Search

Introduction: Hypoxemia is a common complication of sedation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation (SJOV) in preventing hypoxemia during sedative procedures., Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared SJOV with conventional oxygen therapy in sedated patients were searched in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], and Google Scholar) from their inception to March 2024. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who developed hypoxia (SpO 2  < 90%). The secondary outcomes included subclinical respiratory depression (90% ≤ SpO 2  < 95%), severe hypoxemia (SpO 2  < 75%), airway interventions, adverse events, hemodynamics, propofol dosage, and procedure time. The certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach., Results: Twelve trials (n = 3058) were included in the analysis. The evidence suggests that SJOV results in a large reduction in the risk of hypoxemia (risk ratio [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.36; low certainty) and subclinical respiratory depression (RR, 0.40; low certainty) compared with the control. SJOV likely resulted in a large reduction in the risk of severe hypoxemia (RR, 0.22; moderate certainty). In addition, it may result in a large reduction in the need for jaw lift (RR, 0.22; low certainty) and mask ventilation (RR, 0.13; low certainty). The risk of sore throat probably increases with SJOV (RR, 1.71; moderate certainty), whereas SJOV may result in little to no difference in nasal bleeding (RR, 1.75; low certainty). Evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect of SJOV on hemodynamics (very low certainty) and procedure time (very low certainty). SJOV probably resulted in little to no difference in sedative doses between the groups (moderate certainty)., Conclusion: According to the GRADE approach, SJOV likely results in a large reduction in the risk of severe hypoxemia but probably increases the risk of sore throat. Compared with the control, evidence suggests that SJOV results in a large reduction in the risk of hypoxemia, subclinical respiratory depression, and the need for airway manipulation, with little to no difference in nasal bleeding. The integration of SJOV into clinical practice may help minimize hypoxemic events in at-risk patients., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

With increasing prevalence of obesity and cardiovascular diseases, there is a growing interest in the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as an adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The GLP-1RAs are currently not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of T1D in the absence of randomized controlled trials documenting efficacy and safety of these agents in this population. The Diabetes Technology Society convened a series of three consensus meetings of clinicians and researchers with expertise in diabetes technology, GLP-1RA therapy, and T1D management. The project was aimed at synthesizing current literature and providing conclusions on the use of GLP-1RA therapy as an adjunct to automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in adults with T1D. The expert panel members met virtually three times on January 17, 2024, and April 24, 2024, and August 14, 2024, to discuss topics ranging from physiology and outcomes of GLP-1RAs in T1D to limitations of current sensors, algorithms, and insulin for AID systems. The panelists also identified research gaps and future directions for research. The panelists voted to in favor of 31 recommendations. This report presents the consensus opinions of the participants that, in adults with T1D using AID systems, GLP-1RAs have the potential to (1) provide effective adjunct therapy and (2) improve glycemic and metabolic outcomes without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: VNS received research support from Novo Nordisk, Insulet, and Tandem Diabetes Care and received honoraria from LifeScan for advisory board attendance and from Dexcom, Embecta, and Insulet for speaking arrangements. ALP is on the advisory board of Medscape, Vertex, and Lilly; has received research support from Insulin and Abbott; and reports stock options from Omada Health. GEU has received research support (to Emory University) from Abbott, Bayer, Dexcom, and Sanofi. HKA received research support through University of Colorado from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, Senseonics, Medtronic, Eli Lilly, REMD Biotherapeutics, IM Therapeutics, and IAFMS and received honoraria through University of Colorado from Senseonics and Mannkind for advisory board attendance. GA has received research support to her institution Northwestern University from Fractyl Health, MannKind, Insulet, Tandem Diabetes, and Welldoc. GA has received consulting fees from Dexcom and Insulet. LB reports having participated in advisory boards of Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Oviva, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, and Ypsomed and received speaker fees from Dexcom, Ypsomed and Oviva. EC is an advisory board member and consultant for Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Adocia, MannKind, Lexicon, Arecor, PortalInsulin, and Proventionbio. EC was also a speaker for Novo Nordisk. KD discloses research support from Dexcom, Sanofi, Viacyte, Abbott, and Insulet; consulting with Eli Lilly, Insulet, Oppenheimer, Dexcom; and honorarium from UptoDate, Medscape, Med Learning Group, Impact Education, and Elsevier. CF receives royalties from Dexcom and Novo Nordisk managed through her institution. PGJ reports receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, The Leona M. and Harry B. Charitable Trust, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, Dexcom, and the Oregon Health & Science University Foundation; consultancy fees from CDISC; US patents 62/352,939, 63/269,094, 62/944,287, 8810388, 9,480,418, 8,317,700, 61/570382, 8,810,388, 7,976,466, and 6,558,321; and reports stock options from Pacific Diabetes Technologies, outside submitted work. RAL reports consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Deep Valley Labs, Gluroo, PhysioLogic Devices, ProventionBio, and Tidepool. JKM is a member of the advisory board of Abbott Diabetes Care, Becton-Dickinson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Prediktor A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi-Aventis, and Viatris and received speaker honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Servier, and Ypsomed. JLS has conducted clinical trials for Eli Lilly, Insulet, and Medtronic and has received in-kind support for research studies from Dexcom and Medtronic. She has consulted for Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Medtronic, and Sanofi. She has been a member of advisory boards for Bigfoot Biomedical, Cecelia Health, Eli Lilly, Insulet, the T1D Fund, and Vertex. DCK is a consultant for Afon, Better Therapeutics, Integrity, Lifecare, Nevro, Novo, Samsung, and Thirdwayv. AC, UM, PP, SS, EZ, CNH, ATA, TT, and REA have nothing to disclose.

As medical devices become more integrated with wireless technologies, the risks of cyberattacks and data breaches increase, making stringent cybersecurity measures essential. The implementation of rigorous cybersecurity standards is essential for enhancing the cybersecurity of devices. This article examines the evolving cyber threats faced by the medical technology industry, the role of IEEE 2621 in providing comprehensive security benchmarks for medical devices, and the need for continuous risk assessments and adherence to regulatory standards to mitigate future cyber risks. Adherence to cybersecurity standards establishes ensures the effective protection of sensitive data and critical infrastructure., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CNH and ATA are consultants for Liom. CSM is a current member of IEEE. DCK is a consultant for Afon, Embecta, Glucotrack, Lifecare, Novo, Samsung, Synchneuro, and Thirdwayv. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

The advanced glycation end products (AGEs) Webinar was co-hosted by Diabetes Technology Society and Kitalys Institute on August 8, 2024, with the goal of reviewing progress made in the measurement and use of AGEs in clinical practice. Meeting topics included (1) AGEs as predictors of diabetic nephropathy (DKD), (2) hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) and the glycation gap (GG), (3) formation and structure of AGEs, (4) AGEs as a risk factor of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and (5) approaches to limit or prevent AGE formation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: C.N.H. is a consultant for Liom.ATA is a consultant for Liom.DCK is a consultant for Afon, Embecta, Glucotrack, Lifecare, Novo, Samsung, Synchneuro, and Thirdwayv.GAF is an advisor for 180 Life Sciences, 89bio, Adocia, Abbott, AdipoPharma, Aerami, Amolyt, Carthera, Catalyst, Cohen Global, CMC Magnetics, Diasome, Eleos, Entera Bio, Enterin, Glyscend, Hagar, Hogan Lovells, IM Therapeutics, Innoneo, Intarcia, Levicure, Lilly Asia Ventures, Lumos, Mars Symbioscience, Melior, metaLead Therapeutics, Microbiotix, MMD, Modular Medical, New Amsterdam, Northwestern, NuSirt, NuVox, Oramed, Pano, Pasithea, PhylloPharma, Pleiogenix, Recordati, Regor, Remodeless, Renaissance, RenovoRx, Rivus, RxMP, Sera Biopharma, Seraxis, Serpin, SFC Fluidics, Skinject, SROne, Stalicla, Surf Bio, TIXiMED, Veroscience, Verthermia, WaveBreak, Zealand Pharma, and Zucara.PB is co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer at Journey Biosciences.SC has nothing to disclose.AMS holds patents and patent applications with the NYU Grossman School of Medicine for small molecule antagonists of RAGE–DIAPH1.AP has received grant funding (to the institution) from Applied Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Ultromics, Myovista, and Roche; has served as a consultant for and/or received honoraria outside of the present study as an advisor/consultant for Tricog Health Inc., Lilly USA, Rivus, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, Sarfez Therapeutics, Edwards Lifesciences, Merck, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Alleviant, Axon Therapies, and has received nonfinancial support from Pfizer and Merck. AP is also a consultant for Palomarin Inc with stocks compensation and has received research support from the National Institute on Aging GEMSSTAR Grant (1R03AG067960-01), the National Institute on Minority Health and Disparities (R01MD017529), and the National Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL169708).PK is one of the patent holders of GLYLO, a supplement licensed to Juvify Bio by the Buck Institute. PK is also the founder of Juvify Bio.

