Search

There is increased interest in the Bn-receptor family because they are frequently over/ectopically expressed by tumors and thus useful as targets for imaging or receptor-targeted-cytotoxicity. The synthetic Bn-analog, [D-Tyr(6), β-Ala(11), Phe(13), Nle(14)]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] has the unique property of having high affinity for all three human BNRs (GRPR, NMBR, BRS-3), and thus could be especially useful for this approach. However, the molecular basis of this property is unclear and is the subject of this study. To accomplish this, site-directed mutagenesis was used after identifying potentially important amino acids using sequence homology analysis of all BnRs with high affinity for Univ.Lig compared to the Cholecystokinin-receptor (CCK(A)R), which has low affinity. Using various criteria 74 amino acids were identified and 101 mutations made in GRPR by changing each to those of CCK(A)R or to alanine. 22 GRPR mutations showed a significant decrease in affinity for Univ.Lig (>2-fold) with 2 in EC2[D97N, G112V], 1 in UTM6[Y284A], 2 in EC4[R287N, H300S] showing >10-fold decrease in Univ.Lig affinity. Additional mutations were made to explore the molecular basis for these changes. Our results show that high affinity for Univ.Lig by human Bn-receptors requires positively charged amino acids in extracellular (EC)-domain 4 and to a lesser extent EC2 and EC3 suggesting charge-charge interactions may be particularly important for determining the general high affinity of this ligand. Furthermore, transmembrane amino acids particularly in UTM6 are important contributing both charge-charge interactions as well as interaction with a tyrosine residue in close proximity suggesting possible receptor-peptide cation-π or H-bonding interactions are also important for determining its high affinity., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Chloroquine (CQ) is a safe and economical 4-aminoquinoline (AQ) antimalarial. However, its value has been severely compromised by the increasing prevalence of CQ resistance. This study examined 108 AQs, including 68 newly synthesized compounds. Of these 108 AQs, 32 (30%) were active only against CQ-susceptible Plasmodium falciparum strains and 59 (55%) were active against both CQ-susceptible and CQ-resistant P. falciparum strains (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50s], ≤25 nM). All AQs active against both CQ-susceptible and CQ-resistant P. falciparum strains shared four structural features: (i) an AQ ring without alkyl substitution, (ii) a halogen at position 7 (Cl, Br, or I but not F), (iii) a protonatable nitrogen at position 1, and (iv) a second protonatable nitrogen at the end of the side chain distal from the point of attachment to the AQ ring via the nitrogen at position 4. For activity against CQ-resistant parasites, side chain lengths of ≤3 or ≥10 carbons were necessary but not sufficient; they were identified as essential factors by visual comparison of 2-dimensional (2-D) structures in relation to the antiparasite activities of the AQs and were confirmed by computer-based 3-D comparisons and differential contour plots of activity against P. falciparum. The advantage of the method reported here (refinement of quantitative structure-activity relationship [QSAR] descriptors by random assignment of compounds to multiple training and test sets) is that it retains QSAR descriptors according to their abilities to predict the activities of unknown test compounds rather than according to how well they fit the activities of the compounds in the training sets.

Bombesin receptor subtype (BRS)-3, a G-protein-coupled orphan receptor, shares 51% identity with the mammalian bombesin (Bn) receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide. There is increasing interest in BRS-3 because it is important in energy metabolism, glucose control, motility, and tumor growth. BRS-3 has low affinity for all Bn-related peptides; however, recently synthetic high-affinity agonists, [d-Tyr(6)/d-Phe(6),betaAla(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14), were described, but they are nonselective for BRS-3 over other Bn receptors. Based on these peptides, three BRS-3-selective ligands were developed: peptide 2, [d-Tyr(6)(R)-3-amino-propionic acid(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn(6-14); peptide 3, [d-Tyr(6),(R)-Apa(11),4Cl-Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn(6-14); and peptide 4, acetyl-Phe-Trp-Ala-His-(tBzl)-piperidine-3 carboxylic acid-Gly-Arg-NH(2). Their molecular determinants of selectivity/high affinity for BRS-3 are unknown. To address this, we used a chimeric/site mutagenesis approach. Substitution of extracellular domain 2 (EC2) of BRS-3 by the comparable gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) domain decreased 26-, 4-, and 0-fold affinity for peptides 4, 3, and 2. Substitution of EC3 decreased affinity 4-, 11-, and 0-fold affinity for peptides 2 to 4. Ten-point mutations in the EC2 and adjacent transmembrane regions (TM2) 2 and 3 of BRS-3 were made. His107 (EC2-BRS-3) for lysine (H107K) (EC2-GRPR) decreased affinity (25- and 0-fold) for peptides 4 and 1; however, it could not be activated by either peptide. Its combination with Val101 (TM2), Gly112 (EC2), and Arg127 (TM3) resulted in complete loss-of-affinity of peptide 4. Receptor-modeling showed that each of these residues face inward and are within 4 A of the binding pocket. These results demonstrate that Val101, His107, Gly112, and Arg127 in the EC2/adjacent upper TMs of BRS-3 are critical for the high BRS3 selectivity of peptide 4. His107 in EC2 is essential for BRS-3 activation, suggesting amino-aromatic ligand/receptor interactions with peptide 4 are critical for both binding and activation. Furthermore, these result demonstrate that even though these three BRS-3-selective agonists were developed from the same template peptide, [d-Phe(6),betaAla(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14), their molecular determinants of selectivity/high affinity varied considerably.

