Search

Copyright of Journal of Cultural Studies / Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Journal of Cultural Studies / Kultur Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The first section of Ahmet Hamdi Tanpinar's History of Turkish Literature in Nineteenth Century, in which he studied the westernization of Turkish literature, was published in 1942. Believing that the first volume of the book would be completed in 1943, Tanpinar decided to publish the book after writing the remaining chapters. The remaining chapters and book that he considered the first volume of his study were completed in 1949. In 1956, the second revised edition of the book was published. However, during this revision the organization of the text and nature of the topics discussed were changed. The changes made it possible to consider the second edition, published in 1956, as a rewrite. In this study, it is aimed to compare the 1949 and 1956 editions of the History of Turkish Literature in Nineteenth Century and determine the differences. Therefore, the changes made by Tanpinar between the 1949 and 1956 editions were divided into categories of organization, content, and style. It is considered that determining the differences between the two editions is functional in terms of showing the intellectual/visional transformation of the author during the revision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

history of Turkish literature since the first day the subject of writing a history of the Turkish literature has been brought to the agenda of Turkish men of letters. The date, which the Turkish literature should be started with, has been one of the main controversial issues. Another issue has been to analyze and understand adequately the extend of the influence of different cultures and consequently religions and philosophies on Turkish literature, which has been entailed by the mightiness of the geographical area on which the Turks live. The fact that, when compared to the past, the Turkish literature poses much more diversity and disunity as a result of political developments since the end of the 19th century and particularly during the 20th century complicates the issue further for the historian of Turkish literature.

It has been a matter of discussion whether it is possible to write a complete history of Turkish literature since the first day the subject of writing a history of the Turkish literature has been brought to the agenda of Turkish men of letters. The date, which the Turkish literature should be started with, has been one of the main controversial issues. Another issue has been to analyze and understand adequately the extend of the influence of different cultures and consequently religions and philosophies on Turkish literature, which has been entailed by the mightiness of the geographical area on which the Turks live. The fact that, when compared to the past, the Turkish literature poses much more diversity and disunity as a result of political developments since the end of the 19th century and particularly during the 20th century complicates the issue further for the historian of Turkish literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkbilig/Turkoloji Arastirmalari Dergisi is the property of Turkbilig/Turkoloji Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Bases Of Research: Do academicians adequately benefit from scientific studies on literary magazines? Purpose Of The Research: The main purpose of this study is to emphasize the role of Rübab magazine, published during II.Constitutional Monarchy era, in respest of determination of social factors which reflected new Turkish Literature Resources Of Data: 116 volumes of Rübab magazine under authority of Cemal Nadir from 07 February of 1911 to 23 May of 1913. Maın Dıscussıon: Conclusıons: The Rübab magazine has had a prodominant affect on development and alteration of new Turkish Literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Electronic Turkish Studies is the property of Electronic Turkish Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)