1. Cytology Reporting System for Lung Cancer from the Japan Lung Cancer Society and the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology: An Extensive Study Containing More Benign Lesions
- Author
-
Akihiko Yoshizawa, Kenzo Hiroshima, Akemi Takenaka, Reiji Haba, Kunimitsu Kawahara, Yuko Minami, Hirokuni Kakinuma, Yasuo Shibuki, Shinji Miyake, Kenta Kajio, Kana Kiyonaga, Moe Nagatomo, Sanako Nishimura, Masayuki Mano, Jun Matsubayashi, Noriko Motoi, Toshitaka Nagao, Shin-ichi Nakatsuka, Tsutomu Yoshida, and Yukitoshi Satoh
- Subjects
Lung Neoplasms ,Histology ,Nongynecologic Cytopathology ,Cytodiagnosis ,Cytological Techniques ,General Medicine ,Classification ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,Reporting system ,Japan ,Humans ,Risk of malignancy ,Pulmonary cytology ,Cytology ,Societies, Medical - Abstract
Introduction: The Japan Lung Cancer Society (JLCS) and the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology (JSCC) have proposed a new four-tiered cytology reporting system for lung carcinoma (JLCS-JSCC system). Prior to the proposal, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) had proposed a revised reporting system (PSC system), which comprises the “neoplastic, benign neoplasm, and low-grade carcinoma” category (N-B-LG category), in addition to the 4 categories of the JLCS-JSCC system. This study aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement of the JLCS-JSCC system with an additional dataset with more benign lesions in comparison with the PSC system. Methods: We analyzed 167 cytological samples, which included 17 benign lesions, obtained from the respiratory system. Seven observers classified these cases into each category by reviewing one Papanicolaou-stained slide per case according to the JLCS-JSCC system and PSC system. Results: The interobserver agreement was moderate in the JLCS-JSCC (k = 0.499) and PSC (k = 0.485) systems. Of the 167 samples, 17 samples were benign lesions: 7 pulmonary hamartomas, 5 sclerosing pneumocytomas, 2 squamous papillomas, one solitary fibrous tumor, one meningioma, and one lymphocytic proliferation. There were diverse sample types as follows: 11 touch smears, 3 brushing smears, 2 aspirations, and one sputum sample. Fourteen samples (82.3%) were categorized into “negative” or “atypical” by more than half of the observers in the JLCS-JSCC system. Conversely, 3 samples were categorized as “suspicious” or “malignant” by more than half of the observers in the JLCS-JSCC system. On the other hand, 11 samples (64.7%) were categorized into the N-B-LG category by more than half of the observers in the PSC system. Conclusions: The concordance rate in the JLCS-JSCC system was slightly higher than that in the PSC system; however, the interobserver agreement was moderate in both the JLCS-JSCC and PSC systems. These results indicate that both the JLCS-JSCC and PSC systems are clinically useful. Therefore, both systems are expected to have clinical applications. It may be important to integrate the 2 systems and construct a universal system that can be used more widely in clinical practice.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF