Search

IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of deaths worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of its precursor lesion, the polyp, is key to reduce its mortality and to improve procedure efficiency. During the last two decades, several computational methods have been proposed to assist clinicians in detection, segmentation and classification tasks but the lack of a common public validation framework makes it difficult to determine which of them is ready to be deployed in the exploration room.MethodsThis study presents a complete validation framework and we compare several methodologies for each of the polyp characterization tasks.ResultsResults show that the majority of the approaches are able to provide good performance for the detection and segmentation task, but that there is room for improvement regarding polyp classification.DiscussionWhile studied show promising results in the assistance of polyp detection and segmentation tasks, further research should be done in classification task to obtain reliable results to assist the clinicians during the procedure. The presented framework provides a standarized method for evaluating and comparing different approaches, which could facilitate the identification of clinically prepared assisting methods.

Abstract Several Diptera species are known to transmit pathogens of medical and veterinary interest. However, identifying these species using conventional methods can be time-consuming, labor-intensive, or expensive. A computer vision-based system that uses Wing interferential patterns (WIPs) to identify these insects could solve this problem. This study introduces a dataset for training and evaluating a recognition system for dipteran insects of medical and veterinary importance using WIPs. The dataset includes pictures of Culicidae, Calliphoridae, Muscidae, Tabanidae, Ceratopogonidae, and Psychodidae. The dataset is complemented by previously published datasets of Glossinidae and some Culicidae members. The new dataset contains 2,399 pictures of 18 genera, with each genus documented by a variable number of species and annotated as a class. The dataset covers species variation, with some genera having up to 300 samples.

Polyp segmentation within colonoscopy video frames using deep learning models has the potential to automate colonoscopy screening procedures. This could help improve the early lesion detection rate and in vivo characterization of polyps which could develop into colorectal cancer. Recent state-of-the-art deep learning polyp segmentation models have combined Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures and Transformer Network (TN) architectures. Motivated by the aim of improving the performance of polyp segmentation models and their robustness to data variations beyond those covered during training, we propose a new CNN-TN hybrid model named the FCB-SwinV2 Transformer. This model was created by making extensive modifications to the recent state-of-the-art FCN-Transformer, including replacing the TN branch architecture with a SwinV2 U-Net. The performance of the FCB-SwinV2 Transformer is evaluated on the popular colonoscopy segmentation benchmarking datasets Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ClinicDB and ETIS-LaribPolypDB. Generalizability tests are also conducted to determine if models can maintain accuracy when evaluated on data outside of the training distribution. The FCB-SwinV2 Transformer consistently achieves higher mean Dice and mean IoU scores when compared to other models reported in literature and therefore represents new state-of-the-art performance. The importance of understanding subtleties in evaluation metrics and dataset partitioning are also demonstrated and discussed. Code available: https://github.com/KerrFitzgerald/Polyp_FCB-SwinV2Transformer

Abstract Sandflies (Diptera; Psychodidae) are medical and veterinary vectors that transmit diverse parasitic, viral, and bacterial pathogens. Their identification has always been challenging, particularly at the specific and sub-specific levels, because it relies on examining minute and mostly internal structures. Here, to circumvent such limitations, we have evaluated the accuracy and reliability of Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) generated on the surface of sandfly wings in conjunction with deep learning (DL) procedures to assign specimens at various taxonomic levels. Our dataset proves that the method can accurately identify sandflies over other dipteran insects at the family, genus, subgenus, and species level with an accuracy higher than 77.0%, regardless of the taxonomic level challenged. This approach does not require inspection of internal organs to address identification, does not rely on identification keys, and can be implemented under field or near-field conditions, showing promise for sandfly pro-active and passive entomological surveys in an era of scarcity in medical entomologists.