Introduction: An error grid compares measured versus reference glucose concentrations to assign clinical risk values to observed errors. Widely used error grids for blood glucose monitors (BGMs) have limited value because they do not also reflect clinical accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs)., Methods: Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) convened 89 international experts in glucose monitoring to (1) smooth the borders of the Surveillance Error Grid (SEG) zones and create a user-friendly tool-the DTS Error Grid; (2) define five risk zones of clinical point accuracy (A-E) to be identical for BGMs and CGMs; (3) determine a relationship between DTS Error Grid percent in Zone A and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) from analyzing 22 BGM and nine CGM accuracy studies; and (4) create trend risk categories (1-5) for CGM trend accuracy., Results: The DTS Error Grid for point accuracy contains five risk zones (A-E) with straight-line borders that can be applied to both BGM and CGM accuracy data. In a data set combining point accuracy data from 18 BGMs, 2.6% of total data pairs equally moved from Zones A to B and vice versa (SEG compared with DTS Error Grid). For every 1% increase in percent data in Zone A, the MARD decreased by approximately 0.33%. We also created a DTS Trend Accuracy Matrix with five trend risk categories (1-5) for CGM-reported trend indicators compared with reference trends calculated from reference glucose., Conclusion: The DTS Error Grid combines contemporary clinician input regarding clinical point accuracy for BGMs and CGMs. The DTS Trend Accuracy Matrix assesses accuracy of CGM trend indicators., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.C.K. is a consultant for Afon, Lifecare, Novo, Samsung, embecta, Glucotrack, SynchNeuro, and Thirdwayv. G.F. is CEO of IfDT. G.F./IfDT has/have received research support, speakers’ honoraria or consulting fees in the last three years from Abbott, Ascensia, Berlin Chemie, Boydsense, Dexcom, Glucoset, i-SENS, Lilly, Menarini, Novo Nordisk, Perfood, Pharmasens, Roche, Sinocare, Terumo, Ypsomed. S.P. is an employee of IfDT. B.P.K. declares patent royalties handled by UVA from: DexCom, J&J, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and research support handled by UVA: Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Tandem Diabetes Care. D.K. has received research support from Abbott Diabetes Care. M.S.D.A. is currently receiving in kind support (CGM devices) from Dexcom Inc for an investigator-initiated clinical study. K.D. receives research funding from Dexcom, Abbott, Sanofi, Viacyte, Insulet, consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Dexcom, Insulet, Oppenheimer, Elsevier, honoraria from Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Med Learning Group, Medscape, Impact Education, and royalties from UptoDate. S.M. is in receipt of an investigator-initiated grant from DexCom, has received speaker fees from Sanofi & Lilly, is funded by a Wellcome Trust (223024/Z/21/Z), and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. A.S. was supported by the NSF Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations (PATHS-UP) (#1648451). V.N.S. reports receiving personal fees from Sanofi, Embecta, NovoNordisk, Dexcom, Insulet, Tandem Diabetes Care, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Genomelink and LumosFit for consulting, advising or speaking. N.K.T. is a consultant for Roche Diagnostics / Roche Molecular Systems / Radiometer. UC Davis is a Roche Diagnostics Center of Excellence. N.K.T. has received speaking honoraria for Roche Diagnostics, Nova Biomedical, Thermo Fisher, and Radiometer. N.K.T. is also Chair-Elect for the Association for Diagnostic and Laboratory Medicine (ADLM) Critical and Point-of-Care Testing Division, Co-Founder of the Machine Intelligene Learning Optimizer (MILO), Inc, and a member of the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) continuous glucose monitoring workgroup. T.T. is a consultant for Clinical ink. R.E.A. is a consultant for Clinical ink. D.T.A. has received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Insulet, Lilly Diabetes, Mannkind, Novo Nordisk, and Xeris Pharmaceuticals. D.T.A. has received consulting fees from Ascensia Diabetes Care, Lilly Diabetes, and Senseonics. H.K.A. received research grants through University of Colorado from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, Medtronic, Mannkind, IM Therapeutics, IAFMS, and received honorarium through University of Colorado for consulting from Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes, and Medtronic. M.E.A.-S. has served on the advisory boards for Abbott, Medtronic, Insulet, VitalAire, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Dexcom; has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, VitalAire, and Eli Lilly; and received research support from Medtronic and Sanofi. T.S.B. has received research support from Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, Biolinq, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Medtrum, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Senseonics, and vTv Therapeutics and consulting honoraria from Abbott Diabetes, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, ACON, CeQur, HagarTech, Intuity Medical, Lifescan, Mannkind, Medtronic, Novo, Perspirion, Sanofi, Sequel Med Tech, and Ypsomed. M.B. currently participates on the Hospital Advisory board with Dexcom and has received research support from Dexcom. L.B. has received research/product support from Dexcom, Ypsomed, and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker honoraria from Dexcom and Oviva; and participated in advisory boards of Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Ypsomed, Oviva, and Roche Diabetes Care. Y.M.B. has received honoraria for lectures and scientific advisory from Roche and AstraZeneca in the past 12 months. J.E.B. is on the Speaker’s bureau for Insulet and on the Advisory Board for Cardinal Health and Lifescan. J.E.B. is a consultant for Embecta. J.E.B. receives research support from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. E.C. is on the scientific advisory board for Novo Nordisk, Eli-Lilly, Adocia, Arecor, Proventionbio, Portal Insulin, and MannKind. D.C. was a Dexcom employee from August 2018 to May 2024. D.C. is a shareholder of Dexcom, Lilly, Abbott and Tandem. M.C. has received consulting fees from Glooko and research support from Dexcom and Abbott Diabetes Care. G.L.C. is a shareholder of BioTex, Inc., Basepair Biotechnologies Inc., Coordination Centric, Inc., and Shape Memory Medical, Inc. G.L.C. is supported by the NSF Engineering Research Center for Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations (PATHS-UP) (#1648451). K.K.D. has received honoraria, travel, or fees for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Abbott Diabetes, Menarini, and Sanofi in the last 12 months. J.E. receives federal funding from FDA, NIMHD, and NCATS and is a consultant for Sanofi. C.F. receives royalties from Dexcom and Novo Nordisk managed through her institution. G.A.F. is an advisor for 180 Life Sciences, 89bio, Adocia, Abbott, AdipoPharma, Aerami, Amolyt, Carthera, Catalyst, Cohen Global, CMC Magnetics, Diasome, Eleos, Entera Bio, Enterin, Glyscend, Hagar, Hogan Lovells, IM Therapeutics, Innoneo, Intarcia, Levicure, Lilly Asia Ventures, Lumos, Mars Symbioscience, Melior, metaLead Therapeutics, Microbiotix, MMD, Modular Medical, New Amsterdam, Northwestern, NuSirt, NuVox, Oramed, Pano, Pasithea, PhylloPharma, Pleiogenix, Recordati, Regor, Remodeless, Renaissance, RenovoRx, Rivus, RxMP, Sera Biopharma, Seraxis, Serpin, SFC Fluidics, Skinject, SROne, Stalicla, Surf Bio, TIXiMED, Veroscience, Verthermia, WaveBreak, Zealand Pharma, and Zucara. M.A.L.G. is a consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Novonordisk, and Roche. R.J.G. received research support from Novo Nordisk, Dexcom and Eli Lilly and consulting fees/advisory fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Aztra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Medtronic, outside of this work. R.J.G. is partially supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers P30DK111024, K23DK123384, R03DK138255, and U2CD137135. A.M.G.