous mixed venous and arterial blood gas measurements available. The CO2 gap was elevated (>6 mmHg) in 51% of the cohort and in 49% of patients with intermediate-risk PE. A reduced CI (≤2.2 L/min/m2) was associated with an increased odds [odds ratio = 7.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.49-18.1, P < 0.001] for an elevated CO2 gap. There was an inverse relationship between the CI and the CO2 gap. For every 1 L/min/m2 decrease in the CI, the CO2 gap increased by 1.3 mmHg (P = 0.001). Among patients with an elevated baseline CO2 gap >6 mmHg, thrombectomy improved the CO2 gap, CI, and mixed venous oxygen saturation. When the CO2 gap was dichotomized above and below 6, there was no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (9 vs. 0%; P = 0.10; hazard ratio: 1.24; 95% CI 0.97-1.60; P = 0.085)., Conclusion: Among patients with acute PE undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, the CO2 gap is abnormal in nearly 50% of patients and inversely related to the CI. Further studies should examine the relationship between markers of perfusion and outcomes in this population to refine risk stratification., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.B.—advisory board—Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic, and Argon. J.M.H.—funding from Inari Medical. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic impact and clinical outcomes of saddle vs non-saddle pulmonary embolism (PE)., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients with saddle and non-saddle PE within a cohort referred for catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) with invasive hemodynamic assessments. Patients who underwent CBT between August 2020 and January 2024 were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a low cardiac index (CI < 2.2 L/min/m²). Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS., Results: A total of 107 patients (84 intermediate risk, 23 high-risk; mean age 58 years, 47.6% female) were included in the study, with 44 patients having saddle PE and 63 having non-saddle PE. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between saddle and non-saddle PE, including rates of high-risk PE (25% vs 16%, P = .24), rates of RV dysfunction, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (55 vs 53 mm Hg, P = .74), mean pulmonary artery pressure (34 mm Hg vs 33 mm Hg), low cardiac index (56% vs 51%, P = .64), rates of normotensive shock (27% vs 20%, P = .44), or Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock scores (4.5 vs 4.7, P = .25). Additionally, 30-day mortality (6% vs 5%, P = .69), ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were similar between the groups., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing CBT, there were no significant differences in invasive hemodynamic parameters or clinical outcomes between those with saddle and non-saddle PE.

Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared.

Background: Uterine sacculation refers to a temporary pouch or sac within the uterus that may contain the placenta or fetal parts and that may be diagnosed antepartum or after delivery. There is very limited published information about this rare condition and its management., Cases: We report two cases of uterine sacculation with entrapped placenta diagnosed immediately postpartum, managed with two different approaches. In one case, the patient underwent immediate laparotomy and placental extraction. In the second case, the patient was managed conservatively but ultimately developed signs of infection and underwent laparotomy., Conclusion: Uterine sacculation with entrapped placenta is a rare condition that is a potential etiology of retained placenta. Obstetric clinicians should be aware of this diagnosis and the management strategies available., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Exceeding the limit of pericardial stretch, intrapericardial collections exert compression on the right heart and decrease preload. Compensatory mechanisms ensue to maintain hemodynamics in the face of a depressed stroke volume but are outstripped as disease progresses. When constrained within a pressurized pericardial space, the right and left ventricles exhibit differential filling mediated by changes in intrathoracic pressure. Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiographic findings inform on the physiologic effects. In this review, we describe tamponade physiology and implications for supportive care and effusion drainage., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest EY has no conflict of interest, JMH receives funding from Inari Medical., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiogenic shock continues to carry a high mortality rate despite contemporary care, with no breakthrough therapies shown to improve survival over the past few decades. It is a time-sensitive condition that commonly results in cardiovascular complications and multisystem organ failure, necessitating multidisciplinary expertise. Managing patients with cardiogenic shock remains challenging even in well-resourced settings, and an important subgroup of patients may require cardiac replacement therapy. As a result, the idea of leveraging the collective cognitive and procedural proficiencies of multiple providers in a collaborative, team-based approach to care (the "shock team") has been advocated by professional societies and implemented at select high-volume clinical centers. A slowly maturing evidence base has suggested that cardiogenic shock teams may improve patient outcomes. Although several registries exist that are beginning to inform care, particularly around therapeutic strategies of pharmacologic and mechanical circulatory support, none of these are currently focused on the shock team approach, multispecialty partnership, education, or process improvement. We propose the creation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-akin to the successful Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Consortium-with a goal to promote sharing of care protocols, education of stakeholders, and discovery of how process and performance may influence patient outcomes, quality, resource consumption, and costs of care.