Abstract Hematophagous insects belonging to the Aedes genus are proven vectors of viral and filarial pathogens of medical interest. Aedes albopictus is an increasingly important vector because of its rapid worldwide expansion. In the context of global climate change and the emergence of zoonotic infectious diseases, identification tools with field application are required to strengthen efforts in the entomological survey of arthropods with medical interest. Large scales and proactive entomological surveys of Aedes mosquitoes need skilled technicians and/or costly technical equipment, further puzzled by the vast amount of named species. In this study, we developed an automatic classification system of Aedes species by taking advantage of the species-specific marker displayed by Wing Interferential Patterns. A database holding 494 photomicrographs of 24 Aedes spp. from which those documented with more than ten pictures have undergone a deep learning methodology to train a convolutional neural network and test its accuracy to classify samples at the genus, subgenus, and species taxonomic levels. We recorded an accuracy of 95% at the genus level and > 85% for two (Ochlerotatus and Stegomyia) out of three subgenera tested. Lastly, eight were accurately classified among the 10 Aedes sp. that have undergone a training process with an overall accuracy of > 70%. Altogether, these results demonstrate the potential of this methodology for Aedes species identification and will represent a tool for the future implementation of large-scale entomological surveys.

BACKGROUND : Artificial intelligence (AI) research in colonoscopy is progressing rapidly but widespread clinical implementation is not yet a reality. We aimed to identify the top implementation research priorities. METHODS : An established modified Delphi approach for research priority setting was used. Fifteen international experts, including endoscopists and translational computer scientists/engineers, from nine countries participated in an online survey over 9 months. Questions related to AI implementation in colonoscopy were generated as a long-list in the first round, and then scored in two subsequent rounds to identify the top 10 research questions. RESULTS : The top 10 ranked questions were categorized into five themes. Theme 1: clinical trial design/end points (4 questions), related to optimum trial designs for polyp detection and characterization, determining the optimal end points for evaluation of AI, and demonstrating impact on interval cancer rates. Theme 2: technological developments (3 questions), including improving detection of more challenging and advanced lesions, reduction of false-positive rates, and minimizing latency. Theme 3: clinical adoption/integration (1 question), concerning the effective combination of detection and characterization into one workflow. Theme 4: data access/annotation (1 question), concerning more efficient or automated data annotation methods to reduce the burden on human experts. Theme 5: regulatory approval (1 question), related to making regulatory approval processes more efficient. CONCLUSIONS : This is the first reported international research priority setting exercise for AI in colonoscopy. The study findings should be used as a framework to guide future research with key stakeholders to accelerate the clinical implementation of AI in endoscopy.

Abstract We present a new and innovative identification method based on deep learning of the wing interferential patterns carried by mosquitoes of the Anopheles genus to classify and assign 20 Anopheles species, including 13 malaria vectors. We provide additional evidence that this approach can identify Anopheles spp. with an accuracy of up to 100% for ten out of 20 species. Although, this accuracy was moderate (> 65%) or weak (50%) for three and seven species. The accuracy of the process to discriminate cryptic or sibling species is also assessed on three species belonging to the Gambiae complex. Strikingly, An. gambiae, An. arabiensis and An. coluzzii, morphologically indistinguishable species belonging to the Gambiae complex, were distinguished with 100%, 100%, and 88% accuracy respectively. Therefore, this tool would help entomological surveys of malaria vectors and vector control implementation. In the future, we anticipate our method can be applied to other arthropod vector-borne diseases.

Abstract A simple method for accurately identifying Glossina spp in the field is a challenge to sustain the future elimination of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) as a public health scourge, as well as for the sustainable management of African Animal Trypanosomiasis (AAT). Current methods for Glossina species identification heavily rely on a few well-trained experts. Methodologies that rely on molecular methodologies like DNA barcoding or mass spectrometry protein profiling (MALDI TOFF) haven’t been thoroughly investigated for Glossina sp. Nevertheless, because they are destructive, costly, time-consuming, and expensive in infrastructure and materials, they might not be well adapted for the survey of arthropod vectors involved in the transmission of pathogens responsible for Neglected Tropical Diseases, like HAT. This study demonstrates a new type of methodology to classify Glossina species. In conjunction with a deep learning architecture, a database of Wing Interference Patterns (WIPs) representative of the Glossina species involved in the transmission of HAT and AAT was used. This database has 1766 pictures representing 23 Glossina species. This cost-effective methodology, which requires mounting wings on slides and using a commercially available microscope, demonstrates that WIPs are an excellent medium to automatically recognize Glossina species with very high accuracy.

