Search

Objective: To preliminary evaluate the clinical effects of probiotics in individuals with symptomatic oral lichen planus and the possible mechanisms of action. Subjects and Methods: A group of 30 individuals with symptomatic oral lichen planus were recruited in a randomised double‐blind parallel group controlled (1:1) proof‐of‐concept pilot trial of probiotic VSL#3 vs placebo. Efficacy outcomes included changes in pain numeric rating scale, oral disease severity score and the chronic oral mucosal disease questionnaire. Adverse effects, home diary and withdrawals were assessed as feasibility outcomes. Mechanistic outcomes included changes in salivary and serum levels of CXCL10 and IFN‐γ and in oral microbial composition. Results: The probiotic VSL#3 was safe and well tolerated. We observed no statistically significant change in pain, disease activity, quality of life, serum/salivary CXCL10 or oral microbial composition with respect to placebo. Salivary IFN‐γ levels demonstrate a trend for a reduced level in the active group (p = 0.082) after 30 days of probiotic consumption. Conclusions: The present proof‐of‐concept study provides some weak not convincing indication of biological and clinical effects of probiotic VSL#3 in individuals with painful oral lichen planus. Further research in this field is needed, with the current study providing useful information to the design of future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To validate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for measuring pain intensity in chronic oral mucosal diseases. Methods: Secondary analyses of data including the VAS, NRS, demographic, clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes at baseline and 4‐month follow‐up were retrieved from a clinical study of chronic oral mucosal diseases. Construct and criterion validity and responsiveness of the VAS and NRS were assessed through testing hypotheses based upon strength of Spearman's correlation coefficients. Results: Data of 500 and 290 patients with chronic oral mucosal diseases were used for the assessment of validity and responsiveness, respectively. Moderate‐to‐high correlations between both pain scores and scores of clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes were observed, supporting construct validity of the VAS and NRS. Their criterion validity was confirmed by significantly strong association between scores of both scales. Responsiveness of both scales was adequate based on moderate association between their change scores and global rating of change scale. Conclusion: The present results provide evidence supporting validity and responsiveness of the VAS and NRS for pain intensity assessment in patients with chronic oral mucosal diseases. Future research examining other pain intensity domains and standardizing composite scores for pain intensity in this population is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eye movements were measured during the performance of a computerized Tower of London task to specify the source of planning abnormalities in patients with 1st-episode schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Subjects viewed 2 arrays of colored balls in the upper and lower parts of the screen. They were asked to plan the shortest sequence of moves required to rearrange the balls in the lower screen to match the upper arrangement. Compared with healthy controls, patients made more planning errors, and decision times were longer. However, the patients showed the same gaze biases as controls prior to making a response, indicating that they understood the requirements of the task, approached the task in a strategic manner by identifying the nature of the problem, and used appropriate fixation strategies to plan and elaborate solutions. The patients showed increased duration of long-gaze periods toward both parts of the screen. This suggests that the patients had difficulty in encoding the essential features of the stimulus array. This finding is compatible with slowing of working memory consolidation. Keywords: schizophrenia, eye movements, Tower of London planning task, cognitive impairments, working memory