Search

Background Formulating a topical medication that does not irritate the skin is an important factor contributing to patient treatment adherence and satisfaction. Many topical prescription products use penetration enhancers (including propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and ethanol) to overcome barrier properties of the skin. However, these excipients may irritate the skin causing tolerability reactions such as burning and stinging, which can reduce patient treatment adherence. Topical roflumilast is a highly potent (Kd∼0.7 nM) phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor formulated as a water-based cream or foam that does not contain penetration enhancers or fragrances. Objective We present prospectively assessed investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability from Phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast for patients with psoriasis (DERMIS-1, DERMIS-2, ARRECTOR), seborrheic dermatitis (SD; STRATUM), and atopic dermatitis (AD; INTEGUMENT-1, INTEGUMENT-2). Methods Patients were randomized to apply topical roflumilast (DERMIS: 0.3% cream; ARRECTOR and STRATUM: 0.3% foam; INTEGUMENT: 0.15% cream) or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (DERMIS, ARRECTOR, and STRATUM) or 4 weeks (INTEGUMENT). Investigators assessed local tolerability on an 8-point scale (0 [no evidence of irritation] to 7 [strong reaction spreading beyond application site]) in the clinic before investigational product (IP) application. Patients reported local tolerability on a 4-point scale (0 [none: no sensation] to 3 [severe: hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort]) in the clinic 10-15 minutes after IP application. Tolerability was also assessed by reviewing documented adverse events. Results As assessed by investigators, ≥96.5% of patients in the roflumilast-treated groups had no evidence of irritation at the application site across all trials at all timepoints. Patient-rated local tolerability was favorable and improved with treatment: across all trials, 1% of roflumilast-treated patients reported a score of 3 (severe; defined as a "hot tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort") after the first application (day 1) and <1% at each subsequent assessment. Rates of adverse events, including those at the application site, were low for all trials. Conclusions Roflumilast cream and foam formulations demonstrated favorable local tolerability based on investigator- and patient-rated assessments in patients with psoriasis, SD, and AD, including application to sensitive areas such as the face and intertriginous areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Roflumilast is a selective, highly potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor under investigation as a nonsteroidal, once-daily cream for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods We present pooled results from two identical phase 3 randomized controlled trials (INTEGUMENT-1: NCT04773587; INTEGUMENT-2: NCT04773600) of roflumilast cream 0.15%. Patients aged ≥6 years with mild to moderate AD were randomized 2:1 to apply roflumilast (n=884) or vehicle (n=453) cream once-daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) Success (Clear/Almost Clear vIGA-AD plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 4. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated using the Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), SCORing AD (SCORAD), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index/Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the Dermatitis Family Impact questionnaire. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results At Week 4, more roflumilast- than vehicle-treated patients achieved vIGA-AD Success (31.3% vs. 14.1%, P<0.0001), WI-NRS Success (≥4-point improvement on WI-NRS in patients aged ≥12 years with baseline WI-NRS ≥4; 31.9% vs. 16.6%, P<0.0001); and WI-NRS of 0/1 (in patients with baseline WI-NRS ≥2; 28.8% vs 18.5%, P=0.0087). At Week 4, roflumilast-treated patients improved more than vehicle-treated on the pruritus and sleep components of SCORAD (least squares mean percentage change −48.2% vs. −27.8%; [P<0.0001] and −47.9% vs. −22.9% [P<0.05], respectively). Differences favoring roflumilast were also seen for other secondary endpoints, including quality of life of the patient and family. Safety and local tolerability were favorable. Conclusion Once-daily, nonsteroidal roflumilast cream 0.15% improved PROs in patients with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Roflumilast, a highly potent phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, is being investigated as a non-steroidal, once-daily cream for atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods INTEGUMENT-OLE (NCT04804605) was an open-label 52-week safety trial. Patients (N=658) with mild to moderate AD who completed a 4-week randomized vehicle-controlled phase 3 trial of roflumilast cream continued or switched to once-daily roflumilast cream 0.15% in this open-label extension trial. Starting at Week 4, patients achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score of 0 (Clear) switched to twice-weekly (BIW) maintenance dosing. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included vIGA-AD, Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). "Disease control" was defined as duration of vIGA-AD=0/1 on BIW dosing following achievement of vIGA-AD=0. Results With cumulative treatment up to 56 weeks, 36.7% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs); most were mild to moderate in severity. Overall, 4.7% of patients had AEs deemed treatment-related and 3.0% discontinued due to AEs. The most common AEs (>2%) were COVID-19, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and headache. At Week 52, 55.7%, 61.1%, and 53.6% of patients achieved vIGA-AD=0/1 (Clear/Almost Clear), ≥75% reduction in EASI, and ≥4-point reduction in WI-NRS (among patients aged ≥12 years with baseline WI-NRS ≥4), respectively. Of the 130 (19.8%) patients who achieved disease control, 50% maintained "disease control" for at least 281 days. Conclusion Treatment with roflumilast cream 0.15% demonstrated long-term safety in patients with AD consistent with parent trials and durable efficacy through 52 weeks, including patients who switched to BIW dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Roflumilast cream 0.15% is a selective, highly potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor under investigation as a non-steroidal, once-daily treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: Here, pooled results from two identical Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (INTEGUMENT-1: NCT04773587 and INTEGUMENT-2: NCT04773600) are presented. Methods: Patients with AD aged ≥6 years with baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥5 and Validated Investigator Global Assessment-AD (vIGA-AD) score of Mild or Moderate were randomized 2:1 to apply roflumilast (n=884) or vehicle (n=453) once daily for 4 weeks. Results: A significantly greater percentage of roflumilast-versus vehicle-treated patients achieved the primary endpoint, vIGA-AD Success (Clear or Almost Clear vIGA-AD plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 4 (31.3% vs. 14.1%; P<0.0001). Significant differences favoring roflumilast were observed for multiple secondary endpoints at Week 4: percentage of patients achieving vIGA-AD of Clear or Almost Clear (41.1% vs. 21.4%; P<0.0001), percentage achieving 75% reduction in EASI (42.7% vs. 20.6%; P<0.0001), and percentage with baseline Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale ≥4 achieving a 4-point reduction (31.9% vs. 16.6%; P<0.0001). Improvement in itch was reported as early as 24 hours. Both groups had low incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Local tolerability was favorable, with >90% of patients reporting no or mild sensation across both treatment groups at all timepoints. Conclusions: Once-daily roflumilast cream 0.15% provided improvement across multiple efficacy endpoints by Week 4 with favorable safety and tolerability in patients aged ≥6 years with AD in two Phase 3 trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Formulating a topical medication that does not irritate the skin is an important factor contributing to patient treatment adherence and satisfaction. Many topical prescription products use penetration enhancers (including propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and ethanol) to overcome barrier properties of the skin. However, these excipients may irritate the skin causing tolerability reactions such as burning and stinging, which can reduce patient treatment adherence. Topical roflumilast is a highly potent (Kd~0.7 nM) phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor formulated as a water-based cream or foam that does not contain penetration enhancers or fragrances. Objectives: We present prospectively assessed investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability from Phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast for patients with psoriasis (DERMIS-1, DERMIS-2, ARRECTOR) seborrheic dermatitis (SD; STRATUM), and atopic dermatitis (AD; INTEGUMENT-1, INTEGUMENT-2). Methods: Patients were randomized to apply topical roflumilast (DERMIS: 0.3% cream; ARRECTOR and STRATUM: 0.3% foam; INTEGUMENT: 0.15% cream) or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (DERMIS, ARRECTOR, and STRATUM) or 4 weeks (INTEGUMENT). Investigators assessed local tolerability on an 8-point scale (0 [no evidence of irritation] to 7 [strong reaction spreading beyond application site]) in the clinic before investigational product (IP) application. Patients reported local tolerability on a 4-point scale (0 [none: no sensation] to 3 [severe: hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort]) in the clinic 10-15 minutes after IP application. Tolerability was also assessed by reviewing documented adverse events. Results: As assessed by investigators, =96.5% of patients in the roflumilast-treated groups had no evidence of irritation at the application site across all trials at all timepoints. Patient-rated local tolerability was favorable and improved with treatment: across all trials, 1% of roflumilast-treated patients reported a score of 3 (severe; defined as a "hot tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort") after the first application (day 1) and <1% at each subsequent assessment. Rates of adverse events, including those at the application site, were low for all trials. Conclusions: Roflumilast cream and foam formulations demonstrated favorable local tolerability based on investigator- and patientrated assessments in patients with psoriasis, SD, and AD, including application to sensitive areas such as the face and intertriginous areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Safe, effective, and well-tolerated topical treatment options available for long-term use in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited and associated with low adherence rates., Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.15%, vs vehicle cream in patients with AD., Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials (Interventional Trial Evaluating Roflumilast Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis 1 and 2 [INTEGUMENT-1 and INTEGUMENT-2]), included patients from sites in the US, Canada, and Poland. Participants were 6 years or older with mild to moderate AD based on Validated Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (assessed on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 [clear] to 4 [severe])., Intervention: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.15%, or vehicle cream once daily for 4 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis success at week 4, defined as a score of 0 or 1 plus at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline. Secondary end points included Eczema Area and Severity Index and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale. Safety and local tolerability were also evaluated., Results: Among 1337 patients (654 patients in INTEGUMENT-1 and 683 patients in INTEGUMENT-2), the mean (SD) age was 27.7 (19.2) years, and 761 participants (56.9%) were female. The mean body surface area involved was 13.6% (SD = 11.6%; range, 3.0% to 88.0%). Significantly more patients treated with roflumilast than vehicle achieved the primary end point (INTEGUMENT-1: 32.0% vs 15.2%, respectively; P < .001; INTEGUMENT-2: 28.9% vs 12.0%, respectively; P < .001). At week 4, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast also occurred for the achievement of at least 75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (INTEGUMENT-1: 43.2% vs 22.0%, respectively; P < .001; INTEGUMENT-2: 42.0% vs 19.7%, respectively; P < .001). Roflumilast was well tolerated with low rates of treatment-emergent adverse events. At each time point, investigators noted no signs of irritation at the application site in 885 patients who were treated with roflumilast (≥95%), and 885 patients who were treated with roflumilast (90%) reported no or mild sensation at the application site., Conclusions and Relevance: In 2 phase 3 trials enrolling adults and children, once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.15%, improved AD relative to vehicle cream, based on multiple efficacy end points, with favorable safety and tolerability., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04773587, NCT04773600.

Background: Topical treatments are the foundation for patients with psoriasis; however, adherence can be limited by patient preferences and treatment burden., Methods: The Harris Poll conducted an online survey of US patients with psoriasis who use prescription topical therapy to examine their preferences and perspectives on topical treatments., Results: Among patients with psoriasis who use topical treatment ( n  = 507), most participants described their psoriasis symptoms as mild (31%) or moderate (59%). The body areas most often reported to be affected by psoriasis were the scalp, elbows, legs, intertriginous areas, arms, and knees. Participants reported psoriasis affecting the scalp (39%), elbows (20%), and legs (excluding knees; 19%) caused the greatest impact on quality of life. Most participants (76%) preferred topical therapies to treat their psoriasis, while 20% preferred pills, and 4% preferred injections. The most common product attributes that participants wanted in a topical psoriasis treatment and that would help them to continue to use the treatment were: improvement in plaques (68%), itch relief (68%), and easy to apply (63%)., Conclusion: The respondents to this survey reported that they prefer topical treatments to pills or injections (76%) and most (89%) reported they are interested in trying a new topical treatment.