Search

Problem Many national child health guidelines In Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa are outdated and score poorly on rigorous methods and stakeholder participation. Approach In line with the World Health Organization's (WHO) emphasis on local guideline contextualization, the Global Evidence-Local Adaptation (GELA) project supported multistakeholder processes to adapt evidence-informed recommendations for child health in Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa. The GELA project team convened national steering groups, which conducted structured, iterative priority-setting exercises to identify priority topics. We identified appropriate source guidelines by systematically searching and screening available guidelines. We then matched recommendations in potential source guidelines to the relevant questions, and assessed the guidelines for timeliness and quality. Drawing on WHO's guideline process, we applied the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process to develop contextualized recommendations from existing guidelines. If no source guideline or reviews were identified, we conducted new evidence syntheses. Local setting Malawi, Nigeria and South Africa are countries with varying health priorities and systems, all transitioning to universal health coverage. Guideline structures differ between countries, with processes largely led from national health ministries. Relevant changes National guideline groups, supported by GELA researchers and government-academic partners, developed five contextually-tailored child health recommendations. For most of these recommendations, additional evidence was required to inform contextually appropriate national decision-making. Formal capacity-building and on-the-job learning enhanced the competencies of national contributors and researchers in evidence-informed decision-making. Lessons learnt Developing context-relevant recommendations requires considerable resources and time. Further investment in strengthening local capacity is needed for sustainable national guideline development. [phrase omitted] Probleme En Afrique du Sud, au Malawi et au Nigeria, de nombreuses lignes directrices nationales relatives a la sante infantile sont obsoletes et affichent de pietres resultats en termes de rigueur des methodes et d'implication des parties prenantes. Approche S'alignant sur l'importance accordee par l'Organisation mondiale de la Sante (OMS) a la contextualisation des lignes directrices locales, le projet Global Evidence - Local Adaptation (GELA) a apporte son soutien a divers processus de collaboration multilaterale afin d'adapter des recommandations sur la sante infantile etayees par des faits en Afrique du Sud, au Malawi et au Nigeria. L'equipe du projet GELA a constitue des groupes de pilotage nationaux, charges d'effectuer des exercices iteratifs et structures de definition des priorites afin de repertorier les principaux themes. Nous avons identifie des lignes directrices de reference en procedant a une recherche et une selection parmi celles disponibles. Ensuite, nous avons compare les recommandations de ces potentielles lignes directrices de reference avec les questions pertinentes, puis nous avons evalue leur qualite et leur actualite. En nous fondant sur le processus d'elaboration de lignes directrices de l'OMS, nous avons applique la methodologie GRADEADOLOPMENT pour formuler des recommandations contextualisees a partir de lignes directrices existantes. Si aucune analyse ni ligne directrice de reference n'avait pu etre degagee, nous etablissions de nouvelles syntheses de preuves. Environnement local L'Afrique du Sud, le Malawi et le Nigeria sont des pays aux priorites et systemes de sante variables, qui operent tous trois une transition vers une couverture sanitaire universelle. Les structures des lignes directrices different d'un pays a l'autre, les processus etant generalement menes par les Ministeres nationaux de la Sante. Changements significatifs Les groupes charges d'elaborer des lignes directrices nationales, avec l'aide des chercheurs GELA et des partenaires gouvernementaux et universitaires, ont emis cinq recommandations adaptees au contexte en matiere de sante infantile. Dans la plupart des cas, la prise de decisions nationales contextualisees necessitait des preuves supplementaires. Le programme de renforcement des capacites et l'apprentissage sur le terrain ont permis d'ameliorer les competences des chercheurs et contributeurs nationaux dans les processus decisionnels etayes par des faits. Lecons tirees Mettre au point des recommandations propres a chaque contexte demande du temps et des ressources considerables. D'autres investissements dans le renforcement des capacites locales sont indispensables pour perenniser le developpement national de lignes directrices. [phrase omitted] Situacion Muchas directrices nacionales de salud infantil en Malawi, Nigeria y Sudafrica estan obsoletas y obtienen una puntuacion baja respecto a los metodos rigurosos y la participacion de las partes interesadas. Enfoque En consonancia con el enfasis de la Organizacion Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en la contextualizacion local de las directrices, el proyecto Global Evidence-Local Adaptation (GELA) apoyo procesos multisectoriales para adaptar las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia a la salud infantil en Malawi, Nigeria y Sudafrica. El equipo del proyecto GELA convoco a grupos directivos nacionales, que realizaron ejercicios estructurados e iterativos de fijacion de prioridades para identificar los temas prioritarios. Se identificaron las directrices fuente apropiadas mediante la busqueda sistematica y el analisis de las directrices disponibles. A continuacion, se compararon las recomendaciones de las posibles directrices fuente con las preguntas pertinentes y se evaluo la oportunidad y la calidad de las directrices. A partir del proceso de elaboracion de directrices de la OMS, se aplico el proceso GRADE-ADOLOPMENT para desarrollar recomendaciones contextualizadas partiendo de las directrices existentes. Si no se identificaba ninguna directriz o revision fuente, se realizaban nuevas sintesis de la evidencia. Marco regional Malawi, Nigeria y Sudafrica son paises con prioridades y sistemas sanitarios diversos, todos ellos en transicion hacia la cobertura sanitaria universal. Las estructuras de las directrices difieren de un pais a otro, y los procesos se dirigen en gran medida desde los ministerios de sanidad nacionales. Cambios importantes Los grupos nacionales de directrices, apoyados por investigadores del GELA y socios gubernamentales y academicos, elaboraron cinco recomendaciones de salud infantil adaptadas a cada contexto. Para la mayoria de estas recomendaciones, se necesitaron pruebas adicionales para fundamentar una toma de decisiones nacional adecuada al contexto. La capacitacion formal y el aprendizaje en el lugar de trabajo mejoraron las competencias de los colaboradores e investigadores nacionales en la toma de decisiones basada en evidencias. Lecciones aprendidas La elaboracion de recomendaciones adaptadas al contexto requiere recursos y tiempo considerables. Se necesita una mayor inversion en el fortalecimiento de la capacidad local para el desarrollo sostenible de directrices nacionales., Introduction Implementation of evidence-informed health guidelines tailored to the health system contexts of low- and middle-income countries is needed to improve health outcomes. Evidence-informed health guidelines are documents containing clinical, [...]

Introduction: Mobile phone text message reminders (MPTMRs) have been implemented globally to promote vaccination uptake and recall rates. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of MPTMRs on vaccination recall rates. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials of caregivers of children, adolescents, or adults who received MPTMRs for improving vaccine uptake and recall visits. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Scopus to identify relevant studies published up to 24 January 2024. We used Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool to assess the included studies and reported the results as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, using a random effects model. Results: We identified 25 studies for inclusion. All studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. The evidence supports MPTMRs for improving vaccination uptake compared to usual care (RR = 1.09 [95%CI: 1.06, 1.13], I2 = 76%). Intervention characteristics, country setting, country economic status, and vaccination type had no bearing on the effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusions: MPTMRs have a positive effect, albeit relatively small, on vaccination uptake. These findings may assist public health practitioners, policymakers, and vaccine researchers in evidence-based decision making that focuses on MPTMRs and their impact on vaccination coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Diagnosing bacterial infection as the etiology in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) remains challenging. Sputum discoloration is easily measured and often used as a marker of bacterial infection in AECOPD, although high-quality evidence for this practice is lacking. Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of sputum color as a marker for bacteria in AECOPD. Methods: Articles were searched for in electronic databases, and the gray literature were reviewed. Quality assessment of included articles was performed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate logistic regression model with random effects. Analysis was conducted on individual sputum samples rather than on individual participants so that each sample represented a unique index test. Results: Of the 1,600 candidate studies, 13 eligible studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. These included prospective cohort studies (n = 3), cross-sectional studies (n = 3), and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials (n = 7). The included studies were all from Europe and North America. Most studies scored high risk of bias in at least one domain. In total, this systematic review and meta-analysis included 5,770 sputum samples. The estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70-88%) and 50% (95% CI, 35-65%), respectively, and these results were not significantly altered in a series of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Sputum color has limited value as a standalone test in diagnosing bacterial infection as the etiology in AECOPD because of its moderate sensitivity and poor specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the effects of device‐based circumcisions compared with standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult males (10 years old and above). Methods: We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions to the language of publication or publication status. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of device‐based circumcisions compared to standard surgical dissection‐based circumcision conducted by health professionals in a medical setting. We reported study results as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a random‐effects model. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Results: A total of 18 trials met the inclusion criteria. These trials did not report severe adverse events (AEs; 11 trials, 3472 participants). There may be a slight increase in moderate AEs for devices compared to surgical techniques (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.55–3.10; I2 = 68%; 10 trials, 3370 participants; low‐certainty evidence); this corresponds to eight more (ranging from 15 fewer to 84 more) moderate AEs per 1000 participants. We are uncertain about the difference in mild AEs between groups when devices are used compared to surgical techniques (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.44–2.72; I2 = 91%; 10 trials, 3370 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Conclusions: We found no serious AEs using a circumcision device compared to surgical techniques. Still, they may slightly increase moderate AEs, and it is unclear whether there is a difference in mild AEs. High‐quality trials evaluating this intervention are needed to provide further certainty regarding the rates of AEs. Clinicians, patients, and policymakers can use these results combined with their contextual factors to inform the best approach that suits their healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cochrane Africa is a network of researchers and health stakeholders who aim to support the use of high quality Cochrane evidence to improve health outcomes in Africa. It comprises a coordinating centre in South Africa, a Francophone hub directed from Cameroon, a Southern and Eastern Africa Hub directed from South Africa and a West Africa Hub directed from Nigeria. The network supports the engagement with healthcare decision makers to guide priorities, production of high quality context-relevant Cochrane systematic reviews, capacity building to conduct and use reviews, dissemination of evidence, knowledge translation, partnerships for evidence-informed healthcare and the creation of opportunities to expand the network. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]