Search

(1) Background: Over the past two decades use of new imaging modalities and the adaptation of applicators have allowed for advances in volumetric (3D) imaging-based brachytherapy practices for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcome and toxicity for three consecutively introduced brachytherapy practices in a large single-center cohort; (2) Methods: Patients treated for cervical cancer with primary radiotherapy and curative intent were consecutively included in this retrospective, single-center cohort study from 2006 to 2019. This cohort was divided into three groups (CT, MRI, and MRI+needles) based on the timing of the introduction of a novel brachytherapy practice; 3D brachytherapy planning using CT- and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy and the use of parametrial interstitial needles, respectively. Actuarial estimates were compared between groups. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to correct for other risk factors. Crude rates of severe (≥grade 3) late toxicity were reported; (3) Results: A total of 397 patients were included in this cohort. At a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range (IQR) 22–62), actuarial 3-year local control, pelvic control, disease-free survival, and overall survival for the entire cohort were 91% (95% (Confidence Interval (CI)) 88–94), 88% (95% CI 84–91), 69% (95% CI 64–74), and 75% (95% CI 70–79), respectively). Local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were significantly improved in the MRI+needles group compared to the CT group (p = 0.040, p = 0.004, and p < 0.001, respectively). Independent risk factors for overall survival were treatment in either the CT or MRI group (vs. MRI+needles), older age at diagnosis, adeno (squamous) carcinoma, FIGO stage III/IV, and lymph node metastases. The crude rate of severe late toxicity was 27% in the CT, 26% in the MRI, and 20% in the MRI+needles group; (4) Conclusions: Prognosis i

Objective: The in-house developed 70 MHz AMC-4 locoregional hyperthermia system has been in clinical use since 1984. This device was recently commercialized as the Alba 4D (Medlogix®, Rome, Italy), with a similar geometrical 4-waveguide design. At the time of this study a hybrid Alba 4D was installed at our center, which incorporated elements of the AMC-4. This study aims to compare clinical performance of both devices. Methods: During one year after clinical acceptance of the hybrid Alba 4D, both devices were used for treatment delivery in patients scheduled for locoregional hyperthermia. Each patient started with the AMC-4, next sessions were allocated to either device. Possible differences between Alba 4D and AMC-4 sessions in power, achieved temperature T0, T10, T50, T90, T100, treatment time and complaints per session, were evaluated using linear mixed models (LMMs) for repeated measures with patient as random effect. Results: From March 2018 to April 2019, eleven patients with cervical, pancreatic, vaginal carcinoma and uterine leiomyosarcoma received 27 locoregional hyperthermia sessions with the Alba 4D and 34 sessions with the AMC-4. Median number of sessions per patient was 5 (range 3–13). Treatment results for both devices were not significantly different: T50 was 40.5 ± 1.0 °C vs. 40.8 ± 0.7 °C, applied power was 500 ± 79 W vs. 526 ± 108 W, for the Alba 4D vs. AMC-4, respectively. Conclusion: Results of the first patients treated with the hybrid Alba 4D demonstrated comparable clinical performance of the Alba 4D and AMC-4 locoregional hyperthermia systems, and both devices are expected to yield similar favorable clinical results.