Search

Aims: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based model for classification of hip fractures to enhance diagnostic accuracy., Methods: A retrospective study used 5,168 hip anteroposterior radiographs, with 4,493 radiographs from two institutes (internal dataset) for training and 675 radiographs from another institute for validation. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification model was trained on four types of hip fractures (Displaced, Valgus-impacted, Stable, and Unstable), using DAMO-YOLO for data processing and augmentation. The model's accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Intersection over Union (IoU), and Dice coefficient were evaluated. Orthopaedic surgeons' diagnoses served as the reference standard, with comparisons made before and after artificial intelligence assistance., Results: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, IoU, and Dice coefficients of the model for the four fracture categories in the internal dataset were as follows: Displaced (1.0, 0.79, 1.0, 0.70, 0.82), Valgus-impacted (1.0, 0.80, 1.0, 0.70, 0.82), Stable (0.99, 0.95, 0.99, 0.83, 0.89), and Unstable (1.0, 0.98, 0.99, 0.86, 0.92), respectively. For the external validation dataset, the sensitivity and specificity were as follows: Displaced (0.83, 0.94), Valgus-impacted (0.89, 0.90), Stable (0.88, 0.95), and Unstable (0.85, 0.99), respectively. The overall means (Micro AVG and Macro AVG) for the external dataset were Micro AVG (0.83 (SD 0.05), 0.96 (SD 0.01)) and Macro AVG (0.69 (SD 0.02), 0.95 (SD 0.02)), respectively., Conclusion: Compared to human diagnosis alone, our study demonstrates that the developed model significantly improves the accuracy of detecting and classifying hip fractures. Our model has shown great potential in assisting clinicians with the accurate diagnosis and classification of hip fractures., Competing Interests: D. H. Ro reports that this work was supported by the Technology Development Program (RS-2023-00258466) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, South Korea)., (© 2025 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Purpose: Intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) classification is crucial for surgical decision-making. However, orthopedic trauma surgeons have shown lower accuracy in ITF classification than expected. The objective of this study was to utilize an artificial intelligence (AI) method to improve the accuracy of ITF classification., Methods: We trained a network called YOLOX-SwinT, which is based on the You Only Look Once X (YOLOX) object detection network with Swin Transformer (SwinT) as the backbone architecture, using 762 radiographic ITF examinations as the training set. Subsequently, we recruited 5 senior orthopedic trauma surgeons (SOTS) and 5 junior orthopedic trauma surgeons (JOTS) to classify the 85 original images in the test set, as well as the images with the prediction results of the network model in sequence. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) to compare the differences among the SOTS, JOTS, SOTS + AI, JOTS + AI, SOTS + JOTS, and SOTS + JOTS + AI groups. All images were classified according to the AO/OTA 2018 classification system by 2 experienced trauma surgeons and verified by another expert in this field. Based on the actual clinical needs, after discussion, we integrated 8 subgroups into 5 new subgroups, and the dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets by the ratio of 8:1:1., Results: The mean average precision at the intersection over union (IoU) of 0.5 (mAP50) for subgroup detection reached 90.29%. The classification accuracy values of SOTS, JOTS, SOTS + AI, and JOTS + AI groups were 56.24% ± 4.02%, 35.29% ± 18.07%, 79.53% ± 7.14%, and 71.53% ± 5.22%, respectively. The paired t-test results showed that the difference between the SOTS and SOTS + AI groups was statistically significant, as well as the difference between the JOTS and JOTS + AI groups, and the SOTS + JOTS and SOTS + JOTS + AI groups. Moreover, the difference between the SOTS + JOTS and SOTS + JOTS + AI groups in each subgroup was statistically significant, with all p < 0.05. The independent samples t-test results showed that the difference between the SOTS and JOTS groups was statistically significant, while the difference between the SOTS + AI and JOTS + AI groups was not statistically significant. With the assistance of AI, the subgroup classification accuracy of both SOTS and JOTS was significantly improved, and JOTS achieved the same level as SOTS., Conclusion: In conclusion, the YOLOX-SwinT network algorithm enhances the accuracy of AO/OTA subgroups classification of ITF by orthopedic trauma surgeons., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Due to the high incidence of proximal femoral fractures, classifications of these fractures are often used in daily practice. Most classifications are eponymous terms since they bear the name of the person(s) who developed them. In this study we provide an insight in the origin of the classifications and the background of their name givers. The clinical implication and background of the eponymous proximal femur fracture classifications of Garden, Pauwels and Evans-Jensen are discussed. With the rising use of modern classification systems, the relevance of historically important classifications is food for discussion. Nevertheless, these classification systems are still used in daily communication and decision making.

Aims: Following Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures (FIF-ITF), the choice of treatment remains a clinical challenge. This study introduces a novel classification system to guide the selection of femoral prostheses in hip arthroplasty (HA) and validates its clinical efficacy., Methods: Retrospectively, we analyzed 108 cases from three university-affiliated hospitals between December 2012 and February 2023 involving patients who underwent hip arthroplasty due to Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures (FIF-ITF). Patients were classified into three categories based on fracture healing, proximal femoral support, and the severity of femoral cortical defects, with subtypes identified. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the Classification-based Decision Group and the Non-classification Decision Group., Results: The Classification-based Decision Group did not differ significantly from the Non-classification Decision Group in operation time, blood loss, or the use of cemented stems. However, the classification system markedly reduced the risk of periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively from 22.5 to 4.4% and postoperatively from 10 to 1.4%. The Classification-based Decision Group also demonstrated higher postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores., Conclusion: The proposed classification system serves as an innovative clinical tool for femoral prosthesis selection in hip arthroplasty post-FIF-ITF, effectively reducing complications and enhancing hip function in the Classification-based Decision Group, underscoring its significant clinical utility., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Fractures of the femoral head typically occur after high-energy trauma. Radiographs and cross-sectional imaging are used to appropriately classify and identify associated injuries or morphologic characteristics that may influence management. Identification of the radiographic and clinical hallmarks of an irreducible variant is critical to optimizing the patient's outcome. Nonsurgical treatment can be used in the setting of small, infrafoveal femoral head fractures without hip instability. When surgical treatment is indicated, an anterior (Smith-Petersen), posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck), or surgical hip dislocation approach may be used depending on injury details and surgeon preference. The purpose of this review was to summarize current evidence on femoral head fractures regarding indications, variant patterns, surgical approaches, and outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: The relationship between bone density and fracture has been widely studied and recognized, and the role of cortical bone in proximal femoral fractures has also been increasingly studied. However, both the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) and the determination of cortical mass are expensive and cumbersome. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two readily available indicators, Hounsfield Units (HUs) and femoral cortical index (FCI), can be used to predict hip fracture classification and prognosis., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with hip fragility fractures. Cortical index was calculated on fractured and contralateral femur FCI, with HUs calculated on the proximal femur. The correlation of the FCI and HU with diabetes, hypertension, and related indicators, such as albumin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels, were also analyzed in the study., Results: Both the Evans classification of intertrochanteric fractures and the Garden and Pauwels classifications of femoral neck fractures showed that as the severity of the fracture increased, the HUs and FCI decreased. Age and albumin level also had a negative correlation with HUs and FCI. There was also a significant correlation between HUs and FCI., Conclusions: The HUs and FCI, which can be easily and quickly obtained, can be used to predict the classification and prognosis of hip fractures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to aid in the accurate diagnosis of hip fractures and reduce the workload of clinicians. We primarily aimed to develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automated classification of hip fractures based on the 2018 AO-OTA classification system. The secondary aim was to incorporate the model's assessment of additional radiographic findings that often accompany such injuries., Methods: 6,361 plain radiographs of the hip taken between 2002 and 2016 at Danderyd University Hospital were used to train the CNN. A separate set of 343 radiographs representing 324 unique patients was used to test the performance of the network. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index., Results: The CNN demonstrated high performance in identifying and classifying hip fracture, with AUCs ranging from 0.76 to 0.99 for different fracture categories. The AUC for hip fractures ranged from 0.86 to 0.99, for distal femur fractures from 0.76 to 0.99, and for pelvic fractures from 0.91 to 0.94. For 29 of 39 fracture categories, the AUC was ≥ 0.95., Conclusion: We found that AI has the potential for accurate and automated classification of hip fractures based on the AO-OTA classification system. Further training and modification of the CNN may enable its use in clinical settings.

