Search

Background: Cytokine release syndrome, commonly associated with T-cell immunotherapies, was observed with talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody, in the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 study, leading to elevated interleukin (IL)-6, which can suppress cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity., Objective: We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of elevated IL-6 on the exposure of co-administered CYP450 substrates for two scenarios: (1) the observed median IL-6 profile and (2) a profile with the highest IL-6 maximum concentration following talquetamab treatment., Methods: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed based on the literature and simulations performed using observed IL-6 profiles from patients in MonumenTAL-1 who received the subcutaneous recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of talquetamab: 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) and 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W)., Results: Median IL-6 maximum concentration was 18.4 and 7.1 pg/mL, and maximum IL-6 maximum concentration was 213 and 3503 pg/mL for talquetamab QW and Q2W RP2Ds, respectively. For the median IL-6 profile, no interaction between IL-6 and studied CYP substrates was predicted at either RP2D. The maximum IL-6 profile predicted weak-to-moderate impact on exposure of CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 substrates and minimal impact on exposure of CYP1A2 substrates at both RP2Ds. Impact on exposure of CYP2C9 substrates was predicted as minimal at QW and minimal-to-weak at Q2W RP2Ds. Time to return to 20% difference from baseline enzymatic activity was predicted as 7 and 9 days after start of cycle 1 for QW and Q2W RP2Ds, respectively., Conclusions: These modeling results suggest that IL-6 release due to talquetamab-induced cytokine release syndrome has limited impact on potential drug-drug interactions, with the highest likelihood of impact occurring from initiation of talquetamab step-up dosing up to 7 (QW) or 9 (Q2W) days after first treatment dose in cycle 1 and during and after cytokine release syndrome. Multiple myeloma can be treated with immunotherapies such as the bispecific antibody, talquetamab, which binds the novel antigen G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D on multiple myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells and induces T-cell-mediated lysis of multiple myeloma cells. Following talquetamab treatment, many patients experience cytokine release syndrome, an inflammatory immune response where levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, are increased. Interleukin-6 can suppress the activity of important enzymes in the body (cytochrome [CYP] P450s) that are involved in drug clearance. This study used a physiologically based pharmacokinetic computer model to investigate the potential impact of increased IL-6 levels on CYP450 enzymes to determine subsequent impact on drugs that are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes. The results showed no predicted interaction between median levels of IL-6 observed in patients and CYP substrates (such as caffeine and omeprazole) with talquetamab. In a simulation that assessed higher (maximum) IL-6 levels observed in patients, the predicted impact of IL-6 was minimal to weak for most of the CYP substrates assessed. The effect on CYP450 enzymatic activity was highest from initiation of talquetamab step-up dosing up to 7-9 days after the first treatment dose of talquetamab. These results suggest that, in this treatment time period, elevated IL-6 levels due to talquetamab-induced cytokine release syndrome have limited impact on drugs that are CYP substrates that may be used in conjunction with talquetamab, but that the concentration and toxicity of these drugs should be monitored and the dose of CYP substrate adjusted as required., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development and medical writing support was funded by Janssen Global Services. Conflicts of Interest M-EW is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. JG is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. BWH is employed by Janssen Oncology and has stock/other ownership interests in Johnson & Johnson/Janssen. TM is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. JT is employed by Johnson & Johnson, has stock/other ownership interests in Johnson & Johnson, and has received research funding from Janssen Research & Development. TR is employed by Janssen Oncology and has stock/other ownership interests in Johnson & Johnson/Janssen. CH is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. CK is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. LDZ is employed by Janssen and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. SG is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis, has stock/other ownership interests in Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and holds patents with Johnson & Johnson. XM is employed by Janssen at the time of the analysis and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. DO is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Ethics Approval Not applicable. Consent to Participate Not applicable. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data Sharing The data sharing policy of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson is available at https://www.janssen.com/clinicaltrials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu. Code Availability Not applicable. Authors’ Contributions M-EW: wrote the manuscript, designed the research, performed the research, analyzed the data, and contributed significantly to the manuscript review and editing. JG: designed the research, performed the research, contributed to the data acquisition and interpretation, and writing (review and editing). BWH: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). TM: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). JT: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). TR: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). CH: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). CK: contributed to conceptualization, data acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). LDZ: designed the research, performed the research, analyzed the data, and contributed to writing (review and editing). SG: designed the research, contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and writing (review and editing). XM: designed the research, analyzed the data, contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and writing (review and editing). DO: designed the research, performed the research, analyzed the data, and contributed to writing (review and editing)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