Purpose of Review: To describe medical therapies and mechanical circulatory support devices used in the treatment of acute right ventricular failure., Recent Findings: Experts have proposed several algorithms providing a stepwise approach to medical optimization of acute right ventricular failure including tailored volume administration, ideal vasopressor selection to support coronary perfusion, inotropes to restore contractility, and pulmonary vasodilators to improve afterload. Studies have investigated various percutaneous and surgically implanted right ventricular assist devices in several clinical settings. The initial management of acute right ventricular failure is often guided by invasive hemodynamic data tracking parameters of circulatory function with the use of pharmacologic therapies. Percutaneous microaxial and centrifugal extracorporeal pumps bypass the failing RV and support circulatory function in severe cases of right ventricular failure., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The identification of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who may benefit from advanced treatment beyond anticoagulation is unclear. However, when intervention is deemed necessary by the PE patient's care team, data to select the most advantageous interventional treatment option are lacking. Limiting factors include major bleeding risks with systemic and locally delivered thrombolytics and the overall lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data for interventional treatment strategies. Considering the expansion of the pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) model, corresponding rise in interventional treatment, and number of thrombolytic and nonthrombolytic catheter-directed devices coming to market, robust evidence is needed to identify the safest and most effective interventional option for patients., Methods: The PEERLESS study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05111613) is a currently enrolling multinational RCT comparing large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) vs catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). A total of 550 hemodynamically stable PE patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and additional clinical risk factors will undergo 1:1 randomization. Up to 150 additional patients with absolute thrombolytic contraindications may be enrolled into a nonrandomized MT cohort for separate analysis. The primary end point will be assessed at hospital discharge or 7 days post procedure, whichever is sooner, and is a composite of the following clinical outcomes constructed as a hierarchal win ratio: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, (3) major bleeding, (4) clinical deterioration and/or escalation to bailout, and (5) intensive care unit admission and length of stay. The first 4 components of the win ratio will be adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee, and all components will be assessed individually as secondary end points. Other key secondary end points include all-cause mortality and readmission within 30 days of procedure and device- and drug-related serious adverse events through the 30-day visit., Implications: PEERLESS is the first RCT to compare 2 different interventional treatment strategies for hemodynamically stable PE and results will inform strategy selection after the physician or PERT determines advanced therapy is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.F. Gonsalves reports receiving consulting fees from Inari Medical. C.M. Gibson reports receiving research grant support from Angel Medical Corporation, Bayer Corp, CSL Behring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Corporation, and Portola Pharmaceuticals; and has received consulting monies from Amarin Pharma, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Clinical Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Inari Medical, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Corporation, The Medicines Company, Merck & Co, Inc, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Somahlution, St Francis Hospital, Verson Corporation, and Web MD. S. Stortecky reports receiving research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific; consulting fees from Boston Scientific and Teleflex, as well as honoraria for lectures from Boston Scientific. R.A. Alvarez reports receiving consulting fees from United Therapeutics Corporation. D.M. Beam reports receiving consulting fees from Inari Medical and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. J.M. Horowitz reports receiving consulting fees from Inari Medical and Penumbra. M.J. Silver reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, WL Gore and Associates, Cook Medical, Contego Medical, and Inari Medical, as well as speakers’ bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, and Pfizer. C. Toma reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, Neptune Medical and Philips. J.H. Rundback reports being a consultant or advisory board member for Inari Medical, Philips, AngioDynamics, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Truvic, and Aveera Medical; has stocks/options in Protexa, Aveera, and Kalgaro Medical; is a board member of Protexa Medical and the CLI Global Society; is the site or national PI and receives institutional research support from Abbott, 4S, Terumo, Reflow Medical and AngioDynamics. S.P. Rosenberg, C.D. Markovitz, and T. Tu are employees of Inari Medical and own stock and/or have stock options in the company. W.A. Jaber reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic and Inari Medical., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Alliance of Leaders in Academic Affairs in Radiology (ALAAR) advocates for a Universal Curriculum Vitae for all medical institutions and to that end, we have developed a template that can be downloaded on the AUR website (ALAAR CV template) that includes all of the elements required by many academic institutions. Members of ALAAR represent multiple academic institutions and have spent many hours reviewing and providing input on radiologists' curricula vitae. The purpose of this review is to help academic radiologists accurately maintain and optimize their CVs with minimal effort and to clarify common questions that arise at many different institutions in the process of constructing a CV., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute mortality for high-risk, or massive, pulmonary embolism (PE) is almost 30% even when treated using advanced therapies. This analysis assessed the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for high-risk PE., Methods: The prospective, multicenter FlowTriever All-comer Registry for Patient Safety and Hemodynamics (FLASH) study is designed to evaluate real-world PE patient outcomes after MT with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical). In this study, acute outcomes through 30 days were evaluated for the subset of patients with high-risk PE as determined by the sites and following European Society of Cardiology guidelines. An independent medical monitor adjudicated adverse events (AEs), including major AEs: device-related mortality, major bleeding, or intraprocedural device-related or procedure-related AEs., Results: Of the 799 patients in the US cohort, 63 (7.9%) were diagnosed with high-risk PE; 30 (47.6%) patients showed a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, 29 (46.0%) required vasopressors, and 4 (6.3%) experienced cardiac arrest. The mean age of patients with high-risk PE was 59.4 ± 15.6 years, and 34 (54.0%) were women. At baseline, 45 (72.6%) patients were tachycardic, 18 (54.5%) showed elevated lactate levels of ≥2.5 mM, and 21 (42.9%) demonstrated depressed cardiac index of <2 L/min/m 2 . Immediately after MT, heart rate improved to 93.5 ± 17.9 bpm. Twenty-five (42.4%) patients did not require an overnight stay in the intensive care unit, and no mortalities or major AEs occurred through 48 hours. Moreover, no mortalities occurred in 61 (96.8%) patients followed up through the 30-day visit., Conclusions: In this cohort of 63 patients with high-risk PE, MT was safe and effective, with no acute mortalities reported. Further prospective data are needed in this population., Competing Interests: James Horowitz is a consultant for Inari Medical and Penumbra. Ambarish Bhat and Mohannad Bisharat are consultants for Inari Medical. Michael Savin owns stock in Inari Medical. Mitchell Weinberg is a consultant for Magneto Thrombectomy Solutions and Boston Scientific. The other authors reported no financial interests., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

The limits on a system's response to external perturbations inform our understanding of how physical properties can be shaped by microscopic characteristics. Here, we derive constraints on the steady-state nonequilibrium response of physical observables in terms of the topology of the microscopic state space and the strength of thermodynamic driving. Notably, evaluation of these limits requires no kinetic information beyond the state-space structure. When applied to models of receptor binding, we find that sensitivity is bounded by the steepness of a Hill function with a Hill coefficient enhanced by the chemical driving beyond the structural equilibrium limit.

Background: Hemodynamically unstable high-risk, or massive, pulmonary embolism (PE) has a reported in-hospital mortality of over 25%. Systemic thrombolysis is the guideline-recommended treatment despite limited evidence. The FLAME study (FlowTriever for Acute Massive PE) was designed to generate evidence for interventional treatments in high-risk PE., Methods: The FLAME study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, parallel group, observational study of high-risk PE. Eligible patients were treated with FlowTriever mechanical thrombectomy (FlowTriever Arm) or with other contemporary therapies (Context Arm). The primary end point was an in-hospital composite of all-cause mortality, bailout to an alternate thrombus removal strategy, clinical deterioration, and major bleeding. This was compared in the FlowTriever Arm to a prespecified performance goal derived from a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis., Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the FlowTriever Arm and 61 in the Context Arm. Context Arm patients were primarily treated with systemic thrombolysis (68.9%) or anticoagulation alone (23.0%). The primary end point was reached in 9/53 (17.0%) FlowTriever Arm patients, significantly lower than the 32.0% performance goal ( P <0.01). The primary end point was reached in 39/61 (63.9%) Context Arm patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in 1/53 (1.9%) patients in the FlowTriever Arm and in 18/61 (29.5%) patients in the Context Arm., Conclusions: Among patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy with the FlowTriever System, a significantly lower associated rate of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes was observed compared with a prespecified performance goal, primarily driven by low all-cause mortality of 1.9%., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04795167., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Silver reports consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, WL Gore and Associates, Cook Medical, Contego Medical, and Inari Medical; and speakers’ bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, and Pfizer. Dr Gibson reports consulting fees and research grant support from Inari Medical to Boston Clinical Research Institute and consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Giri reports research funds to the institution and advisory boards for Inari Medical, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Recor Medical, Biosense Webster and equity in Endovascular Engineering. Dr Jaber reports consulting fees from Medtronic and Inari Medical. Dr Toma reports consulting fees from Medtronic, Philips and Neptune Medical. Dr Mina reports consulting fees from Inari Medical. Dr Bowers reports consulting fees from Imperative Vascular and Inari Medical, speakers’ bureau and consulting for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and equity interest in Imperative Vascular and Biostar Ventures. Dr Greenspon reports research support from Inari Medical and Exponent Inc. Dr Zlotnick reports speakers’ bureau for Abiomed, Angiodynamics, and Inari Medical. Dr Chakravarthy reports equity in Edwards Lifesciences. Dr DuCoffe reports consulting fees from Inari Medical. Dr Butros reports consulting fees from and speakers’ bureau for Inari Medical. Dr Horowitz reports consulting fees from Inari Medical and Penumbra. The other authors report no conflicts.