-M. reports speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Elli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, and Medtronic. L.H. is a consultant for a number of companies that are developing innovative solutions for the treatment of people with diabetes. N.H. reports Advisory Board member fees from Abbott Diabetes Care and Insulet as well as honoraria for lectures from Berlin-Chemie AG, Becton Dickenson, Sanofi Germany, Roche Diabetes Care, and Dexcom Germany. T.H. serves on the advisory board for Acella and Horizons Therapeutics (no financial compensation). S.H. has served on the advisory board for Tandem, Dexcom, and Medtronic, and received honoraria for nonpromotional educational and/or consultancy work from Abbott, Insulet, Dexcom, Roche, and Sanofi. P.G.J. is a shareholder of Pacific Diabetes Technologies Inc. and serves on the advisory board for Eli Lilly. P.G.J. received grant support from SFC Fluidics and research support from Eli Lilly and Dexcom. J.J. has received fees from lectures and or advisory boards from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Nordic Infucare, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. S.R.J is a consultant for USV, Marico, Glenmark, Franco Indian, Twin Health, Biocon, and Zydus Lifesciences. S.R.J. received speaking honoraria from Abbott, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Lupin, Bayer Zydus, USV, DRL, Meyer Organics, Servier, Natco. R.A.L. is a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Deep Valley Labs, Gluroo, PhysioLogic Devices, Portal Insulin, Sanofi, and Tidepool. R.A.L. has served on advisory boards for. ProventionBio and Lilly. R.A.L. receives research support through his institution from Insulet, Medtronic, Tandem, and Sinocare. L.A.L. has received research funding from, has provided CME on behalf of, and/or has acted as an advisor to Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi. M.L. has been a consultant or received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Nordic InfuCare, and Novo Nordisk, and has received research grants from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, all outside of the submitted work. J.K.M. is a member of advisory boards of Abbott Diabetes Care, Becton-Dickinson, Biomea Fusion, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Medtronic, NovoNordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi-Aventis, and Viatris and received speaker honoraria from A. Menarini Diagnostics, Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Medtrust, MSD, NovoNordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Viatris, and Ypsomed. J.K.M. is a shareholder of decide Clinical Software GmbH and elyte Diagnostics. A.M. reports speaker fees from Novo Nordisk. M.M. has an existing research & development relationship with Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc and has been a consultant for Abbott. S.-J.M. is a consultant for Abbott, Curestream, Daewoong, EOFlow, G2e, Huons, iSense, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. D.N.O. has served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Sanofi; received research support from Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Eli Lilly and Company, and Sanofi; and received travel support from Novo Nordisk and Merck Sharp & Dohme. F.J.P. has received research support (to Emory University) from Dexcom, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Tandem, and Ideal Medical Technologies, and has received consulting fees from Dexcom. A.L.P. is on the advisory board of Medscape, Vertex, and Lilly; receives research support from Insulin and Abbott; and has stock options in Omada Health. R.P.-B. receives grant support from Novo Nordisk, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, and Medtronic and received consulting fees from Bayer, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, and Roche. C.M.R. has received honoraria and/or grant support from AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Fresenius, and Vifor. D.B.S. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. S.S. was a Novo Nordisk employee from 2022-2023. S.S. has served as advisor for Novo Nordisk and has received speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and Nordic Infucare within the past three years. G.D.S’s employer, nonprofit International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, has received educational grant funds from Abbott Diabetes Care, Medscape, and Sanofi-Aventis Groupe. G.D.S receives no personal income/honorarium from these activities. K.S. received grant supports from Arkray, Terumo, and Dexcom. E.K.S. is partly supported by the VA Merit Award (1I01CX001825) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and has received unrestricted research support from Dexcom and Tandem Diabetes (to Baltimore VA Medical Center and to University of Maryland) for the conduction of clinical trials. N.L.S. received funding from Novo Nordisk for an investigator-initiated research grant unrelated to the current project. G.E.U. is partly supported by research grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH/NATS UL 3UL1TR002378-05S2) from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, and from National Institutes of Health and National Center for Research Resources (NIH/NIDDK 2P30DK111024-06). G.E.U. has received research support (to Emory University) from Abbott, Bayer, and Dexcom; and has participated in advisory boards for Dexcom and GlyCare. E.W. has received consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Ascensia, Bayer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, Embecta, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medtronic, Renalytix, and Sanofi. E.W. has received honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Medtronic, Renalytix, and Sanofi. E.W. is on the Speakers’ Bureau from Abbott Diabetes Care, Bayer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Renalytix, and Sanofi. M.Z. is a consultant for DexCom, Inc. M.A.K. is Chief Medical Officer of QuesGen, Inc. C.T., C.L., B.V.H., J.S.K., W.A.L., S.Y.R., J.J.S., K.W., C.W., K.R., C.N.H., A.T.A., A.A., R.R.B., E.M.B., J.G.C., K.Y.C., A.D., N.E., S.K.K., U.M., N.M., C.M., J.H.N., A.P., P.R., S.M.S., B.S., M.V., H.W.V., J.W., A.H.B.W., and S.Y. have nothing to disclose.

Introduction: Insulin pump therapy can be adversely affected by interruption of insulin flow, leading to a rise in blood glucose (BG) and subsequently of blood beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) ketone levels., Methods: We performed a PubMed search for English language reports (January 1982 to July 2024) estimating the rate of rise in BG and/or BHB after ≥ 60 minutes of interruption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in persons with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D). We also simulated the rise in BG in a virtual population of 100 adults with T1D following suspension of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion., Results: We identified eight relevant studies where BG and BHB (seven of these eight studies) were measured following suspension of CSII as a model for occlusion. After 60 minutes post-suspension, the mean extracted rates of rise averaged 0.62 mg/dL/min (37 mg/dL/h) for BG and 0.0038 mmol/L/min (0.20 mmol/L/h) for BHB. Mean estimated time to moderately/severely elevated BG (300/400 mg/dL) or BHB (1.6/3.0 mmol/L) was, respectively, 5.8/8.5 and 8.0/14.2 hours. The simulation model predicted moderately/severely elevated BG (300/400 mg/dL) after 9.25/12, 6.75/8.75, and 4.75/5.75 hours in the virtual subjects post-interruption with small (5th percentile), medium (50th percentile), and large (95th percentile) hyperglycemic changes., Discussion: Clinical studies and a simulation model similarly predicted that, following CSII interruption, moderate/severe hyperglycemia can occur within 5-9/6-14 hours, and clinical studies predicted that moderate/severe ketonemia can occur within 7-12/13-21 hours. Patients and clinicians should be aware of this timing when considering the risks of developing metabolic complications after insulin pump occlusion., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.C.K. is a consultant for Afon, Embecta, GlucoTrack, Lifecare, Novo, Samsung, and Thirdwayv. C. N. H. has nothing to disclose. A.T.A. has nothing to disclose. C.F. reports receiving research support from Novo Nordisk A/S and Dexcom, Inc handled by the University of Virginia, and patent royalties from Novo Nordisk A/S and Dexcom, Inc handled by the University of Virginia’s Licensing and Ventures Group. M.F.V.-T. reports receiving patent royalties from Dexcom, Inc handled by the University of Virginia’s Licensing and Ventures Group. E.A. has nothing to disclose. E.C. has served on the scientific advisory board of Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, MannKind, Arecor, Portal Insulin, Provention Bio, Tandem, and Ypsomed. L.E. receives salary support from NIDDK; has received research support from JDRF, Medtronic, MannKind, and Abbot and has served on the advisory board of Diabetes Center Berne, Sequel, and Medtronic. She has received consulting fees from Jaeb, Tandem Diabetes Care, and Ypsomed and has received honorarium fees from Medtronic and Insulet. J.C.W. has received research support from Dexcom, Inc and Tandem Diabetes Care. L.H. is a shareholder of the Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany, Science Consulting in Diabetes GmbH Düsseldorf, and diateam GmbH, Bad Mergentheim, and Düsseldorf. L.H. is a consultant for several companies that are developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic options for diabetes treatment. M.A.K. has nothing to disclose.

