Search

Over half of the total rainfall and more than 70% of heavy and extreme rainfall in the Melbourne, Australia, region occurs on days with linearly organized precipitation. These systems are typically convective in nature and frequently associated with cold fronts. It is useful to understand the processes that support extreme rainfall in organized convection, for prediction of both near-term and future extreme rainfall, and the topography and climate of Melbourne are different from many of the regions where QLCSs have been studied more extensively (e.g., the U. S. Great Plains region). On both 7 and 8 December 2010, a QLCS passed through the Melbourne region. Both QLCSs resembled classic systems on radar, but heavy rainfall was much more widespread on the second day. The goals of this work are to 1) understand the processes that drive these seemingly similar QLCSs; 2) explore the relationship between the convective inflow layer and moisture sources; and 3) to better understand the characteristics of rain bearing systems in the Melbourne region, which have received little attention to date. A convection-permitting WRF-ARW simulation captures both events. The mesoscale structure is different in each case, but generally is explainable by the existing theory. The development of a mesoscale downdraft, along with more moisture (and CAPE) over a deeper layer, contributed to higher rainfall totals on the second day. Low-level moisture in the QLCS region comes from the east, and parcel trajectories become increasingly westerly with height. On the second day some parcels originate in the tropics; these tend to have the most moisture. Significance Statement: A lot of the rain that falls in Melbourne, Australia, occurs in storms that are grouped or "organized" in the shape of a line. Many studies have looked at how lines of storms work in other places in the world. In southeast Australia, only one study in the 1980s looked at observations of a line of storms. Since then, our understanding of storms and our ability to use computer models to simulate them has improved considerably. In this study we simulate two lines of storms that happened two days in a row. We found that even though they looked similar on weather radar, they had many differences including how air flows through the storm, the role of rain-cooled air, and where moisture comes from. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The job search and application process can be stressful and, at times, overwhelming. Young members of the weather, water, and climate enterprise who are looking to enter the job market [...]

Most job, internship, and graduate school applications require a CV or resume to be included as part of the submitted application. With a seemingly ever-increasing applicant pool, what sets your [...]

Focussing on the major cities of Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne in southeast Australia, this study seeks to determine the environmental factors that distinguish between heavy rainfall events (HREs) and extreme rainfall events (EREs). Using daily rain gauge observations, HREs and EREs are defined for each domain based, respectively, on the 95th and 99th percentiles of wet‐day rainfall for the period 1979–2018. K‐means clustering is applied to mean sea‐level pressure, data from ERA5 to obtain a set of representative large‐scale circulation patterns associated with these events. Composite synoptic maps, mean vertical profiles, and a series of column‐integrated diagnostics are then examined for each cluster and used to compare the environmental characteristics of HREs and EREs. For all three cities, HREs are associated with an upper‐level trough to the west, with large‐scale ascent, positive column water vapour (CWV) anomalies, and strong moisture transport over the analysis domain. For Brisbane and Sydney, the clusters are characterised by a coastal trough/low with moist onshore flow from the Tasman and Coral Seas. For Melbourne, circulation patterns are more distinct, with clusters characterised by a front, a cut‐off low, and an inland trough. Compared with HREs, EREs show a more amplified upper‐level trough, with stronger vertical motion and larger CWV anomalies over the analysis domain. In Brisbane and Sydney, EREs also feature stronger and deeper onshore flow, promoting enhanced moisture transport. A diagnostic termed upward vapour transport, which combines the key ingredients of high CWV and large‐scale ascent, is shown to discriminate well between HREs and EREs in all three domains. In contrast, surface temperature, which is frequently linked to rainfall extremes via Clausius–Clapeyron scaling, shows significant overlap between the different event categories, particularly for Brisbane and Sydney. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The intensity of deep convective storms is driven in part by the strength of their updrafts and cold pools. In spite of the importance of these storm features, they can be poorly represented within numerical models. This has been attributed to model parameterizations, grid resolution, and the lack of appropriate observations with which to evaluate such simulations. The overarching goal of the Colorado State University Convective CLoud Outflows and UpDrafts Experiment (C3LOUD-Ex) was to enhance our understanding of deep convective storm processes and their representation within numerical models. To address this goal, a field campaign was conducted during July 2016 and May–June 2017 over northeastern Colorado, southeastern Wyoming, and southwestern Nebraska. Pivotal to the experiment was a novel "Flying Curtain" strategy designed around simultaneously employing a fleet of uncrewed aerial systems (UAS; or drones), high-frequency radiosonde launches, and surface observations to obtain detailed measurements of the spatial and temporal heterogeneities of cold pools. Updraft velocities were observed using targeted radiosondes and radars. Extensive datasets were successfully collected for 16 cold pool–focused and seven updraft-focused case studies. The updraft characteristics for all seven supercell updraft cases are compared and provide a useful database for model evaluation. An overview of the 16 cold pools' characteristics is presented, and an in-depth analysis of one of the cold pool cases suggests that spatial variations in cold pool properties occur on spatial scales from O(100) m through to O(1) km. Processes responsible for the cold pool observations are explored and support recent high-resolution modeling results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Have you ever wondered about what it takes to be successful in graduate school? What can you do now to prepare for your graduate school adventure? This past year at [...]