This manuscript is a collaborative, multi-institutional effort by members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease Focus Panel and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Women Pelvic Imaging working group. The manuscript reviews the key role radiologists play at tumor board and highlights key imaging findings that guide management decisions in patients with the most common gynecologic malignancies including ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, and endometrial cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Over a third of patients surviving acute pulmonary embolism (PE) will experience long-term cardiopulmonary limitations. Persistent thrombi, impaired gas exchange, and altered hemodynamics account for aspects of the postpulmonary embolism syndrome that spans mild functional limitations to debilitating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), the most worrisome long-term consequence. Though pulmonary endarterectomy is potentially curative for the latter, less is understood surrounding chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) and post-PE dyspnea. Advances in pulmonary vasodilator therapies and growing expertise in balloon pulmonary angioplasty provide options for a large group of patients ineligible for surgery, or those with persistent postoperative pulmonary hypertension. In this clinical review, we discuss epidemiology and pathophysiology as well as advances in diagnostics and therapeutics surrounding the spectrum of disease that may follow months after acute PE.

Rationale and Objectives: Underrepresentation of women in many scientific fields has been linked to biases against female-authored publications in peer-reviewed journals, thereby reducing their opportunities for career development and promotions. The objective of this study is to determine the representation of female academic radiologists in four flagship general radiology journals to elucidate gender-specific trends and disparities in academic radiology., Materials and Methods: We analyzed 23,741 peer-reviewed articles published in Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of the American College of Radiology and Academic Radiology from 2007 to 2020. Data abstraction and statistical analysis were performed for author gender, first and last authorship, research funding, and number of citations and grants. Baseline demographics data of academic radiologists was obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)., Results: A total of 72.4% of authors were male with 54% of articles were written by a male first author and male last author. When compared with assumed random pairing, there were significantly fewer Male/Female author combinations and more Female/Female author combinations than expected (p<0.01). Over the 13-year time period, the rate of increase in the number of female authors exceeded the rate of increase in women in academic radiology as reported by the AAMC. Female last authors received on average 3.2 less citations than their male counterparts (p=.03). Of manuscripts with last female authors, 31.7% of female last authors were funded compared to 25.9% of last male authors., Conclusion: This study showed the increasing numbers and higher productivity of female authors in academic radiology, suggesting progress is being made in overcoming gender disparities., (Copyright © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Deep learning (DL) models can harness electronic health records (EHRs) to predict diseases and extract radiologic findings for diagnosis. With ambulatory chest radiographs (CXRs) frequently ordered, we investigated detecting type 2 diabetes (T2D) by combining radiographic and EHR data using a DL model. Our model, developed from 271,065 CXRs and 160,244 patients, was tested on a prospective dataset of 9,943 CXRs. Here we show the model effectively detected T2D with a ROC AUC of 0.84 and a 16% prevalence. The algorithm flagged 1,381 cases (14%) as suspicious for T2D. External validation at a distinct institution yielded a ROC AUC of 0.77, with 5% of patients subsequently diagnosed with T2D. Explainable AI techniques revealed correlations between specific adiposity measures and high predictivity, suggesting CXRs' potential for enhanced T2D screening., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Quantitative imaging biomarkers of liver disease measured by using MRI and US are emerging as important clinical tools in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Because of their high accuracy and noninvasive nature, in many cases, these techniques have replaced liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. The most commonly evaluated imaging biomarkers are surrogates for liver fibrosis, fat, and iron. MR elastography is now routinely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and typically combined with MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification to exclude or grade hepatic steatosis and iron overload, respectively. US elastography is also widely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and has the advantage of lower equipment cost and greater availability compared with those of MRI. Emerging US fat quantification methods can be performed along with US elastography. The author group, consisting of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Liver Fibrosis Disease-Focused Panel (DFP), the SAR Hepatic Iron Overload DFP, and the European Society of Radiology, review the basics of liver fibrosis, fat, and iron quantification with MRI and liver fibrosis and fat quantification with US. The authors cover technical requirements, typical case display, quality control and proper measurement technique and case interpretation guidelines, pitfalls, and confounding factors. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for radiologists interpreting these examinations. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