What Is This Summary About?: This plain language summary describes the results of a phase 1 research study (or clinical trial) called MonumenTAL-1 published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December 2022. A phase 1 study is an early clinical trial where researchers evaluate how safe a medicine is at different doses in a small number of people. In the MonumenTAL-1 study, researchers looked at a new medicine under development called talquetamab, for people living with multiple myeloma (a type of blood cancer) who did not respond (refractory), stopped responding (relapsed), or who had difficulty dealing with their previous treatments., How Was the Study Conducted?: The phase 1 MonumenTAL-1 study was performed in 2 parts. Safety was the main focus of Part 1 in which side effects, and how serious they were, were assessed. The results of Part 1 were used to identify doses of talquetamab that were well tolerated, without a need to stop treatment or reduce the doses, for further study in Part 2. Part 2 of the study examined how well talquetamab worked to decrease signs of the cancer and what side effects, and their severity, people experienced at the doses identified in Part 1., What Were the Results?: In Part 1 of the study, researchers identified 2 doses of talquetamab for further study: 405 micrograms for every kilogram of body weight (μg/kg) given weekly and 800 μg/kg every other week. All participants experienced at least one side effect of treatment at these 2 doses. Less than half of participants (43% at 405 μg/kg weekly dose and 34% at the 800 μg/kg every other week dose) experienced serious side effects which are those side effects that led to hospitalization, death, or permanent or life-threatening damage). The most common side effects at both doses were a condition known as cytokine release syndrome (CRS); changes in blood cell levels (where different types of cells in the blood were measured); changes in skin such as itching, dry skin, eczema, ulcers or shedding; changes in nails such as discoloration or ridging (lines or dents); and changes in sense of taste such as food tasting sour or metallic. CRS is caused by the overactivation of the immune system (the body's natural defense system) and can result in fever, feeling sick (nausea), being tired (fatigue), low blood pressure, low blood oxygen levels and body aches. Most cases of CRS, as well as most other side effects, were mild or moderate. Most common serious events were CRS, fever and bone pain. Most people had fewer signs of the cancer after taking talquetamab, and the response was similar between the 2 doses. The median duration of response at the 2 identified doses was 8-10 months., What Do the Results Mean?: Most of the side effects people experienced when taking talquetamab were mild or moderate. Most people who took talquetamab responded to the treatment even though they hadn't responded or stopped responding to previous multiple myeloma treatments or stopped taking those treatments because they were unable to tolerate them. These results demonstrate the potential of talquetamab as a treatment option in people who have used up other available therapy options. The 2 doses of talquetamab identified here are being examined in a larger group of participants to further test for safety and to test how well people respond.

Background: G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) is an orphan receptor expressed in malignant plasma cells. Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody against CD3 and GPRC5D, redirects T cells to mediate killing of GPRC5D-expressing myeloma cells., Methods: In a phase 1 study, we evaluated talquetamab administered intravenously weekly or every other week (in doses from 0.5 to 180 μg per kilogram of body weight) or subcutaneously weekly, every other week, or monthly (5 to 1600 μg per kilogram) in patients who had heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that had progressed with established therapies (a median of six previous lines of therapy) or who could not receive these therapies without unacceptable side effects. The primary end points - the frequency and type of dose-limiting toxic effects (study part 1 only), adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities - were assessed in order to select the recommended doses for a phase 2 study., Results: At the data-cutoff date, 232 patients had received talquetamab (102 intravenously and 130 subcutaneously). At the two subcutaneous doses recommended for a phase 2 study (405 μg per kilogram weekly [30 patients] and 800 μg per kilogram every other week [44 patients]), common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (in 77% and 80% of the patients, respectively), skin-related events (in 67% and 70%), and dysgeusia (in 63% and 57%); all but one cytokine release syndrome event were of grade 1 or 2. One dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 rash was reported in a patient who had received talquetamab at the 800-μg dose level. At median follow-ups of 11.7 months (in patients who had received talquetamab at the 405-μg dose level) and 4.2 months (in those who had received it at the 800-μg dose level), the percentages of patients with a response were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 85) and 64% (95% CI, 48 to 78), respectively. The median duration of response was 10.2 months and 7.8 months, respectively., Conclusions: Cytokine release syndrome, skin-related events, and dysgeusia were common with talquetamab treatment but were primarily low-grade. Talquetamab induced a substantial response among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MonumenTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03399799.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Teclistamab (JNJ-64007957), a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, displayed potent T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity of multiple myeloma cells in preclinical studies., Objective: A first-in-human, Phase I, dose escalation study (MajesTEC-1) is evaluating teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma., Patients and Methods: To estimate the efficacious therapeutic dosing range of teclistamab, pharmacokinetic (PK) data following the first cycle doses in the low-dose cohorts in the Phase I study were modeled using a 2-compartment model and simulated to predict the doses that would have average and trough serum teclistamab concentrations in the expected therapeutic range (between EC 50 and EC 90 values from an ex vivo cytotoxicity assay)., Results: The doses predicted to have average serum concentrations between the EC 50 and EC 90 range were validated. In addition, simulations showed that weekly intravenous and subcutaneous doses of 0.70 mg/kg and 0.72 mg/kg, respectively, resulted in mean trough levels comparable to the maximum EC 90 . The most active doses in the Phase I study were weekly intravenous doses of 0.27 and 0.72 mg/kg and weekly subcutaneous doses of 0.72 and 1.5 mg/kg, with the weekly 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous doses selected as the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). With active doses, exposure was maintained above the mean EC 90 . All patients who responded to the RP2D of teclistamab had exposure above the maximum EC 90 in both serum and bone marrow on cycle 3, Day 1 of treatment., Conclusions: Our findings show that PK simulations of early clinical data together with ex vivo cytotoxicity estimates can inform the identification of a bispecific antibody's therapeutic range., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03145181, date of registration: May 9, 2017., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Filanesib (ARRY-520) is a highly selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein, which has demonstrated preclinical antimyeloma activity., Methods: This open-label Phase 1/2 study determined the maximum tolerated dose of Filanesib administered on Days 1 and 2 of 14-Day Cycles in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and included expansion cohorts with and without dexamethasone (40 mg/week). Patients in the dose-escalation (N = 31) and Phase 2 single-agent (N = 32) cohorts had received prior bortezomib as well as prior thalidomide and/or lenalidomide. Patients in the Phase 2 Filanesib plus dexamethasone cohort (N = 55) had received prior alkylator therapy and had disease refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. Prophylactic filgrastim was incorporated during dose escalation and was used throughout Phase 2., Results: Patients in each cohort had received a median of ≥6 prior therapies. The most common dose-limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and mucosal inflammation. In Phase 2, Grade 3 and 4 cytopenias were reported in approximately 50% of patients. Nonhematologic toxicities were infrequent. Phase 2 response rates (partial responses or better) were 16% (single agent) and 15% (Filanesib plus dexamethasone). All responding patients had low baseline levels of α1-acid glycoprotein, a potential selective biomarker., Conclusions: Filanesib 1.50 mg/m 2 /day administered with prophylactic filgrastim has a manageable safety profile and encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00821249. Cancer 2017;123:4617-4630. © 2017 American Cancer Society., (© 2017 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Filanesib is a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor that has demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma. Preclinical synergy with bortezomib was the rationale for the current phase 1 study., Methods: The current study was a multicenter study with an initial dose-escalation phase to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 2 schedules of filanesib plus bortezomib with and without dexamethasone, followed by a dose-expansion phase., Results: With the addition of prophylactic filgastrim, the maximum planned dose was attained: 1.3 mg/m 2 /day of bortezomib plus 40 mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, with filanesib given intravenously either at a dose of 1.5 mg/m 2 /day (schedule 1: days 1, 2, 15, and 16) or 3 mg/m 2 /day (schedule 2: days 1 and 15). The most common adverse events (assessed for severity using version 4.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were transient, noncumulative neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with grade 3/4 events reported in 44% (16% in cycle 1 with filgastrim) and 29% of patients, respectively. A low (≤11%) overall rate of nonhematological grade 3/4 toxicity was observed. With a median of 3 prior lines of therapy and 56% of patients with disease that was refractory to proteasome inhibitors, the overall response rate was 20% (55 patients), and was 29% in 14 patients with proteasome inhibitors-refractory disease receiving filanesib at a dose of ≥1.25 mg/m 2 (duration of response, 5.2 to ≥21.2 months)., Conclusions: The current phase 1 study established a dosing schedule for the combination of these agents that demonstrated a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of nonhematologic toxicity and manageable hematologic toxicity. The combination of filanesib, bortezomib, and dexamethasone appears to have durable activity in patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer 2016;122:3327-3335. © 2016 American Cancer Society., (© 2016 American Cancer Society.)