Study Objective: Although a prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality in the general population, its prognostic value in surgical patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether preoperative QTcI prolongation predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery., Design: The study was a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX network database., Setting: Operating room., Intervention: Assessment and categorization of preoperative QTcI., Patients: Data of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed., Measurements: Patients were categorized into four groups based on preoperative QTcI: long (500-600 ms), borderline (460-500 ms), high-normal (420-460 ms) and control (370-420 ms) groups. The groups were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was the all-cause 90-day mortality risk. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risks of postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (Af), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), emergency visits, hospital readmissions, and pneumonia., Results: In total, data on 519,929 patients were collected in this study. Pairwise comparisons showed that all QTcI prolongation groups demonstrated a heightened incidence of postoperative mortality, arrhythmias, and other complications compared to the control group. Patients with a long QTcI had a 3-fold higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.124, p < 0.001), Af (HR = 3.059, p < 0.001), and VAs (HR = 3.617, p < 0.001) than controls. The risks of emergency visits (HR = 1.287, p < 0.001), hospital readmissions (HR = 1.591, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (HR = 1.672, p < 0.001) were also higher in the long QTcI group than in the control group. A dose-dependent response was evident between QTcI and mortality as well as arrhythmia risk., Conclusion: Preoperative QTcI screening effectively risk-stratifies elderly surgical patients, with a QTcI≥500 ms being strongly predictive of short-term postoperative mortality and other complications. Incorporating QTcI assessment into the preoperative evaluation may guide perioperative monitoring and management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: Quality of postoperative recovery is a crucial aspect of perioperative care. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous steroids in improving the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery, as measured by validated QoR scales., Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Setting: Operating room., Intervention: The use of a single dose of intravenous steroids as a supplement to general anesthesia., Patients: Adult patients undergoing surgery., Measurements: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE and Embase) from their inception to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous steroids with placebo or no treatment in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were included. The primary outcome was the QoR scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2-3, as assessed by validated QoR scales (QoR-15 and QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included QoR dimensions, analgesic rescue, pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)., Main Results: Eleven RCTs involving 951 patients were included in this study. The steroid group showed significant improvements in global QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.52; 95 % confidence interval[CI]: 0.22 to 0.82; P = 0.0007) and POD 2-3 (SMD: 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.81; P = 0.001) compared to the control group. Significant improvements were also observed in all QoR dimensions on POD 1, with the effect sizes ranging from small to moderate. Intravenous steroids also significantly reduced the analgesic rescue requirements (RR: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.88; P = 0.0003), postoperative pain scores (SMD: -0.41; 95 % CI: -0.68 to -0.14; P = 0.003), and PONV incidence (RR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.95; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Intravenous administration of steroids significantly improved QoR after surgery. The benefits of steroids extend to all dimensions of QoR and important clinical outcomes such as analgesic requirements, pain scores, and PONV. These findings support the use of steroids as an effective strategy to enhance the postoperative recovery quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous meta-analyses of intravenous iron supplementation for reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusion risk after cardiac surgery were inconclusive because of limited data. This updated meta-analysis incorporates recent evidence., Methods: Major databases were searched on May 2, 2024 for randomised controlled trials comparing the incidence of RBC transfusion between adult patients receiving intravenous iron supplementation and those receiving controls (i.e. oral iron or placebo) after cardiac surgery. The secondary outcomes included the number of RBC units transfused, postoperative haemoglobin levels, iron status, complications, and length of hospital stay. Trial sequential analysis was conducted to examine the robustness of evidence., Results: Fourteen randomised controlled trials including 2043 subjects were identified. Intravenous iron supplementation was found to reduce the RBC transfusion risk compared with controls (relative risk 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.91, P=0.002, n=1955, I 2 =61%, certainty of evidence: moderate). The trial sequential analysis supported the robustness of the evidence. Furthermore, haemoglobin levels were higher in the intravenous iron supplementation group on postoperative days 4-10 (mean difference 0.17 g dl -1 , 95% CI 0.06-0.29, n=1989) and >21 days (mean difference 0.66 g/dl -1 , 95% CI 0.36-0.95, n=1008). Postoperative iron status also improved with Intravenous iron supplementation, particularly on postoperative days 4-10. There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including mortality., Conclusions: Intravenous iron supplementation can reduce RBC transfusion risk and improve postoperative haemoglobin level and iron status after cardiac surgery, supporting the implementation of Intravenous iron supplementation in perioperative blood management strategies., Systematic Review Protocol: CRD42024542206 (PROSPERO)., (Copyright © 2024 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This meta-analysis investigated the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on the postoperative recovery quality, as assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) questionnaire, in adult surgical patients. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 622 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, magnesium sulfate significantly improved the global QoR score on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.78; p < 0.00001). It also enhanced specific QoR dimensions, with substantial effects on pain (SMD: 1, p < 0.00001) and physical comfort (SMD: 0.85, p < 0.0001), a moderate effect on emotional state (SMD: 0.65, p = 0.002), and small improvements in physical independence (SMD: 0.43, p < 0.00001) and psychological support (SMD: 0.37, p < 0.0001). In addition, magnesium sulfate reduced the intraoperative opioid consumption (SMD: -0.66, p < 0.0001), postoperative pain severity, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 0.48, p = 0.008). The extubation times were unaffected, whereas the post-anesthesia care unit stay was slightly prolonged. These findings highlight the potential of magnesium sulfate as a valuable adjunct for multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery. Future studies should aim to elucidate the optimal dosing strategies, timing of administration, and specific surgical populations that may derive maximum benefits.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a relatively common skin disease associated with hives and angio-oedema. Eosinophils play a role in CSU pathogenesis. Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor-α monoclonal antibody, has been shown to induce nearly complete depletion of eosinophils., Objectives: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with CSU who were symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine treatment., Methods: The 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb portion of the ARROYO trial enrolled adult patients with CSU who were currently on H1 antihistamine treatment. Patients were randomized to one of five treatment groups according to benralizumab dose and regimen for a 24-week treatment period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Itch Severity Score (ISS)7 at week 12. The key secondary endpoint was change from baseline in Urticaria Activity Score (UAS)7 at week 12. Additional secondary endpoints included other metrics to assess CSU at week 24, blood eosinophil levels, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity assessments. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted to explore responses according to demographics, clinical features and biomarkers. Safety was assessed in all treatment groups., Results: Of 155 patients, 59 were randomized to benralizumab 30 mg, 56 to benralizumab 60 mg and 40 to placebo. Baseline and disease characteristics were consistent with what was expected for patients with CSU. There were no significant differences in change from baseline in ISS7 score at week 12 between benralizumab and placebo [benralizumab 30 mg vs. placebo, least-squares mean difference -1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.28 to 1.26; benralizumab 60 mg vs. placebo, least-squares mean difference -1.79, 95% CI -4.09 to 0.50] nor in change from baseline in UAS7 score at week 12 between benralizumab and placebo (benralizumab 30 mg vs. placebo, P = 0.407; benralizumab 60 mg vs. placebo, P = 0.082). Depletion of blood eosinophil levels was observed at week 24 in patients treated with benralizumab. All other secondary endpoints and exploratory/subgroup analyses indicated no significant differences between benralizumab and placebo. Safety results were consistent with the known profile of benralizumab., Conclusions: Although benralizumab resulted in near-complete depletion of blood eosinophils, there was no clinical benefit over placebo., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest S.A. is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from AstraZeneca, BioCryst, Blueprint, CSL Behring, LEO Pharma, Moxie, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharvaris, Sanofi-Regeneron, Takeda and Thermo Fisher Scientific. A.M.G.-A. is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avene, Celldex, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Instituto Carlos III-FEDER, LEO Pharma, Menarini, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, Servier, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Uriach Pharma/Neucor. J.A.B. has been a consultant for Escient Pharmaceuticals, Jasper Therapeutics and Ono Pharmaceutical, and has been a principal investigator and consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celldex Therapeutics, Genentech, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron. M.M. has received honoraria as a speaker and/or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, argenx, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beiersdorf, Celldex, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Jasper Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharvaris, Sanofi, Teva, Third Harmonic Bio and Vifor. L. Bahadori, M.B., L.Brooks, C.N.H., P.J., P.B.L., E.R.-S., C.W. and C.J.D. are or were employees of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and may own stock or stock options., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Benralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear., Methods: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24., Results: A total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P<0.001). However, the change from baseline in the DSQ score did not differ significantly between the two groups (difference in least-squares means, 3.0 points; 95% CI, -1.4 to 7.4; P = 0.18). There was no substantial between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score, which reflects endoscopic abnormalities. Adverse events were reported in 64.1% of the patients in the benralizumab group and in 61.7% of those in the placebo group. No patients discontinued the trial because of adverse events., Conclusions: In this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ketamine/esketamine on postoperative subjective quality of recovery (QoR)., Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impacts of perioperative ketamine/esketamine use and postoperative QoR. The primary outcome was subjective QoR (QoR-9, QoR-15, QoR-40) on postoperative day (POD) 1-3, whereas the secondary outcomes included pain severity, anxiety scores, depression scores, risk of adverse events (i.e. nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness), and length of stay., Results: The analysis included 18 RCTs (1554 participants; ketamine: seven trials, esketamine: 11 trials), of which 15 were conducted in China. Ketamine/esketamine improved the QoR scores on PODs 1 and 2 compared with the control (standardised mean difference [SMD]: 0.63, P<0.0001 for POD 1; SMD: 0.56, P=0.04 for POD 2), without beneficial effect on POD 3. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in QoR scores on POD 1 by regimen (SMD: esketamine 1.14, ketamine 0.01) and country (SMD: China 0.82, other countries -0.21). The emotional domain of QoR was improved from PODs 1 to 3, whereas the other domains were only improved on POD 1. Lower postoperative anxiety (SMD: -0.48, P=0.003) and depression (SMD: -0.72, P=0.001) scores were also observed with ketamine/esketamine use. Furthermore, pain severity was reduced on PODs 1 and 2, with no difference in the risk of adverse events or length of stay., Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ketamine/esketamine use in the perioperative period is associated with improved early subjective QoR, pain severity, and psychological symptoms without an increase in the likelihood of adverse events., Systematic Review Protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42023477580)., (Copyright © 2024 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication that may increase morbidity and mortality risk following cardiac surgery. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is an emerging biomarker that provides an integrated measure of inflammation by incorporating neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts. Recent studies have reported associations between elevated SII and increased POAF risk; however, significant heterogeneity exists regarding its predictive efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess SII's diagnostic efficacy for predicting POAF risk., Methods: To synthesize existing evidence on the ability of perioperative SII for predicting POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. In August 2023, a comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant studies reporting SII cutoff values with corresponding sensitivity and specificity. The primary aim was to evaluate SII's diagnostic utility for predicting POAF, whereas secondary outcomes included the pooled incidence of POAF and the relationship between the SII and POAF., Results: Eight studies published between 2021 and 2023 with 3,245 patients were included. Six studies involved coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery; one encompassed various cardiac procedures, and another focused solely on mitral valve surgery. The pooled incidence of POAF was 23.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.7%-29.2%]. Elevated SII significantly increased the odds of POAF by 3.24-fold (odds ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.6-6.55; p  = 0.001). SII's pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting POAF were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.89) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.23-0.8), respectively. The SII had moderate predictive accuracy based on a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) area under the curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81). Subgroup analyses, whether focusing on CABG alone or CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), both indicated an area under the HSROC curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81)., Conclusion: Elevated SII is significantly correlated with an increased POAF risk following cardiac surgery, highlighting its utility as a predictive biomarker. Considering its moderate diagnostic accuracy, further research is essential for clarifying SII's clinical effectiveness, either as an independent predictor or combined with other risk factors, for stratifying patients at high POAF risk., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42023456128]., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Chen, Liu, Hsu, Hung, Chang, Ho, Hsing and Yiu.)

In this study, we explored the development of engineered inducible systems. Publicly available data from previous transposon sequencing assays were used to identify regulators of metabolism in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. For AraC family regulators (AFRs) represented in these data, we posited AFR/promoter/inducer groupings. Twelve promoters were characterized for a response to their proposed inducers in P. putida , and the resultant data were used to create and test nine two-plasmid sensor systems in Escherichia coli . Several of these were further developed into a palette of single-plasmid inducible systems. From these experiments, we observed an unreported inducer response from a previously characterized AFR, demonstrated that the addition of a P. putida transporter improved the sensor dynamics of an AFR in E. coli , and identified an uncharacterized AFR with a novel potential inducer specificity. Finally, targeted mutations in an AFR, informed by structural predictions, enabled the further diversification of these inducible plasmids.

Purpose: Accurate predictions of postoperative pain intensity are necessary for customizing analgesia plans. Insomnia is a risk factor for severe postoperative pain. Moreover, heart rate variability (HRV) can provide information on the sympathetic-parasympathetic balance in response to noxious stimuli. We developed a prediction model that uses the insomnia severity index (ISI), HRV, and other demographic factors to predict the odds of higher postoperative pain., Methods: We recruited gynecological surgery patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1-3. An ISI questionnaire was completed 1 day before surgery. HRV was calculated offline using intraoperative electrocardiogram data. Pain severity at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was assessed with the 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). The primary outcome was the model's predictive ability for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. The secondary outcome was the relationship between individual risk factors and opioid consumption in the PACU., Results: Our study enrolled 169 women. Higher ISI scores (p = 0.001), higher parasympathetic activity (rMSSD, pNN50, HF; p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001), loss of fractal dynamics (SD2, alpha 1; p = 0.012, p = 0.039) in HRV analysis before the end of surgery were associated with higher NRS scores, while laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.031) was associated with lower NRS scores. We constructed a multiple logistic model (area under the curve = 0.852) to predict higher NRS scores at PACU arrival. The five selected predictors were age (OR: 0.94; p = 0.020), ISI score (OR: 1.14; p = 0.002), surgery type (laparoscopic or open; OR: 0.12; p < 0.001), total power (OR: 2.02; p < 0.001), and alpha 1 (OR: 0.03; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: We employed a multiple logistic regression model to determine the likelihood of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain upon arrival at the PACU. Physicians could personalize analgesic regimens based on a deeper comprehension of the factors that contribute to postoperative pain., (© 2023 World Institute of Pain.)

Background: Systemic inflammation is one of the underlying mechanisms of cognitive impairment. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a systemic inflammation indicator. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between high NLR and cognitive impairment (CI) risk., Method: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted to identify eligible studies published until May 30, 2023. The reference group comprised patients with the lowest NLR level, whereas the exposure group comprised those with the highest NLR level. The main outcome was to examine the relationship between NLR and CI risk. The secondary outcome included the association between patient characteristics or comorbidities and CI risk., Results: This meta-analysis included 11 studies published between 2018 and 2023, involving 10,357 patients. Patients with CI had a higher NLR than those without (mean difference=0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.44, p < 00001, I 2 = 86%). Consistently, pooled results revealed an association between high NLR and CI risk (odds ratio [OR]=2.53, 95% CI:1.67-3.82, p <0.0001, I 2 = 84%). Furthermore, aging (mean difference =4.31 years, 95% CI:2.83-5.8, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 92%), diabetes (OR=1.59, 95% CI:1.35-1.88, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 66%), and hypertension (OR=1.36, 95% CI:1.19-1.57, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 0%) were significant risk factors for CI. However, no significant associations were observed between CI and male gender (OR = 0.84, 95% CI:0.64-1.11, p = 0.22, I 2 = 81%), body mass index (mean = -0.32 kg/m 2 , 95% CI: -0.82, 0.18, p = 0.2, I 2 = 82%), alcohol consumption (OR = 1.11, 95% CI:0.95-1.3, p = 1.35, I 2 = 0%), and smoking (OR = 0.99, 95% CI:0.87-1.13, p = 0.86, I 2 = 0%). Meta-regression found that diabetes and hypertension, but not age, significantly moderated the association between NLR and CI., Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed a significant association between high NLR and increased CI risk. Moreover, meta-regression identified diabetes and hypertension, but not age, as significant moderating factors in the relationship between NLR and CI. To validate and strengthen these findings, further large-scale studies are required., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?ID=CRD42023430384, identifier CRD42023430384., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Hung, Liu, Wu, Ho, Lin, Hsing and Chen.)

Background: Post-stroke depression (PSD) affects up to one-third of patients who survive stroke. This matched cohort study aimed to investigate the relationship between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and PSD using a global health research network., Methods: Adult patients with first-ever stroke were eligible for inclusion if their circulating vitamin D levels were available within 3 months before the onset of stroke. Patients were subdivided into those with VDD [VDD group, 25(OH) D < 20 ng/mL] and those with normal vitamin D levels [control group, 25(OH) D: 30-80 ng/mL]. By using propensity score matching (PSM), potential confounding factors were adjusted. The primary outcomes were the association of VDD with the risk of PSD at the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups, while the secondary outcomes were the relationships between VDD and the risk of pneumonia as well as emergency department visits at the 12-month follow-up., Results: After PSM, 758 individuals were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Musculoskeletal diseases, metabolic disorders, and hypertension were the three leading comorbidities in both the groups. The incidence of PSD was not significantly different between the two groups at the 3-month (5.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.358) and 12-month (11.6% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.364) follow-up. VDD was not associated with an increased risk of PSD at the 3-month [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.258, p = 0.358] or 12-month follow-up (HR = 1.210, p = 0.364). In addition, VDD was not associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (HR = 1.053, p = 0.823) or emergency visits at the 12-month follow-up (HR = 1.206, p = 0.148)., Conclusion: The results revealed no significant link between VDD and PSD risk during the 3-month and 12-month follow-up periods, suggesting that VDD might not play a substantial role in PSD risk. However, further extensive studies employing a prospective design are necessary to explore the potential protective effects of vitamin D against PSD and validate these findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Ho, Sun, Wu, Chen, Chang, Chen and Hung.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of gefapixant in adults with chronic cough remain unclear. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of gefapixant using updated evidence., Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 2022. Subgroup analysis based on dose of gefapixant ( i.e. ≤20, 45-50 and ≥100 mg twice daily for low, moderate and high doses, respectively) was performed to explore a potential dose-dependent effect., Results: Five studies involving seven trials showed the efficacy of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant for reducing objective 24-h cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 30.9% and 58.5%, respectively) ( i.e. primary outcome) and awake cough frequency (estimated relative reduction 47.3% and 62.8%, respectively). Night-time cough frequency was only reduced with high-dose gefapixant. Consistently, the use of moderate- or high-dose gefapixant significantly alleviated cough severity and improved cough-related quality of life, but increased the risk of all-cause adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs and ageusia/dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Subgroup analysis showed dose dependency in both efficacy and AEs with a cut-off dose being ≥45 mg twice daily., Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed dose-dependent efficacy and adverse effects of gefapixant against chronic cough. Further studies are required to investigate the feasibility of moderate-dose ( i.e. 45-50 mg twice daily) gefapixant in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: The associations between blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/albumin ratio and poor prognosis in patients with diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain to be clarified., Methods: A search based on 4 electronic databases (i.e., EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) was performed on June 23, 2022. The association of BUN/Albumin ratio with poor prognostic outcomes, defined as patients with mortality/severe illnesses, were analyzed., Results: Results from analysis of 7 cohort studies (3600 individuals with COVID-19) published between 2020 and 2022 showed a higher BUN/Albumin ratio in the poor-prognosis group (Mean difference:  = 2.838, 95% confidence interval: 2.015-3.66, P < .001, I2 = 92.5%) than the good-prognosis group. Additional investigation into the connection between BUN/Albumin ratio as a binary variable (i.e., high or low) and the risk of poor outcome also supported an association between a higher BUN/Albumin ratio and a poor prognostic risk (odd ratio = 3.009, 95% confidence interval: 1.565-5.783, P = .001, I2 = 93.7%, 5 studies). Merged analysis of poor prognosis produced a sensitivity of 0.76, specificity of 0.72, and area under curve of 0.81., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between BUN/albumin ratio and poor outcome in patients with COVID-19. Additional large-scale prospective studies are needed to verify our findings., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Despite the demonstrated analgesic efficacy of scalp block (SB) during the immediate postoperative period, the impact of SB on pain outcomes at postoperative 24 and 48 h in adults receiving craniotomy remains unclear., Methods: The databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to January 2022 for available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the severity of pain at postoperative 24 and 48 h, while the secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, hemodynamic profiles after surgical incision and in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and risk of postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV)., Results: Meta-analysis of 12 studies revealed a lower pain score [MD = -0.83, p = 0.03, 375 patients, certainty of evidence (COE): low] and morphine consumption (MD = -9.21 mg, p = 0.03, 246 patients, COE: low) at postoperative 24 h, while there were no differences in these pain outcomes at postoperative 48 h (COE: low). The use of SB significantly decreased intraoperative heart rate (MD = -10.9 beats/min, p < 0.0001, 189 patients, COE: moderate) and mean blood pressure (MD = -13.02 mmHg, p < 0.00001, 189 patients, COE: moderate) after surgical incision, but these hemodynamic profiles were comparable in both groups in the PACU setting. There was also no difference in the risk of PONV between the two groups (RR = 0.78, p = 0.2, 299 patients, COE: high)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that scalp block not only provided hemodynamic stability immediately after surgical incision but was also associated with a lower pain score and morphine consumption at postoperative 24 h. Further studies are needed for elucidation of its findings., (© 2022 World Institute of Pain.)

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare but life-threatening genetic disorder of the skeletal muscles triggered by inhalation anesthetics or succinylcholine. A 49-year-old female developed symptoms of MH shortly after a lumbar surgery. Despite being insidious, MH was diagnosed based on the clinical grading scale. We incidentally discovered fine fasciculations in extremities while inserting an ultrasound-guided arterial catheter. On receiving dantrolene, her symptoms improved within 20 minutes; a subsequent ultrasound revealed no fasciculations. Although halothane contracture testing was not available, the fasciculations that resolved with dantrolene administration in a MH suspected patient opens up a new potential avenue of diagnostics., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Background: The association of prior bariatric surgery (BS) with infection rate and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to address this issue., Methods: We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to May, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of mortality, while secondary outcomes included risk of hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), and infection rate., Results: Eleven studies involving 151,475 patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed lower risks of mortality [odd ratio (OR)= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.65, p < 0.001, I 2 = 67%; nine studies; 151,113 patients, certainty of evidence (COE):moderate], hospital admission (OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.85, p = 0.007, I 2 =74.6%; seven studies; 17,810 patients; COE:low), ICU admission (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.001, I 2 =0%; six studies; 17,496 patients, COE:moderate), mechanical ventilation (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p < 0.001, I 2 =57.1%; seven studies; 137,992 patients, COE:moderate) in patients with prior BS (BS group) than those with obesity without surgical treatment (non-BS group). There was no difference in risk of AKI (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.41-1.32, p = 0.304, I 2 =83.6%; four studies; 129,562 patients, COE: very low) and infection rate (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.89-1.22, p = 0.572, I 2 =0%; four studies; 12,633 patients, COE:low) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis from matched cohort studies demonstrated associations of prior BS with lower risks of mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and AKI., Conclusion: Our results showed a correlation between prior BS and less severe COVID-19, which warrants further investigations to verify., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The impact of intraoperative esophageal device insertion (EDI) on endotracheal tube (ET) cuff inflation pressure remains unclear. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Google scholar, Web of Science™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies involving EDI after placement of ETs from inception to July 7, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of high cuff pressure, while the secondary outcomes were increases in cuff pressure following EDI. Difference between adults and children was investigated with subgroup analysis. There were ten eligible studies (observation study, n = 9, randomized controlled study, n = 1) involving a total of 468 participants. EDI notably increased the risk of high cuff pressure (n = 7, risk ratio: 12.82, 95% confidence interval: 4.9 to 33.52, subgroup analysis: p = 0.008). There were significant elevations in cuff pressure in adults and children both during (13.42 and 7.88 cmH 2 O, respectively, subgroup analysis: p = 0.15) and after (10.09 and 3.99 cmH 2 O, respectively, subgroup analysis: p = 0.0003) EDI. Our results revealed an over 12-fold increase in the risk of high endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients, especially adults, receiving EDI under endotracheal anesthesia. There were significant increases in both adults and children despite a higher increase in the former after device insertion., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: To investigate the efficacy of combined epidural anaesthesia/analgesia (EAA) against postoperative delirium/cognitive dysfunction (POD/POCD) in adults after major non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia (GA)., Methods: The databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to November 2021 for available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of EAA on risk of POD/POCD. The primary outcome was risk of POD/POCD, while the secondary outcomes comprised postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay (LOS), risk of complications, and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV)., Results: Meta-analysis of eight studies with a total of 2376 patients (EAA group: 1189 patients; non-EAA group: 1187 patients) revealed no difference in risk of POD/POCD between the EAA and the non-EAA groups [Risk ratio (RR): 0.68; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.13, p = 0.14, I 2  = 73%], but the certainty of evidence was very low. Nevertheless, the EAA group had lower pain score at postoperative 24 h [mean difference (MD): -1.49, 95% CI: -2.38 to -0.61; I 2  = 98%; five RCTs; n = 476] and risk of PONV (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93, p = 0.01, I 2  = 0%; three RCTs, 1876 patients) than those in the non-EAA group. Our results showed no significant impact of EAA on the pain score at postoperative 36-72 h, LOS, and risk of complications., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that EAA had no significant impact on the incidence of POD/POCD in patients following non-cardiac surgery., (Copyright © 2022 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed at providing an updated evidence of the association between intraoperative lidocaine and risk of postcardiac surgery cognitive deficit., Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating effects of intravenous lidocaine against cognitive deficit in adults undergoing cardiac surgeries were retrieved from the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google scholar, and Cochrane controlled trials register databases from inception till May 2021. Risk of cognitive deficit was the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints were length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit/hospital. Impact of individual studies and cumulative evidence reliability were evaluated with sensitivity analyses and trial sequential analysis, respectively., Results: Six RCTs involving 963 patients published from 1999 to 2019 were included. In early postoperative period (i.e., 2 weeks), the use of intravenous lidocaine (overall incidence = 14.8%) was associated with a lower risk of cognitive deficit compared to that with placebo (overall incidence = 33.1%) (relative risk = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.75). However, sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analysis signified insufficient evidence to arrive at a firm conclusion. In the late postoperative period (i.e., 6-10 weeks), perioperative intravenous lidocaine (overall incidence = 37.9%) did not reduce the risk of cognitive deficit (relative risk = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.84) compared to the placebo (overall incidence = 38.6%). Intravenous lidocaine was associated with a shortened LOS in intensive care unit/hospital with weak evidence., Conclusion: Our results indicated a prophylactic effect of intravenous lidocaine against cognitive deficit only at the early postoperative period despite insufficient evidence. Further large-scale studies are warranted to assess its use for the prevention of cognitive deficit and enhancement of recovery (e.g., LOS)., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Self-reported effectiveness of electroencephalogram-based neurofeedback (EEG-NF) against the core symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents/adults remains unclear. We searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 2021 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of EEG-NF with self-reported ADHD symptom ratings. Comparators included participants on waitlist/treatment as usual (TAU) or receiving other interventions. Of the 279 participants (mean age = 23.48; range: 6-60) in five eligible RCTs, 183 received EEG-NF treatment. Forest plot demonstrated no difference in inattention (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI -0.39-0.18, p = 0.46), total score (SMD = -0.08, 95% CI -0.36-0.2, p = 0.56), and hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.23-0.25, p = 0.91) between EEG-NF and comparison groups. Nevertheless, compared with waitlist/TAU, EEG-NF showed better improvement in inattention (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -0.9--0.06, p = 0.03) but not hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = -0.03, 95% CI -0.45-0.38, p = 0.87). Follow-up 6-12 months demonstrated no difference in inattention (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.41-0.38, p = 0.94), total score (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.08-0.52, p = 0.15), and hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.27-0.26, p = 0.96) between the two groups. Dropout rate also showed no difference (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.82-1.33, p = 0.72). Our results support EEG-NF for improving inattention in adolescents/young adults, although its effectiveness against hyperactivity/impulsivity remains inconclusive., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Study Objective: To evaluate the impact of high flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) on the risk of hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (GEPs) under sedation., Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials., Setting: Gastrointestinal endoscopy., Intervention: HFNO., Patients: Adults patients undergoing GEPs under sedation., Measurements: The primary outcome was risk of hypoxemia, while the secondary outcomes included risks of severe hypoxemia, hypercapnia, need for jaw thrust or other airway interventions, and procedural interruption as well as procedure time, minimum SpO 2 , and level of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). Analyses based on age, gender, flow rate, risk status of patients were performed to investigate subgroup effects., Results: Medline, Google scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to July 2021. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2998 patients published from 2019 to 2021 were included. All GEPs were performed under propofol sedation. Pooled results revealed significantly lower risks of hypoxemia [relative risk (RR) = 0.31, 95% CI:0.13-0.75; 2998 patients], severe hypoxemia (RR = 0.38, 95% CI:0.2-0.74; 2766 patients), other airway interventions (RR = 0.34, 95% CI:0.22-0.52; 2736 patients), procedural interruption (RR = 0.12, 95% CI:0.02-0.64, 451 patients) and a lower CO 2 level [standard mean difference (MD) = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.4 to -0.03; 458 patients] in HFNO group compared to control group. Subgroup analysis focusing on risk of hypoxemia showed no significant subgroup effects, indicating consistent benefits of HFNO in different clinical settings. There were no difference in minimum SpO 2 (p = 0.06; 262 patients), risk of hypercapnia (p = 0.09; 393 patients), need for jaw thrust (p = 0.28; 2256 patients), and procedure time (p = 0.41, 1004 patients) between the two groups., Conclusion: Our results demonstrated the efficacy of high flow nasal oxygenation for reducing the risk of hypoxemia in patients receiving elective gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under sedation. Further studies are warranted to verify its cost-effectiveness in the gastrointestinal endoscopy setting., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy of i.v. or topical lidocaine as an anaesthesia adjunct in improving clinical outcomes in patients receiving gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under propofol sedation remains unclear., Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched for RCTs comparing the clinical outcomes with or without lidocaine application (i.v. or topical) in patients receiving propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures from inception to 29 March 2021. The primary outcome was propofol dosage, while secondary outcomes included procedure time, recovery time, adverse events (e.g. oxygen desaturation), post-procedural pain, and levels of endoscopist and patient satisfaction., Results: Twelve trials (1707 patients) published between 2011 and 2020 demonstrated that addition of i.v. (n=7) or topical (n=5) lidocaine to propofol sedation decreased the level of post-procedural pain (standardised mean difference [SMD]=-0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.8 to -0.14), risks of gag events (risk ratio [RR]=0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.75), and involuntary movement (RR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that only i.v. lidocaine reduced propofol dosage required for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (SMD=-0.83, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.47), increased endoscopist satisfaction (SMD=0.75, 95% CI: 0.21-1.29), and shortened the recovery time (SMD=-0.83, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.21). Intravenous or topical lidocaine did not affect the incidence of oxygen desaturation (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.41-1.24) or arterial hypotension (RR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.22-1.65) and procedure time (SMD=0.21, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.51)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that i.v. or topical lidocaine appears safe to use and may be of benefit for improving propofol sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Further large-scale trials are warranted to support our findings., (Copyright © 2021 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument with evidence of validity and reliability for assessing symptoms of eosinophilic gastritis (EG) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is needed to measure treatment benefit in clinical trials. The aim of this research is to develop an EG/EGE symptom PRO instrument for patients aged 12 and above., Methods: The Symptom Assessment for Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases (SAGED) was developed through a literature review, discussions with expert clinicians, and concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews with patients. Patients (n = 28) were recruited based on confirmed diagnosis and self-reported symptoms. The final instrument was translated and linguistically validated with additional cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 105)., Results: SAGED is a 24-h recall questionnaire consisting of eight items evaluating the core symptoms of EG and EGE (abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, early satiety, loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea). Seven of the eight items are evaluated on an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 'none' to 'worst imaginable'. Cognitive debriefing interviews showed that adults and adolescents understand the content and are able to select a response that reflects their experience. The linguistic validation process produced 21 translations that are understandable to patients and conceptually equivalent to the source version., Conclusions: SAGED is suitable for measuring symptom improvement in adult and adolescent patients with EG and/or EGE. The content validity of SAGED has been established through best practices in qualitative research for PRO instrument development. The psychometric properties of SAGED will be evaluated in a future study., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: School-based green space activities have been found to be beneficial to the physical activity level and lifestyle habits of adolescent students. However, their effects on green space use and satisfaction, mental health, and dietary behaviors required further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of school-based hydroponic planting integrated with health promotion activities in improving green space use, competence and satisfaction, healthy lifestyle, mental health, and health-related quality of life (QoL) among early adolescent students in secondary schools. Methods: This study adopted a three-group comparison design (one control and two intervention groups). Secondary school students ( N = 553) of grades 7-9 participated in either (1) hydroponic planting (two times per week for 8 months) integrated with health promotion activities; (2) only health promotion activities (one time per week for 6 weeks); or (3) control group. Outcomes assessed by questionnaire included green space use and satisfaction, life happiness, lifestyle, depressive symptoms, and health-related QoL. Results: After adjusting for sex and school grade, the scores in "green space distance and use" and "green space activity and competence" were significantly better in the intervention groups than in the control group. Hydroponic planting integrated with health promotion activities was also associated with better scores in dietary habits and resistance to substance use. Intervention groups had a higher score in "Green space sense and satisfaction" and life happiness when compared with the control group. Conclusions: Our study shows that the school-based hydroponic planting integrated with health promotion activities were feasible and, to a certain extent, useful to improve green space use and competence, dietary habits, and resistance to substance use among early adolescent students in secondary schools in urban areas. Future studies should address the limitations identified, for example, designing a randomized controlled trial that could fit school schedules to generate new evidence for physical and mental health in adolescent communities., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Kwok, Wu, Tong, Ho, Leung, Leung, Lui and Wong.)

Background: This meta-analysis aimed at addressing the impact of aminophylline use on risk and severity of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)., Methods: Electronic databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane controlled trials register) were searched from inception to the 12 th of January 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of aminophylline for treatment (i.e., primary outcome) or prophylaxis (i.e., secondary outcome) against PDPH in various clinical settings. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020207713)., Results: A total of ten RCTs (n = 976) were included for analysis. Five studies (n = 270) revealed a lower pain score in patients with PDPH receiving aminophylline than that in the placebo group (standardised mean differences = -1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.76 to -0.91). In contrast, five trials (four on Caesarean sections and one on lower extremity surgeries, n = 706) demonstrated no prophylactic effect of aminophylline against PDPH at 24 [risk ratio (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.30-1.63, n = 637], 48 (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22-1.05, n = 506), and 72 (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.54-1.48, n = 317) hours. Nevertheless, sensitivity analysis demonstrated significant prophylactic efficacy after removal of one study adopting a relatively low dose of aminophylline (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.67). Most studies reported no increase in the incidence of adverse events associated with aminophylline use compared with that in the control group., Conclusion: Our results indicated that aminophylline might be a reasonable alternative for treating PDPH. However, its use for prevention was not established in this meta-analysis and further large-scale studies are warranted to support this option., (Copyright © 2021 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the impact of oral vitamin C supplementation on the post-procedural recovery of orthopedic patients, including functional outcomes and complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I). Literature search using the Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception till March 2021 identified seven eligible randomized controlled trials with 1,361 participants. Forest plot revealed no significant difference in the functional outcomes at 6-12 months [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.00, 95% CI - 0.19 to 0.18, 467 patients], risk of overall complications (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.39, 426 patients), and pain severity at 3-6 months (SMD = - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.49 to 0.12, 486 patients) between patients with and without oral vitamin C supplementation. Pooled analysis showed that vitamin C treatment reduced the risk of CRPS I regardless of dosage (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85, 1143 patients). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis demonstrated that oral vitamin C supplementation may reduce the risk of complex regional pain syndrome type I but did not improve the functional outcomes in orthopedic patients. Nevertheless, because of the small number of trials included in the present study, further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to support our findings.

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies, coagulated blood, or necrotic debris is sometimes challenging and time-consuming, partly because of inadequate endoscopic instruments. Therefore, new devices are needed to overcome the current limitations. METHODS : The over-the-scope grasper (OTSG) is a new grasping tool that can be attached to any standard gastroscope. It has been developed for endoscopic removal of larger particles. We present retrospective data on five patients who were treated using the device for various indications, including necrosectomy, bolus impaction, and removal of blood clots. RESULTS : In two patients, the OTSG was used through a lumen-apposing metal stent for direct endoscopic necrosectomy after severe pancreatitis. The other patients had a massive blood clot in the esophagus after endoscopic submucosal dissection, or aphagia due to large meat chunks clogging the esophagus. The OTSG was used with technical success in all of the patients and without any procedure-associated complications. CONCLUSION : The OTSG appears to be a useful device for endoscopic removal of larger particles, blood clots, or necrotic debris. Preliminary experience shows that the device is effective and easy to use., Competing Interests: A. Meining has been a consultant for OVESCO AG, Germany. N. Hofmann and C.-N. Ho are employees of OVESCO AG, Germany. M. Brand declares that he has no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To improve resection speed and to reach higher en bloc resection rates in lesions ≥ 2 cm, a novel grasp and snare EMR technique termed "EMR+", accomplished by an additional working channel (AWC), was developed. Its use compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is evaluated for the first time., Material and Methods: We prospectively conducted a randomized pre-clinical ex-vivo pilot study in explanted porcine stomachs for the comparison of EMR + with classical ESD of mucosal-based lesions. Prior to intervention, we set flat lesions with a standardized size of 3 × 3 cm., Results: The median time of procedure was significantly shorter in the EMR + group (median 10.5 min, range 4.4-24 min) than in the ESD group (median 32 min, range 14-61.6 min, p  < .0001). The rate of en bloc resection was significantly lower in the EMR + group (38 % vs. 95 %) ( p  < .0001). Nevertheless, an improvement in the learning curve for EMR + was achieved after the first 12 procedures, with a subsequent en bloc resection rate of 100 %., Conclusions: EMR + could improve the efficiency of mucosal resection procedures. Initial experience demonstrates a higher and satisfactory en bloc resection rate after going through the learning curve of EMR+.