We study the response of chemical reaction networks driven far from equilibrium to logarithmic perturbations of reaction rates. The response of the mean number of a chemical species is observed to be quantitively limited by number fluctuations and the maximum thermodynamic driving force. We prove these trade-offs for linear chemical reaction networks and a class of nonlinear chemical reaction networks with a single chemical species. Numerical results for several model systems support the conclusion that these trade-offs continue to hold for a broad class of chemical reaction networks, though their precise form appears to sensitively depend on the deficiency of the network., (© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.)

Gastrointestinal malignancies, though uncommon in pregnancy, present several unique challenges with regards to diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Imaging the pregnant patient with a suspected or confirmed GI malignancy requires modifications to the radiologic modality of choice and protocol in order to minimize harm to the fetus, ensure accuracy in diagnosis and staging and guide treatment decisions. In this review article, we discuss the imaging approach to the pregnant patient with GI cancer, including safe radiologic modalities and modifications to imaging protocols. We also review the most common GI cancers encountered in pregnancy, including colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, and small bowel tumors, with emphasis to imaging findings, staging, and treatment considerations., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and hypotension (high-risk PE) have high mortality. Cardiogenic shock can also occur in nonhypotensive or normotensive patients (intermediate-risk PE) but is less well characterized., Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of normotensive shock in intermediate-risk PE., Methods: Intermediate-risk PE patients in the FLASH (FlowTriever All-Comer Registry for Patient Safety and Hemodynamics) registry undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical) were included. The prevalence of normotensive shock (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg but cardiac index ≤2.2 L/min/m 2 ) was assessed. A composite shock score consisting of markers of right ventricular function and ischemia (elevated troponin, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide, moderately/severely reduced right ventricular function), central thrombus burden (saddle PE), potential additional embolization (concomitant deep vein thrombosis), and cardiovascular compensation (tachycardia) was prespecified and assessed for its ability to identify normotensive shock patients., Results: Over one-third of intermediate-risk PE patients in FLASH (131/384, 34.1%) were in normotensive shock. The normotensive shock prevalence was 0% in patients with a composite shock score of 0 and 58.3% in those with a score of 6 (highest score). A score of 6 was a significant predictor of normotensive shock (odds ratio: 5.84; 95% CI: 2.00-17.04). Patients showed significant on-table improvements in hemodynamics post-thrombectomy, including normalization of the cardiac index in 30.5% of normotensive shock patients. Right ventricular size, function, dyspnea, and quality of life significantly improved at the 30-day follow-up., Conclusions: Although hemodynamically stable, over one-third of intermediate-risk FLASH patients were in normotensive shock with a depressed cardiac index. A composite shock score effectively further risk stratified these patients. Mechanical thrombectomy improved hemodynamics and functional outcomes at the 30-day follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Inari Medical sponsored the FLASH registry. Dr Bangalore is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Reata, and Inari Medical. Dr Jaber is a consultant for Inari Medical and Medtronic. Dr Toma is a consultant for Medtronic and Philips. Dr Weinberg is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Magneto Thrombectomy Solutions, and Medtronic. Dr Mina is a consultant for Inari Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)