IntroductionDatasets containing only few images are common in the biomedical field. This poses a global challenge for the development of robust deep-learning analysis tools, which require a large number of images. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are an increasingly used solution to expand small datasets, specifically in the biomedical domain. However, the validation of synthetic images by metrics is still controversial and psychovisual evaluations are time consuming.MethodsWe augment a small brain organoid bright-field database of 40 images using several GAN optimizations. We compare these synthetic images to the original dataset using similitude metrcis and we perform an psychovisual evaluation of the 240 images generated. Eight biological experts labeled the full dataset (280 images) as syntetic or natural using a custom-built software. We calculate the error rate per loss optimization as well as the hesitation time. We then compare these results to those provided by the similarity metrics. We test the psychovalidated images in a training step of a segmentation task.Results and discussionGenerated images are considered as natural as the original dataset, with no increase of the hesitation time by experts. Experts are particularly misled by perceptual and Wasserstein loss optimization. These optimizations render the most qualitative and similar images according to metrics to the original dataset. We do not observe a strong correlation but links between some metrics and psychovisual decision according to the kind of generation. Particular Blur metric combinations could maybe replace the psychovisual evaluation. Segmentation task which use the most psychovalidated images are the most accurate.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of deaths worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of its precursor lesion, the polyp, is key to reduce its mortality and to improve procedure efficiency. During the last two decades, several computational methods have been proposed to assist clinicians in detection, segmentation and classification tasks but the lack of a common public validation framework makes it difficult to determine which of them is ready to be deployed in the exploration room. Methods: This study presents a complete validation framework and we compare several methodologies for each of the polyp characterization tasks. Results: Results show that the majority of the approaches are able to provide good performance for the detection and segmentation task, but that there is room for improvement regarding polyp classification. Discussion: While studied show promising results in the assistance of polyp detection and segmentation tasks, further research should be done in classification task to obtain reliable results to assist the clinicians during the procedure. The presented framework provides a standarized method for evaluating and comparing different approaches, which could facilitate the identification of clinically prepared assisting methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize the growth of brain organoids (BOs), cultures that replicate some early physiological or pathological developments of the human brain are usually manually extracted. Due to their novelty, only small datasets of these images are available, but segmenting the organoid shape automatically with deep learning (DL) tools requires a larger number of images. Light U-Net segmentation architectures, which reduce the training time while increasing the sensitivity under small input datasets, have recently emerged. We further reduce the U-Net architecture and compare the proposed architecture (MU-Net) with U-Net and UNet-Mini on bright-field images of BOs using several data augmentation strategies. In each case, we perform leave-one-out cross-validation on 40 original and 40 synthesized images with an optimized adversarial autoencoder (AAE) or on 40 transformed images. The best results are achieved with U-Net segmentation trained on optimized augmentation. However, our novel method, MU-Net, is more robust: it achieves nearly as accurate segmentation results regardless of the dataset used for training (various AAEs or a transformation augmentation). In this study, we confirm that small datasets of BOs can be segmented with a light U-Net method almost as accurately as with the original method.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly infiltrating multiple areas in medicine, with gastrointestinal endoscopy paving the way in both research and clinical applications. Multiple challenges associated with the incorporation of AI in endoscopy are being addressed in recent consensus documents. Objectives: In the current paper, we aimed to map future challenges and areas of research for the incorporation of AI in capsule endoscopy (CE) practice. Design: Modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey. Methods: The study design was based on a modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey distributed to a group of CE and AI experts. Round one aimed to map out key research statements and challenges for the implementation of AI in CE. All queries addressing the same questions were merged into a single issue. The second round aimed to rank all generated questions during round one and to identify the top-ranked statements with the highest total score. Finally, the third round aimed to redistribute and rescore the top-ranked statements. Results: Twenty-one (16 gastroenterologists and 5 data scientists) experts participated in the survey. In the first round, 48 statements divided into seven themes were generated. After scoring all statements and rescoring the top 12, the question of AI use for identification and grading of small bowel pathologies was scored the highest (mean score 9.15), correlation of AI and human expert reading-second (9.05), and real-life feasibility-third (9.0). Conclusion: In summary, our current study points out a roadmap for future challenges and research areas on our way to fully incorporating AI in CE reading.