The bombesin (Bn) receptor family includes the gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR) and neuromedin B (NMBR) receptors, Bn receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) and Bn receptor subtype 4 (BB(4)). They share 50% homology, yet their affinities for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) differ. The determinants of GRP high affinity for GRPR and BB(4), and low affinity for BRS-3 are largely unknown. To address this question we made an analysis of structural homologies in Bn receptor members correlated with their affinities for GRP to develop criteria to identify amino acids important for GRP selectivity. Fourteen differences were identified and each was mutated singly in GRPR to that found in hBRS-3. Eleven mutants had a loss of GRP affinity. Furthermore, three of four amino acids in the GRPR selected used a similar approach and previously reported to be important for high affinity Bn binding, were important for GRP affinity. Some GRPR mutants containing combinations of these mutations had greater decreases in GRP affinity than any single mutation. Particularly important for GRP selectivity were K101, Q121, A198, P199, S293, R288, T297 in GRPR. These results were confirmed by making the reverse mutations in BRS-3 to make GRP gain of affinity mutants. Modeling studies demonstrated a number of the important amino acids had side-chains oriented inward and within 6A of the binding pocket. These results demonstrated this approach could identify amino acids needed for GRP affinity and complemented results from chimera/mutagenesis studies by identifying which differences in the extracellular domains of Bn receptors were important for GRP affinity.

A series of novel 1,4-diaryl-2-azetidinones was prepared by stereospecific Staudinger reaction as conformationally restricted analogues of combretastatin A-4 because molecular modeling studies suggested close geometric similarities. They were evaluated for cytotoxicity against a number of human tumor and normal cell lines. Strong potencies were observed, with the best compounds exhibiting IC(50)'s of 25-74 nM against human neuroblastoma IMR 32 cell growth and a variety of other cell lines. Compounds inhibited tubulin polymerization with potencies commensurate with their cytotoxic activity and a more soluble anilino-containing analogue was very effective in inhibiting the growth of AR42J rat pancreatic tumors transplanted into in nude mice. Further studies on this interesting group of compounds as anti-cancer agents appear warranted.

Little is known about the function of the central portion of the second intracellular loop (i2 loop) of peptide receptors in activation of downstream pathways and receptor modulatory processes such as receptor internalization or chronic down-regulation (DR). Recent data suggest a role for i2 loop hydrophobic amino acids in these processes. We used site-directed mutagenesis to address these issues with the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R). Each i2 loop residue from 142 to 148 was mutated and the receptors were expressed in Balb 3T3 cells. Two mutants showed a minimal (<2-fold) decrease in affinity. Five mutants showed decreased efficacy for activating phospholipase C (PLC). Two double mutants (IM143.147AA and VM144.147AA) showed a minimal decrease in affinity but had a decreased ability to fully activate PLC. Only the IM double mutation had decreased maximal internalization, whereas the R145A single mutant showed an increase, suggesting a tonic inhibitory role for Arg-145 in internalization. Three single and both double mutants showed decreases in receptor DR. There was a weak correlation between the extent of GRP-R internalization and the maximal PLC activation, whereas changes in the maximal PLC activation were significantly (p = 0.008) coupled to receptor DR. This study shows that amino acids of the i2 loop of the GRP-R are important in activation of PLC, internalization and down-regulation, but not for affinity. Our results support the proposal that internalization and chronic down-regulation have differing dependence on PLC and are largely independent processes, because some mutants showed no changes in internalization, but significant alterations in down-regulation.

The mammalian bombesin peptides [gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and neuromedin B (NMB)] are important in numerous biological and pathological processes. These effects are mediated by the heptahelical GRP receptor (GRPR) and NMB receptor (NMBR). GRP has high affinity for GRPR and lower affinity for NMBR. Almost nothing is known about the molecular basis for the selectivity of GRP. To address this question, we first studied four loss-of-affinity GRPR chimeric receptors formed by exchanging the four extracellular (EC) domains of GRPR with the corresponding NMBR EC domains. Receptors were transiently expressed, and affinities were determined by binding studies. Only substitution of the third EC domain (EC3) of GRPR markedly decreased GRP affinity. In the reverse study using gain-of-affinity NMBR chimeras, only replacement of EC3 of NMBR markedly increased GRP affinity. Replacing each of the 20 comparable EC3 amino acids that differed in the NMBR in GRPR showed that two separate NMBR substitutions in the GRPR, Ile for Phe(185) or Ile for Ala(198), markedly decreased GRP affinity. Additional point mutants demonstrated that an amino acid with an aromatic ring in position 185 of GRPR and the size of the backbone substitution in position 198 of GRPR were important for GRP selectivity. These results demonstrate that selectivity of GRP for GRPR over NMBR is primarily determined by two amino acid differences in the EC3 domains of the receptor. Our results suggest that an interaction between the aromatic ring of Phe(185) of the GRPR with GRP is the most important for GRP selectivity.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neurotransmitter involved in a number of pathological and physiological processes. VIP is rapidly degraded and simplified stable analogs are needed. VIP's action was extensively studied in rat and guinea pig. However, it is largely unknown whether its pharmacophore in these species resembles human. To address this issue we investigated the VIP pharmacophore for VPAC(1) (the predominant receptor subtype in cancers and widely distributed in normal tissues) by using alanine and D-amino acid scanning. Interaction with rat, guinea pig, and human VPAC(1) was assessed using transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and PANC1 cells and cells possessing native VPAC(1). Important species differences existed in the VIP pharmacophore. The human VPAC(1) expressed in CHO cells, which were used almost exclusively in previous studies, differed markedly from the native VPAC(1) in T47D cells. The most important amino acids for determining affinity are His(1), Asp(3), Phe(6), Arg(12), Arg(14), and Leu(23). Ser(2), Asp(8), Asn(9), Thr(11), Val(19), Asn(24), Ser(25), Leu(27), and Asn(28) are not essential for high-affinity interaction/activation. [Ala(2,8,9,11,19,24,25,27,28)]VIP, which contained 11 alanines, was synthesized and it was equipotent to VIP at VPAC(1) receptors in all species and was metabolically stable. Our results show in any design of simplified VIP analogs for VPAC(1) it will be important to consider species differences and it is essential to use transfected systems that reflect the native receptor's pharmacophore. Last, with our results a simplified, metabolically stable VIP analog was identified that should be useful as a prototype for design of selective agonists/antagonists that could be useful therapeutically.

Few gastrointestinal hormones/neurotransmitters have high affinity peptide receptor antagonists, and little is known about the molecular basis of their selectivity or affinity. The receptor mediating the action of the mammalian bombesin (Bn) peptide, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), is an exception, because numerous classes of peptide antagonists are described. To investigate the molecular basis for their high affinity for the GRPR, two classes of peptide antagonists, a statine analogue, JMV594 ([d-Phe(6),Stat(13)]Bn(6-14)), and a pseudopeptide analogue, JMV641 (d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leupsi(CHOH-CH(2))-(CH(2))(2)-CH(3)), were studied. Each had high affinity for the GRPR and >3,000-fold selectivity for GRPR over the closely related neuromedin B receptor (NMBR). To investigate the basis for this, we used a chimeric receptor approach to make both GRPR loss of affinity and NMBR gain of affinity chimeras and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Chimeric or mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb/c 3T3. Only substitution of the fourth extracellular (EC) domain of the GRPR by the comparable NMBR domain markedly decreased the affinity for both antagonists. Substituting the fourth EC domain of NMBR into the GRPR resulted in a 300-fold gain in affinity for JMV594 and an 11-fold gain for JMV641. Each of the 11 amino acid differences between the GRPR and NMBR in this domain were exchanged. The substitutions of Thr(297) in GRPR by Pro from the comparable position in NMBR, Phe(302) by Met, and Ser(305) by Thr decreased the affinity of each antagonist. Simultaneous replacement of Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) in GRPR by the three comparable NMBR amino acids caused a 500-fold decrease in affinity for both antagonists. Replacing the comparable three amino acids in NMBR by those from GRPR caused a gain in affinity for each antagonist. Receptor modeling showed that each of these three amino acids faced inward and was within 5 A of the putative binding pocket. These results demonstrate that differences in the fourth EC domain of the mammalian Bn receptors are responsible for the selectivity of these two peptide antagonists. They demonstrate that Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) of the fourth EC domain of GRPR are the critical residues for determining GRPR selectivity and suggest that both receptor-ligand cation-pi interactions and hydrogen bonding are important for their high affinity interaction.

The search for synthetic analogues of somatostatin which exhibit selective affinities for the five receptor subtypes is of considerable basic and therapeutic interest and has generated a large number of potent agonist analogues with a wide spectrum of binding profiles. In the past, conformational restriction of side chain groups and the peptide backbone has yielded the most interesting results. Under the latter category and as part of the present study, we were interested in the potential effects of N-methylation of peptide bond NH groups on binding affinity since this approach had not been systematically examined with these peptides. This was aided by new chemistries for introducing an N-Me group during regular solid-phase peptide synthesis using Boc protection. A number of interesting effects were noted on relative binding affinities of the two series of agonist sequences chosen, DPhe(5)(or Tyr(5))-c[Cys(6)-Phe(7)-DTrp(8)-Lys(9)-Thr(10)-Cys(11)]Thr(12)-NH(2) (SRIF numbering), at the five known human somatostatin receptors transfected into and stably expressed by CHO cells. N-Methylation of residues 7 (Phe), 10 (Thr), 11 (Cys), and 12 (Thr) largely destroyed affinities for all five receptors. N-Methylation of DTrp in the DPhe series gave an analogue with extraordinarily high affinity for the type 5 receptor for which it was also quite selective. N-Methylation of Lys in both series resulted in retention of type 2 affinity despite this residue constituting the "active center" of somatostatin peptides. N-Methylation of either the N-terminal Tyr residue or of Cys(6) in the Tyr series resulted in analogues with extraordinarily high affinity for the type 3 receptor, also with a degree of specificity. N-Methylation of the peptide bond constrains the conformational space of the amino acid and eliminates the possibility of donor hydrogen bond formation from the amide linkage. The beta-bend conformation of the agonists around DTrp-Lys is stabilized by a transannular intramolecular hydrogen bond(s) between Phe(7) and Thr(10) so methylation of these residues eliminates this source of stabilization. It is expected that several of these analogues will provide additional tools for determining some of the physiological roles played by type 3 and 5 somatostatin receptors which are still far from being fully elucidated.