Purpose: We established the most commonly used clinician and patient-reported hip fracture outcome measures as of 2022, assessed their content validity using an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework, and operationalized these results to contribute to an updated hip fracture core set., Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify articles utilizing outcome measures related to hip fracture. A total of five outcome measures were identified, linked to the ICF, and assessed for content validity via bandwidth percent, content density, and content diversity., Results: Outcome measures were linked to 191 ICF codes, most of which were associated with Activities and Participation. Notably, no outcome measure contained concepts linked to Personal Factors and Environmental Factors were underrepresented across all outcome measures. The modified Harris Hip Score had the highest content diversity (0.67), the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score had the highest bandwidth of ICF content coverage (2.48), and the Oxford Hip Score had the highest content density (2.92)., Conclusions: These results clarify the clinical applicability of outcome measures and guide development of hip fracture outcomes that allow providers to assess the complex role of social, environmental, and personal factors in patient rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHip fracture is a complex and disabling pathology predominantly affecting older adults and represents a public health problem.There are a variety of outcome measures used to assess a patient's recovery following a hip fracture, each with distinctive objectives and modes of administration.Content validity metrics associated with the Harris Hip Score suggest it would be a suitable outcome measure during early-stage recovery, whereas the modified Harris Hip Score may be more suitable for tracking long-term recovery tracking.Choosing an outcome measure most appropriate for a hip fracture patient is an individualized decision that must consider aspects such as age, activity level, needs, and environmental factors.

Background: Femoral head fractures are rare but potentially disabling injuries, and classifying them accurately and consistently can help surgeons make good choices about their treatment. However, there is no consensus as to which classification of these fractures is the most advantageous; parameters that might inform this choice include universality (the proportion of fractures that can be classified), as well as, of course, interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility., Questions/purposes: (1) Which classification achieves the best universality (defined as the proportion of fractures that can be classified)? (2) Which classification delivers the highest intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the clinical CT assessment of femoral head fractures? (3) Based on the answers to those two questions, which classifications are the most applicable for clinical practice and research?, Methods: Between January 2011 and January 2023, 254 patients with femoral head fractures who had CT scans (CT is routine at our institution for patients who have experienced severe hip trauma) were potentially eligible for inclusion in this study, which was performed at a large Level I trauma center in China. Of those, 9% (23 patients) were excluded because of poor-quality CT images, unclosed physes, pathologic fractures, or acetabular dysplasia, leaving 91% (231 patients with 231 hips) for analysis here. Among those, 19% (45) were female. At the time of injury, the mean age was 40 ± 17 years. All fractures were independently classified by four observers according to the Pipkin, Brumback, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Chiron, and New classifications. Each observer repeated his classifications again 1 month later to allow us to ascertain intraobserver reliability. To evaluate the universality of classifications, we characterized the percentage of hips that could be classified using the definitions offered in each classification. The kappa (κ) value was calculated to determine interrater and intrarater agreement. We then compared the classifications based on the combination of universality and interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility to determine which classifications might be recommended for clinical and research use., Results: The universalities of the classifications were 99% (228 of 231, Pipkin), 43% (99 of 231, Brumback), 94% (216 of 231, AO/OTA), 99% (228 of 231, Chiron), and 100% (231 of 231, New). The interrater agreement was judged as almost perfect (κ 0.81 [95% CI 0.78 to 0.84], Pipkin), moderate (κ 0.51 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.59], Brumback), fair (κ 0.28 [95% CI 0.18 to 0.38], AO/OTA), substantial (κ 0.79 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.82], Chiron), and substantial (κ 0.63 [95% CI 0.58 to 0.68], New). In addition, the intrarater agreement was judged as almost perfect (κ 0.89 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.96]), substantial (κ 0.72 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.75]), moderate (κ 0.51 [95% CI 0.43 to 0.58]), almost perfect (κ 0.87 [95% CI 0.82 to 0.91]), and substantial (κ 0.78 [95% CI 0.59 to 0.97]), respectively. Based on these findings, we determined that the Pipkin and Chiron classifications offer near-complete universality and sufficient interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility to recommend them for clinical and research use, but the other classifications (Brumback, AO/OTA, and New) do not., Conclusion: Based on our findings, clinicians and clinician-scientists can use either the Pipkin or Chiron classification systems to classify femoral head fractures based on CT images, with equal confidence. It seems unlikely that any new classifications will substantially outperform these, and the other available systems either lacked sufficient universality or reproducibility to recommend them for general use., Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly, and incur high health and social care costs. Given projected population ageing, the number of incident hip fractures is predicted to increase globally. As fracture classification strongly determines the chosen surgical treatment, differences in fracture classification influence patient outcomes and treatment costs. We aimed to create a machine learning method for identifying and classifying hip fractures, and to compare its performance to experienced human observers. We used 3659 hip radiographs, classified by at least two expert clinicians. The machine learning method was able to classify hip fractures with 19% greater accuracy than humans, achieving overall accuracy of 92%., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The incidence of fragility hip fractures, intracapsular and extracapsular, has been increasing worldwide. Fracture stability is important for treatment decision-making and is related to the expected rate of complications. It is unclear whether metabolic therapy explains the increased incidence of unstable fractures., Objectives: To investigate the possible association between treatment with bisphosphonates and the various patterns encountered with intertrochanteric hip fractures., Methods: Patients with fragility hip fractures who were treated in our department between 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. They were classified into three groups: group 1 had a stable extracapsular fracture, group 2 had an unstable extracapsular fracture, and group 3 had an intracapsular fracture. Collated data included: osteoporosis preventive therapy and duration, fracture-type, history of previous fractures, and vitamin D levels., Results: Of 370 patients, 87 were previously treated with bisphosphonates (18.3% prior to fracture in group 1, 38.3% in group 2, and 13.8% in group 3). Of those treated with bisphosphonates, 56.3% had an unstable fracture, 21.8% had a stable fracture, and the rest an intracapsular fracture. In contrast, only 27.9% of patients who were not treated with bisphosphonates had an unstable fracture and 30.0% had stable fractures., Conclusions: Our findings show a higher proportion of complex and unstable fractures among patients with fragility hip-fractures who were treated with bisphosphonates than among those who did not receive this treatment. The risk for complex and unstable fracture may affect the preferred surgical treatment, its complexity, length of surgery, and rehabilitation.

Background: The trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) is used as an adjunct to the sliding hip screw (SHS) in unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. We wanted to describe the choice of implant for trochanteric fractures with a focus on the TSP in Norway., Methods: A total of 20,902 fractures from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register treated surgically in 43 hospitals from 2011 to 2017 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to detect factors potentially influencing implant choice., Results: The mean age was 83 years, and 15,137 (72%) were women. An SHS was used in 13,273 (63%) fractures, of them 4407 (33%) with a TSP. Fracture classification was the most important determinant of TSP. In cases where an SHS was used, the odds ratio (OR) for using a TSP was 14 for AO/OTA 31A2 fractures and 71 for AO/OTA 31A3 and subtrochanteric fractures, compared to AO/OTA 31A1 fractures. The probability of receiving a TSP was higher in urban, academic, and high-volume hospitals (OR 1.2 to 1.3) and lower in Central and Northern Norway (OR 0.3 to 0.7). The use of an intramedullary nail (IMN) (n = 7629 (36%)) was also to a degree decided by fracture classification (OR 1.8 to 5.3). However, hospital factors, with OR 0.1 to 0.4 for IMN in academic, urban, and high-volume hospitals and OR 1.5 to 2.6 outside South-Eastern Norway (all p < 0.001), were also important., Conclusions: Fracture classification was the main determinant for TSP use. Any additional benefit from a TSP on postoperative fracture stability or clinical outcome needs to be clarified.

Purpose: For this retrospective cohort study, we assessed pertrochanteric fracture types AO/OTA 31-A2. PFNA and DHS were the devices used. We determined both devices in relation to peri-operative variables, postoperative radiographic measurements, implant-related complications and mortality up to 2 years. The null hypothesis was no effect between the two devices., Methods: This single-centre study was conducted based on our computerized data. The treatment period ranged from 2006 to 2015. Only patients with type AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures and an age ≥ 65 years were included. Apart from descriptive variables, the following measurements were assessed: (1) duration of surgery, (2) blood loss, (3) transfusion, (4) hospitalization, (5) tip-apex distance (TAD), (6) fracture reduction, (7) screw position, (8) implant-related complications, and (9) mortality. The follow-up was 2 years for each living patient. Missing data were evaluated by telephone call., Results: A total of 375 consecutive patients were enrolled into three groups: (1) 75 patients treated with DHS and antirotation screw (ARS); (2); 100 patients treated with DHS + ARS + TSP (trochanteric stabilization plate); and (3) 200 patients treated with PFNA. Apart from dementia, the descriptive data (e.g., age and BMI) demonstrated no effects between the three groups. Compared to PFNA, DHS with or without TSP was adversely affected by a longer operation time, higher blood loss, increase in transfusion, and more implant-related complications including cut-out, infection and failure. The rate of cut-out was significantly higher in TAD ≥ 25 mm (p = 0.005), and PFNA demonstrated significantly better TAD measurements (p = 0.001), better fracture reduction (0.002), more central-central screw positions (p = 0.014), and less poor screw placement (p = 0.001). The mortality rate was without effect between the three groups (log rank 0.698)., Conclusions: DHS with or without TSP was associated with significantly higher rates of implant-related complications based on inferior radiographic measurements. Therefore, we only recommend PFNA for the treatment of proximal type AO/OTA 31-A2 femoral fractures., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level III.

Background: In the current diagnostic procedure, generally, both plain radiographs and 3D-CT scans are used for the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. There is no consensus regarding the value of a three-dimensional computerized tomographic (3D-CT) scan alone in the classification of acetabular fractures. In this study, we compared the accuracy of 3D-CT scan and plain radiography through the evaluation of their agreement with the intraoperative surgeon's classification., Method: In a retrospective study, patients who were referred to our center with an acetabular fracture and underwent surgical treatment were included. The classification of acetabular fractures was performed once using Judet view plain radiographs and once using a 3D-CT scan by the corresponding one Experienced musculoskeletal radiologist one independent trauma fellowship-trained orthopaedic who routinely treat acetabular fractures and based on Letournel and Judet classification (17 and 23 years of experience respectively). Cohen's kappa value was used for the assessment agreement between the two imaging modalities, as well as between the imaging modalities and intraoperative classification., Results: Medical files of 152 patients with acetabular fracture were retrospectively reviewed. A kappa value of 0.236 was obtained as the agreement level between radiographs and intraoperative findings (p < 0.001). A kappa value of 0.943 was obtained as the agreement level between 3D-CT and intraoperative classification (p < 0.001). An agreement level of 0.264 was found between the Judet radiographs and 3D-CT scans (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: 3D-CT scans are reliable enough in the classification of acetabular fractures, and plain radiographs could be omitted to avoid radiation exposure as well as to reduce the cost for patients who sustain acetabular fractures.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the cognitive impairment level influence in descriptive characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and pharmacological features of older adults with hip fracture., Design: Cross-sectional study., Method: Five hundred fifty-seven older adults with hip fracture were recruited and divided into cognitive impairment levels (severe/moderate, mild, no impairment). Descriptive characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and pharmacological data were collected., Findings: Significant differences (p < .05, R = .012-.475) between cognitive impairment levels were shown. Shorter presurgery hospital length of stay and lower depression and Parkinson comorbidities; delirium complication; and antidepressants, antiparkinsonians, and neuroleptics use were shown for the no-impairment group. With regard to the cognitive impairment groups, lower presence of cardiopathy and hypertension; higher presence of dementia; antihypertensives, antiplatelets, and antidementia medication; infection/respiratory insufficiency complications; and lower constipation complications were shown., Conclusion: Cognitive impairment levels may determine the characteristics, comorbidities, pharmacology, and complications of older adults with hip fracture., Clinical Relevance: Cognitive impairment level may impact rehabilitation nursing practice, education, and care coordination.

Purpose: This study compared the accuracy and timeliness of two-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) and three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) in the diagnosis of different types of acetabular fractures and by different groups of interpreters using the Letournel and Judet classification system., Methods: Twenty-five fractures cases, five each of five common types of acetabular fractures, were selected. Nineteen interpreters with different levels of experience (ten graduate trainees and nine radiologists) individually classified the fractures using multiplanar 2D and standardized 3DCT images. The 3DCT image set was comprised of 39 images of rotational views of the entire pelvis and the disarticulated fracture hip. Consensus reading by three experts served as a reference standard., Results: Classification accuracy was 66% using 2DCT, increasing to 73% (p = 0.041) when 3DCT was used. Improvement occurred in the interpretation of transverse and posterior wall-type fractures (p < 0.01 and p = 0.015, respectively), but not in T-type, transverse with posterior wall, or both-column fractures. The improvement was noted only in the graduate trainee group (p = 0.016) but not the radiologist group (p = 0.619). Inter-observer reliability in the graduate trainee group improved from poor to moderate with 3DCT, but remained at a moderate level in both 2DCT and 3DCT in the radiologist group. The overall average interpretation time per case with correct diagnosis was 60 s for 2DCT but only 32 s for 3DCT., Conclusions: Standardized 3DCT provides greater reliability and faster diagnosis of acetabular fractures and helps improve the accuracy in transverse- and posterior wall-type fractures. In addition, it helps improve the accuracy of less experienced interpreters.

Background: The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) is expected to increase worldwide; thus, complications are likely to increase at the same ratio. In this scenario, periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are an increasing concern. Identifying the predisposing factors is important in order to prevent as much as possible the risk of PFF in the future., Patients and Methods: The purpose of this study was to correlate the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures to the most common patients' comorbidities and stem geometry. We reviewed all THA for non-oncologic indications between 2004 and 2014 with a mean follow-up of six years (range, 2-12). Three thousand two hundred forty-eight patients (3593 implants) were enrolled in the study, and 45 PFF were registered during this time period. Two thousand five hundred seventy-seven implants (71%) were straight stems, and 1015 (28.3%) were anatomic stems. All X-rays were then analyzed and classified according to the modified Vancouver classification., Results: Periprosthetic femoral fractures incidence was associated with anatomic stem geometry (p < 0.001, OR = 2.2), BMI (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001, OR = 5.18). PFFs were not significantly associated with age, gender, and all the other variables. Fracture pattern was different between straight and anatomic stems. Clamshell fractures were more likely to occur in anatomic stems compared to straight stems (p < 0.005)., Conclusions: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are highly associated with obesity and osteoporosis. Anatomic stems reported a higher incidence of PPF than straight stems. The typical fracture type for anatomical stems is the clamshell pattern, while straight stems are more likely affected by type B fractures.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the modified Heuter approach and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures., Methods: The study cohort consisted of 39 patients with Pipkin type I or type II femoral head fractures who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation through the modified Heuter approach (the Heuter group) or the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (the K-L group) between June 2013 and January 2016. Standard radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained before surgery and during the follow-up. The two approaches were compared in reference to operative time, amount of blood loss, the occurrence of complications, and final functional outcome. The Brooker classification was used to document heterotopic ossification and the Thompson-Epstein scores were used for final evaluation., Results: The mean operative time and estimated blood loss in the Heuter group were lower than those in the K-L group (P < 0.001 for both measures). The incisions healed primarily in all patients after surgery, no infection or deep venous thromboses were detected in either group, post-operative imaging data showed that dislocation and fractures were reduced, and the fractures finally achieved bony union. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications or final functional outcomes between the two groups., Conclusions: Compared with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, the modified Heuter approach can effectively reduce the blood loss and operative time without increasing the risk of complications; this approach is simple, straightforward, and atraumatic and may be a viable option for open reduction and internal fixation of Pipkin type I and type II femoral head fractures.

Background: Hip fracture is one of the major risk factors of global mortality and disability. The aim of this study was to map the pattern of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in China, providing a pilot national dataset and basis for medical policy proposals., Methods: A multistage probability sampling strategy was applied in the national baseline survey. Thirty provinces in mainland China were included in this survey. A standardized questionnaire survey was conducted to collect information about basic characteristics such as age, working seniority, hospital level, and residence, with two other parts including perioperative and postoperative treatment parameters. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were used to determine essential statistical differences. The proportion of the options in each region was compared using the chi-square ( χ 2 ) test. The histogram and choropleth map of the monthly number of admissions were created using Excel 2016 to show the distribution characteristics., Results: In total, 1065 valid responses were included, representing a 96.7% survey capture rate. Perioperative treatment and postoperative care distinctly varied across regions and hospital levels. The monthly number of admissions was relatively lower in the Northern region, with higher proportion of hospitalizations to secondary hospitals compared with the Eastern region. The patients in the Eastern region or tertiary hospitals had shorter preoperative waiting time and hospitalization period., Conclusions: We found apparent geographic variations in intertrochanteric femoral fractures in this study, and the data can be used for drafting national healthcare plans and medical policies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Qian-Hao Yang et al.)

Aims: This study explores data quality in operation type and fracture classification recorded as part of a large research study and a national audit with an independent review., Patients and Methods: At 17 centres, an expert surgeon reviewed a randomly selected subset of cases from their centre with regard to fracture classification using the AO system and type of operation performed. Agreement for these variables was then compared with the data collected during conduct of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) cohort study. Both types of surgery and fracture classification were collapsed to identify the level of detail of reporting that achieved meaningful agreement. In the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), the types of operation and fracture classification were explored to identify the proportion of "highly improbable" combinations., Results: The records were reviewed for 903 cases. Agreement for the subtypes of extracapsular fracture was poor; most centres achieved no better than "fair" agreement. When the classification was collapsed to a single option for "extracapsular" fracture, only four centres failed to have at least "moderate" agreement. There was only "moderate" agreement for the subtypes of intracapsular fracture, which improved to "substantial" when collapsed to "intracapsular". Subtrochanteric fracture types were well reported with "substantial" agreement. There was near "perfect" agreement for internal fixation procedures. "Perfect" or "substantial" agreement was achieved when the type of arthroplasty surgery was reported at the level of "hemiarthroplasty" and "total hip replacement". When reviewing data submitted to the NHFD, a minimum of 5.2% of cases contained "highly improbable" procedures for the stated fracture classification., Conclusion: The complexity of collecting fracture classification data at a national scale compromises the accuracy with which detailed classification systems can be reported. Data around type of surgery performed show similar tendencies. Data capture, reporting, and interpretation in future studies must take this into account. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1292-1299.

Traumatic hip fracture dislocation is a rare injury associated with high-energy trauma. Most of these injuries should be surgically treated. Hip dislocation is an orthopaedic emergency and reduction must be performed within 6-8 hours of trauma. We performed a retrospective analysis of 69 patients with "hip joint associated injuries", treated between January 2002 and December 2016. 33 patients were assessed at a mean follow-up of 36.9 months (range 18-132) after surgery. We propose a new classification system in which, different patterns of fracture (head and/or neck and/or acetabular) are described according to different types of hip dislocation. This anatomical-descriptive classification system is based on the concept of hip as a complex anatomical district and contains all possible traumatic injuries associated with hip dislocation. It includes isolated hip dislocation, hip dislocation with femoral head or neck fracture or hip dislocation with acetabular fracture and femoral head fracture. There are 4 groups: Each one of the previous groups is composed by different subgroups. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis is the most common complication of these hip injuries, followed by avascular necrosis of femoral head and heterotopic ossification. The bad prognosis depends on the type of trauma rather than surgical treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine how the reduction of medial and anteromedial cortices using CT findings in 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures treated with the intramedullary nail could affect the clinical outcomes and complication rates of the fractures., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 43 patients with 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary internal fixation (CRIF) between January 2010 and December 2013. Patients were classified into two groups based on the post-operative CT scans taken from the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively. Five radiographic parameters and three clinical parameters were used to evaluate the post-operative functional states and mobilization levels in this study. Post-operative complications were also recorded., Results: The mean loss of the femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA) was significantly smaller in Group C1 than that in Group C2. There were significant differences in the sliding distance of the cephalic nail and the loss of femoral head height between the two groups. In terms of the reduction conditions shown on the sagittal planes, the FNSA, sliding distance of the cephalic nail, and the loss of FHH were significantly different, although differences in TCD were not significant. Patients in groups C1 (3.6%) and S1 (0.0%) had lower complication rates compared to patients in groups C2 (26.7%) and S2 (27.8%)., Conclusion: Patients with good reduction quality of the medial and anteromedial sustainable cortices had better clinical outcomes and lower complication rates. The sustainable stability and anti-rotational function of these validated reductions might play a critical role in maintaining the fragment positions and reducing the incidence of complications in patients.

Background: The fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification was established to address the specific fracture morphology and dynamic instability in the elderly. Although this system is frequently used, data on the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities are lacking., Methods: Six experienced and 6 inexperienced surgeons and 1 surgeon trained by the originator of the FFP classification ("gold standard") each used the FFP classification 3 times to grade the computed tomography (CT) scans of 60 patients from 6 hospitals. We assessed intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities using Fleiss kappa statistics and the percentage of agreement using the "gold standard," the submitting hospital, and the majority vote as references., Results: The intra-rater reliability for the FFP classification was mainly moderate, with a mean Fleiss kappa coefficient (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.46 (0.40 to 0.50) for the complete classification (i.e., both the main-group FFP ratings [I through III] and the subgroup ratings [a, b, and c]) and 0.60 (0.53 to 0.65) for the main group only. The inter-rater reliability was substantial for the main group classification (0.61 [0.54 to 0.66]) and moderate for the complete classification (0.53 [0.48 to 0.58]). The percentage of agreement was 68% to 80%. The lowest agreement was found for FFP II and III., Conclusions: The FFP classification displayed moderate and substantial intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities., Clinical Relevance: With moderate to substantial intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities, the FFP classification forms a solid basis for future clinical investigations. The differentiation of FFP II from FFP III should be evaluated thoroughly, as the initial treatment changes from nonoperative for II to operative for III.

