Search

Objectives: Biochemical remission is widely considered a satisfactory treatment end point in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The significance of persisting histological activity despite biochemical remission is unknown. We aimed to assess the frequency and prognostic significance of persisting histological inflammation in patients with AIH who had achieved biochemical remission with treatment., Methods: We studied 120 patients (median age at diagnosis 57 years; 81% female) with AIH by International Criteria (59% definite), who received immunosuppressive treatment and underwent a follow-up liver biopsy after at least 6 months of sustained biochemical remission (defined as normal serum ALT and globulin)., Results: Fifty-five patients (46%) had persisting histological activity (Ishak histological activity index (HAI) ≥4). These patients had higher serum ALT (24 vs. 18 IU/l, P=0.003) and AST (27 vs. 23 IU/l, P=0.03) at the time of follow-up biopsy, compared with patients who achieved histological remission (HAI ≤3). They had less frequent regression of fibrosis on follow-up biopsy compared with those achieving histological remission (32 vs. 60%, P=0.004) and had excess mortality (standardized mortality ratio 1.4 vs. 0.7, P<0.05). The excess mortality was due to liver disease. On multivariate analysis, persisting histological activity was independently associated with all-cause death/transplantation (HR 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-8.1); P=0.02); an association with liver-related death/transplantation fell short of significance (HR 9.7 (95% CI 0.84-111.6; P=0.07)., Conclusions: Persisting histological activity, despite biochemical remission, is frequent in patients with treated AIH and is associated with lower rates of fibrosis regression and reduced long-term survival.

Background: Little is known about the infrastructure to train gastroenterologists in capsule endoscopy. The level of capsule endoscopy exposure among trainees in the United Kingdom or Europe has also not been quantified., Aims and Methods: To assess the ability of 10 gastroenterology trainees with endoscopy experience to interpret 10 capsule endoscopy videos against five medical students, with an expert in capsule endoscopy as the gold standard. Parameters assessed included gastric emptying time, small bowel transit and the diagnosis made. A questionnaire survey assessed the level of capsule endoscopy exposure among United Kingdom trainees., Results: Trainees were better at determining the gastric emptying time (p=0.013) and more likely to record true positives compared to the students (p=0.037). They were also less likely to record false positives (p=0.005) and more likely to reach the correct diagnosis (p=0.001, OR 3.6, CI 1.8-7.4). Our survey found that, 65% of trainees had prior exposure to capsule endoscopy but only 13% had done capsule endoscopy reporting. Sixty seven percent felt capsule endoscopy should be incorporated into their training., Conclusion: This study has shown that prior endoscopic experience enables trainees to interpret capsule endoscopy more accurately than medical students. However, there is a demand for focussed training which would enable trainees to reliably interpret pathology on capsule endoscopy.