The search for synthetic peptide analogues of somatostatin (SRIF) which exhibit selective affinities for the five known receptor subtypes (sst1-5) has generated a large number of potent agonists. Some of these agonists display good subtype selectivities and affinities for the subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5, including analogues created by N-methyl amino acid substitutions in a standard octapeptide analogue format. We have now extended this peptide backbone N-methylation approach to a potent somatostatin receptor antagonist series using the antagonist Cpa-cyclo(DCys-Pal-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-Nal-NH2 9 reported from this laboratory as the lead structure. Synthetic analogues were tested for their ability to inhibit somatostatin-stimulated GH release from rat pituitary cells in culture and to displace 125I-labeled somatostatin from CHO cells transfected with the five known human somatostatin receptors. Several interesting observations resulted from the study. N-Methylation at the Lys(9) residue (5) increased the rat GH release inhibitory potency nearly 4-fold to 0.73 nM but resulted in little change in the binding affinity for human type 2 receptor. This analogue also had a high affinity of 5.98 nM for sst5 receptor (compared to 1.4 nM for somatostatin itself) and is the first antagonist analogue to be reported with high affinity for sst5. It also had high potency on in vitro inhibition of sst5 mediated intracellular calcium mobilization. These results were considered surprising, since the Lys(9) residue has long been considered to constitute the active center of somatostatin, important both for receptor binding and activation, and suggests important conformational differences between D-Cys(9) somatostatin antagonists and normal agonist structures. More modifications were carried out on this analogue with the aim of improving antagonist potency and/or specificity. Tyr(7) substitution of 5 resulted in an analogue, which had the highest affinity in the series for hsst2 (K(I) 5.51 nM) and an extraordinarily low IC50 of 0.53 nM in the rat pituitary cell assay. However, this analogue lost considerable affinity for sst5 relative to analogue 5. Analogue 16 with DTrp(12) at C-terminus had the highest affinity for hsst2, however, the IC50 in the rat GH release assay was only 11.6 nM. Replacement of Lys(9) in 9 with Dab(9) gave 11 which displayed high binding affinity for sst3, and it was also quite selective for that receptor. Both the sst3 and sst5 antagonists should be of value in assigning the physiological roles to type 3 and 5 receptor, respectively.

The orphan receptor, bombesin (Bn) receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3), shares high homology with bombesin receptors (neuromedin B receptor (NMB-R) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R)). This receptor is widely distributed in the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract; target disruption leads to obesity, diabetes, and hypertension, however, its role in physiological and pathological processes remain unknown due to lack of selective ligands or identification of its natural ligand. We have recently discovered (Mantey, S. A., Weber, H. C., Sainz, E., Akeson, M., Ryan, R. R. Pradhan, T. K., Searles, R. P., Spindel, E. R., Battey, J. F., Coy, D. H., and Jensen, R. T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26062-26071) that [d-Tyr(6),beta-Ala(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14) has high affinity for BRS-3 and using this ligand showed BRS-3 has a unique pharmacology with high affinity for no known natural Bn peptides. However, use of this ligand is limited because it has high affinity for all known Bn receptors. In the present study we have attempted to identify BRS-3 selective ligands using a strategy of rational peptide design with the substitution of conformationally restricted amino acids into the prototype ligand [d-Tyr(6),beta-Ala(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14) or its d-Phe(6) analogue. Each of the 22 peptides synthesized had binding affinities determined for hBRS-3, hGRPR, and hNMBR, and hBRS-3 selective ligands were tested for their ability to activate phospholipase C and increase inositol phosphates ([(3)H]inositol phosphate). Using this approach we have identified a number of BRS-3 selective ligands. These ligands functioned as receptor agonists and their binding affinities were reflected in their potencies for altering [(3)H]inositol phosphate. Two peptides with an (R)- or (S)-amino-3-phenylpropionic acid substitution for beta-Ala(11) in the prototype ligand had the highest selectivity for the hBRS-3 over the mammalian Bn receptors and did not interact with receptors for other gastrointestinal hormones/neurotransmitters. Molecular modeling demonstrated these two selective BRS-3 ligands had a unique conformation of the position 11 beta-amino acid. This selectivity was of sufficient magnitude that these should be useful in explaining the role of hBRS-3 activation in obesity, glucose homeostasis, hypertension, and other physiological or pathological processes.

Peptoid antagonists are increasingly being described for G protein-coupled receptors; however, little is known about the molecular basis of their binding. Recently, the peptoid PD168368 was found to be a potent selective neuromedin B receptor (NMBR) antagonist. To investigate the molecular basis for its selectivity for the NMBR over the closely related receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR), we used a chimeric receptor approach and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb 3T3. The extracellular domains of the NMBR were not important for the selectivity of PD168368. However, substitution of the 5th upper transmembrane domain (uTM5) of the NMBR by the comparable GRPR domains decreased the affinity 16-fold. When the reverse study was performed by substituting the uTM5 of NMBR into the GRPR, a 9-fold increase in affinity occurred. Each of the 4 amino acids that differed between NMBR and GRPR in the uTM5 region were exchanged, but only the substitution of Phe(220) for Tyr in the NMBR caused a decrease in affinity. When the reverse study was performed to attempt to demonstrate a gain of affinity in the GRPR, the substitution of Tyr(219) for Phe caused an increase in affinity. These results suggest that the hydroxyl group of Tyr(220) in uTM5 of NMBR plays a critical role for high selectivity of PD168368 for NMBR over GRPR. Receptor and ligand modeling suggests that the hydroxyl of the Tyr(220) interacts with nitrophenyl group of PD168368 likely primarily by hydrogen bonding. This result shows the selectivity of the peptoid PD168368, similar to that reported for numerous non-peptide analogues with other G protein-coupled receptors, is primarily dependent on interaction with transmembrane amino acids.

The search for synthetic analogues of somatostatin (SRIF) which exhibit selective affinities for the five known receptor subtypes (sst1-5) has generated a large number of potent agonist analogues. Many of these agonists display good subtype selectivities and affinities for the subtypes 2, 3, and 5, with very few selective for sst1 or sst4. Until the recent report by Bass and co-workers (Mol. Pharmacol. 1996, 50, 709-715; erratum Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 51, 170), no true antagonists of somatostatin had been discovered, let alone any displaying differential receptor subtype selectivity. In this present study, we further explore the effect of this putative L,5D6 antagonist motif on somatostatin octapeptide analogues with a cyclic hexapeptide core. The most potent antagonist found to date is H-Cpa-cyclo[DCys-Tyr-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Cys]-Nal-NH2, PRL-2970 (21), which has an IC50 of 1.1 nM in a rat pituitary growth hormone in vitro antagonist assay versus SRIF (1 nM). This analogue bound to cloned human somatostatin subtype 2 receptors with a Ki of 26 nM. The highest hsst2 affinity analogue was H-Cpa-cyclo[DCys-Pal-DTrp-Lys-Tle-Cys]-Nal-NH2, PRL-2915 (15), with a Ki of 12 nM (IC50 = 1.8 nM). This analogue was also selective for hsst2 over hsst3 and hsst5 by factors of 8 and 40, respectively, and had no agonist activity when tested alone at concentrations up to 10 microM. Regression analysis of the binding affinities versus the observed antagonist potencies revealed high correlations for hsst2 (r = 0.65) and hsst3 (r = 0.52) with a less significant correlation to hsst5 (r = 0.40). This is quite different from the somatostatin agonist analogues which show a highly significant correlation to hsst2 (r > 0.9). Receptor-selective somatostatin antagonists should provide valuable tools for characterizing the many important physiological functions of this neuropeptide.

The search for synthetic analogues of somatostatin (SRIF) which exhibit selective affinities for the five known receptor subtypes (sst1-5) has generated a large number of potent agonist analogues. Many of these agonists display good subtype selectivities and affinities for the subtypes 2, 3, and 5, with very few selective for sst1 or sst4. Until the recent report by Bass and co-workers (Mol. Pharmacol. 1996, 50, 709-715; erratum, Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 51, 170), no true antagonists had been discovered, let alone any displaying differential receptor subtype selectivity. In this present study, we explore the effect of this putative L5,D6 antagonist motif on various series of somatostatin agonist analogues, both linear and cyclic. It was found that many D5,L6 agonists could be converted into competitive antagonists by applying this motif, the most potent of which was H-Nal-cyclo[DCys-Pal-DTrp-Lys-Val-Cys]-Nal-NH2 (32). This antagonist was selective for hsst2 with an affinity of 75 nM and an IC50 of 15.1 nM against SRIF-14 in a rat in vitro antagonist bioassay. Receptor-selective somatostatin antagonists should provide valuable tools for characterizing the many important physiological functions of this neuropeptide.

Somatostatin is a hypothalamic hormone that inhibits the release of growth hormone (GH). It has also been shown to inhibit the release of a broad range of hormones including insulin, glucagon, and gastrin. Presently, five different receptor subtypes of somatostatin have been characterized and cloned. Our previous work on the structure-activity relationship of somatostatin and that of many others has generated a large database of analogues with different biological activities and receptor affinities. This present work is an investigation of the growth hormone release-inhibiting potencies of somatostatin analogues by the three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity paradigm, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). A total of 64 analogues were modeled in SYBYL using structural information from two NMR studies. The molecules were aligned by a root-mean-square fit of atoms and field-fit of the steric and electrostatic molecular fields and the resulting databases analyzed by partial least squares analysis with cross-validation to extract the optimum number of components. The analysis was then repeated without cross-validation to give the final QSAR models. Preliminary investigations with the CoMFA models led to the synthesis of a new somatostatin analogue. This compound together with five other newly synthesized compounds not included in the original training sets were used to test the predictive ability of the CoMFA models. Two models with good predictive powers are presented.

The ability to assess the importance of VIP in different physiological processes is limited by the lack of specific potent antagonists. In the present study, we have adopted two different approaches used successfully with other peptides in an attempt to identify new VIP receptor antagonists. One involves the formation of pseudopeptides by insertion of reduced peptide bonds in the NH2-terminus from position 2 to 8 of VIP. The other methodology involves the formation of a COOH-terminal chimeric analogue by combining VIP(6-28) and PACAP(28-38). The ability of each of these peptides to function as an antagonist was compared with reported VIP antagonists. All of the peptides inhibited [125I]VIP binding to VIP receptors on guinea pig pancreatic acini. For the pseudopeptides the affinities were: [psi 3-4]VIP (0.2 microM) = 4 x [psi 4-5]VIP = 8 x [psi 8-9]VIP = 14 x [psi 6-7]VIP, [psi 2-3]VIP = 25 x [psi 5-6]VIP. Each nonpseudopeptide analogue also inhibited VIP binding with relative potencies of VIP(6-28)-PACAP(28-38) (1 microM) = 2.5 x [4-Cl-D-Phe6,Leu17]VIP, VIP(10-28), neurotensin(6-11)-VIP(7-28) = 6 x [Ac-Tyr1,D-Phe2]GRF. All pseudopeptides were agonists with relative potencies: [psi 3-4]VIP > [psi 6-7], [psi 4-5]VIP > [psi 5-6] > [psi 8- 9]VIP > [psi 2-3]VIP. The reported VIP receptor antagonist, neurotensin(6-11)-VIP(7-28), was also an agonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enhancement of the amphiphilic alpha-helical properties of the central and C-terminal regions of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRH) by substitution with helix-favouring amino acids, particularly Ala, can result in significant improvements in GH-releasing potencies using monolayer cultures of rat pituitary cells, a system which reflects analogue receptor affinity rather than effects of structural modifications on pharmacokinetic properties. For instance, previously reported, helix-enhanced [Ala15]GRH-(1-29)NH2 was presently 5 times more potent than [Gly15]GRH-(1-29)NH2 in this assay. The extent and importance of alpha-helical character further towards the N-terminus is less clear since Chou-Fasman probability calculations indicate also the possibility of beta-bend formation in the 6-10 region. However, replacement of Asn8 with Ala resulted in a 4-fold improvement in potency and when this was combined with Ala15 to give [Ala8,15]GRH-(1-29)NH2 a 15-fold increase in potency was achieved and combination of D-Ala2, Ala8 and Ala15 gave a 27-fold increase indicating that the effects of all of these modifications were additive. Computer analysis furthermore revealed that substitution of Ala for Ser in position 9 should also increase alpha-helix probability from 0.93 to 1.05. [D-Ala2,Ala8,9,15]GRH- (1-29)NH2 was 49 times more potent than GRH itself making it by far the most potent analogue thus far reported in an in vitro assay system. The Ala8 and Ala9 substitutions were also effective in improving the inhibitory potency of a GRH receptor antagonist, [D-Arg2,Leu27]GRH-(1-29)NH2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The ability to assess the importance of secretin in various physiological processes is limited by the lack of specific potent antagonists. Recently, reduced peptide bond (psi) analogues of bombesin or substance P in which the -CONH- bond is replaced by -CH2NH- are reported to be receptor antagonists. To attempt to develop a new class of secretin receptor antagonists, we have adopted a similar strategy with secretin and sequentially altered the eight NH2-terminal peptide bonds, the biological active portion of secretin. In guinea pig pancreatic acini, secretin caused a 75-fold increase in cyclic AMP (cAMP). Secretin inhibited 125I-secretin binding with a half-maximal effect at 7 nM. Each of the psi analogues inhibited 125I-secretin binding. [psi 4,5]Secretin was the most potent, causing the half-maximal inhibition at 4 microM, and was 2-fold more potent than the [psi 1,2]secretin; 7-fold more than [psi 3,4]secretin, [psi 5,6]secretin, and [psi 8,9]secretin; 9-fold more than [psi 7,8]secretin; 13-fold more potent [psi 6,7]secretin, and 17-fold more than [psi 2,3]secretin. Secretin caused a half-maximal increase in cAMP at 1 nM. At concentrations up to 10 microM, [psi 2,3]secretin, [psi 4,5]secretin, and [psi 8,9]secretin did not alter cAMP whereas [psi 1,2]secretin and [psi 6,7]secretin caused a detectable increase in cAMP at 10 nM, [psi 7,8]secretin at 300 nM, [psi 5,6]secretin at 1 microM, and [psi 3,4]secretin at 10 microM. The [psi 4,5], [psi 2,3], and [psi 8,9] analogues of secretin each inhibited 1 nM secretin-stimulated cAMP as well as [psi 3,4]secretin, which functioned as a partial agonist. [psi 4,5]Secretin was the most potent, causing half-maximal inhibition at 3 microM whereas [psi 8,9]secretin was 6-fold less potent, and [psi 2,3]secretin and [psi 3,4]secretin were 17-fold less potent. [psi 4,5]Secretin inhibited secretin-stimulated cAMP and binding of 125I-secretin in a competitive manner. [psi 4,5]Secretin did not interact with cholecystokinin, bombesin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, or cholinergic receptors but did interact with receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide, causing half-maximal inhibition at 72 microM and thus had a 18-fold higher affinity for secretin than vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors. These results indicate that reduced peptide bond analogues of the NH2 terminus of secretin represent a new class of secretin receptor antagonists. It is likely that in the future even more potent members of this class can be developed which may be useful to investigate the role of secretin in various physiological processes.

Previous peptide structure-activity investigations employing the psi[CH2NH] peptide bond isostere have produced antagonists when inserted into various sequences. These include bombesin, in which the incorporation of Leu13 psi[CH2NH]Leu14 produced a potent antagonist, and tetragastrin, with which Boc-Trp-Leu psi[CH2NH]Asp-Phe-NH2 is an antagonist. In this study, we chose to investigate the effect of this isostere on growth hormone-releasing factor (1-29) amide. Analogues were prepared by solid-phase synthesis and the isosteres incorporated by racemization-free reductive alkylation with a preformed protected amino acid aldehyde in the presence of NaBH3CN. The aldehydes were prepared by the reduction of the protected N,O-dimethyl hydroxamates with LiAlH4 at 0 degrees C. The purified analogues were assayed in a 4-day primary culture of male rat anterior pituitary cells for growth hormone (GH) release. Potential antagonists were retested in the presence of GRF(1-29)NH2. The following results were obtained: At position 5-6, a very weak agonist was produced with much less than 0.01% activity. Incorporation of the isostere in positions 1-2, 2-3, and 6-7 gave weak agonists with approximately 0.1% activity. Agonists with 0.39% and 1.6% activity were produced by incorporation at 10-11 and 3-4, respectively. The analogue [Ser9 psi[CH2NH]Tyr10]GRF(1-29)NH2 was found to be an antagonist in the 10 microM range vs 1 nM GRF and had no agonist activity at doses as high as 0.1 mM.

The effect of the CH2NH and CH2NAc peptide bond isosteres on the antagonistic and histamine releasing activities of the LH-RH antagonist [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-Phe2,3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10] LH-RH was investigated. The moieties were introduced by facile, racemization-free solid-phase synthesis in an attempt to reduce the histamine releasing activity inherent to the most potent analogues while retaining high antiovulatory activity. The psi [CH2NH] isostere was incorporated at each CONH site with the exception of 8-9, which involves Pro, by reductive alkylation with a protected amino acid aldehyde in the presence of NaBH3CN during conventional solid-phase peptide synthesis. The psi [CH2NH] group was extremely resistant to derivatization and could only be partially acetylated to give psi [CH2NAc]. The analogues were cleaved from the resin with simultaneous deprotection by anhydrous hydrogen fluoride and purified to homogeneity in two stages: gel permeation followed by preparative reversed-phase liquid chromatography. The analogues were assayed in standard rat antiovulatory and in vitro histamine release assays. The isosteres caused a loss of the antiovulatory activity of the antagonist at the 50-microgram dose when incorporated at the positions 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and 7-8. Incorporation at the other positions resulted in a less marked reduction in activity relative to the unmodified parent analogue. No significant effect was noted on the potent histamine releasing activity of the analogues.

The structure-activity relationship of the hydrophobic amino terminal region of the antagonist [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-pClPhe2,D-Trp3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10]-LH- RH has been investigated by the incorporation of a variety of amino acids with emphasis on positions 1, 2, and 3. The analogues were prepared by routine solid-phase peptide synthesis. All purifications were performed in two stages: gel permeation chromatography followed by preparative, reversed-phase, high-performance chromatography. The analogues were assayed in a standard rat antiovulatory assay using a 40% propane-1,2-diol-saline vehicle. A simplified antagonist was developed that allowed the removal of the custom-synthesized D-pClPhe and the labile D-Trp while retaining antiovulatory potency. The compound [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-Phe2,3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10]-LH-RH caused a 56% blockade of ovulation at the 500-ng dose and is approximately equipotent with the parent analogue in this system.

The reductive alkylation of the D-Lys side chain in position 6 of the LH-RH antagonist [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-Phe2,3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10]LH-RH was investigated in an attempt to reduce the histamine-releasing activity inherent to most potent antagonists while retaining high antiovulatory activity. The protected parent analogue was prepared by conventional solid-phase peptide synthesis. After selective removal of the Lys Fmoc side-chain protection, the resin-bound peptide was readily and conveniently alkylated at the epsilon amino group with various aldehydes and ketones in the presence of NaCNBH3. The analogues were then cleaved from the resin with simultaneous deprotection by anbydrous hydrogen fluoride and purified to homogeneity in two stages: gel permeation followed by preparative reversed-phase liquid chromatography. The analogues were assayed in standard rat antiovulatory and in vitro histamine-release assays. Simple alkyl groups such as ethyl, isopropyl, neopentyl, and cyclohexyl caused little reduction in histamine-releasing activity while exhibiting antiovulatory activity similar to that of the parent peptide. The presence of benzyl and substituted benzyl groups resulted in substantial losses of both histamine-releasing and antiovulatory activities. Thus, results showed that alterations in the hydrophobicity and size of the position-6 side chain have little effect on histamine-releasing activity or antiovulatory activity as long as a high degree of basicity is retained.

The histamine-releasing activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonistic analogs has been documented. Antagonists of LHRH elicited in vitro histamine release from mast cells obtained from previously unexposed rats. Intradermal injection of the antagonists caused increased local skin permeability. Anaphylactoid reactions followed subcutaneous injection of the antagonists and in some cases these edematous reactions were accompanied by increased serum histamine levels. These studies show that these small peptides can cause mast cell degranulation and suggest that the neuropeptide, LHRH, may have modulating effects on the immune system.

Peripherally injected bombesin inhibits GH secretion in conscious, freely moving rats and in sodium pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. This inhibition of GH secretion is unusually prolonged, lasting up to 90 min after a single ip injection. The duration of inhibition of GH secretion by bombesin is greater than that observed for somatostatin (SRIF) in the same bioassay. The inhibition of GH release occurs concomitantly with stimulation of gastrin release and is independent of stimulatory effects of bombesin on plasma glucose. The structurally related mammalian gastrin-releasing peptide also inhibits GH secretion in the pentobarbital-anesthetized rat after peripheral injection. Peripherally administered bombesin blocks GH-releasing factor stimulation of GH secretion. Prior treatment of pentobarbital-anesthetized rats with SRIF-specific anti-serum blocks the inhibitory effect of bombesin on GH secretion. No effect of bombesin on GH secretion was observed in primary cultures of rat anterior pituitary cells. These data suggest that peripherally administered bombesin stimulates SRIF secretion, most probably of hypothalamic origin, which, in turn, inhibits pituitary secretion of GH. This sensitivity of the hypothalamus to a peripherally rather than centrally administered peptide has important mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

The structure-activity relationship of position 7 in the antagonist [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-pClPhe2,D-Trp3,D-Arg6,D-Ala10]-LH-RH has been investigated by the incorporation of a series of amino acids at this position. The analogues were prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis. All purifications were performed in two stages: gel permeation followed by preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The analogues were assayed in the standard rat antiovulatory assay using a 40% propylene glycol-saline vehicle. The results demonstrated that position 7 requires a hydrophobic aromatic amino acid for greatest antiovulatory activity. The compound [N-Ac-D-Nal1,D-pClPhe2,D-Trp3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10]-LH- RH caused 65% blockade of ovulation at the 500-ng dose and is approximately twice as active as the parent analogue in this assay system. The enhanced activity may indicate the stabilization of the active conformation via intramolecular hydrophobic or tau-tau interactions.

The solid-phase reductive alkylation of the Lys side chain in positions 6 (D) and 8 (L) and position 8 alone of the LH-RH antagonist [N-Ac-D-Nal,D-Ph2,3,D-Arg6,Phe7,D-Ala10]LH-RH was investigated in an attempt to reduce the histamine-releasing activity inherent to most potent antagonists while retaining high antiovulatory activity. The protected parent analogues were prepared by conventional solid-phase peptide synthesis. After selective removal of the Lys Fmoc side chain protection, the resin-bound peptides were readily and conveniently alkylated at the epsilon amino groups with various aldehydes and ketones in the presence of NaBH3CN. The analogues were then cleaved from the resin with simultaneous deprotection by anhydrous hydrogen fluoride and purified to homogeneity in two stages: gel permeation followed by preparative reversed-phase liquid chromatography. The analogues were assayed in standard rat antiovulatory and in vitro histamine-release assays.

The cutaneous anaphylactoid test was evaluated as a screen for assessing mast cell mediator-releasing (MCMR) activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) peptides. As expected, LHRH and D-Trp6-LHRH, an agonist of LHRH, were nonreactive at concentrations of antagonist which induced pronounced skin lesions. Differences between LHRH and antagonists were obvious, but it was difficult to detect differences among antagonists using arithmetic means. However, when the geometric means of the highest positive dilution were calculated, the MCMR activities of the antagonists differed and these differences appeared to be related to the hydrophobicities of their N-termini. Thus, it appears that the cutaneous anaphylactoid test is an appropriate screen to assess the MCMR activity of LHRH peptides and should assist in the development of clinically useful inhibitory analogs of LHRH.