Purpose: To demonstrate the effect of teaching a simplified treatment-based classification of proximal femoral fractures on the accuracy, confidence, and inter-reader agreement of radiology residents. The authors hypothesize that these measures will improve after viewing an educational presentation., Materials and Methods: Three radiology residents independently classified 100 operative proximal femoral fractures, both before and after viewing a 45-min educational video describing the simplified classification scheme, with a washout period of at least 12 weeks between sessions. Based on the gold standard established by consensus of two radiologists and an orthopedic trauma surgeon utilizing intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, operative reports, and pre-procedural imaging, accuracy of classification was calculated for each reader before and after viewing the educational video. Reader confidence was recorded on a 0-10 scale, and inter-reader agreement was calculated with Fleiss's kappa. McNemar's test was used to compare accuracy, a paired t test was used to compare confidence, and the Z-test was used to compare kappa values after bootstrapping to determine the standard error of the mean., Results: The study cohort included 60/100 females, with a mean age of 76.6 years. The pooled classification accuracy was initially 65%, which improved to 80% in the second reading session after viewing the educational video (p < 0.0001). Confidence improved from 6.9 initially to 8.6 (p < 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement improved from a kappa of 0.45 (moderate agreement) to 0.74 (substantial agreement) (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: A simplified treatment-based classification of proximal femoral fractures is easily taught to radiology residents and resulted in increased accuracy, increased inter-reader agreement, and increased reader confidence.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a systematic three-dimensional (3D) classification of intertrochanteric fractures by clustering the morphological features of fracture lines using the Hausdorff distance-based K-means approach and assess the usefulness of it in the clinical setting., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 504 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary internal fixation. The morphological fracture lines of all patients extracted from computed tomography were transcribed freehand onto the template. All fracture lines were then clustered into five distinct types using the Hausdorff distance-based K-means clustering method. Five radiographic parameters and four functional parameters were used to evaluate the postoperative functional states and mobilization levels. Postoperative complications were also recorded., Results: Intertrochanteric fractures were classified into five types: type I (108/504, 21.4%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall and greater trochanter fragment; type II (85/504, 16.9%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall with/without lesser trochanter detachment; type III (147/504, 29.2%), fractures with intertrochanteric crest detachment involving the lesser trochanter and greater trochanter with an intact lateral femoral wall; type IV (113/504, 22.4%), fractures with large intertrochanteric crest detachment and large lesser trochanter and greater trochanter detachment partially involving the lateral femoral wall and less medial cortical support; type V (51/504, 10.1%), a combination of pertrochanteric and lateral fracture line involving the entire lateral femoral wall and lesser trochanter detachment. Parameters of femoral neck-shaft angle and sliding distance of the cephalic nail were significantly different among types. The complication rate generally increased from type I to type V (P = 0.035)., Conclusions: The unsupervised clustering can achieve identification of the type of intertrochanteric fractures with clinical significance. The Tang classification can be used to describe fracture morphology, predict the possibility of achieving stable reduction and the risk of complications following intramedullary fixation., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Clinical retrospective studies have only reported limited improvements in hip fracture classification accuracy using finite element (FE) models compared to conventional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements. A possible explanation is that state-of-the-art quasi-static models do not estimate patient-specific loads. A novel FE modeling technique was developed to improve the biofidelity of simulated impact loading from sideways falling. This included surrogate models of the pelvis, lower extremities, and soft tissue that were morphed based on subject anthropometrics. Hip fracture prediction models based on aBMD and FE measurements were compared in a retrospective study of 254 elderly female subjects from the AGES-Reykjavik study. Subject fragility ratio (FR) was defined as the ratio between the ultimate forces of paired biofidelic models, one with linear elastic and the other with non-linear stress-strain relationships in the proximal femur. The expected end-point value (EEV) was defined as the FR weighted by the probability of one sideways fall over five years, based on self-reported fall frequency at baseline. The change in maximum volumetric strain (ΔMVS) on the surface of the femoral neck was calculated between time of ultimate femur force and 90% post-ultimate force in order to assess the extent of tensile tissue damage present in non-linear models. After age-adjusted logistic regression, the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) was highest for ΔMVS (0.72), followed by FR (0.71), aBMD (0.70), and EEV (0.67), however the differences between FEA and aBMD based prediction models were not deemed statistically significant. When subjects with no history of falling were excluded from the analysis, thus artificially assuming that falls were known a priori with no uncertainty, a statistically significant difference in AUC was detected between ΔMVS (0.85), and aBMD (0.74). Multivariable linear regression suggested that the variance in maximum elastic femur force was best explained by femoral head radius, pelvis width, and soft tissue thickness (R 2  = 0.79; RMSE = 0.46 kN; p < 0.005). Weighting the hip fracture prediction models based on self-reported fall frequency did not improve the models' sensitivity, however excluding non-fallers lead to significant differences between aBMD and FE based models. These findings suggest that an accurate assessment of fall probability is necessary for accurately identifying individuals predisposed to hip fracture., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Successful treatment starts by accurate classification of pathology, but there is no conclusive, reliable and universally accepted method for classification of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. As a perfect classification should have high intra- and interobserver agreement, this study aims to access reliability of three classification systems: Garden, AO and simple II stage classification., Materials and Methods: Four orthopaedic trauma surgeons (two of them professors) and two senior orthopaedic trauma residents were invited to evaluated 136 blinded anterior-posterior and lateral X-rays of patients with femoral neck fractures. Observers classified fractures according to IV stage Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications. The exercise was repeated after one month on same but randomised X-rays. Cohen kappa was used to measure inter- and intraobserver agreement. Fleiss kappa was used to access multi-rater agreement., Results: AO classification showed an overall agreement of 0.22 (fair agreement). Garden classification had overall reliability slightly higher than AO, but matching same fair agreement group (0.33). II stage classification provided the highest estimates: from 0.35 (fair agreement) to 0.83 (almost perfect agreement) and multi-rater agreement of 0.50 (moderate agreement). There was seen no difference in intra- and interobserver agreement between observer groups (professors, trauma surgeons and trauma residents) DISCUSSION: All three classification systems showed equal adoption among differently experienced observer groups. Despite this finding, IV stage Garden and AO classifications should be avoided in clinical use because of poor reproducibility. Only simple II stage classification showed sufficient intra- and interobserver reliability., Level of Evidence: IV, Retrospective study., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

National databases, such as the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD), are known to contain inaccuracies. The coordination of services, national funding and future research rely on the integrity of the IHFD so as to avoid policy and budget planning being based on misrepresentative data. An audit was performed to assess the accuracy of the 2016 IHFD data collected in our trauma unit. The Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE)-recorded fracture classification, IHFD-recorded fracture classification and IHFD-recorded operation performed for each hip fracture patient was identified. Each variable was compared with the classifications and procedures derived by the authors. Two hundred fifty-two cases were identified. The HIPE-recorded fracture classification was accurate in 29% of cases, and the IHFD-recorded fracture classification in 61% (p < 0.001). The IHFD-recorded operation performed was accurate in 76% of cases. Thirty-six cases (14%) were omitted by HIPE, and eight (3%) from the local IHFD (p < 0.001). Errors resulted from poor documentation, in determining the presence of fracture displacement, prosthesis coating and intramedullary nail length. Diagnoses and procedures were identified from ward and theatre logbooks that the data coordinator was unable to record. The data coordinator in our unit doubled the accuracy of the data, and reduced the rate of omitted cases by a factor of 4.5. Accuracy levels would be significantly improved with clear, thorough documentation by the medical team following education of junior surgical trainees on hip fracture classification and procedural coding. Inaccurate data has a negative effect on hospital reimbursement and compromises the integrity of the IHFD.

Background: Automatic clinical text classification is a natural language processing (NLP) technology that unlocks information embedded in clinical narratives. Machine learning approaches have been shown to be effective for clinical text classification tasks. However, a successful machine learning model usually requires extensive human efforts to create labeled training data and conduct feature engineering. In this study, we propose a clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation to reduce these human efforts., Methods: We develop a rule-based NLP algorithm to automatically generate labels for the training data, and then use the pre-trained word embeddings as deep representation features for training machine learning models. Since machine learning is trained on labels generated by the automatic NLP algorithm, this training process is called weak supervision. We evaluat the paradigm effectiveness on two institutional case studies at Mayo Clinic: smoking status classification and proximal femur (hip) fracture classification, and one case study using a public dataset: the i2b2 2006 smoking status classification shared task. We test four widely used machine learning models, namely, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLPNN), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), using this paradigm. Precision, recall, and F1 score are used as metrics to evaluate performance., Results: CNN achieves the best performance in both institutional tasks (F1 score: 0.92 for Mayo Clinic smoking status classification and 0.97 for fracture classification). We show that word embeddings significantly outperform tf-idf and topic modeling features in the paradigm, and that CNN captures additional patterns from the weak supervision compared to the rule-based NLP algorithms. We also observe two drawbacks of the proposed paradigm that CNN is more sensitive to the size of training data, and that the proposed paradigm might not be effective for complex multiclass classification tasks., Conclusion: The proposed clinical text classification paradigm could reduce human efforts of labeled training data creation and feature engineering for applying machine learning to clinical text classification by leveraging weak supervision and deep representation. The experimental experiments have validated the effectiveness of paradigm by two institutional and one shared clinical text classification tasks.

A novel three-dimensional fragment-based classification system based on computed tomography findings was established to characterize femoral intertrochanteric fractures. The intertrochanteric bone fragments were defined as follows : neck, posterior portion of the greater trochanter, anterior portion of the greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, and shaft. Each type of fracture was classified as 2-, 3-, 4-, or 5-fragment according to the number of floating bone fragments. Following the description of the fracture type, each floating bone fragment was appended, with the exception of a fragment involving the shaft. Ninety-five intertrochanteric fractures were classified by the same surgeon. The fractures occurred in 14 men and 81 women with a mean age of 84.7 years. The frequency of each type of fracture was investigated. Thirty-one fractures (32.6%) were 2-fragment and 64 (67.4%) were ≥ 3-fragment. A fragment of the anterior portion of the greater trochanter, which cannot be classified using conventional systems, was included in 29 cases (30.5%). A 5-fragment fracture was detected in two cases (2.1%). Using this fragment-based classification system, intertrochanteric fractures can be evaluated in more detail than is possible using conventional classification systems. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 362-366, August, 2019.

Hip fractures are uncommon in childhood and adolescence. A high-energy injury is the most common cause. Low-energy trauma may result in a pathological hip fracture or stress fracture of the femoral neck, on the grounds of a preexisting skeletal disease, a tumor, or a tumor-like lesion. Surgical or conservative treatment may be provided based on underlying disease and/or age, Delbet and/or Colona classification, and displacement of the fracture. We present a case series of 13 children with pathological hip fracture. Mean age of patients was 7 years, and average follow-up was 3 years. There were types I and II, 3 type III, and 10 type IV fractures according to Delbet/Colona classification. Patients were treated conservatively, by open reduction and internal fixation or by minimally invasive surgery. In 11 children (84.5%), the outcome was satisfactory; one child (7.75%) presented with nonunion and refracture after minimally invasive surgery, and another (7.75%) presented with refracture after conservative treatment. Both patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Pathological hip fractures are rare in children and should be treated properly. Surgical treatment with open reduction, internal fixation, and bone grafting is preferred in displaced fractures. In nondisplaced fractures, the choice between conservative and surgical treatment should be based on Delbet/Colona classification and patient profile.

Rationale: Garden type I femoral neck fractures are incomplete stable fractures with impaction in valgus fractures that the question of whether there exists Garden type I femoral neck fracture is currently uncertain. There is still disagreement on the existence of the Garden type I fractures., Patient Concerns: Herein we report 2 cases with the Garden type I femoral neck fractures. Both of them had a history of simple fall., Diagnoses: The X-ray showed incomplete fractures of the femoral neck and the Garden classification is type I. Further computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to confirm the diagnosis of this type fracture, which showed that the superior cortex of femoral neck was discontinuous and the inferior cortex remains intact., Interventions: The conservative treatment schedule including immobilization of the affected lower limb, strict bed rest, bed-to-wheelchair transfer training, and half-to-full weight bearing mobilization were chosen to treat the patients., Outcomes: Both of them achieved fracture union with conservative treatment at 3-month follow-up. No secondary displacement, signal of osteonecrosis of the femoral head or other complications occurred during 24-month follow-up in 2 cases., Lessons: Although the Garden type I femoral neck fractures are rare, our report is in line with the real existence of it.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of uniform anti-rotational proximal femoral intramedullary nail (APFN) use on patient mobility status with the treatment of two different unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture groups of geriatric patients., Methods: The study included patients aged > 65 years who underwent surgery with APFN. Group 1 comprised AO classification, AO/OTA 31-A22, and A23 patients, and group 2, A31 and A32 patients. The demographic data of the patients, postoperative complications, follow-up, mortality status, postoperative reduction, tip-apex distance (TAD), and the Parker-Palmer mobility (PPM) score were evaluated., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of gender, affected side, time from trauma to surgery, ASA score, anesthesia type, duration of hospitalization, duration of surgery, TAD values, reduction values, or mortality rate. The average age of patients in group 2 was significantly higher than that of patients in group 1 (p < 0.05). The mobility scores of group 1 patients were significantly higher than those of group 2 (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: While no relationship was found between the TAD values and the reduction status of the cases, the PPM scores of the AO 31 A3 cases were determined to be significantly worse. Therefore, fractures with a preoperative classification of AO type 31 A3 can be expected to have worse results than A2 ITF fractures. The fracture type seems to have as great an effect as other factors on the postoperative mobility score.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical utility of internal rotation traction radiography in the classification of proximal femoral fractures., Materials and Methods: The study cohort included 78 consecutive patients who were surgically treated for a proximal femoral fracture and for whom preoperative physician-assisted internal rotation traction radiographs of the fractured hip were obtained in addition to standard radiographs. Two radiologists who were blinded to clinical information independently classified each fracture without the traction view and then with the traction view. The radiologists also reported their confidence (expressed as a percentage) in their classifications. The reference standard was the consensus interpretation of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopic images by two orthopedic surgeons and one radiologist. Classification accuracy was compared using the McNemar test. Subjective confidence and confidence-weighted accuracy were compare using paired t tests. Agreement with the reference standard and interreader agreement were calculated using the kappa statistic and were compared using the z-test after bootstrapping was performed to obtain the standard error., Results: With the traction view, the pooled accuracy increased from 44.9% to 72.4%, subjective confidence increased from 87% to 94%, and confidence-weighted accuracy increased from 51.7% to 74.3% (p < 0.001). With the traction view, the kappa statistic for agreement with the reference standard increased from 0.530 to 0.791 and from 0.381 to 0.625 for the two readers, and interreader agreement increased from 0.480 to 0.678 (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The addition of an internal rotation traction radiographic view significantly improves radiologist accuracy and confidence as well as interreader agreement in the classification of proximal femoral fractures, all of which would be expected to best guide appropriate surgical management.

Background: Radiographic fracture classification helps with research on prognosis and treatment. AO/OTA classification into fracture type has shown to be reliable, but further classification of fractures into subgroups reduces the interobserver agreement and takes a considerable amount of practice and experience in order to master., Questions/purposes: We assessed: (1) differences between more and less experienced trauma surgeons based on hip fractures treated per year, years of experience, and the percentage of their time dedicated to trauma, (2) differences in the interobserver agreement between classification into fracture type, group, and subgroup, and (3) differences in the interobserver agreement when assessing fracture stability compared to classifying fractures into type, group and subgroup., Methods: This study used the Science of Variation Group to measure factors associated with variation in interobserver agreement on classification of proximal femur fractures according to the AO/OTA classification on radiographs. We selected 30 anteroposterior radiographs from 1061 patients aged 55 years or older with an isolated fracture of the proximal femur, with a spectrum of fracture types proportional to the full database. To measure the interobserver agreement the Fleiss' kappa was determined and bootstrapping (resamples = 1000) was used to calculate the standard error, z statistic, and 95% confidence intervals. We compared the Kappa values of surgeons with more experience to less experienced surgeons., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the Kappa values on each classification level (type, group, subgroup) between more and less experienced surgeons. When all surgeons were combined into one group, the interobserver reliability was the greatest for classifying the fractures into type (kappa, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.97; p < 0.001), reflecting almost perfect agreement. When comparing the kappa values between classes (type, group, subgroup), we found statistically significant differences between each class. Substantial agreement was found in the clinically relevant groups stable/unstable trochanteric, displaced/non-displaced femoral neck, and femoral head fractures (kappa, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.67, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study adds to a growing body of evidence that relatively simple distinctions are more reliable and that this is independent of surgeon experience., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and AO classification systems, and to investigate whether or not the experience of the surgeon had any effect on the classification., Patients and Methods: All the radiographs of 35 patients with subtrochanteric femur fracture were classified by 16 observers using the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and 31-AO classifications. Two groups of observers were formed of eight orthopedic surgeons, each with at least five-year experience and eight orthopedic assistants, from six different hospitals, who were invited to participate in the study. All the observers reviewed all the X-rays at this first evaluation. At 6 weeks after the first evaluation, the same radiographs were presented to each observer again in a random order and all the observers were requested to classify the fractures again. To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability, the Fleiss kappa and Cohen's kappa values were used., Results: In the inter-observer reliability, the mean values of the two evaluations for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.724 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.722 (substantial) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the mean values were κ:0.691 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.629 (substantial) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the mean values were κ:0.279 (fair) for the specialists and κ:0.291 (fair) for the assistants. In the intra-observer reliability, the median values for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.955 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.855 (almost perfect) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the median values were κ:0.915 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.900 (almost perfect) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the median values were κ:0.665 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.695 (substantial) for the assistants., Conclusions: As both the Russell Taylor and Seinsheimer classifications were found to be more reliable and reproducible than the AO classification for subtrochanteric femoral fractures, they can be considered to be more valuable in clinical practice and communication. The experience of the surgeons was not found to have any significance in the evaluation of these three classification systems in these types of fractures.

Objective: To discuss the effectiveness of the modified Hueter direct anterior approach in treatment of Pipkin typeⅠ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures., Methods: Between September 2014 and May 2016, 12 patients with Pipkin type Ⅰ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures were treated with the modified Hueter direct anterior approach. There were 8 males and 4 females, aged from 32 to 60 years (mean, 40.2 years). The disease causes included traffic accident injury in 9 cases and falling from height injury in 3 cases. According to Pipkin typing, 8 cases were rated as type Ⅰ and 4 cases as type Ⅱ. The interval of injury and admission was 2-28 hours (mean, 7.2 hours). Reduction was performed in all patients within 6 hours after admission, and then bone traction was given. The operation was performed in 3-7 days (mean, 4.3 days) after redution. The modified Hueter direct anterior approach was applied to expose and fix femoral head fractures by Herbert screws compressively. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the Thompson-Epstein scale at last follow-up., Results: The operation time was 80-130 minutes (mean, 97.5 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 100-200 mL (mean, 130.2 mL). All fractures achieved anatomical reduction and successful fixation. All 12 patients were followed up 12-32 months (mean, 24.3 months). All patients achieved bone union in 15-20 weeks (mean, 16.3 weeks) and no wound infection, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, or heterotopic ossification occurred. Traumatic arthritis occured in 3 patients. According to the Thompson-Epstein scale at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 83.3%., Conclusion: The modified Hueter direct anterior approach has the advantages of clear anatomic structure, less trauma, and shorter operation time, and it can effectively expose and fix the Pipkin typeⅠ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures.

Background: The surgical treatment of acetabular fractures relies on the understanding of fracture architecture and their classification. The Judet and Letournel classification has been the cornerstone in understanding and treating acetabular fractures. Recently, there has been growing evidence of discrepancies and incompleteness in the Judet and Letournel classification, adversely affecting its clinical use. This study describes a novel comprehensive classification system that will direct surgical approach and fixation methods., Methods: A retrospective study of patients with acetabular fractures treated at a level-I trauma center also serving as a referral center for acetabular fractures was performed. Fractures were classified according to both the novel and Judet and Letournel classification systems. The novel classification developed integrates the displacement vector (posterior, superomedial, or combined) and the fractured anatomic structures (anteroposterior wall, pelvic brim, iliac wing, quadrilateral plate, and ischium). Furthermore, postoperative malreduction was evaluated on the basis of intra-articular gap measurements in either anteroposterior or Judet oblique views., Results: The study included 229 patients with acetabular fractures treated between 2007 and 2016. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 46.7 ± 21.75 years, and 172 patients (75.1%) were surgically treated. According to the novel classification system, the posterior displacement vector group included 60 patients, the superomedial displacement vector group included 130 patients, the combined displacement vector group included 36 patients, and 3 patients were unclassified by the new system. Forty-six patients (20.1%) could not be classified by the Judet and Letournel classification. Pelvic-brim fracture patterns were described as along the pelvic brim, across the pelvic brim, or comminuted. The quadrilateral plate primary fracture line was shown to be perpendicular to the pelvic brim. The selection of surgical approach and fixation methods depends on the fracture type., Conclusions: This study presents a novel classification system for acetabular fractures. It offers a complete classification system, encompassing nearly all fracture patterns. As the selection of surgical approach and fixation methods depends on fracture classification and understanding, the novel classification system can aid the surgeon with decision-making.

Hip fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and a major health problem in the United States (). Eighty percent of hip fractures are experienced by 80-year-old women. Plain radiographs usually confirm the diagnosis, but if there is a high level of suspicion of an occult hip fracture, magnetic resonance imaging or bone scan is the next step to confirm the diagnosis. Areas of the hip bone have varied bone strength and blood supply, making the femoral neck one of the most vulnerable areas for fracture. A consultation to an orthopedic surgeon will determine surgical interventions.

Objective: To observe the effect of admission blood urea and creatinine levels on mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture., Methods: Form January 2013 to December 2014, 767 elder patients with hip fracture were treated in our hospital including 253 males and 514 females, aged from 65 to 96 years old with an average of(75.67±6.81) years old. According blood urea and creatinine levels, the 767 hip fracture patients were divided into four groups as follow: group A(blood urea>=5 mmol/L, creatinine>=70 μmol/L); group B (blood urea>=5 mmol/L, creatinine<70 μmol/L); group C (blood urea<5 mmol/L, creatinine>=70 μmol/L); group D(blood urea<5 mmol/L, creatinine<70 μmol/L). In group A, there were 211 patients including 70 males and 141 females, aged from 65 to 95 years old with an average of(80.24±6.51) years old; in group B, there were 355 patients including 125 males and 230 females, aged from 65 to 93 years old with an average of(78.46±7.09) years old; in group C, there were 36 patients including 11 males and 25 females, aged from 65 to 95 years old with an average of (77.83±6.78) years old; in group D, there were 165 patients including 47 males and 118 females, aged from 65 to 96 years old with an average of (76.71±8.35) years old. The survivals and dead patients in four groups were collected and in-hospital mortality rate, 3-month, 12-month and 18-month mortality rate of patients were calculated. COX regression analysis was performed on these data, and clinical significance of serum urea and creatinine at admission in the elderly patients was researched., Results: All 767 hip fracture patients were followed up from 18 to 24 months with an average of (21.33±1.25) months, 159 patients were died in follow up period. The in-hospital mortality rate in 3-month, 12-month and 18-month mortality rate of the patients with high blood urea and high blood creatinine (urea>=5 mmol/L, creatinine>=70 μmol/L) were 2.37%, 9.95%, 16.11% and 26.07%, and were higher than other three groups respectively. COX regression analysis revealed that the independent predictors effecting the mortality rate included age [ P =0.000, OR=1.375, 95%CI(1.155, 1.637)], blood urea at admission [ P =0.000, OR=1.375, 95%CI(1.155, 1.637)], and blood creatinine at admission[ P =0.037, OR=1.213, 95%CI(1.121, 1.484)]., Conclusions: Elderly hip fracture patients with high serum urea and high serum creatinine at admission indicate higher fatality rate. Age, serum urea and serum creatinine at admission were independent predictors of fatality rate of elderly hip fracture patients., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose.

Objective: To determine the effect of site of fracture on the prognosis for patients of elderly hip fracture., Methods: From January 2012 to December 2014, 667 patients with hip fractures were divided into femoral neck fracture group and intertrochanteric fracture group according to the site of fracture. There were 304 cases of intertrochanteric fracture, including 96 males and 208 females, with an average age of (80.33±7.94) years old. There were 217 cases of femoral neck fracture, including 74 males and 143 females, with an average age of (79.82±9.33) years old. Patients' data, mortality and activities of daily living were compared between two groups., Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidity, ASA classification, and anesthesia between two groups, but the time of admission to surgery, duration of operation, blood loss of intra-operative, volume of drainage, and the average of transfusion were shown to have significant differences. The levels of White blood cell count (WBC) for intertrochanteric fracture group were shown to be higher than that of femoral neck fracture patients at admission, 1, 3 and 5 days after operation. The levels of hemoglobin, and albumin for intertrochanteric fracture were lower than that of femoral neck fracture patients at all period of time. The mortality of intertrochanteric fracture group during hospitalization, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were higher than that of femoral neck fracture, but did not reach significant difference. In patients who survived, the scores of ADL for femoral neck fracture were higher than that of intertrochanteric fracture at discharge, 1, 3 months after operation, but there was no significant difference for ADL at 6 and 12 months between two groups., Conclusions: The response of stress for intertrochanteric fracture were more than femoral neck fracture, but the mortality was similar than that of femoral neck fracture after excluding the influence of age, sex, comorbidity, and other factors. Compared to intertrochanteric fracture, the femoral neck fracture patients had a better functional recovery during early stage, and the two groups reached a similar functional recovery at 1 year after operation., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose.

Purpose: Tha aims of this study were to identify the incidence of femoral head fractures in the setting of acetabular fractures and to determine the relationship between acetabular fracture pattern, the degree of acetabular fracture displacement, and the incidence of femoral head fractures., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 274 patients with 300 acetabular fractures diagnosed on pelvic CT. Acetabular fractures were categorized using the Judet-Letournel classification system., Results: Femoral head fractures were present in 18.0% of acetabular fractures. Fracture patterns with a posterior wall component had a very high (56.3%) incidence of femoral head fracture. Anterior column and anterior column with posterior hemitransverse fractures have a very low (3.4%) incidence of femoral head fracture. Anterior hip dislocation had a 66.7% incidence of femoral head fracture, while posterior dislocation had a 71.9% incidence. Acetabular fractures displaced by more than 5 mm had a 26.9% incidence of femoral head fracture, while acetabular fracture displaced less than 5 mm had only 4.2% incidence of femoral head fracture., Conclusion: Femoral head fractures are a very common associated finding in patients presenting with acetabular fractures. In patients with a posterior wall component of the fracture or associated hip dislocation, a femoral head fracture is more likely than not present. Conversely, in acetabular fractures with less than 5 mm displacement or anterior column fractures without posterior acetabular involvement, femoral head fractures are very unlikely in the absence of a dislocation event.

Objective: To compare clinical results of treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures through modified Smith-Peterson(S-P) approach and modified Hardinge approach., Methods: From July 2005 to July 2014, 42 patients with Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures were treated with operation. A total of 23 patients in anterior group was treated with modified S-P approach including 17 males and 6 females with an average age of (29.3±9.4) years old, 5 cases of type I by excision of the fragement, 3 cases of type I and 15 cases of type II cases by fixation of the fragement. While a total of 19 patients in the lateral group was treated with modified Hardinge approach including 15 males and 4 females with an average age of (31.4±10.0) years old, 3 cases of type I by excision of the fragement, 4 cases of type I and 12 cases of type II by fixation of the fragement. Operative time, blood loss during operation and fracture healing time were observed and compared. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of the patients were measured using Thompson-Epstein scoring scale. The effect of hip reduction time of less than 6 h, 6 to12 h, and more than 12 h, the effect of surgery time within 24 h and more than 24 h after injury were compared., Results: All patients were followed up from 24 to 60 months with an average of(30.29±6.95) months. The operation time (61.96±12.22) min, blood loss (46.09±18.03) ml, and (74.74±10.06) min, blood loss (72.11±19.88) ml in lateral group in the anterior group were better than those of lateral group( P <0.05). In anterior group, fracture healing time was(12.22±1.70) weeks, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 10 cases, fair in 4 cases and poor in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 78.3%, the incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 8.69%(2/23), and the incidence of heterotopic ossification was 13.04%(3/23). While in lateral group, the fracture healing time was(12.42±1.95) weeks, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 3 cases, the excellent and good rate was 68.4%, the incidence of avascular necrosis of femoral head was 10.53%(2/19), and the incidence of heterotopic ossification was 5.26%(1/19). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time, postoperative effect and postoperative complications between the anterior group and lateral group( P <0.05). The effect of patients with reduction time of hip dislocation less than 12 h was significantly better than that of more than 12 h, there was no significant difference in the effect between reduction time within 6 h and 6 to 12 h. There was no significant difference in the outcome between surgical patients within 24 h and more than 24 h after injury., Conclusions: Dislocated hip of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures should be closed reduction within 6 h. If conditions are limited, the reduction time can be accepted within 12 h. Both of modified S-P approach and modified Hardinge approach are effective in treating Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures, and can obtain excellent outcomes. Moreover, modified S-P approach has advantage of less trauma, less blood loss, shorter operative time., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose.

Objective: To observe the biomechanical effects of the lateral wall of the femur in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures with intramedullary or extramedullary fixation to guide the choice of clinical fixed methods., Methods: Twelve adults femur specimens of intertrochanteric fractures were belong to the type A1 of the AO fracture classification and randomly divided into the lateral wall complete PFNA group, the lateral wall complete PF-LCP group, the lateral wall breakage PFNA group, lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group, every group had 3 specimens. The four groups of specimens were subjected to compressive loading experiment with Universal Material Testing Machine. The maximum loading force was observed. The distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments along the intertrochanteric were measured with Calipers., Results: The maximum loading force of lateral wall complete PFNA group were larger than that of lateral wall complete PF-LCP group, and the maximum loading force of lateral wall breakage PFNA group were larger than that of lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group, there were significant differences ( P <0.05). The distance between fracture ends of the four groups before compression were not significant differences( P >0.05). The distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments were not significant differences between lateral wall complete PFNA group and lateral wall complete PF-LCP group after compression ( P >0.05). But the distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments of lateral wall breakage PFNA group were less than that of lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group( P <0.05)., Conclusions: Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures have stronger loading force. Both intramedullary and extramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures have strong stability when the lateral wall of the femur is complete, but intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is stronger stability than extramedullary fixation when the lateral wall of the femur is broken. So the intramedullary fixation is the first choice for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose.