Search

Although literature evidence suggests deficits in social and non-social cognition in patients with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (SCZ), the difference in neural correlates of the impairments between the two disorders has not been elucidated. We examined brain function in response to a non-social cognition and a social cognition task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in 13 patients with ASD, 15 patients with SCZ, and 18 healthy subjects. We assessed the brain function of participants using a verbal fluency task and an emotional facial recognition task. The patients with ASD showed significantly reduced brain activation in the left frontotemporal area during both tasks compared to healthy subjects. The patients with ASD with larger score in ‘attention to detail’ in the autism spectrum quotient showed lower activation of the left frontotemporal area during the two tasks. The patients with SCZ showed significantly reduced activation, compared to healthy subjects, and greater activation, compared to patients with ASD, in the area during the verbal fluency task. The patients with SCZ with more severe symptoms had lower brain activation during the task in this area. Our results suggest that two distinct areas are involved in the distinctive brain pathophysiology relevant to cognitive processing in patients with ASD and SCZ.

The cataleptogenic effects of haloperidol, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist; SCH23390, a D1 receptor antagonist; physostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor; and pilocarpine, a muscarinic M1 receptor agonist, were challenged by pretreatment of mice with SKF38393, a dopamine D1 receptor agonist; apomorphine, a dopamine D1/D2 receptor agonist (mainly D2 receptor); pirenzepine, a muscarinic M1 receptor antagonist; and scopolamine, a muscarinic M1/M2 receptor antagonist. The effect of physostigmine and pilocarpine on haloperidol and SCH23390 cataleptic responses was also examined. Each of the challenging agents blocked one or more of the cataleptogenic agents, but only scopolamine blocked all four. Pirenzepine blocked cataleptic responses induced by SCH23390 and pilocarpine, but not those by haloperidol and physostigmine. The results of this study suggest that the action of physostigmine (endogenous acetylcholine) on M2 receptors might be more potent than that on muscarinic M1 receptors. A further interesting observation was that the haloperidol-induced catalepsy was enhanced by physostigmine pretreatment, but not by pilocarpine pretreatment, whereas the SCH23390-induced catalepsy showed the opposite spectrum of enhancement by the two cholinergic agonists. We conclude that, although the four cataleptogenic agents act via the dopaminergic-cholinergic systems, their pharmacological differences may be due largely to the different receptor subtypes that are involved in the mediation of catalepsy produced by each agent. Thus, dopamine receptors not only influence the cholinergic muscarinic receptors, but muscarinic M1 and M2 receptors also might mediate dopamine D1 and D2 receptor responses, respectively. The results suggest that there are, at the least, relationships between muscarinic M1 receptors and dopaminergic D1 receptors, and between muscarinic M2 receptors and dopaminergic D2 receptors. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors may interact in a synergistic fashion on dopaminergic systems, but act independently of each other in influencing other system such as cholinergic neurons.

This study examined the effects of 1,4-bis[3-(3,4,5-trimethoxy benzoyloxy)-propyl] perhydro-1,4-diazepine (dilazep; Comelian) on central dopaminergic, cholinergic, and purinergic neuronal systems in rats. Intraperitoneal injections of dilazep (1-5 mg/kg) produced yawning responses, the most effective dose being 2 mg/kg. Dilazep potentiated physostigmine-induced yawning but not pilocarpine- and bromocriptine-induced yawning. Dilazep-induced yawning was not affected by low doses of haloperidol or sulpiride, but was completely inhibited by atropine, a muscarinic M1 receptor antagonist. Dilazep-induced yawning, as well as physostigmine-induced yawning, were markedly inhibited by pretreatment with SK & F 38393, a dopamine D1 receptor agonist, and were potentiated by SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist that alone does not elicit yawning. Caffeine, an adenosine receptor antagonist, inhibited dilazep- and physostigmine-induced yawning responses but N6-cyclohexyl adenosine (CHA) and N6-(L-phenylisopropyl, adenosine (L-PIA), adenosine A1 receptor agonists, were inactive. These results suggest that because the effects of dilazep on central cholinergic neurons are similar to those of physostigmine dilazep may potentiate indirectly the action of endogenous acetylcholine. Cholinergic neurons activated by dilazep may be modulated by postsynaptic dopamine D1 receptor activity but may not be affected by dopamine D2 receptor activity. Furthermore, the stimulatory effects of dilazep on cholinergic neuron may not be due to an inhibition of dopamine D1 receptors via purinergic (adenosine A1 receptor) stimulation by dilazep.

The effects of psychological stress on catecholamine and indoleamine metabolism were examined in various brain regions of rats. Psychologically stressed rats were exposed to emotional responses of foot-shocked rats, but were themselves prevented from receiving foot-shock. Psychological stress for 30 min resulted in significant increases of both 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), but not in other dopamine (DA) terminal fields. The levels of noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) were unaffected in all brain regions examined after 30 min of psychological stress. A small but significant increase of DOPAC levels in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) was observed after a shorter (10 min) duration of stress. Moreover, an increase of DOPAC levels in the MPFC 30 min after psychological stress was attenuated by diazepam (5 mg/kg), and this attenuating effect was antagonized by Ro 15-1788 (15 mg/kg). These results suggest that mesoprefrontal DA neurons are selectively activated by psychological stress, and that the activation of the A10 cell body site (VTA) may precede that of the terminal field (MPFC). Moreover, diazepam was found to possess an inhibitory effect on the activation of mesoprefrontal DA neurons induced by psychological stress, and this effect may be partly mediated by benzodiazepine (BZD) receptors and implicated in the specific anxiolytic action of BZDs.

The efficacy of mianserin as a supplement in treating chronic schizophrenia was tested in 20 inpatients with schizophrenia who were receiving fixed doses of neuroleptics. Mianserin was given for six weeks with a starting dose of 60 mg/day. A brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) was completed before starting mianserin and thereafter BPRS scoring was carried out once weekly. The total BPRS score and the score for negative symptoms were decreased by mianserin treatment as compared to the pre-treatment values. Plasma 5-HIAA concentrations were increased after medication in both responding patients and nonresponding patients. However, the 5-HIAA values of responders were lower than those of nonresponders. Plasma HVA levels were slightly increased by mianserin in the responders. There were no significant changes in MHPG levels. These results suggest that the negative symptoms of schizophrenia may be improved by mianserin treatment.

Mutations in the gene encoding the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) cause frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. Clinical variability is seen not only among families with different mutations, but also among family members with the same mutation. We investigated a newly identified familial frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism family. The disease was of early onset and was inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. Clinically, parkinsonism was the prominent and often early feature, and it preceded dementia. Three autopsied cases shared involvement predominantly in the frontal and temporal lobes and also in the subcortical nuclei, including substantia nigra, globus pallidus, and subthalamic nucleus, that microscopically consisted of neuronal loss, microvacuolation, and astrocytic fibrosis. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated neuropil threads, ballooned cells, and glial fibrillary tangles. Sequencing analysis of the MAPT gene showed an alteration in one allele, resulting in a P301S substitution. These findings suggest that the MAPT P301S mutation can cause pathologically subcortical-predominant, neuropil thread-rich, tau-containing lesions, which could result in consistent parkinsonism. Our study confirms the notion that the phenotype observed in affected individuals from P301S MAPT mutation families is heterogeneous and is broader than the phenotypes seen to date in affected family members carrying other MAPT mutations. Ann Neurol 2005

To determine whether post-feeding increases in dialysate dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens are associated with persisting increases in DA release, we examined the effect of Ca++-free perfusion on post-feeding dialysate concentrations of DA. Post-feeding dialysate DA is entirely Ca++-dependent, suggesting the existence of post-feeding increases in exocytotic DA release and the ability of microdialysis to monitor dynamic changes in DA release through behaviour.

Mice given clonidine (20-50 mg/kg i.p. and 5 micrograms i.c.v.) exhibited aggressive behavior. Dilazep as well as N6-(L-phenylisopropyl) adenosine (adenosine agonist) inhibited this behavior. Dilazep combined with N6-(L-phenylisopropyl) adenosine markedly inhibited the behavior at low doses that were without effect when given alone whereas the inhibitory effect of dilazep on the behavior was reversed by caffeine and 8-phenyltheophylline, which are adenosine antagonists. The results suggest that the inhibitory action of dilazep on clonidine-induced aggressive behavior can be substantially attributed to central purinoceptor stimulation.