Search

Krox-20, originally identified as a member of 'immediate-early' genes, plays a crucial role in the formation of two specific segments in the hindbrain during early development of the vertebrate nervous system. Here we cloned a genomic sequence of Xenopus Krox-20 (XKrox-20) and studied functions of a promoter element in the flanking sequence and associated transcription factors, which function in early Xenopus embryos. Using the luciferase reporter assay system, we showed that the 5' flanking sequence was sufficient to induce luciferase activities when the reporter construct was injected into embryos at the eight-cell stage. Deletion and mutagenesis analyses of the 5' flanking sequence revealed a minimal promoter element that included two known subelements, a CArG-box and cAMP response element (CRE) within a stretch of 22 bp nucleotide sequence (-72 to -51 from the transcription initiation site), both of which were essential for the promoter activity. The gel mobility shift assay indicated that these two subelements bound to some components in whole cell extracts prepared from stage 20 Xenopus embryos. Antibody supershift and competition experiments revealed that these components in cell extracts were serum response factor (SRF) and a member of CRE binding protein (CREB) family proteins that bound the CArG-box and CRE, respectively. They appeared to assemble on the minimal promoter element to produce a novel ternary complex. When we injected mRNA of a dominant-negative version of Xenopus SRF (XSRF[DELTA]C) into animal pole blastomeres at the eight-cell stage, expression of XKrox-20 in the nervous system as well as the minimal promoter activity was strongly suppressed. Suppression by XSRF[DELTA]C was counteracted by coexpressed wild-type XSRF. These results indicate that XSRF functions as an endogenous activator of XKrox-20 by forming a ternary complex with CREB on the minimal promoter element. Keywords: Xenopus; XKrox-20; egr-2; Immediate-early genes; CArG-box; CRE; SRF; CREB; Ternary complex; Hindbrain; Neuroectoderm; Promoter; Ets-binding site; Ets family transcription factor; CBP; Rhombomere

We previously showed that FGF was capable of inducing Xenopus gastrula ectoderm cells in culture to express position-specific neural markers along the anteroposterior axis in a dose-dependent manner. However, conflicting results have been obtained concerning involvement of FGF signaling in the anterior neural induction in vivo using the same dominant-negative construct of Xenopus FGF receptor type-1 ((delta)XFGFR-1 or XFD). We explored this issue by employing a similar construct of receptor type-4a (XFGFR-4a) in addition, since expression of XFGFR-4a was seen to peak between gastrula and neurula stages, when the neural induction and patterning take place, whereas expression of XFGFR-1 had not a distinct peak during that period. Further, these two FGFRs are most distantly related in amino acid sequence in the Xenopus FGFR family. When we injected mRNA of a dominant-negative version of XFGFR-4a (AXFGFR-4a) into eight animal pole blastomeres at 32-cell stage, anterior defects including loss of normal structure in telencephalon and eye regions became prominent as examined morphologically or by in situ hybridization. Overexpression of (delta)XFGFR-1 appeared far less effective than that of (delta)XFGFR-4a. Requirement of FGF signaling in ectoderm for anterior neural development was further confirmed in culture: when ectoderm cells that were overexpressing (delta)XFGFR-4a were cocultured with intact organizer cells from either early or late gastrula embryos, expression of anterior and posterior neural markers was inhibited, respectively. We also showed that autonomous neuralization of the anterior-type observed in ectoderm cells that were subjected to prolonged dissociation was strongly suppressed by (delta)XFGFR-4a, but not as much by (delta)XFGFR-1. It is thus indicated that FGF signaling in ectoderm, mainly through (delta)FGFR-4, is required for the anterior neural induction by organizer. We may reconcile our data to the current 'neural default model,' which features the central roles of BMP4 signaling in ectoderm and BMP4 antagonists from organizer, simply postulating that the neural default pathway in ectoderm includes constitutive FGF signaling step.

Early neural patterning along the anteroposterior (AP) axis appears to involve a number of signal transducing pathways, but the precise role of each of these pathways for AP patterning and how they are integrated with signals that govern neural induction step is not well understood. We investigate the nature of Fgf response element (FRE) in a posterior neural gene, Xcad3 (Xenopus caudal homologue) that plays a crucial role of posterior neural development. We provide evidence that FREs of Xcad3 are widely dispersed in its intronic sequence and that these multiple FREs comprise Ets-binding and Tcf/Lef-binding motifs that lie in juxtaposition. Functional and physical analyses indicate that signaling pathways of Fgf, Bmp and Wnt are integrated on these FREs to regulate the expression of Xcad3 in the posterior neural tube through positively acting Ets and Sox family transcription factors and negatively acting Tcf family transcription factor(s). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]